Neuroimaging evaluation and successful treatment by using directional deep brain stimulation and levodopa in a patient with GNAO1-associated movement disorder: A case report

Dyskinetic crisis in GNAO1-related disorders: clinical perspectives and management strategies

Background

GNAO1-related disorders (GNAO1-RD) encompass a diverse spectrum of neurodevelopmental and movement disorders arising from variants in the GNAO1 gene. Dyskinetic crises, marked by sudden and intense exacerbations of abnormal involuntary movements, present a significant challenge in GNAO1-RD.

Objectives

This study aimed to establish a standardized framework for understanding dyskinetic crises, addressing crucial aspects such as definition, triggers, diagnostic criteria, complications, and management strategies.

Methods

A Delphi consensus process was conducted involving international experts in GNAO1-RD. The panel of thirteen experts participated in three voting rounds, discussing 90 statements generated through a literature review and clinical expertise.

Results

Consensus was achieved on 31 statements, defining dyskinetic crises as abrupt, paroxysmal episodes involving distinct abnormal movements in multiple body regions, triggered by emotional stress or infections. Dyskinetic crises may lead to functional impairment and complications, emphasizing the need for prompt recognition. While individualized pharmacological recommendations were not provided, benzodiazepines and clonidine were suggested for acute crisis management. Chronic treatment options included tetrabenazine, benzodiazepines, gabapentin, and clonidine. Deep brain stimulation should be considered early in the treatment of refractory or prolonged dyskinetic crisis.

Conclusion

This consensus provides a foundation for understanding and managing dyskinetic crises in GNAO1-RD for clinicians, caregivers, and researchers. The study emphasizes the importance of targeted parental and caregiver education, which enables early recognition and intervention, thereby potentially minimizing both short- and long-term complications. Future research should concentrate on differentiating dyskinetic crises from other neurological events and investigating potential risk factors that influence their occurrence and nature. The proposed standardized framework improves clinical management, stakeholder communication, and future GNAO1-RD research.

Deep Brain Stimulation for GNAO1-Associated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha-activating activity polypeptide O (GNAO1) syndrome, a rare congenital monogenetic disorder, is characterized by a neurodevelopmental syndrome and the presence of dystonia. Dystonia can be very pronounced and even lead to a life-threatening status dystonicus. In a small number of pharmaco-refractory cases, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been attempted to reduce dystonia. In this study, we summarize the current literature on outcome, safety, and outcome predictors of DBS for GNAO1-associated dystonia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on individual patient data. We included 18 studies describing 28 unique patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of onset of symptoms was 2.4 years (SD 3.8); 16 of 28 patients were male, and dystonia was nearly always generalized (20/22 patients). Symptoms were present before DBS for a median duration of 19.5 months, although highly variable, occurring between 3 and 168 months. The exact phenotype, genotype, and radiologic abnormalities varied and seemed to be of little importance in terms of DBS outcome. All studies described an improvement in dystonia. Our meta-analysis focused on pallidal DBS and found an absolute and relative improvement in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) of 32.5 points (37.9%; motor part; p = 0.001) and 5.8 points (21.5%; disability part; p = 0.043) at last follow-up compared with preoperative state; 80% of patients were considered responders (BFMDRS-M reduction by ≥25%). Although worsening over time does occur, an improvement was still observed in patients after >10 years. All reported cases of status dystonicus resolved after DBS surgery. Skin erosion and infection were observed in 18% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Pallidal DBS can be efficacious and safe in GNAO1-associated dystonia.

Phenotypes in children with GNAO1 encephalopathy in China

Background

The GNAO1 gene encodes the α-subunit (Gαo) of the heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein). The aim of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics of patients with GNAO1 pathogenic variations.

Methods

Ten patients with pathogenic variations in GNAO1 were enrolled from the Shenzhen Children's Hospital. Clinical data from several cases previously reported from China were also included and analyzed.

Results

Twenty-seven patients with variations in GNAO1 were analyzed (10 patients from Shenzhen Children's Hospital, 17 patients from previously published studies) including 12 boys and 15 girls. The median age of onset was 3 months with moderate to severe global developmental delay. Nineteen different GNAO1 heterozygous variants were identified. Epilepsy was observed in 18 patients (67%, 18/27), movement disorder (MD) was observed in 22 patients (81%, 22/27), and both were seen in 13 patients (48%, 13/27). Seizures typically presented as focal seizures in all patients with epilepsy. MD typically presented as dystonia and chorea. Loss-of-function (LOF) or partial loss-of-function (PLOF) mutations were more frequent in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (p = 0.029). Interictal electroencephalograms showed multifocal or diffuse epileptiform discharges. The most common magnetic resonance imaging finding was widened extracerebral space. In contrast to MD, in which improvements were not common, seizures were easily controlled by anti-seizure medications. Severe dystonia in three patients was effectively treated by deep brain stimulation. Seven (26%, 7/27) patients died of respiratory complications, status dystonicus, choreoathetosis, or sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.

Conclusion

We analyzed clinical data of 27 cases of GNAO1-related encephalopathy in China. MD seemed to be the central feature and was most difficult to control. LOF or PLOF variants were significantly associated with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. The active intervention of severe dystonia may prevent death due to status dystonicus. However, future studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these results.

GNAO1-related movement disorder: An update on phenomenology, clinical course, and response to treatments

AIM

To evaluate clinical phenotype and molecular findings of 157 cases with GNAO1 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants delineating the clinical spectrum, course, and response to treatments.

METHOD

Clinical phenotype, genetic data, and pharmacological and surgical treatment history of 11 novel cases and 146 previously published patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Complex hyperkinetic movement disorder (MD) characterizes 88% of GNAO1 patients. Severe hypotonia and prominent disturbance of postural control seem to be hallmarks in the early stages preceding the hyperkinetic MD. In a subgroup of patients, paroxysmal exacerbations became so severe as to require admission to intensive care units (ICU). Almost all patients had a good response to deep brain stimulation (DBS). Milder phenotypes with late-onset focal/segmental dystonia, mild to moderate intellectual disability, and other minor neurological signs (i.e., parkinsonism and myoclonus) are emerging. MRI, previously considered noncontributory to a diagnosis, can show recurrent findings (i.e., cerebral atrophy, myelination and/or basal ganglia abnormalities). Fifty-eight GNAO1 pathogenic variants, including missense changes and a few recurrent splice site defects, have been reported. Substitutions at residues Gly²⁰³, Arg²⁰⁹ and Glu²⁴⁶, together with the intronic c.724-8G > A change, account for more than 50% of cases.

INTERPRETATION

Infantile or childhood-onset complex hyperkinetic MD (chorea and/or dystonia) with or without paroxysmal exacerbations, associated hypotonia, and developmental disorders should prompt research for GNAO1 mutations. DBS effectively controls and prevents severe exacerbations and should be considered early in patients with specific GNAO1 variants and refractory MD. Prospective and natural history studies are necessary to define genotype-phenotype correlations further and clarify neurological outcomes.

GNAO1-related neurodevelopmental disorder: Literature review and caregiver survey

Background

GNAO1-related neurodevelopmental disorder is a heterogeneous condition characterized by hypotonia, developmental delay, epilepsy, and movement disorder. This study aims to better understand the spectrum of epilepsy associated with GNAO1 variants and experience with anti-seizure medications, and to review published epilepsy phenotypes in GNAO1.

Methods

An online survey was distributed to caregivers of individuals diagnosed with GNAO1 pathogenic variants, and a literature review was conducted.

Results

Fifteen respondents completed the survey with the median age of 39 months, including a novel variant p.Q52P. Nine had epilepsy - six had onset in the first week of life, three in the first year of life - but two reported no ongoing seizures. Seizure types varied. Individuals were taking a median of 3 seizure medications without a single best treatment. Our cohort was compared to a literature review of epilepsy in GNAO1. In 86 cases, 38 discrete variants were described; epilepsy is reported in 53 % cases, and a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy in 36 %.

Conclusions

While GNAO1-related epilepsy is most often early-onset and severe, seizures may not always be drug resistant or lifelong. Experience with anti-seizure medications is varied. Certain variant "hotspots" may correlate with epilepsy phenotype though genotype-phenotype correlation is poorly understood.

Deep brain stimulation in a young child with GNAO1 mutation – Feasible and helpful

Background:

GNAO1 is an emerging disorder characterized with hypotonia, developmental delay, epilepsy, and movement disorder, which can be potentially life threatening during acute exacerbation. In the USA, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been licensed for treating children with chronic, treatment-resistant primary dystonia, who are 7 years old or older.

Case Description:

A 4-year-old girl diagnosed to have GNAO1-related dyskinesia and severe global developmental delay. She had severe dyskinesia precipitated by intercurrent infection, requiring prolonged intensive care for heavy sedation and related complications. Her dyskinesia improved dramatically after DBS implantation. Technical difficulties and precautions of DBS in preschool children were discussed.

Conclusion:

DBS should be considered early in the treatment of drug-resistant movement disorders in young children with GNAO1, especially after dyskinetic crisis, as they tend to recur. Presurgical counseling to parents and close monitoring of complications is also important in the process.

Highlighting the Dystonic Phenotype Related to GNAO1

BACKGROUND

Most reported patients carrying GNAO1 mutations showed a severe phenotype characterized by early-onset epileptic encephalopathy and/or chorea.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to characterize the clinical and genetic features of patients with mild GNAO1-related phenotype with prominent movement disorders.

METHODS

We included patients diagnosed with GNAO1-related movement disorders of delayed onset (>2 years). Patients experiencing either severe or profound intellectual disability or early-onset epileptic encephalopathy were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients and 1 asymptomatic subject were included. All patients showed dystonia as prominent movement disorder. Dystonia was focal in 1, segmental in 6, multifocal in 4, and generalized in 13. Six patients showed adolescence or adulthood-onset dystonia. Seven patients presented with parkinsonism and 3 with myoclonus. Dysarthria was observed in 19 patients. Mild and moderate ID were present in 10 and 2 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We highlighted a mild GNAO1-related phenotype, including adolescent-onset dystonia, broadening the clinical spectrum of this condition. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Both subthalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation are effective for GNAO1-associated dystonia: three case reports and a literature review

Background

Mutations in the G-protein subunit alpha o1 (GNAO1) gene have recently been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of early infantile epileptic encephalopathy and movement disorders. The clinical manifestations of GNAO1-associated movement disorders are highly heterogeneous. However, the genotype-phenotype correlations in this disease remain unclear, and the treatments for GNAO1-associated movement disorders are still limited.

Objective

The objective of this study was to explore diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for GNAO1-associated movement disorders.

Methods

This study describes the cases of three Chinese patients who had shown severe and progressive dystonia in the absence of epilepsy since early childhood. We performed genetic analyses in these patients. Patients 1 and 2 underwent globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation, and Patient 3 underwent subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS implantation. In addition, on the basis of a literature review, we summarized and discussed the clinical characteristics and outcomes after DBS surgery for all reported patients with GNAO1-associated movement disorders.

Results

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis revealed de novo variants in the GNAO1 gene for all three patients, including a splice-site variant (c.724-8G > A) in Patients 1 and 3 and a novel heterozygous missense variant (c.124G > A; p. Gly42Arg) in Patient 2. Both GPi and STN DBS were effective in improving the dystonia symptoms of all three patients.

Conclusion

DBS is effective in ameliorating motor symptoms in patients with GNAO1-associated movement disorders, and both STN DBS and GPi DBS should be considered promptly for patients with sustained refractory GNAO1-associated dystonia.

Nomenclature of Genetic Movement Disorders: Recommendations of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Task Force - An Update

In 2016, the Movement Disorder Society Task Force for the Nomenclature of Genetic Movement Disorders presented a new system for naming genetically determined movement disorders and provided a criterion-based list of confirmed monogenic movement disorders. Since then, a substantial number of novel disease-causing genes have been described, which warrant classification using this system. In addition, with this update, we further refined the system and propose dissolving the imaging-based categories of Primary Familial Brain Calcification and Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation and reclassifying these genetic conditions according to their predominant phenotype. We also introduce the novel category of Mixed Movement Disorders (MxMD), which includes conditions linked to multiple equally prominent movement disorder phenotypes. In this article, we present updated lists of newly confirmed monogenic causes of movement disorders. We found a total of 89 different newly identified genes that warrant a prefix based on our criteria; 6 genes for parkinsonism, 21 for dystonia, 38 for dominant and recessive ataxia, 5 for chorea, 7 for myoclonus, 13 for spastic paraplegia, 3 for paroxysmal movement disorders, and 6 for mixed movement disorder phenotypes; 10 genes were linked to combined phenotypes and have been assigned two new prefixes. The updated lists represent a resource for clinicians and researchers alike and they have also been published on the website of the Task Force for the Nomenclature of Genetic Movement Disorders on the homepage of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (https://www.movementdisorders.org/MDS/About/Committees--Other-Groups/MDS-Task-Forces/Task-Force-on-Nomenclature-in-Movement-Disorders.htm). © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson Movement Disorder Society.

An intronic GNAO1 variant leading to in-frame insertion cause movement disorder controlled by deep brain stimulation

GNAO1 variants are associated with a wide range of neurodevelopmental disorders including epileptic encephalopathies and movement disorders. It has been reported that some GNAO1 variants are associated with movement disorders, and the 207-246 amino acid region was proposed as a mutational hotspot. Here, we report an intronic variant (NM_020988.3:c.724-8G>A) in GNAO1 in a Japanese girl who showed mild developmental delay and movement disorders including dystonia and myoclonus. Her movement disorders were improved by deep brain stimulation treatment as previously reported. This variant has been recurrently reported in four patients and was transmitted from her mother who possessed the variant as low-prevalent mosaicism. Using RNA extracted from lymphoblastoid cells derived from the patient, we demonstrated that the variant caused abnormal splicing of in-frame 6-bp intronic retention, leading to 2 amino acid insertion (p.Thr241_Asn242insProGln). Immunoblotting and immunostaining using WT and mutant GNAO1 vectors showed no significant differences in protein expression levels, but the cellular localization pattern of this mutant was partially shifted to the cytoplasm whereas WT was exclusively localized in the cellular membrane. Our report first clarified abnormal splicing and resulting mutant protein caused by the c.724-8G>A variant.

DBS emergency surgery for treatment of dystonic storm associated with rhabdomyolysis and acute colitis in DYT-GNAO1

INTRODUCTION

Patients with variants in the GNAO1 gene may present with life-threatening dystonic storm. There is little experience using pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) as an emergency treatment in such cases.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report on a 16-year-old girl with a variant in the GNAO1 gene (c.626G > T; p.(Arg209Leu)) who was admitted to the intensive care unit with medically refractory dystonic storm with secondary complications inducing rhabdomyolysis and acute colitis. Emergency pallidal DBS resulted in rapid improvement of dystonic storm and the subsidence of rhabdomyolysis and colitis. There were no further episodes of dystonic storm during follow-up of 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Pallidal DBS is a useful treatment option for GNAO1-related dystonic storm with secondary complications which can be performed as an emergency surgery.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Pediatric Dystonia

Dystonia is one of the most common pediatric movement disorders and can have a profound impact on the lives of children and their caregivers. Response to pharmacologic treatment is often unsatisfactory. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a promising treatment option for children with medically refractory dystonia. In this review we highlight the relevant literature related to DBS for pediatric dystonia, with emphasis on the background, indications, prognostic factors, challenges, and future directions of pediatric DBS.

Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation for Monogenic Dystonia: The Effect of Gene on Outcome

Globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi DBS) is the most effective intervention for medically refractory segmental and generalized dystonia in both children and adults. Predictive factors for the degree of improvement after GPi DBS include shorter disease duration and dystonia subtype with idiopathic isolated dystonia usually responding better than acquired combined dystonias. Other factors contributing to variability in outcome may include body distribution, pattern of dystonia and DBS related factors such as lead placement and stimulation parameters. The responsiveness to DBS appears to vary between different monogenic forms of dystonia, with some improving more than others. The first observation in this regard was reports of superior DBS outcomes in DYT-TOR1A (DYT1) dystonia, although other studies have found no difference. Recently a subgroup with young onset DYT-TOR1A, more rapid progression and secondary worsening after effective GPi DBS, has been described. Myoclonus dystonia due to DYT-SCGE (DYT11) usually responds well to GPi DBS. Good outcomes following GPi DBS have also been documented in X-linked dystonia Parkinsonism (DYT3). In contrast, poorer, more variable DBS outcomes have been reported in DYT-THAP1 (DYT6) including a recent larger series. The outcome of GPi DBS in other monogenic isolated and combined dystonias including DYT-GNAL (DYT25), DYT-KMT2B (DYT28), DYT-ATP1A3 (DYT12), and DYT-ANO3 (DYT24) have been reported with varying results in smaller numbers of patients. In this article the available evidence for long term GPi DBS outcome between different genetic dystonias is reviewed to reappraise popular perceptions of expected outcomes and revisit whether genetic diagnosis may assist in predicting DBS outcome.