Is Image Interpretation a Sustainable Form of Advanced Practice in Medical Imaging?

Current Radiology workforce perspective on the integration of artificial intelligence in clinical practice: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Artificial Intelligence (AI) represents the application of computer systems to tasks traditionally performed by humans. The medical imaging profession has experienced a transformative shift through the integration of AI. While there have been several independent primary studies describing various aspects of AI, the current review employs a systematic approach towards describing the perspectives of radiologists and radiographers about the integration of AI in clinical practice. This review provides a holistic view from a professional standpoint towards understanding how the broad spectrum of AI tools are perceived as a unit in medical imaging practice.

METHODS

The study utilised a systematic review approach to collect data from quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. Inclusion criteria encompassed articles concentrating on the viewpoints of either radiographers or radiologists regarding the incorporation of AI in medical imaging practice. A stepwise approach was employed in the systematic search across various databases. The included studies underwent quality assessment using the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs (QATSSD) checklist. A parallel-result convergent synthesis approach was employed to independently synthesise qualitative and quantitative evidence and to integrate the findings during the discussion phase.

RESULTS

Forty-one articles were included, all of which employed a cross-sectional study design. The main findings were themed around considerations and perspectives relating to AI education, impact on image quality and radiation dose, ethical and medico-legal implications for the use of AI, patient considerations and their perceived significance of AI for their care, and factors that influence development, implementation and job security. Despite varying emphasis, these themes collectively provide a global perspective on AI in medical imaging practice.

CONCLUSION

While expertise levels are varied and different, both radiographers and radiologists were generally optimistic about incorporation of AI in medical imaging practice. However, low levels of AI education and knowledge remain a critical barrier. Furthermore, equipment errors, cost, data security and operational difficulties, ethical constraints, job displacement concerns and insufficient implementation efforts are integration challenges that should merit the attention of stakeholders.

Impact of artificial intelligence on clinical radiography practice: Futuristic prospects in a low resource setting

OBJECTIVES

Current trends in clinical radiography practice include the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and related applications to improve patient care and enhance research. However, in low resource countries there are unique barriers to the process of AI integration. Using Ghana as a case study, this paper seeks to discuss the potential impact of AI on future radiographic practice in low-resource settings. The opportunities, challenges and the way forward to optimise the potential benefits of AI in future practice within these settings have been explored.

KEY FINDINGS

Some of the barriers to AI integration into radiographic practice relate to lack of regulatory and legal policy frameworks and limited resource availability including unreliable internet connectivity and low expert skillset.

CONCLUSION

These barriers notwithstanding, AI presents a great potential to the growth of medical imaging and subsequently improving quality of healthcare delivery in the near future. For example, AI-enabled radiographer reporting has a potential to improving quality of healthcare, especially in low-resource settings like Ghana with an acute shortage of radiologists. In addition, futuristic AI-enabled advancements such as synthetic cross-modality transfer where images from one modality are used as a baseline to generate a corresponding image of another modality without the need for additional scanning will be of particular benefit in low-resource settings.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The urgent need for inclusion of AI modules for the training of the radiographer of the future has been suggested. Recommendations for development of AI strategies by national societies and regulatory bodies will harmonise the implementation efforts. Finally, there is need for collaboration between clinical practitioners and academia to ensure that the future radiography workforce is well prepared for the AI-enabled clinical environment.