1
|
Holmes NP, Di Chiaro NV, Crowe EM, Marson B, Göbel K, Gaigalas D, Jay T, Lockett AV, Powell ES, Zeni S, Reader AT. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over supramarginal gyrus stimulates primary motor cortex directly and impairs manual dexterity: implications for TMS focality. J Neurophysiol 2024; 131:360-378. [PMID: 38197162 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00369.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Based on human motor cortex, the effective spatial resolution of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is often described as 5-20 mm, because small changes in TMS coil position can have large effects on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). MEPs are often studied at rest, with muscles relaxed. During muscle contraction and movement, corticospinal excitability is higher, thresholds for effective stimulation are lower, and MEPs can be evoked from larger regions of scalp, so the effective spatial resolution of TMS is larger. We found that TMS over the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) impaired manual dexterity in the grooved pegboard task. It also resulted in short-latency MEPs in hand muscles, despite the coil being 55 mm away from the motor cortex hand area (M1). MEPs might be evoked by either a specific corticospinal connection from SMG or a remote but direct electromagnetic stimulation of M1. To distinguish these alternatives, we mapped MEPs across the scalp during rest, isotonic contraction, and manual dexterity tasks and ran electric field simulations to model the expected M1 activation from 27 scalp locations and four coil orientations. We also systematically reviewed studies using TMS during movement. Across five experiments, TMS over SMG reliably evoked MEPs during hand movement. These MEPs were consistent with direct M1 stimulation and substantially decreased corticospinal thresholds during natural movement. Systematic review suggested that 54 published experiments may have suffered from similar motor activation confounds. Our results have implications for the assumed spatial resolution of TMS, and especially when TMS is presented within 55 mm of the motor cortex.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is often described as having an effective spatial resolution of ∼10 mm, because of the limited area of the scalp on which TMS produces motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in resting muscles. We find that during natural hand movement TMS evokes MEPs from a much larger scalp area, in particular when stimulating over the supramarginal gyrus 55 mm away. Our results show that TMS can be effective at much larger distances than generally assumed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas P Holmes
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Emily M Crowe
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Marson
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Göbel
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Dominykas Gaigalas
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Talia Jay
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Abigail V Lockett
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Eleanor S Powell
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Silvia Zeni
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Arran T Reader
- Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Application of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Map the Supplementary Motor Area in Healthy Subjects. J Clin Neurophysiol 2020; 37:140-149. [DOI: 10.1097/wnp.0000000000000530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
3
|
Chen H, Pan X, Bickerton WL, Lau JK, Zhou J, Zhou B, Harris L, Rotshtein P. Delineating the cognitive-neural substrates of writing: a large scale behavioral and voxel based morphometry study. Sci Rep 2019; 9:18881. [PMID: 31827143 PMCID: PMC6906401 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55129-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The current study investigated the cognitive and neural substrates that underpin writing ability. We explored similarities and differences in writing numbers and words and compared these to language and manual actions in a large group of sub-acute, stroke patients (n = 740). The behavioral data showed association and dissociation in the ability to write words and numbers. Comorbidities of writing deficits with both language and motor impairments were prevalent, with less than a handful showing deficits restricted to the writing tasks. A second analysis with a subset of patients (n = 267) explored the neural networks that mediate writing abilities. Lesion to right temporal contributed to writing words, while lesions to left postcentral contributed to writing numbers. Overlapping neural mechanisms included the bilateral prefrontal cortex, right inferior parietal, left middle occipital and the right cerebellum. With the former regions associated with error pattern typical to writing based on prior knowledge (the lexical route), while lesion to left MOG was associated with errors to the phonological (non-lexical) route. Using principle components extracted from the behavioral data, we showed that right prefrontal and right parietal contributed to the ability to use pen, while lesion to bilateral prefrontal, inferior temporal and cerebellum supported unique use of pen for writing. The behavioral and imaging data suggested that writing numbers and words primarily relied on overlapping cognitive and neural functions. Incidents of pure writing deficits, in the absence of motor or language deficits were rare. Nevertheless, the PCA and neural data suggested that writing abilities were associated with some unique neuro-cognitive functions, specifically dedicated to the use of pen and the ability to transform meaning to motor command.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haobo Chen
- Department of Neurology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, P.R. China.
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Xiaoping Pan
- Department of Neurology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, P.R. China.
| | | | - Johnny King Lau
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Harry Pitt Building, Reading, RG6 7BE, UK
| | - Jin Zhou
- Department of Neurology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, P.R. China
| | - Beinan Zhou
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- Faculty of linguistics, philology and phonetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK
| | - Lara Harris
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Pia Rotshtein
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raffa G, Quattropani MC, Germanò A. When imaging meets neurophysiology: the value of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative neurophysiological mapping prior to brain tumor surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2019; 47:E10. [DOI: 10.3171/2019.9.focus19640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Maximal safe resection is the modern goal for surgery of intrinsic brain tumors located in or close to brain eloquent areas. Nowadays different neuroimaging techniques provide important anatomical and functional information regarding the brain functional organization that can be used to plan a customized surgical strategy to preserve functional networks, and to increase the extent of tumor resection. Among these techniques, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has recently gained great favor among the neurosurgical community for preoperative mapping and planning prior to brain tumor surgery. It represents an advanced neuroimaging technique based on the neurophysiological mapping of the functional cortical brain organization. Moreover, it can be combined with other neuroimaging techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging tractography, thus providing a reliable reconstruction of brain eloquent networks. Consequently, nTMS mapping may provide reliable noninvasive brain functional mapping, anticipating information that otherwise may be available to neurosurgeons only in the operating theater by using direct electrical stimulation. The authors describe the reliability and usefulness of the preoperative nTMS-based approach in neurosurgical practice, and briefly discuss their experience using nTMS as well as currently available evidence in the literature supporting its clinical use. In particular, special attention is reserved for the discussion of the role of nTMS as a novel tool for the preoperative neurophysiological mapping of motor and language networks prior to surgery of intrinsic brain tumors located in or close to eloquent networks, as well as for future and promising applications of nTMS in neurosurgical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Raffa
- 1Division of Neurosurgery, BIOMORF Department, University of Messina, Italy; and
| | | | - Antonino Germanò
- 1Division of Neurosurgery, BIOMORF Department, University of Messina, Italy; and
| |
Collapse
|