1
|
Ferrario F, Franzese C, Faccenda V, Vukcaj S, Belmonte M, Lucchini R, Baldaccini D, Badalamenti M, Andreoli S, Panizza D, Magli A, Scorsetti M, Arcangeli S. Toxicity profile and Patient-Reported outcomes following salvage Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy to the prostate Bed: The POPART multicentric prospective study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 44:100704. [PMID: 38111610 PMCID: PMC10726256 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While SBRT to the prostate has become a valuable option as a radical treatment, limited data support its use in the postoperative setting. Here, we report the updated results of the multicentric Post-Prostatectomy Ablative Radiation Therapy (POPART) trial, investigating possible predictors of toxicities and patient-reported outcomes. Methods Patients with PSA levels between 0.1-2.0 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy received Linac-based SBRT to the prostate bed in five fractions every other day for a total dose of 32.5 Gy (EQD21.5 = 74.3 Gy). Late toxicity was assessed using CTCAE v.5 scale, while EPIC-CP, ICIQ-SF, IIEF 5 questionnaires and PSA levels measured quality of life and biochemical control. Pre- and post-treatment scores were compared using a paired t-test, with MID established at > 0.5 pooled SD from the baseline. A logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate potential associations between specific patient/tumor/treatment factors and outcome deterioration. Results From April 2021 to April 2023 a total of 50 pts were enrolled and treated. Median follow-up was 12.2 (3-27) months. No late ≥ G2 GI or GU toxicity was registered. Late G1 urinary and rectal toxicities occurred in 46 % and 4 % of patients, respectively. Among 47 patients completing all EPIC-CP domains, four (9 %) showed worsened QoL, and eleven (26 %) developed erectile dysfunction correlating with PTV D2% (P = 0.032). At Multivariate analysis bladder wall D10cc independently correlated with late G1 GU toxicity (P = 0.034). Median post-treatment PSA nadir was 0.04 ng/mL (0.00 - 0.84). At the last follow-up, six patients presented with biochemical failure, including two nodal relapses. Conclusions Our findings show that post-prostatectomy SBRT did not result in increased toxicity nor a significant decline in QoL measures, thus showing that it can be safely extended to the postoperative setting. Long-term follow-up and randomized comparisons with different RT schedules are needed to validate this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Ferrario
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Valeria Faccenda
- Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Suela Vukcaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Maria Belmonte
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Raffaella Lucchini
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Davide Baldaccini
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Marco Badalamenti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Stefano Andreoli
- Department of Medical Physics, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Denis Panizza
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AULSS 1 Dolomiti, 32100 Belluno, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roy A, Green O, Brenneman R, Bosch W, Gay HA, Michalski JM, Baumann BC. Assessing inter-fraction changes in the size and position of the penile bulb during daily MR-guided radiation therapy to the prostate bed: Do we need to adjust how we plan radiation in the post-radical prostatectomy setting to reduce risk of erectile dysfunction? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:e227-e232. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
3
|
Robin S, Jolicoeur M, Palumbo S, Zilli T, Crehange G, De Hertogh O, Derashodian T, Sargos P, Salembier C, Supiot S, Udrescu C, Chapet O. Prostate Bed Delineation Guidelines for Postoperative Radiation Therapy: On Behalf Of The Francophone Group of Urological Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:1243-1253. [PMID: 33186618 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate bed (PB) irradiation is considered the standard postoperative treatment after radical prostatectomy (RP) for tumors with high-risk features or persistent prostate-specific antigen, or for salvage treatment in case of biological relapse. Four consensus guidelines have been published to standardize practices and reduce the interobserver variability in PB delineation but with discordant recommendations. To improve the reproducibility in the PB delineation, the Francophone Group of Urological Radiotherapy (Groupe Francophone de Radiothérapie Urologique [GFRU]) worked to propose a new and more reproducible consensus guideline for PB clinical target volume (CTV) definition. METHODS AND MATERIALS A 4-step procedure was used. First, a group of 10 GFRU prostate experts evaluated the 4 existing delineation guidelines for postoperative radiation therapy (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; the Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary Group; the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; and the Princess Margaret Hospital) to identify divergent issues. Second, data sets of 50 magnetic resonance imaging studies (25 after RP and 25 with an intact prostate gland) were analyzed to identify the relevant anatomic boundaries of the PB. Third, a literature review of surgical, anatomic, histologic, and imaging data was performed to identify the relevant PB boundaries. Fourth, a final consensus on PB CTV definition was reached among experts. RESULTS Definitive limits of the PB CTV delineation were defined using easily visible landmarks on computed tomography scans (CT). The purpose was to ensure a better reproducibility of PB definition for any radiation oncologist even without experience in postoperative radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS New recommendations for PB delineation based on simple anatomic boundaries and available as a CT image atlas are proposed by the GFRU. Improvement in uniformity in PB CTV definition and treatment homogeneity in the context of clinical trials are expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Robin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Center Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Marjory Jolicoeur
- Radiation Oncology Department, Charles LeMoyne Hospital, CISSS Montérégie-center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Samuel Palumbo
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHU UCL Namur - Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Gilles Crehange
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Olivier De Hertogh
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHR Verviers East Belgium, Verviers, Belgium
| | - Talar Derashodian
- Radiation Oncology Department, Charles LeMoyne Hospital, CISSS Montérégie-center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Paul Sargos
- Radiation Oncology Department, Jewish General Hospital, McGill, Montreal, Canada
| | - Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes Saint-Herblain, France; CRCINA CNRS Inserm, University of Nantes and Angers, Nantes, France
| | - Corina Udrescu
- Radiation Oncology Department, Center Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Olivier Chapet
- Radiation Oncology Department, Center Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France.
| |
Collapse
|