1
|
Alkatout I, De Wilde RL, Herrmann J, Klapdor R, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Mészáros J, Mustea A, Oppelt P, Pape JM, Schäfer SD, Wallwiener M, Krämer B. Adhesion Prevention in Gynecologic Surgery: Guidance and Clinical Experience. J Clin Med 2024; 13:7517. [PMID: 39768440 PMCID: PMC11678543 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2024] [Revised: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Postoperative adhesions represent a major medical challenge and are associated with serious health and economic consequences. 4DryField® PH (PlantTec Medical GmbH, Lueneburg, Germany) is a starch-based medical device designed both to prevent adhesions and for hemostasis. This paper explores methods to successfully apply it in gynecological surgery, leveraging the authors' extensive clinical experience. We provide detailed insights into best practices that benefit most patients with conditions such as endometriosis, along with practical tips and guidance on optimizing application and dosage. Our real-world clinical experience across various indications, supported by published data, demonstrates significant patient benefits: reduced adhesion formation, better recovery, less pain, and improved fertility. Patient acceptance and satisfaction are notably high. The device can be applied to surgical wounds as a powder for hemostasis and transformed into a gel in situ or as a premixed gel when adhesion prevention is prioritized. Specific advantages for each method are demonstrated by case studies. When used correctly, 4DryField PH is safe and effective, especially for larger wound areas with a high risk of reoperation and adhesion formation and when pregnancy is desired. It offers great versatility due to its use as either in situ gel or premixed gel with different viscosities. Despite some remaining gaps in clinical evidence and ongoing studies, our personal clinical experience suggests significant benefits with minimal risks. Therefore, we have no concerns regarding the broad use of 4DryField PH in gynecology and other surgical disciplines. Future research should focus on patient-reported outcomes and health economic benefits to support reimbursement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Alkatout
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Rudy Leon De Wilde
- Department of Gynecology, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany;
| | - Jörg Herrmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Weimar Hospital, 99425 Weimar, Germany;
| | - Rüdiger Klapdor
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Albertinen Hospital Hamburg, 22457 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Giessen, 35392 Gießen, Germany;
| | - József Mészáros
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany;
| | - Alexander Mustea
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Peter Oppelt
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Endocrinology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital Linz, 4020 Linz, Austria;
| | - Julian Maria Pape
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | | | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Halle, 06120 Halle, Germany;
| | - Bernhard Krämer
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Torres-de la Roche LA, Catena U, Clark TJ, Devassy R, Leyland N, De Wilde RL. Perspectives in adhesion prevention in gynaecological surgery. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:291-296. [PMID: 38128088 PMCID: PMC10832654 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.4.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Adhesions are a frequent, clinically relevant, and often costly complication of surgery that can develop in any body location regardless of the type of surgical procedure. Adhesions result from surgical trauma inducing inflammatory and coagulation processes and to date cannot be entirely prevented. However, the extent of adhesion formation can be reduced by using good surgical technique and the use of anti-inflammatory drugs, haemostats, and barrier agents. Strategies are needed in the short-, medium- and longer-term to improve the prevention of adhesions. In the short-term, efforts are needed to increase the awareness amongst surgeons and patients about the potential risks and burden of surgically induced adhesions. To aid this in the medium- term, a risk score to identify patients at high risk of adhesion formation is being developed and validated. Furthermore, available potentially preventive measures need to be highlighted. Both clinical and health economic evaluations need to be undertaken to support the broad adoption of such measures. In the longer- term, a greater understanding of the pathogenic processes leading to the formation of adhesions is needed to help identify effective, future treatments to reliably prevent adhesions from forming and lyse existing ones.
Collapse
|