The effect of body position on pulmonary function, chest wall motion, and discomfort in young healthy participants

Effects of body postures on respiratory muscle force and coughing in healthy people

The respiratory muscle force determines the intensity of cough force. A greater cough force for cleaning the airways is essential for preventing and managing pneumonia. Body posture can affect the onset of aspiration pneumonia. However, the effects of body posture on the respiratory muscle and cough forces remain unclear. Thus, we aimed to explore the influence of the four body postures on respiratory muscle force, cough pressure, subjective ease of coughing, and pulmonary function in healthy individuals. Twenty healthy individuals were included in this study. Body postures were 0-degree supine, 30- and 60-degree semi-recumbent, and 90-degree sitting. The maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures, maximal cough pressure, subjective ease of coughing, and pulmonary function, including peak expiratory flow, were evaluated. We set the measured values in the supine posture to 100% and showed the relative values. The 60-degree posture showed stronger inspiratory (125.1 ± 3.9%, mean ± standard error [SE]) and expiratory (116.4 ± 3.0%) muscle force, cough pressure, more subjective ease of coughing, and greater peak expiratory flow (113.4 ± 3.0%) than the supine posture. The sitting posture also showed greater inspiratory muscle force and peak expiratory flow than the supine posture. The correlation coefficient for the 60-degree posture showed that the maximal inspiratory pressure was moderately correlated with the maximal expiratory pressure (r = 0.512), cough pressure (r = 0.495), and peak expiratory flow (r = 0.558). The above findings suggest the advantage of keeping a 60-degree posture and avoiding the supine posture to generate a greater cough force in the prevention and management of pneumonia.

The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults

Abstract Introduction: Pulmonary function testing, or spirometry, is a validated, globally recognized test that contributes to the diagnosis, staging, and longitudinal follow-up of lung diseases. The exam is most often performed in a sitting position in clinical practice; hence, there are no predicted values for its performance in other positions, such as in different decubitus. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of position on pulmonary function test results in healthy adults. Methods: Forty-two healthy adults of both sexes, divided into male (MG) and female groups (FG), were provided respiratory questionnaires. Subsequently, the pulmonary function test was conducted to evaluate the ventilatory parameters of forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio in the sitting (S), dorsal decubitus (DD), right lateral decubitus (RLD), and left lateral decubitus (LLD) positions. A comparison of the parametric data was performed via one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post-hoc tests. Correlations between the S position variables along with the other positions were evaluated using the Pearson test. Results: The mean and standard error for the FVC values of the MG at positions DD (4.3 ± 0.7/L), RLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) and LLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) were lower when compared to S (5.05 ± 0.6 L). There was a strong positive correlation between the values of FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC in the S position compared to other positions analyzed in both groups. Conclusion: Body positioning altered the parameters of the pulmonary function test in healthy adults.

Effect of Position Change From the Bed to a Wheelchair on the Regional Ventilation Distribution Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Patients With Respiratory Failure

Background: There is limited knowledge about the effect of position change on regional lung ventilation in patients with respiratory failure. This study aimed to examine the physiological alteration of regional lung ventilation during the position change from lying in bed to sitting on a wheelchair.

Methods: In this study, 41 patients with respiratory failure who were weaned from the ventilators were prospectively enrolled. The electrical impedance tomography (EIT) was used to assess the regional lung ventilation distribution at four time points (T_base: baseline, supine position in the bed, T_30min: sitting position in the wheelchair after 30 min, T_60min: sitting position in the wheelchair after 60 min, T_return: the same supine position in the bed after position changing). The EIT-based global inhomogeneity (GI) and center of ventilation (CoV) indices were calculated. The EIT images were equally divided into four ventral-to-dorsal horizontal regions of interest (ROIs 1–4). Depending on the improvement in ventilation distribution in the dependent regions at T_60min (threshold set to 15%), the patients were divided into the dorsal ventilation improved (DVI) and not improved (non-DVI) groups.

Results: When the patients moved from the bed to a wheelchair, there was a significant and continuous increase in ventilation in the dorsal regions (ROI 3 + 4: 45.9 ± 12.1, 48.7 ± 11.6, 49.9 ± 12.6, 48.8 ± 10.6 for T_base, T_30min, T_60min, and T_return, respectively; p = 0.015) and CoV (48.2 ± 10.1, 50.1 ± 9.2, 50.5 ± 9.6, and 49.5 ± 8.6, p = 0.047). In addition, there was a significant decrease in GI at T_60min compared with T_base. The DVI group (n = 18) had significantly higher oxygenation levels than the non-DVI group (n = 23) after position changing. ROI4_Tbase was significantly negatively correlated with the ΔSpO₂ (R = 0.72, p < 0.001). Using a cutoff value of 6.5%, ROI4_Tbase had 79.2% specificity and 58.8% sensitivity in indicating the increase in the dorsal region related to the position change. The corresponding area under the curve (AUC) was 0.806 (95% CI, 0.677–0.936).

Conclusions: Position change may improve the ventilation distribution in the study patients. The EIT can visualize real-time changes of the regional lung ventilation at the bedside to guide the body position change of the patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and measure the effect of clinical practice.

Trial Registration: Effect of Early Mobilization on Regional Lung Ventilation Assessed by EIT, NCT04081129. Registered 9 June 2019—Retrospectively registered. https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S00096WT&selectaction=Edit&uid=U00020D9&ts=2&cx=v2cwij.

[Pulmonary insufficiency in acute stroke: risk factors and mechanisms of development]

Various degrees of pulmonary insufficiency (PI) (PaO₂ ≤60 mm Hg, SaO₂ ≤90%) are diagnosed in most of patients with severe acute stroke (AS). Frequency and severity of PI positively correlates with the severity of AS. PI worsens patient's condition, prolongs the hospitalization period, and increases the probability of fatal outcome. Early clinical signs of PI may be undiagnosed due to the severity of stroke and thus not treated. The initiating pathogenic mechanism of PI is stress-related activation of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and systemic immunosuppression. In severe stroke with mass effect, the rapid and significant increase in intracranial pressure may additionally activate the SNS. Risk factors of PI include older age, previous pulmonary disease, prolonged supine position, respiratory muscle dysfunction, apnea, and concomitant somatic diseases. Decompensation of somatic diseases leads to multiple stage reactions with facilitation of functional and morphologic changes in the pulmonary system, hypoxemia and hypoxia, promotes infectious complications and multiple organ failure and worsens neurological outcome. Diagnosis and treatment of PI in AS decreases mortality and improves rehabilitation prognosis.

Cardiopulmonary Capacity in Children During Exercise Testing: The Differences Between Treadmill and Upright and Supine Cycle Ergometry

Background/Hypothesis: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used in the assessment of function and prognosis of cardiopulmonary health in children with cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Techniques, such as cardiac MRi, and PET-scan, can be performed simultaneously with exercise testing. Thus, it is desirable to have a broader knowledge about children’s normal cardiopulmonary function in different body postures and exercise modalities. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different body positions on cardiopulmonary function in healthy subjects performing CPETs.

Materials and Methods: Thirty-one healthy children aged 9, 12, and 15 years did four CPETs: one treadmill test with a modified Bruce protocol and three different bicycle tests with different body postures, sitting, tilted 45°, and lying flat (0°). For the bicycle tests, a 20-watt ramp protocol with a pedal frequency of 60 ± 5 rotations per minute was used. Continous ECG and breath-by-breath V.O2 measurements was done throughout the tests. Cardiac structure and function including aortic diameter were evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography prior to the tests. Doppler measurements of the blood velocity in the ascending aorta were measured prior to and during the test. Prior to every test, the participants performed pulmonary function tests with maximum voluntary ventilation test.

Results: There is a significantly (p < 0.05) lower peak V.O2 in all bicycle tests compared with the treadmill test. There is lower corrected peak V.O2 (ml kg^−0.67 min⁻¹), but not relative peak V.O2 (ml kg⁻¹ min⁻¹), in the supine compared with the upright bicycle test. There are no differences in peak stroke volume or cardiac output between the bicycle modalities when calculated from aortic blood flow. Peak heart rate decreases from both treadmill to upright bicycle and from upright bicycle to the supine test (0°).

Conclusion: There are no differences in peak cardiac output between the upright bicycle test and supine bicycle tests. Heart rate and corrected peak V.O2 are lower in the supine test (0°) than the upright bicycle test. In the treadmill test, it is a higher absolute and relative peak V.O2. Despite the latter differences, we are convinced that both upright and supine bicycle tests are apt in the clinical setting when needed.

The effect of body position on pulmonary function: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are routinely performed in the upright position due to measurement devices and patient comfort. This systematic review investigated the influence of body position on lung function in healthy persons and specific patient groups.

METHODS

A search to identify English-language papers published from 1/1998-12/2017 was conducted using MEDLINE and Google Scholar with key words: body position, lung function, lung mechanics, lung volume, position change, positioning, posture, pulmonary function testing, sitting, standing, supine, ventilation, and ventilatory change. Studies that were quasi-experimental, pre-post intervention; compared ≥2 positions, including sitting or standing; and assessed lung function in non-mechanically ventilated subjects aged ≥18 years were included. Primary outcome measures were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC, FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), functional residual capacity (FRC), maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax), maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), peak expiratory flow (PEF), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Standing, sitting, supine, and right- and left-side lying positions were studied.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies met inclusion criteria. The study populations included healthy subjects (29 studies), lung disease (nine), heart disease (four), spinal cord injury (SCI, seven), neuromuscular diseases (three), and obesity (four). In most studies involving healthy subjects or patients with lung, heart, neuromuscular disease, or obesity, FEV1, FVC, FRC, PEmax, PImax, and/or PEF values were higher in more erect positions. For subjects with tetraplegic SCI, FVC and FEV1 were higher in supine vs. sitting. In healthy subjects, DLCO was higher in the supine vs. sitting, and in sitting vs. side-lying positions. In patients with chronic heart failure, the effect of position on DLCO varied.

CONCLUSIONS

Body position influences the results of PFTs, but the optimal position and magnitude of the benefit varies between study populations. PFTs are routinely performed in the sitting position. We recommend the supine position should be considered in addition to sitting for PFTs in patients with SCI and neuromuscular disease. When treating patients with heart, lung, SCI, neuromuscular disease, or obesity, one should take into consideration that pulmonary physiology and function are influenced by body position.

Factors Affecting Lung Function: A Review of the Literature

Lung function reference values are traditionally based on anthropometric factors, such as weight, height, sex, and age. FVC and FEV₁ decline with age, while volumes and capacities, such as RV and FRC, increase. TLC, VC, RV, FVC and FEV₁ are affected by height, since they are proportional to body size. This means that a tall individual will experience greater decrease in lung volumes as they get older. Some variables, such as FRC and ERV, decline exponentially with an increase in weight, to the extent that tidal volume in morbidly obese patients can be close to that of RV. Men have longer airways than women, causing greater specific resistance in the respiratory tract. The increased work of breathing to increase ventilation among women means that their consumption of oxygen is higher than men under similar conditions of physical intensity. Lung volumes are higher when the subject is standing than in other positions. DLCO is significantly higher in supine positions than in sitting or standing positions, but the difference between sitting and standing positions is not significant. Anthropometric characteristics are insufficient to explain differences in lung function between different ethnic groups, underlining the importance of considering other factors in addition to the conventional anthropometric measurements.

Comparison of Arterial Oxygenation Following Head-Down and Head-Up Laparoscopic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Regarding the role of gas entry in abdomen and cardiorespiratory effects, the ability of anesthesiologists would be challenged in laparoscopic surgeries. Considering few studies in this area and the relevance of the subject, this study was performed to compare the arterial oxygen alterations before operation in comparison with after surgery between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ovarian cystectomy.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort, 70 consecutive women aged from 20 to 60 years who were candidate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 35) and ovarian cystectomy (n = 35) with reverse (20 degrees) and direct (30 degrees) Trendelenburg positions, respectively, with ASA class I or II were enrolled. After intubation and before operation, for the first time, the arterial blood gas from radial artery in supine position was obtained for laboratory assessment. Then, the second blood sample was collected from radial artery in supine position and sent to the lab to be assessed with the same device after 30 minutes from surgery termination. The measured variables from arterial blood gas were arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and Oxygen saturation (SpO2) alterations.

RESULTS

Total PaO2 was higher in the first measurement. The higher values of PaO2 in cholecystectomy (upward) than in ovarian cystectomy (downward) were not significant in univariate (P = 0.060) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.654). Furthermore, higher values of SpO2 in cholecystectomy (upward) than in ovarian cystectomy (downward) were not significant in univariate (P = 0.412) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.984).

CONCLUSIONS

In general, based on the results of this study, the values of PaO2 in cholecystectomy (upward) were not significantly higher than the values in cystectomy (downward) in laparoscopic surgeries when measured 30 minutes after surgery.

Evaluation of oxygen saturation values in different body positions in healthy individuals

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The research was conducted to evaluate oxygen saturation values measured in healthy individuals in different body positions.

BACKGROUND

Changes in position affect ventilation-perfusion rates, oxygen transport and lung volume in normal lungs. There have been few studies and not enough information about which positioning of a healthy individual can increase oxygenation.

DESIGN

A descriptive study.

METHODS

A sample of 103 healthy individuals with no chronic disease, anaemia or pain was included in the research. Individuals were positioned in five different positions: sitting upright, supine position, prone position, lying on the left side and lying on the right side. Oxygen saturation and pulse rates were then measured and recorded after the individuals held each position for ten minutes.

RESULTS

It was found that the average oxygen saturation value when measured while sitting in an upright position in a chair was significantly higher than that measured when the individual was lying on the right or left side of the body. Oxygen saturation values measured in the five different body positions were significantly higher in women, in individuals below the age of 35, in those with Body Mass Indexes of below 25 kg/m(2), and in nonsmokers.

CONCLUSION

All of the oxygen saturation values measured in the five different body positions were in the normal range. Although oxygen saturation values were within the normal range in the five different body positions, post hoc analysis showed that the best oxygenation was in the 'sitting upright' position while the lowest oxygenation was in the supine position.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Based on the results of this research, it can be concluded that the differences among oxygen saturation values according to the different body positions were statistically significant.

Effects of anaesthesia techniques and drugs on pulmonary function

The primary task of the lungs is to maintain oxygenation of the blood and eliminate carbon dioxide through the network of capillaries alongside alveoli. This is maintained by utilising ventilatory reserve capacity and by changes in lung mechanics. Induction of anaesthesia impairs pulmonary functions by the loss of consciousness, depression of reflexes, changes in rib cage and haemodynamics. All drugs used during anaesthesia, including inhalational agents, affect pulmonary functions directly by acting on respiratory system or indirectly through their actions on other systems. Volatile anaesthetic agents have more pronounced effects on pulmonary functions compared to intravenous induction agents, leading to hypercarbia and hypoxia. The posture of the patient also leads to major changes in pulmonary functions. Anticholinergics and neuromuscular blocking agents have little effect. Analgesics and sedatives in combination with volatile anaesthetics and induction agents may exacerbate their effects. Since multiple agents are used during anaesthesia, ultimate effect may be different from when used in isolation. Literature search was done using MeSH key words ‘anesthesia’, ‘pulmonary function’, ‘respiratory system’ and ‘anesthesia drugs and lungs’ in combination in PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar filtered by review and research articles sorted by relevance.