Altered fractionation radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Effect of definitive hypo-fractionated radiotherapy concurrent with weekly cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

To mitigate the risk of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients, it is recommended to utilize hypo-fractionated treatment schedules that aim to minimize the overall duration of treatment. In this study, we aimed to determine whether hypo-fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (hypo-IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy was practical, effective, and could achieve acceptable tumor control rates for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We enrolled 62 patients with high-risk stage II, stage III, and IVA SCCHN who received hypo-IMRT (62.5 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks 2.5Gy/fraction with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m²). Our primary endpoint was to assess acute toxicity, while our secondary endpoints were late toxicity, loco-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. The percentages of grade 3 acute pain, dermatitis, mucositis, and dysphagia were 71%, 19.4%, 72.6%, and 41.9%, respectively. The rates of late xerostomia, dysphagia, dental complications, grade 3 pain, and grade 3 weight loss were 72.6%, 62.9%, 27.4%, 4.8%, and 4.3%, respectively. At a median follow-up time of 24 months, 2-year loco-regional control and overall survival were 87.1% and 83.9%, respectively. Disease-free survival was 100%, 89.5%, and 69% in stages II, III, and IV%, respectively, with a significant p-value of 0.024. This regimen was effective and relatively safe, with acceptable and tolerable acute and late toxicity. Given the reduced need for hospital visits, hypo-fractionated schedules may represent an alternative treatment during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Outcome of Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Can be Predicted by Expression of eIF4E and Osteopontin in Free Surgical Margins

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) is recognized as the third most common cause of death. Incomplete resection of the primary tumor is the main cause of local recurrence and poor prognosis in HNSCC. Histologic assessment in order to determine "tumor-free" margins could be inadequate because of malignant transformation occurs at the molecular level earlier than the morphologic level. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and Osteopontin in the tumor cells and histologically tumor free surgical margins of HNSCC. This cohort study was performed on 60 cases of HNSCC diagnosed at the Department of Pathology and treated at the Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University. Our enrolled formalin fixed paraffin embedded biopsy specimens with their matched tumor free surgical margins from resected head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were immunostaind for eIF4E and Osteopontin markers. 65% of our HNSCC patients had eIF4 E positive cytoplasmic immunostaining and 70% of them exhibited Osteopontin staining. Two-thirds of the dead patients exhibited high Osteopontin positive staining, whereas the surviving group did not exhibit this high expression. Concerning eIF4E, 85% and 5% of the dead patients showed high and low eIF4E expression, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were significantly (P=0.000) different between high and negative expression of Osteopontin, high and negative expression of eIF4E. 84% of patients with eIF4E positive margins and 75% with Osteopontin positive margins had local recurrence. In addition, negative expression of eIF4E is associated with highly significant better DFS and overall survival (P=0.000 and 0.001), respectively, in the margin negative expression status, while negative expression of Osteopontin was significantly associated with better DFS but of no significance in overall survival outcome. Our findings suggest that tumor-free surgical margins in HNSCC may be redefined as histologically Osteopontin and eIF4E negative resection margins. However, multicenter prospective studies are required to further evaluate their clinical utility in the surgical management of primary HNSCC.

Improving organ at risk sparing in oropharyngeal treatment planning by increasing target dose heterogeneity: A feasibility study

Target dose homogeneity has historically been a priority in radiotherapy treatment planning. However, in an era of more advanced modulated techniques, there is now greater flexibility in shaping dose distributions suggesting that allowing controlled target dose heterogeneity may consequently improve organ at risk (OAR) sparing. This study sought to determine the feasibility of allowing an increase in target dose heterogeneity in oropharyngeal VMAT plans, and to examine the dosimetric impact this has on target coverage and OARs such as the parotid glands, spinal cord, brainstem and mandible. Nineteen oropharyngeal patients' plans were created with homogeneous dose distributions specified in the London Cancer Head and Neck Radiotherapy Protocol. The upper dose constraint (UDC) objective of the primary planning target volumes (PTV) for each plan were increased in increments of 10% until a maximum of 150% of the prescribed dose was reached. These plans were dosimetrically compared to plans with a uniform dose distribution in terms of OAR sparing and target coverage. Minimal coverage was not compromised, with the largest median changes being a 0.81% decrease [98.6 to 97.8%] to the PTV_70Gy D98% and a 2.86% decrease [99.81 to 96.96%] to the PTV_54Gy D98% at a UDC of 150% of the prescription dose. An OAR sparing effect was observed for the parotid glands, spinal cord and oral cavity sub PTV. Mandible and brainstem Dmax values increased as the PTV UDC increased. Changes in brainstem dose were not statistically significant. All other differences were statistically significant for UDC's above 130%. Target coverage was not compromised as a result of increased target dose heterogeneity. The OAR sparing effect was promising for most organs, however further research with a larger dataset is necessary surrounding the effect on organs that overlap with the PTV.

A review of Image Guided Radiation Therapy in head and neck cancer from 2009-201 - Best Practice Recommendations for RTTs in the Clinic

Radiation therapy (RT) is beneficial in Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) in both the definitive and adjuvant setting. Highly complex and conformal planning techniques are becoming standard practice in delivering increased doses in HNC. A sharp falloff in dose outside the high dose area is characteristic of highly complex techniques and geometric uncertainties must be minimised to prevent under dosage of the target volume and possible over dosage of surrounding critical structures. CTV-PTV margins are employed to account for geometric uncertainties such as set up errors and both interfraction and intrafraction motion. Robust immobilisation and Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) is also essential in this group of patients to minimise discrepancies in patient position during the treatment course. IGRT has evolved with increased 2-Dimensional (2D) and 3-Dimensional (3D) IGRT modalities available for geometric verification. 2D and 3D IGRT modalities are both beneficial in geometric verification while 3D imaging is a valuable tool in assessing volumetric changes that may have dosimetric consequences for this group of patients. IGRT if executed effectively and efficiently provides clinicians with confidence to reduce CTV-PTV margins thus limiting treatment related toxicities in patients. Accumulated exposure dose from IGRT vary considerably and may be incorporated into the treatment plan to avoid excess dose. However, there are considerable variations in the application of IGRT in RT practice. This paper aims to summarise the advances in IGRT in HNC treatment and provide clinics with recommendations for an IGRT strategy for HNC in the clinic.

Six fractions weekly as accelerated fraction radiotherapy: Is it applicable for nasopharyngeal cancer? A review

Standard therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is concurrent chemoradiation. Nevertheless, therapeutic outcomes are often unsatisfactory particularly for locally advanced stage. To enhance the therapeutic outcome, we may consider using altered fraction radiotherapy. Altered fraction radiotherapy is divided into two large groups for the therapy of NPC: hyperfraction radiotherapy and accelerated fraction radiotherapy. One of the accelerated fraction regimens suitable for NPC therapy is an accelerated regimen of six radiotherapy fractions weekly. This regimen is considered safe whether using conventional 2D planning technique or advance technique. Response to radiotherapy is better owing to the decrease in overall treatment time (OTT). Furthermore, acute or late side effects for this therapy are not very different to those of standard therapy. The conclusion is that we recommend the use of an accelerated regimen of six radiotherapy fractions weekly for locally advanced stage NPC with contraindication to concurrent chemoradiation, due to the high degree of clinical outcome as well as better tolerated side effect for NPC patients, particularly for those with locally advanced stage NPC.

Accelerated Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

The benefits of accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HART) and conventional fractionation radiotherapy (CFRT) in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) remain controversial. In this study, we analyzed the therapeutic effects of these two treatment regimens to explore whether HART can improve the overall survival (OS) rate and locoregional control (LRC) rate in patients with HNC.

Methods

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for eligible studies. The OS rate and LRC rate were considered as the efficacy outcomes. I² was used to test the heterogeneity among studies with a cutoff value of 50%. Potential publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger's test. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to assess the stability of the results. In this meta-analysis, all analyses were performed using R 3.5.3 software.

Results

Twelve qualified articles including a total of 2,935 patients were identified. HART had a significant beneficial effect on OS rate (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65–0.98). Compared with CFRT, HART demonstrated a significantly higher LRC rate (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71–0.96).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis showed that HART can significantly improve OS and LRC compared with CFRT in patients with HNC.

Altered fractionation radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer: a network meta-analysis

Objectives

A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted in patients with head and neck cancers (HNCs) to estimate the efficacy and safety of treatment with conventional fractionation radiotherapy (CF), conventional fractionation chemoradiotherapy (CF_CRT), hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HF), hyperfractionated chemoradiotherapy (HF_CRT), accelerated fractionation radiotherapy, accelerated fractionation chemoradiotherapy, accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HART) or accelerated hyperfractionated chemoradiotherapy (HACRT) to identify superior treatments to aid in clinical decisions.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for potentially eligible randomized controlled trials up to December 2016. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional control (LRC) were considered efficacy outcomes, whereas acute toxicity and late toxicity on skin and mucosa were considered safety outcomes. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank each treatment in each index.

Results

Data from 72 trials with 21,868 participants were included in the analysis. Concerning OS, all treatments were associated with a significant advantage compared to CF alone, with HR effect sizes ranging from 0.64 to 0.83, and HACRT was significantly more effective than all the other treatments. The network comparisons of both HACRT vs HART and HF_CRT vs HF demonstrated a higher OS benefit, with an HR of 0.78 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.64–0.95) and 0.78 (95% CrI: 0.61–0.99), respectively. The results of SUCRA indicated that HACRT had the best ranking for OS and LRC, HF_CRT for DFS, HART for acute and late skin toxicity, CF_CRT for acute mucosal toxicity and HF_CRT for late mucosal toxicity.

Conclusion

The NMA results support the notion that HACRT is the preferable treatment modality for HNCs because it has better rankings in all three efficacy indexes, although it does present a high risk of acute mucosal toxicity.

Accelerated or hyperfractionated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified (accelerated and/or hyperfractionated) radiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma, compared with conventional radiotherapy.

Methods

Studies published in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CBM, VIP, CNKI and Wanfang databases in the most recent two decades were searched for use in this meta-analysis. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The heterogeneity analysis and calculation of the pooled odds ratio (OR) were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The assessment of publication bias and sensitivity analyses was conducted using Stata 13.0 software.

Results

Twenty trials with a total of 1,742 Chinese patients who met the inclusion criteria were included. The pooled results showed that modified radiotherapy improved the response rate compared with conventional schedules (OR =3.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.47–6.16, P<0.001). Favorable results were observed for the 1-year (OR =2.58, 95% CI: 2.05–3.26, P<0.001), 3-year (OR =2.30, 95% CI: 1.83–2.89, P<0.001) and 5-year (OR =2.36, 95% CI: 1.74–3.21, P<0.001) overall survival and for the 1-year (OR =2.46, 95% CI: 1.72–3.51, P<0.001), 3-year (OR =2.08, 95% CI: 1.49–2.90, P<0.001) and 5-year (OR =2.15, 95% CI: 1.38–3.34, P<0.001) overall local control rate in the modified fractionation radiotherapy group. However, the altered radiotherapy increased the risk of acute radiation esophagitis (OR =1.70, 95% CI: 1.27–2.28, P<0.001) and acute radiation tracheitis (OR =1.47, 95% CI: 1.09–1.99, P=0.01). No significant differences in the risk of esophageal perforation (OR =1.30, 95% CI: 0.51–3.32, P=0.58) or esophagorrhagia (OR =0.88, 95% CI: 0.41–1.88, P=0.74) were found between the two groups.

Conclusion

Chinese patients with squamous cell esophagus carcinomas gained a significant benefit in terms of the response rate, survival and local control rates from the modified fractionation radiotherapy, but also had an increased risk of acute radiation reactions. Otherwise, there was no observed statistically significant difference in terms of early adverse reactions.