Weight-Adjusted Contrast Administration in the Computed Tomography Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism

A comparison of bolus track and test bolus computed tomography pulmonary angiography and the implications on pulmonary and aortic vessel enhancement, effective dose and suboptimal scan rate

INTRODUCTION

Bolus track and test bolus are the most commonly used contrast timing protocols to undertake computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). The aim of this study was to compare test bolus and bolus track contrast enhancement protocols in terms of enhancement of the pulmonary vessels and aorta, radiation dose and suboptimal scan rate to determine the optimal technique for CTPA.

METHODS

A total of 200 CTPA examinations (100 using each protocol) performed between January and February 2021 were assessed retrospectively. All scans were performed on a 2x128 Dual Source Siemens Drive Scanner. CT attenuation was measured in Hounsfield Units (HU), with measurements taken from the main pulmonary trunk, right pulmonary artery and left pulmonary artery, ascending and descending aorta. The mean effective dose was calculated from the dose-length product (DLP). The suboptimal scan rate was calculated as the percentage of examinations below 210HU.

RESULTS

The average HU of the pulmonary arteries was 358 HU ± SD 129.2 in the test bolus group and increased to 394 HU ± SD 133.9 in the bolus track group with a P value of ≤0.05. The average HU of the aorta was 235 HU ± SD 82.8 in the test bolus group and increased to 319 HU ± SD 91.8 in the bolus track group with a P value of <0.001. Although not statistically significant, the mean effective dose was reduced by 4.2% for the bolus track protocol (2.4 mSv vs. 2.5 mSv, P > 0.05). Fewer suboptimal scans were performed with the bolus track protocol (5 scans <210HU Bolus Track vs. 9 scans <210HU Test Bolus).

CONCLUSION

The bolus track protocol results in increased enhancement of the pulmonary arteries and aorta, with the added benefits of a lower suboptimal scan rate and lower effective dose.

The impact of body compositions on contrast medium enhancement in chest CT: a randomised controlled trial

Objective

To compare a fixed-volume contrast medium (CM) protocol with a combined total body weight (TBW) and body composition-tailored protocol in chest CT.

Methods and materials

Patients referred for routine contrast enhanced chest CT were prospectively categorised as normal, muscular or overweight. Patients were accordingly randomised into two groups; Group 1 received a fixed CM protocol. Group 2 received CM volume according to a body composition-tailored protocol. Objective image quality comparisons between protocols and body compositions were performed. Differences between groups and correlation were analysed using t-test and Pearson's r.

Results

A total of 179 patients were included: 87 in Group 1 (mean age, 51 ± 17 years); and 92 in Group 2 (mean age, 52 ± 17 years). Compared to Group 2, Group 1 showed lower vascular attenuation in muscular (mean 346 Hounsfield unit (HU) vs 396 HU; p = 0.004) and overweight categories (mean 342 HU vs 367 HU; p = 0.12), while normal category patients showed increased attenuation (385 vs 367; p = 0.61). In Group 1, strongest correlation was found between attenuation and TBW in muscular (r = -.49, p = 0.009) and waist circumference in overweight patients (r = -.50, p = 0.005). In Group 2, no significant correlations were found for the same body size parameters. In Group 1, 13% of the overweight patients was below 250 HU (p = 0.053).

Conclusion

A combined TBW and body composition-tailored CM protocol in chest CT resulted in more homogenous enhancement and fewer outliers compared to a fixed-volume protocol.

Advances in knowledge

This is, to our knowledge, the first study to investigate the impact of various body compositions on contrast medium enhancement in chest CT.

Halved contrast medium dose in lower limb dual-energy computed tomography angiography-a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare vascular attenuation (VA) of an experimental half iodine-load dual-layer spectral detector CT (SDCT) lower limb computed tomography angiography (CTA) with control (standard iodine-load conventional 120-kilovolt peak (kVp) CTA).

METHODS

Ethical approval and consent were obtained. In this parallel RCT, CTA examinations were randomized into experimental or control. Patients received 0.7 vs 1.4 mL/kg of iohexol 350 mgI/mL in the experimental- vs the control group. Two experimental virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) series at 40 and 50 kiloelectron volts (keV) were reconstructed.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

VA.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

image noise (noise), contrast- and signal-to-noise ratio (CNR and SNR), and subjective examination quality (SEQ).

RESULTS

A total of 106 vs 109 were randomized and 103 vs 108 were analyzed in the experimental vs, control groups, respectively. VA was higher on experimental 40 keV VMI than on control (p < 0.0001), but lower on 50 keV VMI (p < 0.022). Noise was higher on experimental 40 keV VMI than on control (p = 0.00022), but lower on 50 keV VMI (p = 0.0033). CNR and SNR were higher than the control on experimental 40 keV VMI (both p < 0.0001) and 50 keV (p = 0.0058 and p = 0.0023, respectively). SEQ was better on both VMIs in the experimental group than in the control (both p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Half iodine-load SDCT lower limb CTA at 40 keV achieved higher VA than the control. CNR, SNR, noise, and SEQ were higher at 40 keV, while 50 keV showed lower noise.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Spectral detector CT with low-energy virtual monoenergetic imaging performed halved iodine contrast medium (CM) lower limb CT-angiography with sustained objective and subjective quality. This facilitates CM reduction, improvement of low CM-dosage examinations, and examination of patients with more severe kidney impairment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered 5 August 2022 at clinicaltrials.gov NCT05488899.

KEY POINTS

• Contrast medium dosage may be halved in lower limb dual-energy CT angiography with virtual monoenergetic images at 40 keV, which may reduce contrast medium consumption in the face of a global shortage. • Experimental half-iodine-load dual-energy CT angiography at 40 keV showed higher vascular attenuation, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and subjective examination quality than standard iodine-load conventional. • Half-iodine dual-energy CT angiography protocols may allow us to reduce the risk of PC-AKI, examine patients with more severe kidney impairment, and provide higher quality examinations or salvage poor examinations when impaired kidney function limits the CM dose.

Contrast medium protocols in routine chest CT: a survey study

BACKGROUND

Administration of contrast medium (CM) is an important image quality factor in computed tomography (CT) of the chest. There is no clear evidence or guidelines on CM strategies for chest CT, thus a consensus approach is needed.

PURPOSE

To survey the potential impact on differences in chest CT protocols, with emphasis on strategies for the administration of CM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 170 respondents were included in this survey, which used two different approaches: (i) an online survey was sent to the members of the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI); and (ii) an email requesting a copy of their CT protocol was sent to all hospitals in Norway, and university hospitals in Sweden and Denmark. The survey focused on factors affecting CM protocols and enhancement in chest CT.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 24% (n = 170): 76% of the respondents used a CM concentration of ≥350 mgI/mL; 52% of the respondents used a fixed CM volume strategy. Fixed strategies for injection rate and delay were also the most common approach, practiced by 73% and 57% of the respondents, respectively. The fixed delay was in the range of 20-90 s. Of the respondents, 56% used flexible tube potential strategies (kV).

CONCLUSION

The chest CT protocols and CM administration strategies employed by the respondents vary widely, affecting the image quality. The results of this study underline the need for further research and consensus guidelines related to chest CT.