1
|
Ahmed TM, Kawamoto S, Lopez-Ramirez F, Yasrab M, Hruban RH, Fishman EK, Chu LC. Early detection of pancreatic cancer in the era of precision medicine. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:3559-3573. [PMID: 38761272 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04358-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality and it is often diagnosed at advanced stages due to non-specific clinical presentation. Disease detection at localized disease stage followed by surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment. In this era of precision medicine, a multifaceted approach to early detection of PDAC includes targeted screening in high-risk populations, serum biomarkers and "liquid biopsies", and artificial intelligence augmented tumor detection from radiologic examinations. In this review, we will review these emerging techniques in the early detection of PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taha M Ahmed
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Satomi Kawamoto
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Felipe Lopez-Ramirez
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mohammad Yasrab
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Linda C Chu
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Munnings R, Gibbs P, Lee B. Evolution of Liquid Biopsies for Detecting Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3335. [PMID: 39409954 PMCID: PMC11475855 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2024] [Revised: 09/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy characterised by late diagnosis and poor prognosis. Despite advancements, current diagnostic and prognostic strategies remain limited. Liquid biopsy techniques, including circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumour cells (CTCs), circulating tumour exosomes, and proteomics, offer potential solutions to improve PDAC diagnosis, prognostication, and management. A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE identified studies published between 2019 and 2024, focusing on liquid biopsy biomarkers for PDAC. A total of 49 articles were included. ctDNA research shows some promise in diagnosing and prognosticating PDAC, especially through detecting mutant KRAS in minimal residual disease assays. CTC analyses had low sensitivity for early-stage PDAC and inconsistent prognostic results across subpopulations. Exosomal studies revealed diverse biomarkers with some diagnostic and prognostic potential. Proteomics, although relatively novel, has demonstrated superior accuracy in PDAC diagnosis, including early detection, and notable prognostic capacity. Proteomics combined with CA19-9 analysis has shown the most promising results to date. An update on multi-cancer early detection testing, given its significance for population screening, is also briefly discussed. Liquid biopsy techniques offer promising avenues for improving PDAC diagnosis, prognostication, and management. In particular, proteomics shows considerable potential, yet further research is needed to validate existing findings and comprehensively explore the proteome using an unbiased approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Munnings
- Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia
| | - Belinda Lee
- Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Northern Health, Epping, VIC 3076, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin X, Zong C, Zhang Z, Fang W, Xu P. Progresses in biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy. MedComm (Beijing) 2023; 4:e387. [PMID: 37799808 PMCID: PMC10547938 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy has emerged as prevailing treatment modality for diverse cancers. However, immunotherapy as a first-line therapy has not consistently yielded durable responses. Moreover, the risk of immune-related adverse events increases with combination regimens. Thus, the development of predictive biomarkers is needed to optimize individuals benefit, minimize risk of toxicities, and guide combination approaches. The greatest focus has been on tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), microsatellite instability (MSI), and tumor mutational burden (TMB). However, there remains a subject of debate due to thresholds variability and significant heterogeneity. Major unmet challenges in immunotherapy are the discovery and validation of predictive biomarkers. Here, we show the status of tumor PD-L1, MSI, TMB, and emerging data on novel biomarker strategies with oncogenic signaling and epigenetic regulation. Considering the exploration of peripheral and intestinal immunity has served as noninvasive alternative in predicting immunotherapy, this review also summarizes current data in systemic immunity, encompassing solute PD-L1 and TMB, circulating tumor DNA and infiltrating lymphocytes, routine emerging inflammatory markers and cytokines, as well as gut microbiota. This review provides up-to-date information on the evolving field of currently available biomarkers in predicting immunotherapy. Future exploration of novel biomarkers is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuwen Lin
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicinePeking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhenGuangdong ProvinceChina
- Department of Internal MedicineShantou University Medical CollegeShantouGuangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Chenyu Zong
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicinePeking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhenGuangdong ProvinceChina
- Department of Internal MedicineZunyi Medical UniversityZunyiGuizhou ProvinceChina
| | - Zhihan Zhang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicinePeking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhenGuangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Weiyi Fang
- Cancer Research InstituteSchool of Basic Medical ScienceSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdong ProvinceChina
- Cancer CenterIntegrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Ping Xu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicinePeking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhenGuangdong ProvinceChina
- Department of Internal MedicineZunyi Medical UniversityZunyiGuizhou ProvinceChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ei S, Takahashi S, Ogasawara T, Mashiko T, Masuoka Y, Nakagohri T. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The Current Status of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treatment in Japan. Gut Liver 2023; 17:698-710. [PMID: 36843421 PMCID: PMC10502496 DOI: 10.5009/gnl220311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Resection is the only curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Although the outcome of technically resectable PDAC has improved with advances in surgery and adjuvant therapy, the 5-year survival rate remains low at 20% to 40%. More effective therapy is needed. Almost 15 years ago, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines proposed a resectability classification of PDAC based on preoperative imaging. Since then, treatment strategies for PDAC have been devised based on resectability. The standard of care for resectable PDAC is adjuvant chemotherapy after R0 resection, as shown by the results of pivotal clinical trials. With regard to neoadjuvant treatment, several recent clinical trials comparing neoadjuvant treatment with upfront resection have been conducted on resectable PDAC and borderline resectable PDAC, and the benefits and efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer has become clearer. The significance of neoadjuvant treatment for resectable PDAC remains controversial, but in borderline resectable PDAC the efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment has been further recognised, although the standard of care has not yet been established. Several promising clinical trials for PDAC are ongoing. This review presents previous and ongoing trials of perioperative treatment for resectable and borderline resectable PDAC, focusing on the difference between Asian and Western countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigenori Ei
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Toshihito Ogasawara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Taro Mashiko
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Masuoka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Toshio Nakagohri
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hijioka S, Nagashio Y, Maruki Y, Kawasaki Y, Takeshita K, Morizane C, Okusaka T. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition of Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Aiming for a Comprehensive Genome Profile. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13071275. [PMID: 37046493 PMCID: PMC10093621 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13071275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, cancer genomic medicine centered on comprehensive genome profile (CGP) analysis has become widely used in the field of pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) has played an important role in pancreatic cancer, and recently, more EUS-TA tissue samples are considered for CGP analysis. Differences exist between the Oncoguide NCC Oncopanel System and Foundation One CDx Cancer Genome Profile, which are CGP tests approved by insurance programs in Japan, including the analysis criteria, optimal needle selection for meeting these criteria, and puncture target. It is important to understand not only the specimen collection factors, but also the specimen processing factors that can increase the success rate of CGP testing. Furthermore, cancer genome medicine is expected to enter an era of increasing turbulence in the future, and endoscopists need to respond flexibly to these changes. Herein, we review the current status of cancer genome medicine in pancreatic and biliary tract cancers and cancer gene panel testing using EUS-TA.
Collapse
|
6
|
Nitschke C, Markmann B, Walter P, Badbaran A, Tölle M, Kropidlowski J, Belloum Y, Goetz MR, Bardenhagen J, Stern L, Tintelnot J, Schönlein M, Sinn M, van der Leest P, Simon R, Heumann A, Izbicki JR, Pantel K, Wikman H, Uzunoglu FG. Peripheral and Portal Venous KRAS ctDNA Detection as Independent Prognostic Markers of Early Tumor Recurrence in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Clin Chem 2023; 69:295-307. [PMID: 36644936 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvac214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND KRAS circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown biomarker potential for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) but has not been applied in clinical routine yet. We aim to improve clinical applicability of ctDNA detection in PDAC and to study the impact of blood-draw site and time point on the detectability and prognostic role of KRAS mutations. METHODS 221 blood samples from 108 PDAC patients (65 curative, 43 palliative) were analyzed. Baseline peripheral and tumor-draining portal venous (PV), postoperative, and follow-up blood were analyzed and correlated with prognosis. RESULTS Significantly higher KRAS mutant detection rates and copy numbers were observed in palliative compared to curative patients baseline blood (58.1% vs 24.6%; P = 0.002; and P < 0.001). Significantly higher KRAS mutant copies were found in PV blood compared to baseline (P < 0.05) samples. KRAS detection in pre- and postoperative and PV blood were significantly associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (all P < 0.015) and identified as independent prognostic markers. KRAS ctDNA status was also an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for shorter overall survival in both palliative and curative cohorts (hazard ratio [HR] 4.9, P = 0.011; HR 6.9, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS KRAS ctDNA detection is an independent adverse prognostic marker in curative and palliative PDAC patients-at all sites of blood draw and a strong follow-up marker. The most substantial prognostic impact was seen for PV blood, which could be an effective novel tool for identifying prognostic borderline patients-guiding future decision-making on neoadjuvant treatment despite anatomical resectability. In addition, higher PV mutant copy numbers contribute to an improved technical feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Nitschke
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
- Mildred Scheel Cancer Career Center, Hamburg 20246, Germany
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Benedikt Markmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Philipp Walter
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Anita Badbaran
- Clinic for Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Marie Tölle
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Jolanthe Kropidlowski
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Yassine Belloum
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Mara R Goetz
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Jan Bardenhagen
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Louisa Stern
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Joseph Tintelnot
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic (Oncology), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Martin Schönlein
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic (Oncology), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic (Oncology), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Paul van der Leest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, Netherlands
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Asmus Heumann
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Jakob R Izbicki
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Klaus Pantel
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Harriet Wikman
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Faik G Uzunoglu
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stoffel EM, Brand RE, Goggins M. Pancreatic Cancer: Changing Epidemiology and New Approaches to Risk Assessment, Early Detection, and Prevention. Gastroenterology 2023; 164:752-765. [PMID: 36804602 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer usually results in poor survival with limited options for treatment, as most affected individuals present with advanced disease. Early detection of preinvasive pancreatic neoplasia and identifying molecular therapeutic targets provide opportunities for extending survival. Although screening for pancreatic cancer is currently not recommended for the general population, emerging evidence indicates that pancreatic surveillance can improve outcomes for individuals in certain high-risk groups. Changes in the epidemiology of pancreatic cancer, experience from pancreatic surveillance, and discovery of novel biomarkers provide a roadmap for new strategies for pancreatic cancer risk assessment, early detection, and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena M Stoffel
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Randall E Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Goggins
- Departments of Medicine and Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mazer BL, Lee JW, Roberts NJ, Chu LC, Lennon AM, Klein AP, Eshleman JR, Fishman EK, Canto MI, Goggins MG, Hruban RH. Screening for pancreatic cancer has the potential to save lives, but is it practical? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:555-574. [PMID: 37212770 PMCID: PMC10424088 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2217354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most patients with pancreatic cancer present with advanced stage, incurable disease. However, patients with high-grade precancerous lesions and many patients with low-stage disease can be cured with surgery, suggesting that early detection has the potential to improve survival. While serum CA19.9 has been a long-standing biomarker used for pancreatic cancer disease monitoring, its low sensitivity and poor specificity have driven investigators to hunt for better diagnostic markers. AREAS COVERED This review will cover recent advances in genetics, proteomics, imaging, and artificial intelligence, which offer opportunities for the early detection of curable pancreatic neoplasms. EXPERT OPINION From exosomes, to circulating tumor DNA, to subtle changes on imaging, we know much more now about the biology and clinical manifestations of early pancreatic neoplasia than we did just five years ago. The overriding challenge, however, remains the development of a practical approach to screen for a relatively rare, but deadly, disease that is often treated with complex surgery. It is our hope that future advances will bring us closer to an effective and financially sound approach for the early detection of pancreatic cancer and its precursors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L. Mazer
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jae W. Lee
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nicholas J. Roberts
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Linda C. Chu
- Department of Radiology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P. Klein
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James R. Eshleman
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elliot K. Fishman
- Department of Radiology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael G. Goggins
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu Z, Han Y, Dang Q, Xu H, Zhang Y, Duo M, Lv J, Li H, Kong Y, Han X. Roles of circulating tumor DNA in PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint Inhibitors: Current evidence and future directions. Int Immunopharmacol 2022; 111:109173. [PMID: 35998502 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing holds considerable promise for early diagnosis and detection of surveillance and minimal residual disease. Blood ctDNA monitors specific cancers by detecting the alterations found in cancer cells, such as apoptosis and necrosis. Due to the short half-life, ctDNA reflects the actual burden of other treatments on tumors. In addition, ctDNA might be preferable to monitor tumor development and treatment compared with invasive tissue biopsy. ctDNA-based liquid biopsy brings remarkable strength to targeted therapy and precision medicine. Notably, multiple ctDNA analysis platforms have been broadly applied in clinical immunotherapy. Through targeted sequencing, early variations in ctDNA could predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between ctDNA kinetics and anti-PD1 antibodies. The need for further research and development remains, although this biomarker holds significant prospects for early cancer detection. This review focuses on describing the basis of ctDNA and its current utilities in oncology and immunotherapy, either for clinical management or early detection, highlighting its advantages and inherent limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaoqu Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China; Interventional Institute of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China; Interventional Treatment and Clinical Research Center of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China.
| | - Yilin Han
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
| | - Qin Dang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
| | - Hui Xu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
| | - Yuyuan Zhang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
| | - Mengjie Duo
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
| | - Jinxiang Lv
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
| | - Huanyun Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
| | - Ying Kong
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
| | - Xinwei Han
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China; Interventional Institute of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China; Interventional Treatment and Clinical Research Center of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nikas IP, Mountzios G, Sydney GI, Ioakim KJ, Won JK, Papageorgis P. Evaluating Pancreatic and Biliary Neoplasms with Small Biopsy-Based Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Doing More with Less. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020397. [PMID: 35053560 PMCID: PMC8773813 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma are aggressive diseases mostly diagnosed at an advanced and inoperable stage. This review presents the value of next-generation sequencing (NGS) when performed on small biopsies—including fine-needle aspiration/biopsy samples, brushings, pancreatic juice and bile, and also blood—in the field of pancreatobiliary neoplasia. NGS could guide physicians while evaluating pancreatic solid and cystic lesions or suspicious biliary strictures, performing surveillance in high-risk individuals, or monitoring the disease and assessing prognosis in already diagnosed cancer patients. Evidence suggests that NGS performed on small biopsies is a robust tool for the diagnosis and pre-operative risk stratification of pancreatic and biliary lesions, whereas it also carries significant prognostic and therapeutic value. However, effective standardization of the pre-analytical and analytical assay parameters used for each clinical scenario is needed to fully implement NGS into routine practice and provide more personalized management in patients with suspected or established pancreatobiliary neoplasia. Abstract Pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma are lethal diseases mainly diagnosed at an inoperable stage. As pancreatobiliary surgical specimens are often unavailable for further molecular testing, this review aimed to highlight the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic impact of next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed on distinct small biopsies, including endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspirations and biopsies of pancreatic solid and cystic lesions, biliary duct brushings, and also “liquid biopsies” such as the pancreatic juice, bile, and blood. NGS could clarify indeterminate pancreatic lesions or biliary strictures, for instance by identifying TP53 or SMAD4 mutations indicating high-grade dysplasia or cancer. It could also stratify pancreatic cystic lesions, by distinguishing mucinous from non-mucinous cysts and identifying high-risk cysts that should be excised in surgically fit patients, whereas the combination of cytology, elevated cystic CEA levels and NGS could improve the overall diagnostic accuracy. When NGS is performed on the pancreatic juice, it could stratify high-risk patients under surveillance. On the plasma, it could dynamically monitor the disease course and response to therapy. Notably, the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels have been associated with staging, grading, and survival. Lastly, NGS has shown potential in identifying potentially actionable molecular alterations. In conclusion, NGS applied on small biopsies could carry significant diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilias P. Nikas
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (G.I.S.); (K.J.I.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Giannis Mountzios
- Fourth Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Trials Unit, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, 11526 Athens, Greece;
| | - Guy I. Sydney
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (G.I.S.); (K.J.I.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62702, USA
| | - Kalliopi J. Ioakim
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (G.I.S.); (K.J.I.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Limassol General Hospital, Limassol 4131, Cyprus
| | - Jae-Kyung Won
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea;
| | - Panagiotis Papageorgis
- Tumor Microenvironment, Metastasis and Experimental Therapeutics Laboratory, Basic and Translational Cancer Research Center, Department of Life Sciences, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Underhill HR. Leveraging the Fragment Length of Circulating Tumour DNA to Improve Molecular Profiling of Solid Tumour Malignancies with Next-Generation Sequencing: A Pathway to Advanced Non-invasive Diagnostics in Precision Oncology? Mol Diagn Ther 2021; 25:389-408. [PMID: 34018157 PMCID: PMC8249304 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-021-00534-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) has emerged as a promising diagnostic tool in oncology. Identification of tumour-derived ccfDNA (i.e. circulating tumour DNA [ctDNA]) provides non-invasive access to a malignancy’s molecular landscape to diagnose, inform therapeutic strategies, and monitor treatment efficacy. Current applications of ccfDNA to detect somatic mutations, however, have been largely constrained to tumour-informed searches and identification of common mutations because of the interaction between ctDNA signal and next-generation sequencing (NGS) noise. Specifically, the low allele frequency of ctDNA associated with non-metastatic and early-stage lesions may be indistinguishable from artifacts that accrue during sample preparation and NGS. Thus, using ccfDNA to achieve non-invasive and personalized molecular profiling to optimize individual patient care is a highly sought goal that remains limited in clinical practice. There is growing evidence, however, that further advances in the field of ccfDNA diagnostics may be achieved by improving detection of somatic mutations through leveraging the inherently shorter fragment lengths of ctDNA compared to non-neoplastic ccfDNA. Here, the origins and rationale for seeking to improve the mutation-based detection of ctDNA by using ccfDNA size profiling are reviewed. Subsequently, in vitro and in silico methods to enrich for a target ccfDNA fragment length are detailed to identify current practices and provide perspective into the potential of using ccfDNA size profiling to impact clinical applications in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter R Underhill
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. .,Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. .,Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Satoh K. Molecular Approaches Using Body Fluid for the Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:375. [PMID: 33671729 PMCID: PMC7926932 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most malignant form of gastrointestinal tumor and is the fourth leading cause of deaths due to cancer in Japan. This cancer shows a poor outcome due to the difficulty of its early diagnosis and its rapid growth. Once this disease becomes clinically evident, it is frequently accompanied by distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. A recent multicenter study in Japan revealed that patients with the early stage of this disease (stage 0 and I) showed favorable prognosis after surgical resection, indicating the importance of early detection for improvement of PDAC prognosis. PDAC develops through a stepwise progression from the precursor lesion, and over the last few decades molecular analyses have shown the detailed genetic alterations that occur in this process. Since advances in molecular technologies have enabled the detection of genetic changes from a very small quantity of samples, a large number of non-invasive molecular approaches have been utilized in an attempt to find precursor or non-invasive carcinoma lesions. In this review, the current efforts in terms of the molecular approaches applied for the early detection of PDAC-especially using body fluids such as pancreatic juice, blood, and saliva-are summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kennichi Satoh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-15-1 Fukumuro, Miyaginoku, Sendai, Miyagi 983-8536, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thompson ED, Roberts NJ, Wood LD, Eshleman JR, Goggins MG, Kern SE, Klein AP, Hruban RH. The genetics of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the year 2020: dramatic progress, but far to go. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:2544-2563. [PMID: 32704031 PMCID: PMC8375585 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0629-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The publication of the "Pan-Cancer Atlas" by the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium, a partnership formed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), provides a wonderful opportunity to reflect on where we stand in our understanding of the genetics of pancreatic cancer, as well as on the opportunities to translate this understanding to patient care. From germline variants that predispose to the development of pancreatic cancer, to somatic mutations that are therapeutically targetable, genetics is now providing hope, where there once was no hope, for those diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth D Thompson
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas J Roberts
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laura D Wood
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James R Eshleman
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael G Goggins
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Scott E Kern
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P Klein
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|