Uncovering the triggers for GPCR activation using solid-state NMR spectroscopy

Flip-Flopping Retinal in Microbial Rhodopsins as a Template for a Farnesyl/Prenyl Flip-Flop Model in Eukaryote GPCRs

Thirty years after the first description and modeling of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), information about their mode of action is still limited. One of the questions that is hard to answer is: how do the allosteric changes in the GPCR induced by, e.g., ligand binding in the end activate a G protein-dependent intracellular pathway (e.g., via the cAMP or the phosphatidylinositol signal pathways). Another question relates to the role of prenylation of G proteins. Today's "consensus model" states that protein prenylation is required for the assembly of GPCR-G protein complexes. Although it is well-known that protein prenylation is the covalent addition of a farnesyl- or geranylgeranyl moiety to the C terminus of specific proteins, e.g., α or γ G protein, the reason for this strong covalent binding remains enigmatic. The arguments for a fundamental role for prenylation of G proteins other than just being a hydrophobic linker, are gradually accumulating. We uncovered a dilemma that at first glance may be considered physiologically irrelevant, however, it may cause a true change in paradigm. The consensus model suggests that the only functional role of prenylation is to link the G protein to the receptor. Does the isoprenoid nature of the prenyl group and its exact site of attachment somehow matter? Or, are there valid arguments favoring the alternative possibility that a key role of the G protein is to guide the covalently attached prenyl group to - and it hold it in - a very specific location in between specific helices of the receptor? Our model says that the farnesyl/prenyl group - aided by its covalent attachment to a G protein -might function in GPCRs as a horseshoe-shaped flexible (and perhaps flip-flopping) hydrophobic valve for restricting (though not fully inhibiting) the untimely passage of Ca2+, like retinal does for the passage of H+ in microbial rhodopsins that are ancestral to many GPCRs.

Binding of histamine to the H1 receptor-a molecular dynamics study

Binding of histamine to the G-protein coupled histamine H₁ receptor plays an important role in the context of allergic reactions; however, no crystal structure of the resulting complex is available yet. To deduce the histamine binding site, we performed unbiased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on a microsecond time scale, which allowed to monitor one binding event, in which particularly the residues of the extracellular loop 2 were involved in the initial recognition process. The final histamine binding pose in the orthosteric pocket is characterized by interactions with Asp107^3.32, Tyr108^3.33, Thr194^5.43, Asn198^5.46, Trp428^6.48, Tyr431^6.51, Phe432^6.52, and Phe435^6.55, which is in agreement with existing mutational data. The conformational stability of the obtained complex structure was subsequently confirmed in 2 μs equilibrium MD simulations, and a metadynamics simulation proved that the detected binding site represents an energy minimum. A complementary investigation of a D107A mutant, which has experimentally been shown to abolish ligand binding, revealed that this exchange results in a significantly weaker interaction and enhanced ligand dynamics. This finding underlines the importance of the electrostatic interaction between the histamine ammonium group and the side chain of Asp107^3.32 for histamine binding.

Protein Sequence and Membrane Lipid Roles in the Activation Kinetics of Bovine and Human Rhodopsins

Rhodopsin is a G protein-coupled receptor found in the rod outer segments in the retina, which triggers a visual response under dim light conditions. Recently, a study of the late, microsecond-to-millisecond kinetics of photointermediates of the human and bovine rhodopsins in their native membranes revealed a complex, double-square mechanism of rhodopsin activation. In this kinetic scheme, the human rhodopsin exhibited more Schiff base deprotonation than bovine rhodopsin, which could arise from the ∼7% sequence difference between the two proteins, or from the difference between their membrane lipid environments. To differentiate between the effects of membrane and protein structure on the kinetics, the human and bovine rhodopsins were inserted into 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine lipid nanodiscs and the kinetics of activation at 15°C and pH 8.7 was investigated by time-resolved absorption spectroscopy and global kinetic analysis. For both proteins, the kinetics in nanodiscs shows the characteristics observed in the native membranes, and is described by a multisquare model with Schiff base deprotonation at the lumirhodopsin I intermediate stage. The results indicate that the protein sequence controls the extent of Schiff base deprotonation and accumulation of intermediates, and thus plays the main role in the different activation kinetics observed between human and bovine rhodopsins. The membrane lipid does have a minor role by modulating the timing of the kinetics, with the nanodisc environment leading to an earlier Schiff base deprotonation.

Recent advances in biophysical studies of rhodopsins - Oligomerization, folding, and structure

Retinal-binding proteins, mainly known as rhodopsins, function as photosensors and ion transporters in a wide range of organisms. From halobacterial light-driven proton pump, bacteriorhodopsin, to bovine photoreceptor, visual rhodopsin, they have served as prototypical α-helical membrane proteins in a large number of biophysical studies and aided in the development of many cutting-edge techniques of structural biology and biospectroscopy. In the last decade, microbial and animal rhodopsin families have expanded significantly, bringing into play a number of new interesting structures and functions. In this review, we will discuss recent advances in biophysical approaches to retinal-binding proteins, primarily microbial rhodopsins, including those in optical spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance, and electron paramagnetic resonance, as applied to such fundamental biological aspects as protein oligomerization, folding, and structure.

New approaches towards the understanding of integral membrane proteins: A structural perspective on G protein-coupled receptors

Three-dimensional structure determination of integral membrane proteins has advanced in unprecedented detail our understanding of mechanistic events of how ion channels, transporters, receptors, and enzymes function. This exciting progress required a tremendous amount of methods development, as exemplified here with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs): Optimizing the production of GPCRs in recombinant hosts; increasing the probability of crystal formation using high-affinity ligands, nanobodies, and minimal G proteins for co-crystallization, thus stabilizing receptors into one conformation; using the T4 lysozyme technology and other fusion partners to promote crystal contacts; advancing crystallization methods including the development of novel detergents, and miniaturization and automation of the lipidic cubic phase crystallization method; the concept of conformational thermostabilization of GPCRs; and developing microfocus X-ray synchrotron technologies to analyze small GPCR crystals. However, despite immense progress to explain how GPCRs function, many receptors pose intractable hurdles to structure determination at this time. Three emerging methods, serial femtosecond crystallography, micro electron diffraction, and single particle electron cryo-microscopy, hold promise to overcome current limitations in structural membrane biology.

NMR as a tool to investigate the structure, dynamics and function of membrane proteins

Membrane-protein NMR occupies a unique niche for determining structures, assessing dynamics, examining folding, and studying the binding of lipids, ligands and drugs to membrane proteins. However, NMR analyses of membrane proteins also face special challenges that are not encountered with soluble proteins, including sample preparation, size limitation, spectral crowding and sparse data accumulation. This Perspective provides a snapshot of current achievements, future opportunities and possible limitations in this rapidly developing field.

Membrane-Mediated Oligomerization of G Protein Coupled Receptors and Its Implications for GPCR Function

The dimerization or even oligomerization of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) causes ongoing, controversial debates about its functional role and the coupled biophysical, biochemical or biomedical implications. A continously growing number of studies hints to a relation between oligomerization and function of GPCRs and strengthens the assumption that receptor assembly plays a key role in the regulation of protein function. Additionally, progress in the structural analysis of GPCR-G protein and GPCR-ligand interactions allows to distinguish between actively functional and non-signaling complexes. Recent findings further suggest that the surrounding membrane, i.e., its lipid composition may modulate the preferred dimerization interface and as a result the abundance of distinct dimeric conformations. In this review, the association of GPCRs and the role of the membrane in oligomerization will be discussed. An overview of the different reported oligomeric interfaces is provided and their capability for signaling discussed. The currently available data is summarized with regard to the formation of GPCR oligomers, their structures and dependency on the membrane microenvironment as well as the coupling of oligomerization to receptor function.

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) applied to membrane–protein complexes

Increasing evidence suggests that most proteins occur and function in complexes rather than as isolated entities when embedded in cellular membranes. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) provides increasing possibilities to study structure, dynamics and assembly of such systems. In our review, we discuss recent methodological progress to study membrane–protein complexes (MPCs) by NMR, starting with expression, isotope-labeling and reconstitution protocols. We review approaches to deal with spectral complexity and limited spectral spectroscopic sensitivity that are usually encountered in NMR-based studies of MPCs. We highlight NMR applications in various classes of MPCs, including G-protein-coupled receptors, ion channels and retinal proteins and extend our discussion to protein–protein complexes that span entire cellular compartments or orchestrate processes such as protein transport across or within membranes. These examples demonstrate the growing potential of NMR-based studies of MPCs to provide critical insight into the energetics of protein–ligand and protein–protein interactions that underlie essential biological functions in cellular membranes.