1
|
Trager RJ, Baumann AN, Perez JA, Dusek JA, Perfecto RPT, Goertz CM. Association between chiropractic spinal manipulation and cauda equina syndrome in adults with low back pain: Retrospective cohort study of US academic health centers. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299159. [PMID: 38466710 PMCID: PMC10927125 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a lumbosacral surgical emergency that has been associated with chiropractic spinal manipulation (CSM) in case reports. However, identifying if there is a potential causal effect is complicated by the heightened incidence of CES among those with low back pain (LBP). The study hypothesis was that there would be no increase in the risk of CES in adults with LBP following CSM compared to a propensity-matched cohort following physical therapy (PT) evaluation without spinal manipulation over a three-month follow-up period. METHODS A query of a United States network (TriNetX, Inc.) was conducted, searching health records of more than 107 million patients attending academic health centers, yielding data ranging from 20 years prior to the search date (July 30, 2023). Patients aged 18 or older with LBP were included, excluding those with pre-existing CES, incontinence, or serious pathology that may cause CES. Patients were divided into two cohorts: (1) LBP patients receiving CSM or (2) LBP patients receiving PT evaluation without spinal manipulation. Propensity score matching controlled for confounding variables associated with CES. RESULTS 67,220 patients per cohort (mean age 51 years) remained after propensity matching. CES incidence was 0.07% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.05-0.09%) in the CSM cohort compared to 0.11% (95% CI: 0.09-0.14%) in the PT evaluation cohort, yielding a risk ratio and 95% CI of 0.60 (0.42-0.86; p = .0052). Both cohorts showed a higher rate of CES during the first two weeks of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that CSM is not a risk factor for CES. Considering prior epidemiologic evidence, patients with LBP may have an elevated risk of CES independent of treatment. These findings warrant further corroboration. In the meantime, clinicians should be vigilant to identify LBP patients with CES and promptly refer them for surgical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J. Trager
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Clinical Research Training Program, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Anthony N. Baumann
- Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
- College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Jaime A. Perez
- Clinical Research Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Jeffery A. Dusek
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Romeo-Paolo T. Perfecto
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Clinical Research Training Program, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Christine M. Goertz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Robert J. Margolis, MD, Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, and Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alcantara J, Alcantara JD, Alcantara J. The chiropractic care of patients with cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Integr Cancer Ther 2011; 11:304-12. [PMID: 21665878 DOI: 10.1177/1534735411403309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE Cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide and accounted for 7.4 million deaths in 2004. By 2030, deaths from cancer have been estimated at 12 million with 30% being preventable. Complementary and alternative medicine remains popular among cancer patients; particularly with chiropractic services. However, the nature of the chiropractic clinical encounter and its reported benefits remains to be fully investigated. Towards these efforts, we begin with a systematic review of the literature on the chiropractic care of patients with cancer. METHODS The following electronic databases were searched: MANTIS [1965-2010]; Index to Chiropractic Literature [1984-2010]; Pubmed [1966-2010]; Medline [1965-2010] EMBASE [1974-2010], AMED [1975-2010], CINAHL Plus [1965-2010], Alt-Health Watch [1965-2010] and PsychINFO [1965-2010]. Key words used were "cancer" and "neoplasm" in Boolean combination with "chiropractic." Primary investigation/reports in peer-reviewed English journals involving chiropractic care were reviewed. RESULTS Our review revealed 60 case reports, 2 case series, 21 commentaries, 2 survey studies, and 2 literature reviews. The case reports were diagnostic with commentaries highlighting the importance of recognizing the patient presenting with NMS complaints due to an underlying neoplasm. The chiropractic clinical encounter prior to cancer diagnosis and subsequent medical referral is poorly characterized in the literature. CONCLUSION Patients with cancer seek the care of chiropractors. The literature does not reflect or describe the totality of the chiropractic clinical encounter. We encourage further research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Alcantara
- International Chiropractic Pediatric Association, Media, PA 19063, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|