Does post-operative symptomatic lead edema associated with subthalamic DBS implantation impact long-term clinical outcomes?

Postoperative use of steroids for peri-electrode edema after deep brain stimulation surgery: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To review the incidence and extent of peri-electrode edema after DBS and to clarify the effect of postoperative use of steroids on the peri-electrode edema.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 250 patients who underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS surgery with intact MRI within 1 month after DBS surgery. Patients were divided into steroid and non-steroid groups, based on postoperative steroids use. The occurrence and extent of peri-electrode edema were compared between the two groups, and other associated factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

Peri-electrode edema >1 cm3 in at least one hemisphere was reported in 215 (86.00%) patients. The mean volume of peri-electrode edema observed in the steroid group was significantly smaller than in the non-steroid group (8.09 ± 8.47 cm3 vs 17.10 ± 16.90 cm3 , p < 0.001). In the steroid group, 104 (32.91%) of the 316 implanted electrodes present with edema less than 1 cm3 , whereas in the non-steroid group, only 27 (14.67%) of the 184 implanted electrodes present with edema less than 1 cm3 (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that lesser peri-electrode edema was significantly associated with postoperative steroids use and general anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-electrode edema is common after DBS surgery, and postoperative steroids use reduces the occurrence and extent of peri-electrode edema.

Longitudinal Neuropsychological Assessment of Symptomatic Edema after Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Case Series Study

Severe non-infectious or non-haemorrhagic brain edema surrounding the electrode represents a rare complication of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) surgery. The aim of this study is to report three patients with advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) who developed symptomatic brain edema after STN-DBS surgery treated with intravenous steroids with a specific profile of reversible cognitive alterations. Patients were both assessed with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery including attention, memory, visuo-spatial and executive tasks. They were also briefly assessed for emotional and behavioural alterations, and for possible limitations in the activities of daily living. Normative data for an Italian population were available for all neuropsychological tests. The patients were firstly assessed before the surgery (baseline) as soon as they became symptomatic for the post-surgery edema and a few more times in follow-up up to ten months. In all patients we observed the resolution of cognitive deficits within six months after surgery with the corresponding reabsorption of edema at brain CT scans. The appearance of post-DBS edema is a fairly frequent and clinically benign event. However, in some rare cases it can be very marked and lead to important clinical-albeit transient-disturbances. These events can compromise, at least from a psychological point of view, the delicate path of patients who undergo DBS and can prolong the post-operative hospital stay. In this setting it could be helpful to perform a brain CT scan in 2-3 days with the aim of detecting the early appearance of edema and treating it before it can constitute a relevant clinical problem.

Complications of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a single-center experience of 517 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

The number of deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures is rapidly rising as well as the novel indications. Reporting adverse events related to surgery and to the hardware used is essential to define the risk-to-benefit ratio and develop novel strategies to improve it.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze DBS complications (both procedure-related and hardware-related) and further assess potential predictive factors.

METHODS

Five hundred seventeen cases of DBS for Parkinson's disease were performed between 2006 and 2021 in a single center (mean follow-up: 4.68 ± 2.86 years). Spearman's Rho coefficient was calculated to search for a correlation between the occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and the number of recording tracks. Multiple logistic regression analyzed the probability of developing seizures and ICH given potential risk factors. Kaplan-Meier curves were performed to analyze the cumulative proportions of hardware-related complications.

RESULTS

Mortality rate was 0.2%, while permanent morbidity 0.6%. 2.5% of cases suffered from ICH which were not influenced by the number of tracks used for recordings. 3.3% reported seizures that were significantly affected by perielectrode brain edema and age. The rate of perielectrode brain edema was significantly higher for Medtronic's leads compared to Boston Scientific's (Χ2(1)= 5.927, P= 0.015). 12.2% of implants reported Hardware-related complications, the most common of which were wound revisions (7.2%). Internal pulse generator models with smaller profiles displayed more favorable hardware-related complication survival curves compared to larger designs (X2(1)= 8.139, P= 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Overall DBS has to be considered a safe procedure, but future research is needed to decrease the rate of hardware-related complications which may be related to both the surgical technique and to the specific hardware's design. The increased incidence of perielectrode brain edema associated with certain lead models may likewise deserve future investigation.

Incidence and management of idiopathic peri-lead edema (IPLE) following deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery: Case series and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Idiopathic peri-lead edema (IPLE) is being increasingly described as a potential complication occurring after DBS surgery. Its incidence and relationship to post-operative symptoms, though, are still poorly defined and its understanding and management yet limited.

METHODS

We reviewed delayed (≥ 72 h) post-operative CT imaging of patients who underwent DBS surgery at our Institution. A comparison of clinical and laboratory findings was carried out between patients with IPLE and controls.

RESULTS

61 patients, accounting for 115 electrodes, were included. Incidence of IPLE was 37.7 % per patient and 29.5 % per electrode. Patients with IPLE were significantly older than controls (52.82 ± 15.65 years vs 44.73 ± 18.82 years, p = 0.04). There was no difference in incidence of new-onset neurological symptoms between patients with IPLE and controls. Longer operative time (180.65 ± 34.30 min vs 158.34 ± 49.28 min, p = 0.06) and a greater number of MERs per electrode were associated with IPLE (3.37 ± 1.21 vs 3.00 ± 1.63, p = 0.089), though these comparisons did not meet the statistical significance. None of the patients with IPLE underwent hardware removal, with IPLE vanishing spontaneously over months.

CONCLUSIONS

IPLE is an underestimated, benign event that may occur after DBS surgery. Age, longer operative time and MER use may represent risk factors for IPLE formation, but further studies are needed. The presence of post-operative neurological symptoms and fever was not associated with IPLE presence, highlighting its benign nature and suggesting that empiric treatment may not be always justified.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage to the Chest Subcutaneous Pocket Due to Aggressive Brain Edema around the Leads for Deep Brain Stimulation: A Case Report and Literature Review

Cerebral edema around the lead has been reported as a complication of deep brain stimulation; however, the causes remain unknown. Herein, we present a rare case of sudden cerebral edema around the lead occurring after deep brain stimulation. This was accompanied by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage into the subcutaneous thoracic pocket around the implantable pulse generator in a 53-year-old man with Parkinson's disease. No such case has been reported thus far. Lumbar drainage was performed to improve CSF leakage. The cerebral edema initially responded to steroids, but then it stopped responding to treatment. The edema appeared alternately on the left and right sides, and cyst formation was noted around the left lead. There are some reports of cyst formation around the lead; however, in our case, images were used to monitor the edema and cyst from their appearance to their disappearance. Our data suggest that cyst formation and cerebral edema are related.

Fulminant non-infectious peri-electrode edema after deep brain stimulation system implantation in a pediatric patient

Non-infectious peri-electrode edema is a rare complication after implantation of a deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode. DBS is frequently used in the management of movement disorders with increasing interest surrounding its value in more rare disorders associated with movement abnormalities. This is the report of a 10-year-old male with Cockayne syndrome who acutely developed symptomatic non-infectious, non-hemorrhagic peri-electrode edema 18 days postoperatively from implantation of a DBS system targeting the bilateral globus pallidus internus. CT head confirmed extensive vasogenic edema along the entire length of the left electrode, and infectious workup was negative. The patient required admission to the pediatric intensive care unit for management utilizing steroid, hypertonic, and hyperosmolar therapy due to the amount of mass effect. Symptoms reduced over a 7-day hospital stay and were completely resolved at 1 month without removal of the DBS system. Management of this rare entity remains controversial and often involves the use of steroids and anti-epileptic prophylaxis. This represents the first case of non-infectious peri-electrode edema reported in a pediatric patient and is especially notable for its fulminant nature.

The need to be alert to complications of peri‐lead cerebral edema caused by deep brain stimulation implantation: A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis study

Background

The compatibility of deep brain stimulation (DBS) hardware and MRI scans has greatly improved the diagnostic rate of postoperative peri‐lead edema (PLE). However, the etiology, incidence, and prognostic outcomes of this complication have not been established.

Objective

The incidence of PLE and associated symptoms, the process of occurrence and progression of this complication, as well as treatment strategies were evaluated.

Methods

We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses compliant systematic review of all studies that reported on incidences of PLE and associated symptoms after DBS implantation. Through systematic literature review, we evaluated its causes, neuropsychiatric symptoms, duration, treatment methods, and prognostic outcomes.

Results

Our search retrieved 10 articles, including 5 articles on PLE and 10 articles on symptomatic PLE. The incidence of PLE was 35.8% (95% CI: 17.0%–54.6%), while the incidence of symptomatic PLE was 3.1% (95% CI: 1.5%–4.7%) accounting for 8.7% of PLE.

Conclusions

This complication is not as rare as previously reported. Therefore, it requires significant attention after DBS implantation. The correlation between its causes, duration, symptoms, and the area involved in edema should be assessed in long‐term prospective clinical studies with large sample sizes.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Cockayne Syndrome-Associated Movement Disorder

Cockayne syndrome (CS) is a rare progeroid disorder characterized by multisystem degeneration, including neurological dysfunction, for which deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a proposed treatment. This study represents only the third case of DBS for CS-associated movement disorder and the first in which both proposed targets had devices implanted, allowing for direct comparison. A case of DBS for CS-associated movement disorder is presented. Previous literature documents two cases with one targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) and the other targeting the globus pallidus interna (GPi). Our patient underwent stimulation of GPi nuclei followed by repositioning to VIM nuclei with improved symptom control using VIM stimulation. In all cases, there was a significant clinical benefit without off-target effects. CS-associated movement disorder exhibits phenotypic variability for which DBS is a viable treatment. Target selection should be driven by clinical phenotype.

Surgical Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: Devices and Lesion Approaches

Surgical treatments have transformed the management of Parkinson's disease (PD). Therapeutic options available for the management of PD motor complications include deep brain stimulation (DBS), ablative or lesioning procedures (pallidotomy, thalamotomy, subthalamotomy), and dopaminergic medication infusion devices. The decision to pursue these advanced treatment options is typically done by a multidisciplinary team by considering factors such as the patient's clinical characteristics, efficacy, ease of use, and risks of therapy with a goal to improve PD symptoms and quality of life. DBS has become the most widely used surgical therapy, although there is a re-emergence of interest in ablative procedures with the introduction of MR-guided focused ultrasound. In this article, we review DBS and lesioning procedures for PD, including indications, selection process, and management strategies.