A method for continuous and stable perfusion of tissue and single cell preparations with accurate concentrations of volatile anaesthetics

Lack of influence of dexmedetomidine on rat glomus cell response to hypoxia, and on mouse acute hypoxic ventilatory response

Background and Aims

There is a lack of basic science data on the effect of dexmedetomidine on the hypoxic chemosensory reflex with both depression and stimulation suggested. The primary aim of this study was to assess if dexmedetomidine inhibited the cellular response to hypoxia in rat carotid body glomus cells, the cells of the organs mediating acute hypoxic ventilatory response (AHVR). Additionally, we used a small sample of mice to assess if there was any large influence of subsedative doses of dexmedetomidine on AHVR.

Material and Methods

In the primary study, glomus cells isolated from neonatal rats were used to study the effect of 0.1 nM (n = 9) and 1 nM (n = 13) dexmedetomidine on hypoxia-elicited intracellular calcium [Ca2%]i influx using ratiometric fluorimetry. Secondarily, whole animal unrestrained plethysmography was used to study AHVR in a total of 8 age-matched C57BL6 mice, divided on successive days into two groups of four mice randomly assigned to receive sub-sedative doses of 5, 50, or 500 μg.kg-1 dexmedetomidine versus control in a crossover study design (total n = 12 exposures to drug with n = 12 controls).

Results

There was no effect of dexmedetomidine on the hypoxia-elicited increase in [Ca2%]i in glomus cells (a mean ± SEM increase of 95 ± 32 nM from baseline with control hypoxia, 124 ± 41 nM with 0.1 nM dexmedetomidine; P = 0.514). In intact mice, dexmedetomidine had no effect on baseline ventilation during air-breathing (4.01 ± 0.3 ml.g-1.min-1 in control and 2.99 ± 0.5 ml.g-1.min-1 with 500 μg.kg-1 dexmedetomidine, the highest dose; P = 0.081) or on AHVR (136 ± 19% increase from baseline in control, 152 ± 46% with 500 μg.kg-1 dexmedetomidine, the highest dose; P = 0.536).

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine had no effect on the cellular responses to hypoxia. We conclude that it unlikely acts via inhibition of oxygen sensing at the glomus cell. The respiratory chemoreflex effects of this drug remain an open question. In our small sample of intact mice, hypoxic chemoreflex responses and basal breathing were preserved.

Competitive Interactions between Halothane and Isoflurane at the Carotid Body and TASK Channels

Background

The degree to which different volatile anesthetics depress carotid body hypoxic response relates to their ability to activate TASK potassium channels. Most commonly, volatile anesthetic pairs act additively at their molecular targets. We examined whether this applied to carotid body TASK channels.

Methods

We studied halothane and isoflurane effects on hypoxia-evoked rise in intracellular calcium (Ca2+i, using the indicator Indo-1) in isolated neonatal rat glomus cells, and TASK single-channel activity (patch clamping) in native glomus cells and HEK293 cell line cells transiently expressing TASK-1.

Results

Halothane (5%) depressed glomus cell Ca2+i hypoxic response (mean ± SD, 94 ± 4% depression; P < 0.001 vs. control). Isoflurane (5%) had a less pronounced effect (53 ± 10% depression; P < 0.001 vs. halothane). A mix of 3% isoflurane/1.5% halothane depressed cell Ca2+i response (51 ± 17% depression) to a lesser degree than 1.5% halothane alone (79 ± 15%; P = 0.001), but similar to 3% isoflurane alone (44 ± 22%; P = 0.224), indicating subadditivity. Halothane and isoflurane increased glomus cell TASK-1/TASK-3 activity, but mixes had a lesser effect than that seen with halothane alone: 4% halothane/4% isoflurane yielded channel open probabilities 127 ± 55% above control, versus 226 ± 12% for 4% halothane alone (P = 0.009). Finally, in HEK293 cell line cells, progressively adding isoflurane (1.5 to 5%) to halothane (2.5%) reduced TASK-1 channel activity from 120 ± 38% above control, to 88 ± 48% (P = 0.034).

Conclusions

In all three experimental models, the effects of isoflurane and halothane combinations were quantitatively consistent with the modeling of weak and strong agonists competing at a common receptor on the TASK channel.

Editor’s Perspective

What We Already Know about This Topic

What This Article Tells Us That Is New

Influence of propofol on isolated neonatal rat carotid body glomus cell response to hypoxia and hypercapnia

•

The intravenous anaesthetic propofol acts directly on carotid body glomus cells to inhibit their response to hypoxia.

•

Propofol acts via novel mechanisms, as we excluded action via its known target receptors (nicotinic, GABA-ergic, or K+ channel).

•

Inhibition of the hypoxic response is clinically relevant in anaesthesia.

In humans the intravenous anaesthetic propofol depresses ventilatory responses to hypoxia and CO₂. Animal studies suggest that this may in part be due to inhibition of synaptic transmission between chemoreceptor glomus cells of the carotid body and the afferent carotid sinus nerve. It is however unknown if propofol can also act directly on the glomus cell. Here we report that propofol can indeed inhibit intracellular Ca²⁺ responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia in isolated rat glomus cells. Neither this propofol effect, nor the glomus cell response to hypoxia in the absence of propofol, were influenced by GABA receptor activation (using GABA, muscimol and baclofen) or inhibition (using bicuculline and 5-aminovaleric acid). Suggesting that these effects of propofol are not mediated through GABA receptors. Propofol inhibited calcium responses to nicotine in glomus cells but the nicotinic antagonists vecuronium and methyllycaconitine did not inhibit calcium responses to hypoxia. TASK channel activity was not altered by propofol. The glomus cell Ca²⁺ response to depolarisation with 30 mM K⁺ was however modestly inhibited by propofol. In summary we conclude that propofol does have a direct effect upon hypoxia signalling in isolated type-1 cells and that this may be partially due to its ability to inhibit voltage gated Ca²⁺_v channels. We also note that propofol has the capacity to supress glomus cell excitation via nicotinic receptors and may therefore also interfere with paracrine/autocrine cholinergic signalling in the intact organ. The effects of propofol on chemoreceptor function are however clearly complex and require further investigation.

Acute oxygen sensing by the carotid body: from mitochondria to plasma membrane

Maintaining oxygen homeostasis is crucial to the survival of animals. Mammals respond acutely to changes in blood oxygen levels by modulating cardiopulmonary function. The major sensor of blood oxygen that regulates breathing is the carotid body (CB), a small chemosensory organ located at the carotid bifurcation. When arterial blood oxygen levels drop in hypoxia, neuroendocrine cells in the CB called glomus cells are activated to signal to afferent nerves that project to the brain stem. The mechanism by which hypoxia stimulates CB sensory activity has been the subject of many studies over the past 90 years. Two discrete models emerged that argue for the seat of oxygen sensing to lie either in the plasma membrane or mitochondria of CB cells. Recent studies are bridging the gap between these models by identifying hypoxic signals generated by changes in mitochondrial function in the CB that can be sensed by plasma membrane proteins on glomus cells. The CB is important for physiological adaptation to hypoxia, and its dysfunction contributes to sympathetic hyperactivity in common conditions such as sleep-disordered breathing, chronic heart failure, and insulin resistance. Understanding the basic mechanism of oxygen sensing in the CB could allow us to develop strategies to target this organ for therapy. In this short review, I will describe two historical models of CB oxygen sensing and new findings that are integrating these models.