Distinguishing CNS neurosarcoidosis from multiple sclerosis and an approach to “overlap” cases

Uveitis in the Setting of Co-Existing Systemic Sarcoidosis and Multiple Sclerosis

We report a case of intermediate uveitis in the setting of both systemic sarcoidosis and multiple sclerosis. A 68-year-old female was diagnosed with bilateral granulomatous intermediate uveitis and cystoid macular edema. Initial systemic work-up was unrevealing. The uveitis was treated successfully with local corticosteroid injections. Eighteen months after presentation, the patient developed new systemic symptoms. Additional testing revealed systemic lymphadenopathy, with biopsy showing non-caseating granulomas, leading to a diagnosis of sarcoidosis. However, MRI of the brain and spinal cord along with cerebrospinal fluid analysis was consistent with MS. The management of the uveitis and systemic inflammation was co-managed by ophthalmology, neurology, and rheumatology, and eventually controlled with leflunomide and rituximab. Patients can rarely have co-existing systemic sarcoidosis and multiple sclerosis. Although challenging to diagnose, radiographic findings and cerebrospinal fluid analysis can be helpful to differentiate multiple sclerosis and neurosarcoidosis. Management of these patients requires coordination between multiple specialties.

Neurosarcoidosis: Diagnostic Challenges and Mimics A Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neurosarcoidosis is a rare manifestation of sarcoidosis that is challenging to diagnose. Biopsy confirmation of granulomas is not sufficient, as other granulomatous diseases can present similarly. This review is intended to guide the clinician in identifying key conditions to exclude prior to concluding a diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although new biomarkers are being studied, there are no reliable tests for neurosarcoidosis. Advances in serum testing and imaging have improved the diagnosis for key mimics of neurosarcoidosis in certain clinical scenarios, but biopsy remains an important method of differentiation. Key mimics of neurosarcoidosis in all cases include infections (tuberculosis, fungal), autoimmune disease (vasculitis, IgG4-related disease), and lymphoma. As neurosarcoidosis can affect any part of the nervous system, patients should have a unique differential diagnosis tailored to their clinical presentation. Although biopsy can assist with excluding mimics, diagnosis is ultimately clinical.

Differentiating neurosarcoidosis from multiple sclerosis using combined analysis of basic CSF parameters and MRZ reaction

Background

Neurosarcodosis is one of the most frequent differential diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS) and requires central nervous system (CNS) biopsy to establish definite diagnosis according to the latest consensus diagnostic criteria. We here analyzed diagnostic values of basic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters to distinguish neurosarcoidosis from MS without CNS biopsy.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed clinical, radiological and laboratory data of 27 patients with neurosarcoidosis treated at our center and compared following CSF parameters with those of 138 patients with relapsing-remitting MS: CSF white cell count (WCC), CSF/serum albumin quotient (Q_alb), intrathecal production of immunoglobulins including oligoclonal bands (OCB), MRZ reaction, defined as a polyspecific intrathecal production of IgG reactive against ≥2 of 3 the viruses measles (M), rubella (R), and zoster (Z) virus, and CSF lactate levels. Additional inflammatory biomarkers in serum and/or CSF such as neopterin, soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed.

Results

There was no significant difference in the frequency of CSF pleocytosis, but a CSF WCC > 30/μl was more frequent in patients with neurosarcoidosis. Compared to MS, patients with neurosarcoidosis showed more frequently an increased Q_alb and CSF lactate levels as well as increased serum and CSF levels of sIL-2R, but a lower frequency of intrathecal IgG synthesis and positive MRZ reaction. Positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of single CSF parameters indicating neurosarcoidosis was highest, if (a) CSF WCC was >30/μl (PLR 7.2), (b) Q_alb was >10 × 10^-3 (PLR 66.4), (c) CSF-specific OCB were absent (PLR 11.5), (d) CSF lactate was elevated (PLR 23.0) or (e) sIL-2R was elevated (PLR>8.0). The combination of (a) one of three following basic CSF parameters, i.e., (a.1.) CSF WCC >30/ul, or (a.2.) Q_Alb >10 × 10^-3, or (a.3.) absence of CSF-specific OCB, and (b) absence of positive MRZ reaction showed the best diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity each >92%; PLR 12.8 and NLR 0.08).

Conclusion

Combined evaluation of basic CSF parameters and MRZ reaction is powerful in differentiating neurosarcoidosis from MS, with moderate to severe pleocytosis and Q_Alb elevation and absence of intrathecal IgG synthesis as useful rule-in parameters and positive MRZ reaction as a rule-out parameter for neurosarcoidosis.

Multiple sclerosis in sarcoidosis patients: Two case reports

Two cases of sarcoidosis referred to our clinic with neurological symptoms. They were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis using non‐invasive studies. The first patient refused treatment and died of myocardial infarction 6 months after visiting our clinic. The second received interferon‐beta and methotrexate with a favorable outcome after 3 years. Since the possible similar presentation of the two conditions could appear indistinct for certain diagnosis, accurate evaluation of symptoms and paraclinical data can provide the best approach to each condition.