1
|
Miller JS, Oladele F, McAfee D, Adereti CO, Theodore WH, Akinsoji EO. Disparities in Epilepsy Diagnosis and Management in High-Income Countries: A Review of the Literature. Neurol Clin Pract 2024; 14:e200259. [PMID: 38585438 PMCID: PMC10996906 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000200259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Currently, an estimated 3.4 million people in the United States live with epilepsy. Previous studies have identified health disparities associated with race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), sex, insurance status, and age in this population. However, there has been a dearth of research addressing these disparities. We performed a literature review of articles published between 2010 and 2020 pertaining to health disparities in people with epilepsy (PWE), identified key factors that contribute to gaps in their care, and discussed possible solutions. Recent Findings Health disparities in prevalence, treatment access, time to diagnosis, health care delivery and engagement, and clinical outcomes were identified among individuals who were either of low SES, rural-based, uninsured/underinsured, older patients, patients of color, or female sex. Summary Disparities in care for PWE continue to persist. Greater priority should be placed on addressing these gaps intricately tied to sociodemographic factors. Reforms to mitigate health disparities in PWE are necessary for timely diagnosis, effective treatment, and positive long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph S Miller
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine (JSM), Dublin, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (FO), New York; University of Maryland School of Medicine (DM), Baltimore, MD; Ross University School of Medicine (COA); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (WHT), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (EOA), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Folake Oladele
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine (JSM), Dublin, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (FO), New York; University of Maryland School of Medicine (DM), Baltimore, MD; Ross University School of Medicine (COA); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (WHT), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (EOA), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Darrian McAfee
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine (JSM), Dublin, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (FO), New York; University of Maryland School of Medicine (DM), Baltimore, MD; Ross University School of Medicine (COA); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (WHT), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (EOA), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Christopher O Adereti
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine (JSM), Dublin, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (FO), New York; University of Maryland School of Medicine (DM), Baltimore, MD; Ross University School of Medicine (COA); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (WHT), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (EOA), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - William H Theodore
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine (JSM), Dublin, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (FO), New York; University of Maryland School of Medicine (DM), Baltimore, MD; Ross University School of Medicine (COA); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (WHT), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (EOA), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Elizabeth O Akinsoji
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine (JSM), Dublin, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (FO), New York; University of Maryland School of Medicine (DM), Baltimore, MD; Ross University School of Medicine (COA); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (WHT), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (EOA), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Almohaish S, Cook AM, Brophy GM, Rhoney DH. Personalized antiseizure medication therapy in critically ill adult patients. Pharmacotherapy 2023; 43:1166-1181. [PMID: 36999346 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
Precision medicine has the potential to have a significant impact on both drug development and patient care. It is crucial to not only provide prompt effective antiseizure treatment for critically ill patients after seizures start but also have a proactive mindset and concentrate on epileptogenesis and the underlying cause of the seizures or seizure disorders. Critical illness presents different treatment issues compared with the ambulatory population, which makes it challenging to choose the best antiseizure medications and to administer them at the right time and at the right dose. Since there is a paucity of information available on antiseizure medication dosing in critically ill patients, therapeutic drug monitoring is a useful tool for defining each patient's personal therapeutic range and assisting clinicians in decision-making. Use of pharmacogenomic information relating to pharmacokinetics, hepatic metabolism, and seizure etiology may improve safety and efficacy by individualizing therapy. Studies evaluating the clinical implementation of pharmacogenomic information at the point-of-care and identification of biomarkers are also needed. These studies may make it possible to avoid adverse drug reactions, maximize drug efficacy, reduce drug-drug interactions, and optimize medications for each individual patient. This review will discuss the available literature and provide future insights on precision medicine use with antiseizure therapy in critically ill adult patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sulaiman Almohaish
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Clinical Pharmacy College, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aaron M Cook
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Gretchen M Brophy
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Denise H Rhoney
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu P, He M, Xu X, He Y, Yao W, Liu B. Real-world safety of Lacosamide: A pharmacovigilance study based on spontaneous reports in the FDA adverse event reporting system. Seizure 2023; 110:203-211. [PMID: 37423166 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lacosamide is licensed for the treatment of focal seizures in both adults and children, however there is little information available on its adverse reactions. Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), we seek to assess adverse occurrences that may be related to Lacosamide. METHODS On the basis of the FAERS database from the fourth quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2022, disproportionality analysis was carried out using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method, the United Kingdom Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency omnbius standard (MHRA) method, and the bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) method. We extracted valuable positive signals for designated medical event (DME) screening, focused on the evaluation and comparison of safety signals appearing in DME with system organ classification (SOC) analysis. RESULTS A total of 10,226 adverse reaction reports with Lacosamide as the primary suspect drug were obtained, with 30,960 reported cases, detecting 232 valuable positive signals, involving a total of 20 SOCs, of which the most frequently reported SOCs were nervous system disorders (6537 cases, 55.21%), psychiatric disorders (1530 cases, 12.92%), injury poisoning and procedural complications (1059 cases, 8.94%). According to 232 valuable positive signals with DME screening results, two signals of stevens-johnson syndrome and ventricular fibrillation were consistent with PT signals on the DME list, with the two SOCs focusing on skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders and cardiac disorders, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our research demonstrates that the clinical use of Lacosamide should be noticed and avoided in relation to ADRs since it raises the risk of cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, stevens-johnson syndrome, and rhabdomyolysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengcheng Liu
- China Pharmaceutical University School of International Pharmaceutical Business, Nanjing 211198, Jiangsu, China
| | - Mengjiao He
- China Pharmaceutical University School of International Pharmaceutical Business, Nanjing 211198, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaoli Xu
- China Pharmaceutical University School of International Pharmaceutical Business, Nanjing 211198, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yun He
- China Pharmaceutical University School of Science, Nanjing 211198, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wenbing Yao
- China Pharmaceutical University School of International Pharmaceutical Business, Nanjing 211198, Jiangsu, China
| | - Bin Liu
- Department of Neurology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Impact of predictive, preventive and precision medicine strategies in epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 16:674-688. [PMID: 33077944 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-0409-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Over the last decade, advances in genetics, neuroimaging and EEG have enabled the aetiology of epilepsy to be identified earlier in the disease course than ever before. At the same time, progress in the study of experimental models of epilepsy has provided a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the condition and has enabled the identification of therapies that target specific aetiologies. We are now witnessing the impact of these advances in our daily clinical practice. Thus, now is the time for a paradigm shift in epilepsy treatment from a reactive attitude, treating patients after the onset of epilepsy and the initiation of seizures, to a proactive attitude that is more broadly integrated into a 'P4 medicine' approach. This P4 approach, which is personalized, predictive, preventive and participatory, puts patients at the centre of their own care and, ultimately, aims to prevent the onset of epilepsy. This aim will be achieved by adapting epilepsy treatments not only to a given syndrome but also to a given patient and moving from the usual anti-seizure treatments to personalized treatments designed to target specific aetiologies. In this Review, we present the current state of this ongoing revolution, emphasizing the impact on clinical practice.
Collapse
|
6
|
Adamo D, Coppola N, Pecoraro G, Nicolò M, Mignogna MD. Lacosamide in trigeminal neuralgia: report of a case refractory to first- and second-generation anticonvulsants. Cranio 2020; 41:126-130. [PMID: 32776864 DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2020.1804233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) involves first- and second-generation anticonvulsants. However, side effects (SEs) impair compliance with treatment, especially in elderly patients. Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation anticonvulsant with a mechanism of action that is not completely clear. It has few SEs and has been considered in the treatment of neuropathic pain. CLINICAL PRESENTATION LCM was prescribed as a monotherapy for a 60-year-old female with TN who had proven refractory to previous treatments in terms of both the absence of any pain relief and the appearance of severe leukopenia. The treatment dosage was 100 mg twice daily. Pain relief was obtained after three weeks of treatment without any SEs. Currently, the patient takes a maintenance dosage of 100 mg/daily, remaining in a state of complete well-being. CONCLUSION LCM has shown evidence of a potential efficacy and a good safety profile in the treatment of this patient with TN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Adamo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Noemi Coppola
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Pecoraro
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Nicolò
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Davide Mignogna
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|