Effectiveness of half-a-tablet efavirenz plus 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors as maintenance therapy with the guidance of therapeutic drug monitoring among virologically suppressed HIV-positive patients: A prospective study

Genetic and non-genetic factors influencing efavirenz population pharmacokinetics among human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected children in Ethiopia

Despite the potential for efavirenz (EFV) to be an effective alternative antiretroviral agent, its sources of wide inter- and intra-individual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability are not well-characterized in children. We investigated the effects of genetic and non-genetic factors, including demographic, treatment duration, baseline clinical, and biochemical characteristics, on the PKs of EFV through population-PK modeling. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve HIV infected children, 3-16 years (n = 100), were enrolled in Ethiopia and received EFV-based combination ART. EFV concentrations after the first dose and at steady-state collected over a span of 1 year were modeled using population-based methods. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption kinetics described the observed EFV data adequately. The CYP2B6*6 and ABCB1c.4036A>G genotypes were identified as major factors influencing EFV clearance. The typical estimates of oral clearance, volume of distribution, and absorption rate constant for typical 22 kg children with CYP2B6 *1/*1 and ABCB1c.4036G/G genotypes were 4.3 L/h, 124 L, and 0.776/h, respectively. Clearance was reduced by 28% and 72% in CYP2B6*1/*6 and CYP2B6*6/*6 genotypes, respectively. Compared to week 1, clearance was higher from weeks 8 and 12 in CYP2B6*1/*6 and CYP2B6*1/*1 genotypes, respectively. Simulations indicated that EFV 12-h concentrations were comparable across weight bands, but more than 80% of subjects with CYP2B6*6/*6 had EFV concentrations greater than 4 μg/mL. EFV PK variability among children is partly explained by body weight, treatment duration, CYP2B6*6, and ABCB1 rs3842 genotypes. Therefore, in addition to body weight, pediatric dosing of EFV should consider pharmacogenetic variability, duration of therapy, and individual treatment outcomes.

Therapeutic drug monitoring study on the switch from coformulated 600-mg efavirenz, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and emtricitabine to coformulated 400-mg efavirenz, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and lamivudine among HIV-positive patients with viral suppression

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the efavirenz (EFV) mid-dose plasma concentration (C12), clinical efficacy, and safety after the switch to a single-tablet regimen containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), lamivudine (3TC), and 400-mg EFV in virally suppressed HIV-positive Taiwanese who were receiving co-formulated TDF, emtricitabine (FTC), and 600-mg EFV.

METHODS

In this single-arm, open-label study, HIV-positive adults who had undetectable plasma HIV RNA load (<50 copies/ml) for 6 months or longer while receiving co-formulated TDF, FTC, and 600-mg EFV with EFV C12 of ≥1 mg/L were enrolled. The participants were switched to co-formulated TDF, 3TC, and 400-mg EFV and followed for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with EFV C12 ≥ 1 mg/L at Week 4. The secondary endpoints included virologic response and change of CD4 lymphocyte count up to Week 24. Specific adverse effects associated with EFV were recorded before and after the switch.

RESULTS

From December 2018 to January 2019, 50 participants were enrolled. EFV C12 remained ≥1 mg/L in 48 (96.0%) participants with a median reduction of 38.9% (interquartile range 29.0-44.4) at Week 4 after switch. All participants had undetectable plasma HIV RNA by Week 12, whereas 96.0% of them remained so at Week 24. Significant increases of CD4 lymphocyte count were observed at Weeks 12 and 24. Thirty-three participants (66.0%) reported improvement of pre-existing adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Switch to coformulated TDF, 3TC, and 400-mg EFV in virally suppressed HIV-positive Taiwanese maintained effective EFV concentration and viral suppression while the adverse effects were reduced.