An ¹⁸F-FDG PET study of cervical muscle in parkinsonian anterocollis

Predictors and Pathophysiology of Axial Postural Abnormalities in Parkinsonism: A Scoping Review

Background

Postural abnormalities involving the trunk are referred to as axial postural abnormalities and can be observed in over 20% of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and in atypical parkinsonism. These symptoms are highly disabling and frequently associated with back pain and a worse quality of life in PD. Despite their frequency, little is known about the pathophysiology of these symptoms and scant data are reported about their clinical predictors, making it difficult to prompt prevention strategies.

Objectives

We conducted a scoping literature review of clinical predictors and pathophysiology of axial postural abnormalities in patients with parkinsonism to identify key concepts, theories and evidence on this topic.

Methods

We applied a systematic approach to identify studies, appraise quality of evidence, summarize main findings, and highlight knowledge gaps.

Results

Ninety-two articles were reviewed: 25% reported on clinical predictors and 75% on pathophysiology. Most studies identified advanced disease stage and greater motor symptoms severity as independent clinical predictors in both PD and multiple system atrophy. Discrepant pathophysiology data suggested different potential central and peripheral pathogenic mechanisms.

Conclusions

The recognition of clinical predictors and pathophysiology of axial postural abnormalities in parkinsonism is far from being elucidated due to literature bias, encompassing different inclusion criteria and measurement tools and heterogeneity of patient samples. Most studies identified advanced disease stage and higher burden of motor symptoms as possible clinical predictors. Pathophysiology data point toward many different (possibly non-mutually exclusive) mechanisms, including dystonia, rigidity, proprioceptive and vestibular impairment, and higher cognitive deficits.

Therapeutic Efficacy and Prediction of 18F-FDG PET/CT-Assisted Botulinum Toxin Therapy in Patients With Idiopathic Cervical Dystonia

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT-assisted botulinum toxin (BTX) injection therapy and predictive PET findings in relation to a good response in patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia (ICD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 78 patients was enrolled from November 2007 to July 2018. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) score was determined at baseline and 4 weeks after BTX injection guided by electromyography and PET/CT. The number of hypermetabolic muscles, the highest SUVmax among hypermetabolic muscles, and the total SUVmax of hypermetabolic muscles were evaluated as pretreatment PET parameters. A good response was defined as a reduction rate ≥30% and a point decrease ≥15 of the TWSTRS total score.

RESULTS

Half of the subjects showed a good response. Good responders had significantly higher baseline TWSTRS scores than poor responders (total score, P < 0.001; severity, P < 0.001; disability, P < 0.001; pain, P = 0.026). Good responders also had significantly higher numbers of hypermetabolic muscles and BTX-injected hypermetabolic muscles (P < 0.001, both). In multivariable analysis, the baseline TWSTRS disability subscale score and the number of BTX-injected hypermetabolic muscles were significant predictors for good response (P = 0.001 and P = 0.028). The aforementioned 3 PET parameters were positively correlated with the baseline TWSTRS scores. In addition, PET/CT well detected dystonic deep cervical muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG PET/CT-assisted BTX injection therapy showed good therapeutic efficacy in ICD patients. The numbers of hypermetabolic cervical muscles and BTX-injected hypermetabolic muscles may be helpful in predicting a good response.

Botulinum toxin treatment failures in cervical dystonia: causes, management, and outcomes

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is highly effective in the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD), yet a significant proportion of patients report low levels of satisfaction following treatment and fail to follow up for repeated treatments. The goal of this study was to determine the reasons that some patients have unsatisfactory responses. A total of 35 subjects who came to our center requesting alternative treatments due to unsatisfactory responses following BoNT treatment for CD were evaluated. Included were 26 women and 9 men with an average age of 57.1 years (range 25-82 years), and an average duration of illness of 12.5 years (range 1-55 years). Details of unsatisfactory BoNT treatments were methodically collected by a movement specialist using a standardized intake form, including provider subspecialty, product used, the number of satisfactory or unsatisfactory trials, doses given, specific muscles treated, the use of electromyographic guidance, side effects, and tests of resistance. The specialist then provided repeat treatments if indicated, and followed each case until the reasons for unsatisfactory outcomes could be determined. Multiple reasons for unsatisfactory outcomes were found. They included suboptimal BoNT doses, suboptimal muscle targeting, intolerable side effects, complex movement patterns, discordant perceptions, and incorrect diagnoses. Only one patient was functionally resistant to BoNT. Of 32 subjects who received repeat BoNT treatments, 25 (78 %) achieved satisfactory responses after revision of the original treatment plan. These results indicate that the majority of unsatisfactory responses to BoNT treatment of CD were caused by correctible factors and imply a need for improved education regarding optimal treatment methods.