True Prevalence of Diaphragmatic Endometriosis and Its Association with Severe Endometriosis: A Call for Awareness and Investigation

Tailoring radicality in diaphragmatic surgery for deep endometriosis: A matter of choice

Diaphragmatic endometriosis (DpE) is a rare disease localization which represents an important clinical challenge. The main criticisms toward the proper DpE management consist of poor consensus on both surgical indications and the choice between different surgical techniques available to treat the disease. Furthermore, only weak recommendations are provided by current guidelines and surgical management is mostly based on surgeon's experience. As consequence, the lack of standardization about the surgical treatment led to the risk of under- or over-treatments in patients suffering from this form of endometriosis. The latest evidence-based data suggest to adopt a lesion-oriented surgical approach serving as a guide in daily surgical activities, in order to ensure a tailored radicality and reduce the rate of surgery-related complications. Diaphragmatic endometriosis surgery should be performed only by expert surgeons with an extensive oncogynecologic expertise since it represents a technically demanding procedure. A multidisciplinary approach is also mandatory in order to adequately select and treat these patients by minimizing the risk of additional morbidity.

Robotic-assisted Laparoscopy Excision of a Severe Form of Diaphragmatic Endometriosis: A Retrospective Study of 60 Patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of the robotic surgical approach in the treatment of severe diaphragmatic endometriosis (DE).

DESIGN

Retrospective single-center study using data prospectively recorded in the Franco-European Multidisciplinary Institute of Endometriosis database and the National Observatory for Endometriosis database.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center. Endometriosis care center.

PATIENTS

Sixty consecutive patients undergoing robotic excision of severe DE from January 2020 to July 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

Robotic excision of severe DE.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated and compared using descriptive statistics. A p value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. Full-thickness diaphragmatic resection was performed in 76.7% of patients (46 of 60) and partial diaphragmatic muscle resection in 10% of cases (6 of 60). Peritoneal stripping technique was performed in 60% of patients (36 of 60), divided as follows: as the only technique in the case of extensive superficial diaphragmatic involvement in 13.3% of cases (8 of 60), in addition to full-thickness or partial diaphragmatic resection in the case of concomitant multiple foci in 46.7% of patients (28 of 60). Median operative time was 79.6 minutes with no statistically significative difference related to the surgeon performing surgery (p >.05). Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 1.7% (1 of 60) and 6.6% of cases (4 of 60), respectively. Diaphragmatic hernia (Clavien-Dindo 3b) was the most common postoperative complication and required surgical repair in all cases. Median hospital stay was 24 hours. The rate of patients with complete recovery from DE symptoms has gradually increased during follow-up, reaching 89% after 12 months from surgery.

CONCLUSION

In this case series, robotic treatment of severe DE in expert hands was feasible, effective, and safe.

Diaphragm endometriosis: Random localization or extended form of pelvis endometriosis. A large comparative analysis of 202 cases

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate and present the clinical characteristics of diaphragm endometriosis, to approach the pathogenetic mechanisms, and to answer the question of whether this disease can be considered an extended form of pelvic endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN

It was a retrospective comparative one-to-one analysis of 202 cases. Two groups of patients were compared: Group 1 patients with diaphragm endometriosis vs Group 2 (control group) with pelvis endometriosis, each with 101 patients.

RESULTS

Patients with diaphragm endometriosis had extreme significantly higher prevalence of severe pelvis endometriosis included deep infiltrated endometriosis and severe adhesions in term of complete Douglas obliteration (p value = 0.0001). There was neither age nor BMI difference in two groups. Besides of cyclic shoulder or upper abdomen pain there was no difference of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Diaphragm endometriosis is a rare condition with an approximate prevalence of 1.1% of all endometriosis cases. Since the symptoms are very specific and patients do not associate the pain with diaphragmatic endometriosis, the symptoms should be asked about explicitly. If patients with diaphragmatic endometriosis have no symptoms, the lesions do not necessarily need to be removed. The pathogenesis is still unclear. The authors of this study consider this disease to be an extended form of severe pelvic and deep infiltrated endometriosis. However, the right-side dominance still cannot be explained. Further research is needed to fully understand the origin of diaphragmatic endometriosis.

Diaphragmatic Endometriosis-A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of the Patients' Demographics, Symptomatology, and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes

Diaphragmatic endometriosis is rare and forms 0.67-4.7% of all endometriosis cases. Evidence regarding its optimal management is lacking. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the patient characteristics and long-term treatment outcomes of diaphragmatic endometriosis patients. Over a 4-year period, 23 patients were diagnosed with diaphragmatic endometriosis. The majority of patients had coexisting deep pelvic endometriosis. Cyclic upper abdominal pain was reported by 60.9% of patients, while cyclic chest and shoulder pain were reported by 43.5% and 34.8% of patients, respectively. Most patients were treated with laparoscopic lesion ablation, while 21.1% were treated with minimally invasive excision. The mean follow-up time was 23.7 months. Long-lasting resolution of the chest, abdominal, and shoulder pain occurred in 50%, 35.7%, and 25% of patients, respectively. Nonetheless, 78.9% of patients reported major improvement in their symptoms postoperatively. Significantly higher rates of postoperative shoulder, abdominal, and chest pain were observed in patients who received postoperative hormonal therapy compared with those who did not. All patients treated expectantly remained stable. Therefore, we recommend treating diaphragmatic endometriosis only in symptomatic patients. The risk of incomplete surgery should be minimized by a multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach with a careful assessment of the diaphragm and the thoracic cavity.