Comparison between Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Bone Metastases Based on β-Emitting and α-Emitting Radionuclides

Dosimetry of bone seeking beta emitters for bone pain palliation metastases

Amongst cancer patients, bone pain due to skeletal metastases is a major cause of morbidity. A number of beta-emitting radiopharmaceuticals have been used to provide internal radiotherapy of bone metastases and provide palliative pain relief. In this article we describe the different physical characteristics of the various beta emitting radionuclides which have been used in this clinical setting and the potential impact of differences in dose-rate on radiobiological outcomes. A detailed review of the biodistribution of these treatments, based on both in-vivo clinical investigations and post mortem autoradiography assessments is provided. These treatments result in physiological delivery of radiation doses to the target disease as well as to critical healthy organs. Particular attention is paid to the radiation doses received by normal bone tissue, bone marrow as well as metastatic bone disease. The underlying models of radiation transport within bone and bone marrow are reviewed alongside the practical steps that must be taken to acquire and analyse the information require for clinical dosimetry assessments. The role of whole body measurements, blood and faecal assays as well as both planar and tomographic gamma camera imaging are considered. In addition we review the rationale for allocating measured bone uptake between trabecular and cortical bone tissue. The difference between bone volume and bone surface seeking radiopharmaceuticals are also discussed. This review also extends to the development of preclinical models of bone metastases which may inform future dosimetric calculations. Finally, we also present a comprehensive review of the dosimetry of the established treatments ⁸⁹Strontium-chloride; ³²Phosphorus; ¹⁸⁸Rhenium-hydroxyethylidine disphosphonate; ¹⁸⁶Rhenium-1,1-hydroxyethylidene disphosphonate (¹⁸⁶Re-HEDP); ¹⁵³Samarium-ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonate; as well as the emerging treatments ¹⁸⁸Rhenium-zoledronic acid; ¹⁸⁸Rhenium-ibedronat; ¹⁷⁷Lutetium-zoledronic acid; and ¹⁷⁷Lutetium ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonate. This review highlights not only the inter treatment differences in the radiation absorbed doses delivered to metastatic disease by different radiopharmaceuticals but also the intra treatment differences which result in a large range of observed doses between patients.

177Lu-EDTMP for Metastatic Bone Pain Palliation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Painful metastatic bone involvement is common in advanced stages of many cancers. Between available radionuclides for bone pain palliation, no consensus has been reached on lutetium ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonate (¹⁷⁷Lu-EDTMP) administration in this milieu. The aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment efficacy, safety profile, and toxicities of ¹⁷⁷Lu-EDTMP in patients with metastatic bone involvement, according to the published literature. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was carried out to retrieve pertinent articles published until January 2019, concerning the clinical efficacy and safety of ¹⁷⁷Lu-EDTMP for bone pain palliative purposes. Results: Eight studies (172 patients) were included. This analysis revealed statistically significant effect of ¹⁷⁷Lu-EDTMP therapy on the visual analog score (4.84% (95% CI: 3.88-5.81; p < 0.001), bone palliative pain response (84%, 95% CI: 75%-90%; p < 0.001), and Karnofsky performance status (21%, 95% CI: 18%-24%; p < 0.001) overall (as well as in the high-dose and low-dose subgroups). Complete palliative pain response to treatment was observed in 32% (95% CI: 16%-53%) of patients receiving ¹⁷⁷Lu-EDTMP. Anemia was found to be the most common hematologic toxicity imposed by this therapeutic approach (grade I/II anemia in 24% (95% CI: 14%-38%; p < 0.001) and grade III/IV anemia in 19% (95% CI: 12%-28%; p < 0.001)). Conclusions: ¹⁷⁷Lu-EDTMP seems to have comparable efficacy and safety profile as that of the frequently administered radiopharmaceuticals for bone palliation. Therefore, this agent can be a good option for bone pain palliative purposes, in case of limited access to other bone palliative radiopharmaceuticals.

Targeted Palliative Radionuclide Therapy for Metastatic Bone Pain

Bone metastasis develops in multiple malignancies with a wide range of incidence. The presence of multiple bone metastases, leading to a multitude of complications and poorer prognosis. The corresponding refractory bone pain is still a challenging issue managed through multidisciplinary approaches to enhance the quality of life. Radiopharmaceuticals are mainly used in the latest courses of the disease. Bone-pain palliation with easy-to-administer radionuclides offers advantages, including simultaneous treatment of multiple metastatic foci, the repeatability and also the combination with other therapies. Several β¯- and α-emitters as well as pharmaceuticals, from the very first [⁸⁹Sr]strontium-dichloride to recently introduced [²²³Ra]radium-dichloride, are investigated to identify an optimum agent. In addition, the combination of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals with chemotherapy or radiotherapy has been employed to enhance the outcome. Radiopharmaceuticals demonstrate an acceptable response rate in pain relief. Nevertheless, survival benefits have been documented in only a limited number of studies. In this review, we provide an overview of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals used for bone-pain palliation, their effectiveness and toxicity, as well as the results of the combination with other therapies. Bone-pain palliation with radiopharmaceuticals has been employed for eight decades. However, there are still new aspects yet to be established.