Surgical Management of Urinary Tract Endometriosis: A 1-year Longitudinal Multicenter Pilot Study at 31 French Hospitals (by the FRIENDS Group)

Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic management of deep endometriosis involving the sacral plexus and sciatic nerve: A comparative before and after study

OBJECTIVE

To compare robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) and laparoscopy (LPS) for intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and functional results after a 6-month follow-up period among patients having undergone excision of deep endometriosis (DE) involving the sacral plexus (SP) and sciatic nerve (SN).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 100 patients included in our prospective database, who underwent surgical eradication of DE involving the SP and SN at our tertiary referral centre between September 2018 and June 2023. Patients were managed by LPS (n = 71) until 2021, and subsequently by RAL (n = 29).

RESULTS

Baseline symptoms and distribution of DE lesions were comparable in the two groups. Nerve dissection, nerve shaving, and intra-nerve dissection were performed in 55 (77.5%), 14 (19.7%), and 2 (5.6%) patients in the LPS group, respectively. Nerve dissection and nerve shaving were performed and in 24 (82.8%) and 5 (17.2%) patients in the RAL group, while no cases of intra-nerve dissection were observed (P = 0.434). Mean operative times were 183.71 ± 85.32 min and 177.41 ± 77.19 min, respectively (P = 0.734). There were no reported cases of conversion to open surgery. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. At 6 months follow up, we observed a significant reduction in sciatic pain in both the LPS group (39.1% vs 15.6%, P < 0.001) and RAL group (37.5% vs 25%, P = 0.001), with no differences in terms of outcomes (P = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Both LPS and RAL result in significant long-term relief of symptoms associated with SP and SN endometriosis. Although surgeons found that RAL improved the quality of excision of these specific DE localizations, our study did not reveal significant advantages in terms of its outcomes.

Combined Cystoscopic-Abdominal Versus Abdominal-Only Route for Complete Excision of Large Deep Endometriosis Nodules Infiltrating the Supratrigonal Area of the Bladder: A Comparative Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Surgical excision of large deep endometriosis nodules infiltrating the bladder may be challenging, particularly when the nodule limits are close to the trigone and ureteral orifice. Bladder nodules have classically been approached abdominally. However, combining a cystoscopic with an abdominal approach may help to better identify the mucosal borders of the lesion to ensure complete excision without unnecessary resection of healthy bladder. This study aimed to compare classical excision of large bladder nodules by abdominal route with a combined cystoscopic-abdominal approach.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study on data prospectively recorded in a database. Patients were managed from September 2009 to June 2022.

SETTING

Two tertiary referral endometriosis centers.

PATIENTS

A total of 175 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the bladder more than 2 cm undergoing surgical excision of bladder nodules.

INTERVENTIONS

Excision of bladder nodules by either abdominal or combined cystoscopic-abdominal approaches.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 141 women (80.6%) were managed by abdominal route and 34 women (19.4%) underwent a combined cystoscopic-abdominal approach. In 99.4% of patients, the approach was minimally invasive. Patients with nodules requiring the combined approach had a lower American Fertility Society revised score and endometriosis stage and less associated digestive tract nodules, but larger bladder nodules. They were less frequently associated with colorectal resection and preventive stoma. Operative time was comparable. The rate of early postoperative complications was comparable (8.8% vs 22%), as were the rates of ureteral fistula (2.2% vs 2.9%), bladder fistula (2.2% vs 0), and vesicovaginal fistula (0.7% vs 2.9%).

CONCLUSION

In our opinion, the combined cystoscopic-abdominal approach is useful in patients with large bladder nodules with limits close to the trigone and ureteral orifice. These large deep bladder nodules seemed paradoxically associated to less nodules on the digestive tract, resulting in an overall comparable total operative time and complication rate.

Robotic surgery for deep-infiltrating endometriosis: is it time to take a step forward?

Endometriosis is a chronic debilitating disease that affects nearly 10% of women of the reproductive age. Although the treatment modalities of endometriosis are numerous, surgical excision of the endometriotic implants and nodules remains the sole cytoreductive approach. Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis was proven to be beneficial in improving the postoperative pain and fertility. Moreover, it was also proved to be safe and efficient in treating the visceral localization of deep endometriosis, such as urinary and colorectal endometriosis. More recently, robotic-assisted surgery gained attention in the field of endometriosis surgery. Although the robotic technology provides a 3D vision of the surgical field and 7-degree of freedom motion, the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of this approach are yet to be determined. With this paper, we aim to review the available evidence regarding the role of robotic surgery in the management of endometriosis along with the current practices in the field.

First experience with the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system for endometriosis: A descriptive study

INTRODUCTION

The Medtronic Hugo™ Robot-assisted Surgery (RAS) system was recently approved for clinical use. We explored the safety and feasibility of this system for endometriosis surgery. The primary outcome was safe case completion without major surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≤2) and no conversion to open surgery or laparoscopy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Surgeries for endometriosis performed at the Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, on the Medtronic Hugo™ RAS system were included. Two experienced robotic surgeons performed all surgeries with their usual robotic team. The variables included were patient demographics, peri- and postoperative data, complications and 30-day readmission rate. We used the IDEAL framework 1/2a for surgical innovation in this descriptive study.

RESULTS

The first 12 patients were included. All cases were completed without intraoperative complications or conversion. Four patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade 1 postoperative complications. No patients were re-admitted within 30 days. Median docking time (17 minutes), console time (87.5 minutes), blood loss (40 mL) and length of hospital stay (1 day) were acceptable compared with previous literature.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, we found the Medtronic Hugo™ RAS system safe and feasible for robot-assisted surgery for endometriosis. The advent of new robotic systems is welcomed to accelerate the development of technology that will advance surgical care for patients across the globe.

Robotic assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis

Deep infiltrative endometriosis is a condition affecting up to 15 % of women of childbearing age, defined by extra uterine location of endometrial like tissues. The symptoms of endometriosis range from severe dysmenorrhea to infertility, chronic pelvic pain, bowel dysfunction and urinary tract involvement to name the most common. Endometriosis has an impact on the quality of life of patients, with personal and social consequences. Although medical treatment is indicated in the first instance, surgery may be necessary. Standard laparoscopy has become the gold standard for this surgery. However, surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis is known to be highly complex, and the significant development of robotic assistance in recent years has had an impact on the evolution of surgical practice. This comprehensive review of the literature provides an overview of the contributions of robotic surgery in the field of endometriosis and gives an insight into the next steps in its development.

Outcomes of Urinary Tract Endometriosis-Laparoscopic Treatment: A 10-Year Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract endometriosis (UTE), a rare manifestation, encompasses bladder and ureteral involvement. Surgical intervention is commonly recommended for UTE, though the optimal surgical approach remains a subject of debate. This study aims to report our centre's experience with UTE.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 55 patients who underwent surgical treatment for UTE at a single tertiary centre over a 10-year period (2012-2022). Patient data, including demographics, symptoms, intraoperative findings, and complications, were collected from medical records. Data were statistically analysed, and correlations were explored.

RESULTS

The study population had a mean age of 37.11 years, with dysmenorrhea (89.1%) being the most common symptom. Bladder endometriosis was present in 27 cases, ureteral endometriosis in 25, and mixed-location in 3. Laparoscopy was the primary surgical approach, with multidisciplinary teams involving urologists. There were six patients with postoperative complications, and there were six (10.9%) recurrences of endometriosis. A positive correlation was found between age and recurrence, but no significant predictors of recurrence were identified in our analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic treatment of urinary endometriosis is safe and effective. Multidisciplinary collaboration plays a pivotal role in addressing this challenging condition.

[Management of endometriomas in France: A survey of practices]

OBJECTIVES

To present an overview of French practices for the management of endometriomas.

METHODS

We carried out a nationwide survey of practices concerning the management of endometriomas between October 2021 and January 2022. This study was carried out by means of two questionnaires sent to surgical centers used to treat endometriosis (n=62) and to Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) centers (n=102).

RESULTS

At the end of the survey, 39/62 (62.9%) surgical teams from the centers contacted had given a response and 51/102 (50.0%) from ART centers. Laparoscopic cystectomy was the technique most frequently used by almost two thirds of the surgical teams (61%) when there was no known infertility, whereas it was the most common technique for only 14% of the ART teams. On the contrary, ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy was the most frequent technique for more than half of the ART teams (56%) and for only 8% of the surgical teams. In case of recurrence, 49% of surgical teams would choose ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy. Prior to IVF, 73% of ARP teams stated that they 'rarely' treated endometriomas.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study show a certain variability in practices between different centers and depending on the presence or absence of infertility for the management of endometriomas in France.

Robotic Surgery for Bladder Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Approach

INTRODUCTION

Women with bladder endometriosis often present with more advanced stages of endometriosis. Robotic surgery has emerged as a promising approach to the management of bladder endometriosis. This systematic review aims to analyze the current literature on robotic surgery for bladder endometriosis and describe our systematic approach to surgical treatment.

METHODS

This review followed the PRISMA guidelines, which ensured a comprehensive and transparent approach to selecting and evaluating relevant studies. We conducted a thorough literature search to identify studies that investigated the use of robotic surgery for bladder endometriosis. Relevant databases were searched, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select eligible studies. Data extraction and analysis were performed to assess the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic surgery for the treatment of bladder endometriosis.

RESULTS

We did not find any randomized clinical trials with the use of robotics in the treatment of bladder endometriosis. We found only two retrospective studies comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy, and another retrospective study comparing robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of bladder endometriosis. All the other 12 studies were solely case reports. Despite the lack of robust evidence in the literature, the studies demonstrated that robotic surgery is feasible and is associated with reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of robotic technology is a promising option for the surgical management of bladder endometriosis. We advocate a surgical systematic approach for the robotic treatment of bladder endometriosis. Robotic technology, with its 3D vision, instrumental degrees of freedom, and precision, particularly in suturing, may provide potential benefits over traditional laparoscopy.

Improvement of Post-Operative Quality of Life in Patients 2 Years after Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pain and Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis

This study addressed the improvement in the quality of life of patients 2 years after minimally invasive surgery for painful deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), evaluated with EHP-5 (Endometriosis Health Profile-5) scores and the intensity of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. This was a retrospective study, performed in a referral centre for endometriosis, between January 2010 and January 2019. EHP-5 scores were complete for 54 patients, and two subgroups were analysed: classic laparoscopy (CL) vs. robotic laparoscopy (RL), and conservative surgery (ConservS) vs. total surgery (TS). There was an important decrease in 2-year post-operative EHP-5 scores in the global population (pre-op: 61.36 (42.18−68.75) and 2-year post-op: 20.45 (0−38.06); p < 0.001). The Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) was also lower for dysmenorrhea (pre-op: 8 (7−9.75) vs. 2-year post-op: 3 (2−5.25); p < 0.001) and dyspareunia (pre-op: 6 (3.1−8.9) vs. 2-year post-op: 3 (0−6); p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, EHP-5 scores were improved in the RL group (pre-op: 65.9 (59.09−71.02) vs. 2-year post-op: 11.4 (0−38.06); p < 0.001) and the CL group (pre-op: 50 (34.65−68.18) vs. 2-year post-op: 27.27 (14.20−40.90); p < 0.001), with a slight advantage for RL (p = 0.04), and the same improvements were found for ConservS (pre-op: 61.4 (38.06−71.59) vs. 2-year post-op: 22.7 (11.93−38.07); p < 0.001) and TS groups (pre-op: 61.59 (51.70−68.75) vs. 2-year post-op: 13.63 (0−44.30); p < 0.001). Minimally invasive surgery improved the quality of life for DIE patients 2 years after surgery, and conservative surgery showed comparable results to total surgery.

The current role of robotic surgery in endometriosis management

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects approximately 10%-15% of women of childbearing age. Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred surgical approach. Recently, robotic surgery has been used for benign gynecologic surgery, but its role in the treatment of endometriosis is still unknown.

AREAS COVERED

We included studies that evaluated the outcomes of robotic surgery for endometriosis. Using the keywords 'endometriosis' and 'robotics', a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed in July 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

Robotic surgery for endometriosis has similar outcomes as conventional laparoscopy, with no evidence of increased complication rates. Despite the non-inferiority of the surgical route, the associated costs of robotic surgery limit its availability. Rapid development of robot-assisted surgery necessitates long-term prospective randomized controlled trials. However, the limitations of robotic surgery should not be overlooked. If robotic surgery can facilitate the spread of minimally invasive surgery, it will be necessary to evaluate the cost, availability, complexity of the lesions, and most importantly, the results of patient satisfaction and values of value-based medicine.