Laparoscopic Treatment of Ureteral Endometriosis: A Systematic Review

Preoperative diagnosis of ureteral medial deviations secondary to deep endometriosis using transvaginal ultrasound examinations: Can we predict the need for ureterolysis during laparoscopic surgery?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate ureteral involvement using transvaginal sonography (TVS) regarding the distortion of the course of the ureters caused by deep endometriosis (DE), which can facilitate predicting the need for ureterolysis during surgery, even in the absence of ureteral stenosis or dilatation.

METHODS

This is a single-center, observational, retrospective pilot study of 88 consecutive patients who later underwent surgery for DE that used ultrasound preoperative diagnosis of ureteral medial deviation of one or both ureters between January 2019 and January 2022. At TVS, the course of the ureter was considered medialized if, in longitudinal and transversal section, any distance was detectable between the ureter and the cervix at the point where the ureter crosses the uterine artery. The primary end point was to determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of "ureteral medial deviation" diagnosed using TVS, in order to predict the need for ureterolysis.

RESULTS

Our series included 88 women with a median age of 39 (interquartile range 33-43) years. Ureteral medialization showed a relatively low false-positive rate (10.9%), with a specificity of 89.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.4%-96.7%) and a sensitivity of 86.6% (95% CI 80.3%-92.9%), along with a high positive predictive value of 93.3% (95% CI 88.4%-98.1%), and a lower negative predictive value of 79.1% (95% CI 69.8%-88.5%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study introduced a new ultrasound sign with a high degree of accuracy to predict ureterolysis and this may have positive implications in the management and surgical planning of patients with ureteral endometriosis.

Keep your attention closer to the ureters: Ureterolysis in deep endometriosis surgery

Endometriosis surgery involving the ureter poses significant challenges requiring meticulous surgical techniques and vigilant postoperative care. This chapter addresses key aspects of ureterolysis techniques, intraoperative management of ureteral injuries, and postoperative care in the context of endometriosis surgery. Ureterolysis methods aim to isolate and mobilize the ureter while preserving its vascularity. Cold instruments and careful dissection are recommended to prevent thermal injury during surgery. Intraoperative tools such as indocyanine green (ICG) show promise in assessing for vascular compromise. Over half of ureteral injuries are detected postoperatively, necessitating a high index of suspicion. Optimal postoperative care in the case of ureteral injury involves Foley catheterization for decompression, ureteral stenting, and meticulous follow-ups to monitor healing and renal function. While advances have been made in surgical techniques and diagnostic tools, gaps persist in preoperative imaging optimization and predictive models for identifying at-risk patients. This chapter aims to bridge existing knowledge gaps, optimize surgical practices, and enhance the overall care and outcomes of patients undergoing endometriosis surgery involving the ureter.

Retroperitoneal dermoid cyst complicated with uterine adenomyoma: a case report and literature review

Pelvic masses frequently originate from the pelvic cavity and are often associated with uterine, ovarian, or intestinal disorders. This report describes the case of a patient with a pelvic mass diagnosed as a retroperitoneal dermoid cyst at our hospital. We analyzed this case and conducted a literature review, to mitigate the risk of misdiagnosis and enhance the treatment of retroperitoneal masses.

Robotic Assisted En-Bloc Removal of Kidney, Ureter and Bladder Wall for Endometriosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To highlight a case where a nephroureterectomy and partial bladder cystectomy needed to be done due to endometriosis.

DESIGN

A video article demonstrating a case study and the surgical management.

SETTING

Ureteral endometriosis is a complex form of endometriosis [1]. If left untreated, the ureter can become significantly compressed leading to hydroureter, hydronephrosis and complete loss of kidney function [2].

INTERVENTIONS

This is a case of a 29-year-old patient with pelvic pain and cyclical rectal bleeding. Further investigation showed significant left hydronephrosis and almost complete loss of left kidney function (8% on renogram). MRI revealed endometriosis involving the posterior bladder wall and distal left ureter, a large full-thickness sigmoid nodule and a large left endometrioma. The patient underwent a robotic-assisted left nephroureterectomy, partial cystectomy (bladder), excision of pelvic endometriosis and sigmoid resection. This procedure was performed jointly with the gynecologist, urologist, and colorectal surgeon and the SOSURE technique was employed [3]. The specimen (left kidney, whole length of ureter and bladder wall around ureteric orifice) was removed en-bloc through a small 3cm extension of the umbilical incision. As the distance between the sigmoid nodule and the anal verge was 35cm, which was above the limit of the transanal circular stapler, a limited resection was performed over a discoid excision. The patient made a good recovery postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Ureteral endometriosis is an indolent and aggressive condition which can lead to silent kidney loss. It is essential that hydronephrosis and hydroureter is ruled out in cases with deep endometriosis. Isolated hydronephrosis should also prompt a suspicion for endometriosis.

Robotic assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis

Deep infiltrative endometriosis is a condition affecting up to 15 % of women of childbearing age, defined by extra uterine location of endometrial like tissues. The symptoms of endometriosis range from severe dysmenorrhea to infertility, chronic pelvic pain, bowel dysfunction and urinary tract involvement to name the most common. Endometriosis has an impact on the quality of life of patients, with personal and social consequences. Although medical treatment is indicated in the first instance, surgery may be necessary. Standard laparoscopy has become the gold standard for this surgery. However, surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis is known to be highly complex, and the significant development of robotic assistance in recent years has had an impact on the evolution of surgical practice. This comprehensive review of the literature provides an overview of the contributions of robotic surgery in the field of endometriosis and gives an insight into the next steps in its development.

Are ureterolysis for deep endometriosis really all the same? An anatomical classification proposal for ureterolysis: A single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

Ureteral endometriosis has an incidence of 0.1% to 1%. The type of surgery required is either conservative (ureterolysis) or radical treatment, depending on the degree of ureter infiltration. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications is heterogeneous. Thus, the aim of the current study was to propose a classification of ureterolysis based on the anatomical structure of the ureter and differing complication rates with procedures.

METHODS

A total of 139 ureterolysis procedures were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups according to the depth of ureterolysis required. Differences were recorded across the three types of ureterolysis in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The incidence of ureteral fistula was reported in 0.7% of cases, with postoperative ureteral stenosis in 2% of type 2 ureterolysis. In the case of type 3 ureterolysis, after conservative procedures, 52.9% of patients required an ureteroneocystostomy to solve the ureteral stenosis.

CONCLUSION

The risk of ureteral injury and ureteroneocystostomy after conservative procedures appears to be associated with type 3 ureterolysis, probably due to excessive devascularization, secondary to the incision of adventitia. Obviously, these data should be confirmed through a prospective study of a larger number, but our proposed classification can provide the basis for making data from future studies more comparable.

Symptoms and Surgical Technique of Bladder Endometriosis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to review all the available evidence regarding bladder endometriosis (BE) surgical techniques, resolution of symptoms, and nodule size.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted systematic searches in PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Centre on Health Sciences Information, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to December 2021.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the literature search yielded 1279 articles. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and reviewed full-text articles to meet the eligibility criteria: women diagnosed as having BE, treated surgically to remove the BE nodule, and reported of the nodule size and/or symptoms after the surgery. We included 28 studies, which mainly were case reports and case series.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The following information was extracted from the included studies: author, country, publication year, study design, number of patients, age, surgery performed, follow-up time, operation time, nodule location, nodule size, and postsurgical symptoms. Patients' ages range from 26 to 44 years and most women were nulliparous. The BE nodule size ranged from 0.7 to 5.5 cm, and the most frequent location (63.57%) was the posterior wall. Dysuria was reported by 27.18% of women and generic lower urinary tract symptoms were reported by 27.95%. After surgery, the recurrence rate of urinary symptoms was 7.34%. Most studies performed a partial cystectomy to remove the nodule, showing that the disease affects the bladder mucosa frequently.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment with complete excision of BE lesion was shown to improve complaints of urinary symptoms in patients with BE. Given that most of the studies evaluated were descriptive, additional studies with a large sample population and a better level of evidence for this condition are needed.

Deep Endometriosis: the Involvement of Multiple Pelvic Compartments Is Associated with More Severe Pain Symptoms and Infertility

Endometriosis can be classified into three phenotypes: superficial, ovarian, and deep. Deep endometriosis (DE) has been associated with more severe pain symptoms, although no large-scale studies have evaluated the association between pain intensity and infertility and the different compartments of the pelvis affected by superficial and DE. This retrospective study included 1116 women who underwent laparoscopy for endometriosis treatment at two referral centers between 2009 and 2019. For the evaluation of each symptom, patients were divided according to their visual analog scale score (< 7 and ≥ 7) and fertility status. On multiple logistic regression, severe dysmenorrhea and dyschezia were correlated with DE of the posterior compartment alone (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6, confidence interval (CI) 1.09-2.34, and p = 0.02 and OR = 2.09, CI 1.36-3.23, and p < 0.01, respectively) and in combination with other compartments. DE of the posterior and lateral compartments had the most consistent statistical power (OR = 3.55 for dysmenorrhea and OR = 4.4 for dyschezia). Infertility was associated with DE of the posterior compartment alone (OR = 1.6, CI 1.06-2.54, p = 0.04) and in combination with the anterior compartment (OR = 2.62, CI 1.29-5.29, p < 0.01), with the combination of posterior and anterior compartment having the highest OR value. Severe dyschezia and infertility were also correlated with the presence of multiple localizations of DE (p = 0.04 and p < 0.01). This study confirms the association between DE and severe pain symptoms as well as the influence of the number of DE compartments on the severity of symptoms and the chance of infertility.

Short-term outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis with rectal involvement: a single-center experience of 168 cases

Purpose

The surgical management of deep infiltrative endometriosis (DE) involving the rectum remains a challenge. The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes from a single tertiary center over a decade with an emphasis on the role of a protective loop ileostomy (PI).

Methods

A retrospective review of outcomes for 168 patients managed between 2008 and 2018 is presented including 57 rectal shaves, 23 discoid excisions, and 88 segmental rectal resections.

Results

The nodule size (mean±standard deviation) in the segmental resection group was 32.7±11.2 mm, 23.4±10.5 mm for discoid excision, and 18.8±6.0 mm for rectal shaves. A PI was performed in 19 elective cases (11.3%) usually for an ultra-low anastomosis <5 cm from the anal verge. All Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV complications occurred after segmental resections and included 5 anastomotic leaks, 6 rectovaginal fistulas, 2 ureteric fistulas, and 1 ureteric stenosis. Of 26 stomas (15.5%), there were 19 PIs, 3 secondary ileostomies (after complications), and 4 end colostomies. The median time to PI closure was 5.8 months (range, 0.4-16.7 months) in uncomplicated disease compared with 9.2 months (range, 4.7-18.4 months) when initial postoperative complications were recorded (P=0.019). Only 1 patient with a recurrent rectovaginal fistula had a permanent colostomy.

Conclusion

In patients with DE and rectal involvement a PI is selectively used for low anastomoses and complex pelvic reconstructions. Protective stomas and those used in the definitive management of a major postoperative complication can usually be reversed.

The current role of robotic surgery in endometriosis management

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects approximately 10%-15% of women of childbearing age. Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred surgical approach. Recently, robotic surgery has been used for benign gynecologic surgery, but its role in the treatment of endometriosis is still unknown.

AREAS COVERED

We included studies that evaluated the outcomes of robotic surgery for endometriosis. Using the keywords 'endometriosis' and 'robotics', a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed in July 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

Robotic surgery for endometriosis has similar outcomes as conventional laparoscopy, with no evidence of increased complication rates. Despite the non-inferiority of the surgical route, the associated costs of robotic surgery limit its availability. Rapid development of robot-assisted surgery necessitates long-term prospective randomized controlled trials. However, the limitations of robotic surgery should not be overlooked. If robotic surgery can facilitate the spread of minimally invasive surgery, it will be necessary to evaluate the cost, availability, complexity of the lesions, and most importantly, the results of patient satisfaction and values of value-based medicine.

Uterine artery closure at the origin versus at the uterus level in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The transfusion rate in hysterectomies for benign pathology is almost 3%. However, despite the strong interest in reducing intraoperative bleeding, limited evidence is available regarding the technical aspects concerning uterine vessel management during a total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Uterine artery (UA) closure in TLH can be performed at the origin from the internal iliac artery or at the uterus level (UL). However, low-quality evidence is available regarding the superiority of one method over the other.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a single-blind randomized (1:1) controlled trial (NCT04156932) between December 2019 and August 2020. One hundred and eighty women undergoing TLH for benign gynecological diseases were randomized to TLH with UA closure at the origin from the internal iliac artery (n = 90), performed at the beginning of the procedure by putting two clips per side at the origin, versus closure at the UL (n = 90). Intraoperative blood loss estimated from suction devices was the primary outcome. Secondary end points were perioperative outcomes, the conversion rate from one technique to the other, and complication rates with 4 months of follow up.

RESULTS

Uterine artery closure at the origin was completed in all 90 patients (0%), whereas closure at the UL was converted to closure at the origin in 11 cases (12.2%; p < 0.001); failures were mainly associated with the presence of endometriosis (81.8% [9/11] versus 10.1% [8/79]; p < 0.001). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the intraoperative blood loss was higher in the group assigned to the closure at the UL (108.5 mL) than in the group with closure at the origin (69.3 mL); the mean difference was 39.2 mL (95% CI 13.47-64.93 mL; p = 0.003). Other perioperative outcomes and complications rates did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Uterine artery closure at the origin reduces intraoperative blood loss during a TLH and appears to be more reproducible than closure at the UL without higher complication rates. However, the absent translation in clinical benefits impedes the support of a clinical superiority in all women. Closure at the origin may provide clinical advantages in the presence of severe preoperative anemia or pelvic anatomic distortion.