Disparities in stage at diagnosis for liver cancer in China

Clinicopathological and therapeutic comparisons of esophageal cancer between China and the USA: a multicenter hospital-based study

Background

Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a global health challenge due to its poor prognosis. China and the United States of America (USA) represent two distinct epicenters of EC burden. Understanding the EC disparities in these two countries is vital for tailoring prevention strategies, optimizing treatment, and enhancing outcomes in both countries. Yet, there lacks a comprehensive comparison of EC characteristics between the two countries.

Methods

In this multicenter, retrospective hospital-based study, we enrolled primary EC patients who received their initial treatment at one of 23 hospitals in China during 2016-2017. Using electronic medical records and cancer registration records, information on demographics, lifestyle, and clinicopathological characteristics (including tumor site, pathology, stage, metastases, differentiation, and treatment) were collected. Additionally, we compared these data with the clinicopathological information of invasive EC patients diagnosed in 2016-2017 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database in the USA.

Results

A total of 6,658 EC patients in China and 8,555 EC patients in the USA were included finally. 85.5% (n = 5,694) of EC were esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in China, while esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) was prominent in the USA (58.9%, n = 5,041). Among EC patients with known staging, the proportion of early stage was higher in China compared to the USA (48.3% vs. 30.5%). Among ESCC patients, early-stage cases were higher in China than in the USA (49.8% vs. 31.8%), while among EAC patients, late-stage cases were higher in China than in the USA (77.3% vs. 68.5%) (all P < 0.001). In China, EC mainly occurred in the middle third (60.2%) of the esophagus, whereas in the USA, it was more common in the lower third (59.9%) of the organ. Compared with EC patients with known metastatic status in the USA, China had fewer cases of lymph node metastases (51.4% vs. 57.7%) and distant metastases (7.9% vs. 33.8%). Regarding treatment, China had more surgical therapy (53.7% vs. 22.6%), less radiotherapy (35.6% vs. 53.3%), and less chemotherapy (46.7% vs. 59.7%) compared to the USA.

Conclusions

This study reveals notable disparities in EC between China and the USA, encompassing epidemiological, clinicopathological, and treatment dimensions. These findings provide insight for tailored strategies addressing regional variations in clinicopathological and therapeutic characteristics.

Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced MRI improves diagnosis and efficacy evaluation of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the use of hepatocyte-specific contrast agent Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) in the diagnosis and efficacy evaluation of patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective clinical study was conducted on 157 patients diagnosed with stage Ia-Ib liver cancer. Of these, 100 patients underwent preoperative EOB-MRI, while 57 patients underwent contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT). The study compared the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of these two imaging modalities in diagnosing early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. In the EOB-MRI group, 100 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation or interventional procedures, and imaging data were collected post-scan. The following arterial and hepatobiliary phase enhancement features were analyzed: length-diameter difference (LDD), signal intensity ratio of metastases to liver parenchyma (RatioM/L), relative signal intensity difference (RSID), normalized relative enhancement (NRE), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Based on treatment outcomes, patients were categorized into high and low response rate groups, and the imaging parameters between these two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the significance of these parameters in predicting patient outcomes.

RESULTS

The accuracy of lesion detection by EOB-MRI was 97.4%, significantly higher than that of CECT (80.0%) (P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the EOB-MRI group was 0.923 (95% CI: 0.784-1.000), with a sensitivity of 97.4% and a specificity of 83.3%. In comparison, the AUC for the CECT group was 0.712 (95% CI: 0.582-0.843), with a sensitivity of 77.2% and a specificity of 65.2%. The median response rate of patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma to systemic therapy was 60% (range: 36%-81%). Using 60% as the cut-off value, patients were divided into a high response rate group (n = 53) and a low response rate group (n = 47). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of the EOB-MRI parameters in both groups identified ADC and NRE as independent predictors for assessing the treatment efficacy of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

EOB-MRI is effective for both the diagnosis and evaluation of treatment efficacy in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Effectiveness and safety of vascular intervention plus lenvatinib versus vascular intervention alone for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus: a retrospective comparative study

Background

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of vascular intervention combined with lenvatinib versus vascular intervention alone in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), and to identify prognostic factors associated with the treatment outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 92 patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who were treated between February 2016 and February 2023. Among them, 56 patients underwent vascular intervention alone (transarterial chemoembolization, TACE), while 36 patients received vascular intervention (TACE or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy [HAIC]) combined with lenvatinib. The primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). Survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and confounders were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Prognostic factors were determined through the Cox regression model.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 20.07 months (interquartile range: 6.41-25.36). The combination therapy group had a significantly longer median PFS (11.00 vs. 5.00 months, P<0.05) and OS (12.91 vs. 6.83 months, P<0.05) in comparison to the monotherapy group, and these findings remained consistent after IPTW matching. Moreover, the combination therapy group showed a higher ORR (55.56% vs. 26.79%, P<0.05) based on mRECIST criteria. Cox multivariate analysis identified extrahepatic metastasis and maximum tumor diameter as risk factors for PFS, while age, tumor number, and maximum tumor diameter influenced OS. Combined treatment emerged as a protective factor for OS. In the combination therapy group, hypertension was the most frequent adverse event, with grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurring rarely.

Conclusion

The combination of vascular intervention with lenvatinib has demonstrated improved PFS and OS in advanced HCC patients with PVTT, and its safety profile appears to be acceptable. Adoption of this combined treatment strategy at an earlier stage may enhance patient outcomes.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapies in hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer, specifically hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The development of effective systemic therapies, particularly those involving immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has substantially improved the outcomes of patients with advanced-stage HCC. Approximately 30% of patients are diagnosed with early stage disease and currently receive potentially curative therapies, such as resection, liver transplantation or local ablation, which result in median overall survival durations beyond 60 months. Nonetheless, up to 70% of these patients will have disease recurrence within 5 years of resection or local ablation. To date, the results of randomized clinical trials testing adjuvant therapy in patients with HCC have been negative. This major unmet need has been addressed with the IMbrave 050 trial, demonstrating a recurrence-free survival benefit in patients with a high risk of relapse after resection or local ablation who received adjuvant atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In parallel, studies testing neoadjuvant ICIs alone or in combination in patients with early stage disease have also reported efficacy. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current approaches to manage patients with early stage HCC. We also describe the tumour immune microenvironment and the mechanisms of action of ICIs and cancer vaccines in this setting. Finally, we summarize the available evidence from phase II/III trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches and discuss emerging clinical trials, identification of biomarkers and clinical trial design considerations for future studies.

LINC01134: a pivotal oncogene with promising predictive maker and therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a leading and fatal malignancy within the gastrointestinal tract. Recent advancements highlight the pivotal role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in diverse biological pathways and pathologies, particularly in tumorigenesis. LINC01134, a particular lncRNA, has attracted considerable attention due to its oncogenic potential in hepatoma. Current research underscores LINC01134's potential in augmenting the onset and progression of HCC, with notable implications in drug resistance. This review comprehensively explores the molecular functions and regulatory mechanisms of LINC01134 in HCC, offering a fresh perspective for therapeutic interventions. By delving into LINC01134's multifaceted roles, we aim to foster novel strategies in HCC management.

Cancer profiles in China and comparisons with the USA: a comprehensive analysis in the incidence, mortality, survival, staging, and attribution to risk factors

China faces a disproportionate cancer burden to the population size and is undergoing a transition in the cancer spectrum. We extracted data in five aspects of cancer incidence, mortality, survival, staging distributions, and attribution to risk factors in China, the USA and worldwide from open-source databases. We conducted a comprehensive secondary analysis of cancer profiles in China in the above aspects, and compared cancer statistics between China and the USA. A total of 4,546,400 new cancer cases and 2,992,600 deaths occurred in China in 2020, accounting for 25.1% and 30.2% of global cases, respectively. Lifestyle-related cancers including lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer showed an upward trend and have been the leading cancer types in China. 41.6% of new cancer cases and 49.3% of cancer deaths occurred in digestive-system cancers in China, and the cancers of esophagus, nasopharynx, liver, and stomach in China accounted for over 40% of global cases. Infection-related cancers showed the highest population-attributable fractions among Chinese adults, and most cancers could be attributed to behavioral and metabolic factors. The proportions of stage I for most cancer types were much higher in the USA than in China, except for esophageal cancer (78.2% vs. 41.1%). The 5-year relative survival rates in China have improved substantially during 2000-2014, whereas survival for most cancer types in the USA was significantly higher than in China, except for upper gastrointestinal cancers. Our findings suggest that although substantial progress has been made in cancer control, especially in digestive system cancers in China, there was still a considerable disparity in cancer burden between China and the USA. More robust policies on risk factors and standardized screening practices are urgently warranted to curb the cancer growth and improve the prognosis for cancer patients.