Interrater and Intrarater Reliability and Minimum Detectable Change of Ultrasound for Active Myofascial Trigger Points in Upper Trapezius Muscle in Individuals With Shoulder Pain

Ischemic compression associated with joint mobilization does not promote additional clinical effects in individuals with rotator cuff related shoulder pain: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to verify which are the additional effects of the ischemic compression (IC) technique associated with joint mobilization techniques on pain, morphological aspects of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), function, and psychological aspects in individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP).

METHODS

Sixty individuals with RCRSP were randomly allocated intervention sessions the Mobilization Group (MG, n = 20), only joint mobilizations of the shoulder complex; intervention sessions Compression Group (CG, n = 20), with the same mobilizations associated with the IC over MTrPs; and Placebo Group (PG, n = 20), with the same mobilizations associated with placebo of IC. All interventions performed 2 per week, for 6-weeks. Pain was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale and function by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire. The kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, perception of improvement, mobility, pain threshold and area the MTrPs were also evaluated at baseline (week-0), after 6-weeks and after 10-weeks.

RESULTS

There were no between-group difference in pain: CG-MG 0.8 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.2), CG-PG 0.5 (95% CI 0.0 to 0.9), MG-PG -0.3 (95% CI -0.8 to 0.1) after 6-weeks and CG-MG 0.1 (95% CI -0.2 to 0.5), CG-PG -0.7 (95% CI -0.9 to -0,4), MG-PG -0,8 (95% CI -1.07 to 0.5) at 10-weeks. Similar effects were observed on function, characteristics of MTrPs and psychological aspects.

CONCLUSION

The IC technique on the MTrPs of the upper trapezius muscle associated with joint mobilization techniques has no additional effect on pain in individuals with RCRSP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

RBR-44v8y7.

Ultrasound Imaging and Guidance for Cervical Myofascial Pain: A Narrative Review

Cervical myofascial pain is a very common clinical condition in the daily practice of musculoskeletal physicians. Physical examination is currently the cornerstone for evaluating the cervical muscles and identifying the eventual presence of myofascial trigger points. Herein, the role of ultrasound assessment in precisely localizing them is progressively mounting in the pertinent literature. Moreover, using ultrasound, not only the muscle tissue but also the fascial and neural elements can be accurately located/evaluated. Indeed, several potential pain generators, in addition to paraspinal muscles, can be involved in the clinical scenario of cervical myofascial pain syndrome. In this article, the authors extensively reviewed the sonographic approach for cervical myofascial pain in order to better diagnose or guide different procedures that can be performed in the clinical practice of musculoskeletal physicians.

From Histoanatomy to Sonography in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM Approach

ABSTRACT

Myofascial pain is a common clinical condition, whereby accurate physical examination is usually considered as the cornerstone to identify/diagnose the "trigger point complex," that is, the characteristic finding of this syndrome. Considering the emerging role of ultrasound examination as the natural extension of physical assessment for musculoskeletal disorders, we briefly revise the histological/anatomical features of trigger points and propose a standardized, multistep sonographic approach to myofascial pain. We also imply that the integrated clinical-ultrasound evaluation could be considered as a potential tool to discriminate different phases/subsets of this challenging pathology.

Diagnostic Applications of Ultrasonography in Myofascial Trigger Points: A Scoping Review and Critical Appraisal of Literature

Objective:

Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are pathognomonic of myofascial pain syndrome. The detection ability of MTrPs via ultrasonography is underreported and the characteristics of MTrPs are not sufficiently standardized. The objective was to summarize the characteristics and diagnostic abilities of ultrasonography for MTrP investigations.

Materials and Methods:

A multi-database, and bibliography hand-search was implemented. Studies of ≥10 patients, published after 1980, appraising ultrasonography as a diagnostic aid for myofascial pain syndrome were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the included studies.

Results:

Six cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria. The back and trapezius muscles were the most studied locations. The diagnostic studies were of low-medium risk of bias. The studies reported a large range of diagnostic metrics (accuracy 58%–100%, sensitivity 33%–91%, specificity 75%–100%, positive predictive value 91%–100%, negative predictive value 47%–97%, positive likelihood ratio 3.6, and negative likelihood ratio 0.12–0.67).

Conclusion:

This review found low-medium risk of bias evidence in support of ultrasonography for MTrP investigations. The clinical studies identified in the scoping review used gray-scale ultrasound equipment systems with a 5 to 14 MHz transducer to diagnose MTrPs and the local twitch response, and MTrPs were visualized mostly as hypoechoic nodules.