Changes in Lower Limb Strength and Function Following Lumbar Spinal Mobilization

Effects of Multimodal Physical Therapy on Pain, Disability, H-reflex, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Due to Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Preliminary Trial

Background Lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a condition caused by mechanical compression of nerve roots. Various physical therapy interventions have been proposed for the conservative management of LSR due to LDH. However, the study of physical therapy interventions in a multimodal form is lacking. Additionally, the effect of physical therapy on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters of the compressed nerve root has not been studied. This study aimed to investigate the effects of multimodal physical therapy (MPT) on pain, disability, soleus H-reflex, and DTI parameters of the compressed nerve root in patients with chronic unilateral LSR due to LDH. Methods A prospective preliminary pre-post clinical trial with a convenience sample was conducted. A total of 14 patients with chronic unilateral LSR due to paracentral L4-L5 or L5-S1 LDH were recruited for the study. Participants received a total of 18 sessions of a six-week MPT program that consisted of electrophysical agents, manual therapy interventions, and core stability exercises. Electrophysical agents involved interferential current and hot pack. Manual therapy interventions included myofascial release, side posture positional distraction, passive spinal rotation mobilization, and high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation. Visual analog scale (VAS), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), soleus H-reflex amplitude, side-to-side amplitude (H/H) ratio, fractional anisotropy (FA), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the compressed nerve root were measured at baseline and post-intervention. Results There were significant improvements in VAS, RMDQ, H/H ratio, FA, and ADC of the compressed nerve root. Furthermore, significant improvement was found in the affected side compared with the contralateral side in H-reflex amplitude. Conclusions The observations of this preliminary trial suggest that MPT is a successful intervention in patients with chronic unilateral LSR due to LDH. Regarding DTI parameters of the compressed nerve root, FA increased and ADC decreased. Future studies with a control group, large sample sizes, and longer follow-up periods are needed.

Trunk muscles influence lower limb performance in crossfit athletes: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Crossfit is a sport that combines cardio-respiratory and muscle endurance, strength, flexibility, muscle power, speed, coordination, agility and balance. However, there is no information in the literature regarding functional performance of the lower limbs and the endurance of core muscles in this population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between trunk strength/endurance and lower limb function through lower limb symmetry and balance tests.

METHODS

Forty-one young adults aged 19-41 years (26.3 ± 5.4) participated, 15 sedentary and 26 cross fit practitioners for at least one year. The tests were as follows: Biering-Sørensen Test of trunk extensor endurance, Trunk Flexors Endurance Test at 60°, Side Plank Endurance Test, Lumbar Dynamometry, Single-Leg Hop Test and Star Excursion Balance Test.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Although there were higher values, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the groups for lower limb symmetry and strength of trunk flexor muscles. For balance, strength and resistance variables of trunk extensor muscles, the values found were higher in crossfit practitioners than in sedentary subjects.

CONCLUSION

There is a relationship between trunk muscle strength and endurance and lower limb balance. Moreover, cross fit athletes showed higher values of trunk muscle strength/endurance and lower limb balance compared to sedentary adults.

The Biomechanical Analysis of Magnitude and Direction of Force by Different Techniques of Thoracic Spinal Manipulation

BACKGROUND

Spinal manipulation (SM) has been widely recognized and used with success in health care fields for spinal joint dysfunction and pain. SM is a procedure that involves small amplitude manipulative thrusts performed with speed. These forces are complex three-dimensional (3-D) forces delivered to create forces and moments at the joint of interest to cause joint movements. The aim of this study was to conduct a 3-dimensional analysis of the magnitude and direction of the forces transmitted in 2 techniques of thoracic spinal manipulation (TSM). Materials/Methods. Thirty-two healthy participants were recruited from the university community. The physical therapist performed TSM using anterior (A) to posterior (P) and P to A techniques once at each of T3, T7, and T12 spinal levels. The magnitude and direction of the forces transmitted during TSM were sensed by the force plates, and the camera system monitored vertebral motion by tracking motion markers.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences on the x-axis while there were significant differences on the y-axis between the measured spinal levels in the P to A technique. There were significant differences found at preload force maximum, preload force minimum, and peak force between T3 and T12 and between T7 and T12 and at peak base force between T7 and T12 on the z-axis. In the A to P technique, there were significant differences in the change of force in measured spinal levels at different axes.

CONCLUSION

These study findings can help therapists better understand the mechanism of TSM and enhance the clinical usefulness of TSM.

Effect of Pelvic Floor and Hip Muscle Strengthening in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of strengthening the hip muscles in addition to strengthening the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

METHODS

This study used a prospective, assessor-blind, randomized clinical trial with parallel groups. We randomly allocated 47 individuals with stress urinary incontinence to 2 groups: 1 performing only pelvic floor strengthening exercises (PF, n = 21) and the other performing pelvic floor strengthening exercises plus exercises for the gluteus maximus and medius and hip adductor muscles (PFH, n = 22). Four individuals did not complete the study. Frequency of urine leakage was the primary outcome (3-day voiding diary and a follow-up voiding diary). Secondary outcomes were pelvic floor muscle strength (Ortiz scale, PERFECT scheme [Oxford Scale], and perineometry) and quality of life (QoL; International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form and King's Health Questionnaire), which were evaluated by a blinded assessor before and after 20 sessions over 10 weeks.

RESULTS

Regarding the daily frequency of urine loss evaluated by the follow-up voiding diary, an effect of group was observed (P < .001), with the PFH group showing a significant decrease in daily loss frequency, although no significant differences were found in the comparison between groups for the 3-day voiding diary, QoL, or functional assessment of the PFM.

CONCLUSION

Strengthening the PFM together with the hip synergic muscles showed better results for frequency of daily urine loss throughout the sessions, although there was no accompanying superiority in improvement of strength, perineometry, or QoL over the group that performed only PFM-strengthening exercises.

Immediate Effects of a Single Spinal Manipulation on Lower-Limb Strength in Healthy Individuals: A Critically Appraised Topic

Clinical Scenario: Many people with lower quarter musculoskeletal dysfunction present with muscle weakness. Strength training hypertrophies muscle and increases strength, but often requires periods over 6 weeks, which can exceed the episode of care. Weakness can persist despite muscle hypertrophy, particularly in the early stages of joint pathology or in the presence of limb or spinal joint hypomobility, which may inhibit muscle activation. Emerging evidence suggests spinal manipulation can increase short-term strength. Screening for specific muscle weakness that could benefit from manipulation to particular spinal segments could facilitate efficient clinical intervention. Although the neuromuscular mechanisms through which manipulation can increase strength remains a topic of investigation, immediate gains can benefit patients by jump-starting an exercise program to train new muscle function gained and enhancing the motivation to continue strengthening. Evidence from randomized controlled trials would provide support for using manipulation to increase muscle strength, while studying healthy people would eliminate confounding factors, such as pain and pathology. Clinical Question: Does randomized controlled trial-level evidence support the concept that a single lumbar spine manipulation session can increase lower-limb strength in healthy individuals? Summary of Key Findings: Level 1b evidence of moderate quality from 3 randomized controlled trials showed immediate small to large effect size muscle strength increases immediately after lumbar spine manipulation. Clinical Bottom Line: Lumbar spine manipulation can result in immediate lower-limb isometric strength increases. While healthy people with normal muscle strength may improve minimally, joint manipulation for people with knee and hip weakness who are otherwise healthy can result in large effect size strength gains. Strength of Recommendation: Moderate quality level 1b evidence from randomized controlled trials with small samples support the use of spinal manipulation to immediately increase lower-limb strength. Additional studies investigating impact on strength and function immediately in people with musculoskeletal pathology are warranted.

The immediate effects of passive hip joint mobilization on hip abductor/external rotator muscle strength in patients with anterior knee pain and impaired hip function. A randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial

Background: Anterior knee pain (AKP) is often associated with persistent hip muscle weakness and facilitatory interventions may be beneficial for managing patients with AKP (pwAKP). Physiotherapists often employ passive oscillatory hip joint mobilizations to increase hip muscle function. However, there is little information about their effectiveness and the mechanisms of action involved. Objectives: To investigate the immediate effects of passive hip joint mobilization on eccentric hip abductor/external rotator muscle strength in pwAKP with impaired hip function. Design: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover design. Method: Eighteen patients with AKP participated in two sessions of data collection with one week apart. They received passive hip joint mobilization or placebo mobilization in a randomized order. Eccentric hip muscle strength was measured immediately before and after each intervention using a portable hand-held dynamometer. Results: An ANCOVA with the sequence of treatment condition as the independent variable, the within-subject post-treatment differences as the dependent variable and the within-subject pre-treatment differences as the covariate was conducted. Patients showed a significant mean increase in eccentric hip muscle strength of 7.73% (p = 0.001) for the mobilization condition, compared to a mean decrease of 4.22% for the placebo condition. Seventeen out of eighteen participants reported having no pain during any of the strength testing. Conclusion: These data suggest that passive hip joint mobilization has an immediate positive effect on eccentric hip abductor/external rotator muscle strength in pwAKP with impaired hip function, even in the absence of current pain.

The Effectiveness of Spinal Manipulation in Increasing Muscle Strength in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the effects of spinal manipulation on muscular strength in healthy individuals and conduct a meta-analysis to appraise the quality of evidence.

METHODS

Articles were searched and retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Academic Search Premier, SPORTDiscus, and AMED. Searches were conducted in September 2017 without a limit on the starting period. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale was used to appraise the quality of the included studies. Data from eligible articles were pooled, and meta-analyses were conducted. The quality of evidence was appraised by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach. The registration number for the review on PROSPERO is CRD42017075215.

RESULTS

A total of 911 records were screened, and 3 randomized controlled trials were eligible to be included in this review. There was a significant pooled standardized mean difference in isometric strength (0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-1.68; P = .02) between the experimental and control groups, with a moderate level of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

This review suggests that spinal manipulative therapy augments the percentage of change in isometric strength gain among healthy participants when compared to no intervention or sham manipulation. However, the heterogeneity of pooled studies in this review suggests that the results should be interpreted with caution.

The immediate effects of passive joint mobilisation on local muscle function. A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Passive joint mobilisation is popular among healthcare providers and their patients; however, its effectiveness for improving muscle function is not well researched and the mechanisms of action involved are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of passive joint mobilisations on the function of muscles surrounding the targeted joints in symptomatic as well as asymptomatic individuals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled experimental trials assessing the immediate effect of passive joint mobilisation on outcomes associated with local muscle function.

DATA COLLECTION

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of seventeen studies were included, of which ten studies reported data on asymptomatic individuals and seven studies reported data on symptomatic individuals with various conditions. There is a moderate level of evidence that joint mobilisation immediately decreases the activation of superficial muscles during low load conditions in symptomatic individuals. For asymptomatic individuals, there is a low level of evidence that passive joint mobilisation improves maximum muscle strength when compared to sham mobilisation, opposed to a very low level of evidence suggesting no effect in symptomatic individuals. The five studies reporting data on both, changes in muscle function as well as changes in pain, suggest that other, not pain-related mechanisms may play an important role regarding the reported improvement in muscle function.

CONCLUSION

Current best evidence suggests that passive joint mobilisation has the ability to immediately alter muscle function. The specific mechanisms of action involved require further basic science investigations. Registration number (PROSPERO): CRD42018117033.

Effect of manual therapy versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in dynamic balance, mobility and flexibility in field hockey players. A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of a specific Manual Therapy (MT) protocol applied to field hockey players (FHP), versus a Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) protocol, in the improvement of dynamic balance, active range of movement and lumbar flexibility one-week and four-weeks after the treatment.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial. Participants were assigned to 2 groups: MT and PNF. 30 min' sessions were performed once a week for three weeks. Three evaluations were performed: basal, one-week and four-weeks post-treatment.

SETTING

University of Valencia (Spain).

PARTICIPANTS

22 in MT group and 20 in PNF group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Dynamic Balance, measured with Star Excursion Balance Test; Active Range of Motion (ROM), using a manual goniometer and Lumbar Flexibility, assessed with Fingertip-to-floor test.

RESULTS

Both groups significantly improved in lateral and medial dynamic balance one-week post-treatment (p < 0.05); but the improvement in the MT group lasted until the fourth-week after treatment in both reaches (lateral and medial) (p < 0.05). MT group also obtained significant improvements in dorsal flexion of the ankle in the fourth-week post-treatment (p < 0.05) and in lumbar flexibility one-week post-treatment (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MT and PNF improve dynamic balance one-week post-treatment; however, the improvement obtained through MT is maintained four-weeks later. Only MT improves dorsal flexion of the ankle four-weeks post-treatment and lumbar flexibility one-week post-treatment.