1
|
Pascarella A, Manzo L, Gasparini S, Marsico O, Abelardo D, Torino C, Cianci V, Iudice A, Bisulli F, Bonanni P, Caggia E, D'Aniello A, Di Bonaventura C, DiFrancesco JC, Domina E, Dono F, Gambardella A, Fortunato F, Marini C, Marrelli A, Matricardi S, Morano A, Paladin F, Renna R, Piccioli M, Striano P, Ascoli M, La Neve A, Le Piane E, Orsini A, Di Gennaro G, Aguglia U, Ferlazzo E. Perampanel in post-stroke epilepsy: Clinical practice data from the PERampanel as Only Concomitant antiseizure medication (PEROC) study. J Neurol Sci 2024; 462:123106. [PMID: 38925069 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is one of the most common causes of acquired epilepsy. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence regarding the clinical profile of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in PSE. This study aims to evaluate the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) used as only add-on treatment in patients with PSE in a real-world setting. METHODS We performed a subgroup analysis of PSE patients included in a previous retrospective, longitudinal, multicentre observational study on adults. Treatment discontinuation, seizure frequency and adverse events were collected at 3, 6 and 12 months. Sub-analyses by early (≤1 previous ASM) or late PER add-on were also conducted. RESULTS Our analysis included 56 individuals with PSE, characterized by varying initial treatment modalities and timeframes relative to disease onset. We found notable retention rates (92.8%, 83.7%, and 69% at 3, 6, and 12 months), with treatment withdrawal mainly due to poor tolerability. One year after PER introduction, seizure frequency significantly reduced, with a responder rate (≥50% reduction) of 83.9% and a seizure-free rate of 51.6%. Adverse events occurred in 25 (46.3%) patients, mainly dizziness, irritability, and behavioural disorders. No major statistical differences were found between early (30 patients, 53.6%) and late add-on groups, except for a higher 6-month responder rate in the early add-on group. CONCLUSION Adjunctive PER was effective and well-tolerated in patients with PSE in a real-world setting. Perampanel demonstrated good efficacy and safety as both early and late add-on treatment, making it a compelling option for this unique patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Pascarella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Lucia Manzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Sara Gasparini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Oreste Marsico
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Domenico Abelardo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Claudia Torino
- Clinical Epidemiology and Physiopathology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension of Reggio Calabria, National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Vittoria Cianci
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Alfonso Iudice
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Neurology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Bisulli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy; IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Full Member of the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (EpiCARE), Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Treviso, Italy
| | | | | | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Fedele Dono
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Antonio Gambardella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Neurologic Clinic, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Francesco Fortunato
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Neurologic Clinic, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Carla Marini
- Child Neurology and Psychiatric Unit, G. Salesi Pediatric Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alfonso Marrelli
- Neurophysiopathology Unit, Epilepsy Center, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Alessandra Morano
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rosaria Renna
- Neurological Clinic and Stroke Unit, "Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Marta Piccioli
- UOC Neurology, PO San Filippo Neri, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Striano
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Angela La Neve
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche di Base, Neuroscienze e Organi di Senso, Università di Bari
| | - Emilio Le Piane
- Dipartimento di Neurologia, Ospedale Pugliese-Ciaccio, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Alessandro Orsini
- Pediatric Neurology, Pediatric Department, AOUP Santa Chiara Univeristy Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Di Gennaro
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Scuola di Medicina, Università Magna Graecia di Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Umberto Aguglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Edoardo Ferlazzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matricardi S, Scorrano G, Prezioso G, Burchiani B, Di Cara G, Striano P, Chiarelli F, Verrotti A. The latest advances in the pharmacological management of focal epilepsies in children: a narrative review. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:371-381. [PMID: 38433525 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2326606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Focal epilepsy constitutes the most common epilepsy in children, and medical treatment represents the first-line therapy in this condition. The main goal of medical treatment for children and adolescents with epilepsy is the achievement of seizure freedom or, in drug-resistant epilepsies, a significant seizure reduction, both minimizing antiseizure medications (ASM)-related adverse events, thus improving the patient's quality of life. However, up to 20-40% of pediatric epilepsies are refractory to drug treatments. New ASMs came to light in the pediatric landscape, improving the drug profile compared to that of the preexisting ones. Clinicians should consider several factors during the drug choice process, including patient and medication-specific characteristics. AREAS COVERED This narrative review aims to summarize the latest evidence on the effectiveness and tolerability of the newest ASMs administered as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in pediatric epilepsies with focal onset seizures, providing a practical appraisal based on the existing evidence. EXPERT OPINION The latest ASMs have the potential to be effective in the pharmacological management of focal onset seizures in children, and treatment choice should consider several drug- and epilepsy-related factors. Future treatments should be increasingly personalized and targeted on patient-specific pathways. Future research should focus on discovering new chemical compounds and repurposing medications used for other indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Matricardi
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Di Cara
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Pasquale Striano
- Paediatric Neurology and Muscular Disease Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Verrotti
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Y, Guo H, Hu Y, Wang J, Zhang Y, Huang J, Xu J, Chen J, Lu X, Chen F. Effectiveness and safety of mono- and add-on perampanel in pediatric patients with epilepsy: Experience from a single-center retrospective study. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9:268-277. [PMID: 37943144 PMCID: PMC10839354 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of perampanel (PER) monotherapy (MT) or add-on therapy (AT) in Chinese children with epilepsy, as well as to evaluate the data from routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of PER for these pediatric patients. METHODS This retrospective and observational study was carried out on children with epilepsy (n = 340) from 2020 to 2022 at the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Outcome measures were the responder rate (50% or greater seizure reduction), long-term efficacy, and tolerability (number and types of adverse events) in MT and AT groups. Concentrations of plasma PER obtained from these patients, if available, were analyzed too. RESULTS A total of 279 patients achieved at least 3 months of therapy, and 58.1% responded to PER therapy. 53 of the responders were seizure-free (32.7%). The retention rate dropped from 88.0% at 3 months to 40.6% at 12 months after treatment. Patients with MT achieved better seizure control than those with AT (P < 0.001). Intriguingly, PER exerted a very weak effect on patients who took more than 2 ASMs or were diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy. There were no significant differences in tolerability between the two groups. In addition, 179 patients were routinely monitored for PER, and the trough concentrations (C0 ) for these patients ranged from 30.0 to 992.0 ng/mL. However, no significant difference in C0 was observed between responders and nonresponders (333 ng/mL vs 325.5 ng/mL, P = 0.264). SIGNIFICANCE This study provides effectiveness and safety data on Chinese children with epilepsy treated with PER either as MT or as AT. The efficacy of patients receiving MT was much better than cases administered with more than 2 ASMs or diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy. In addition, no association was found between the plasma PER concentration and efficacy or safety. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY The study reports the effects of perampanel on seizures and adverse effects in Chinese patients with epilepsy younger than 18 years. Seizures decreased in 58.1% of patients (responders); in a third of these responders, seizures stopped. After treatment was started, 88% of patients were still on perampanel at 3 months and 40.6% at 12 months. People who were treated with perampanel only were more likely to respond than those who received perampanel and other antiseizure treatments, although perampanel was tolerated equally well in these groups. Plasma perampanel concentration did not predict seizure response or adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Li
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research CenterDepartment of PharmacyChildren's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Hong‐Li Guo
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research CenterDepartment of PharmacyChildren's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Ya‐Hui Hu
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research CenterDepartment of PharmacyChildren's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Jie Wang
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research CenterDepartment of PharmacyChildren's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Yuan‐Yuan Zhang
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research CenterDepartment of PharmacyChildren's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Jian Huang
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research CenterDepartment of PharmacyChildren's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Jing Xu
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research CenterDepartment of PharmacyChildren's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of NeurologyChildren's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Xiao‐Peng Lu
- Department of NeurologyChildren's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Feng Chen
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research CenterDepartment of PharmacyChildren's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scorrano G, Lattanzi S, Salpietro V, Giannini C, Chiarelli F, Matricardi S. The Cognitive and Behavioural Effects of Perampanel in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:372. [PMID: 38256507 PMCID: PMC10816822 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
In children and adolescents with epilepsy, neurodevelopmental comorbidities can impair the quality of life more than seizures. The aim of this review was to evaluate the cognitive and behavioural effects of perampanel (PER) in the paediatric population. We performed a systematic search of the literature, selecting studies published in English including children and adolescents with epilepsy treated with PER. Cognitive and behavioural outcomes were assessed through validated neuropsychological standardised scales. Eighteen studies involving 3563 paediatric patients were included. Perampanel did not impair general cognitive functions and visuospatial skills, whereas a slight improvement in verbal memory and a decline in attentional power were detected. In adolescents with refractory epilepsies, high doses and/or rapid titration of PER and an underlying psychiatric disorder were risk factors for developing or worsening psychiatric outcomes such as anger, aggressiveness, and irritability. Data on children and adolescents treated with new antiseizure medications are scant, and neuropsychiatric effects are tricky to be detected during developmental age. According to the currently available evidence, PER showed an overall favourable risk-benefit profile. Pharmacodynamics, co-administration of other antiseizure medications, and family and personal history of neuropsychiatric disorders should be considered before PER treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Scorrano
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (G.S.); (C.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, 60020 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Vincenzo Salpietro
- Department of Neuromuscular Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK;
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences (DISCAB), University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Cosimo Giannini
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (G.S.); (C.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Francesco Chiarelli
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (G.S.); (C.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Sara Matricardi
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (G.S.); (C.G.); (F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pascarella A, Gasparini S, Manzo L, Marsico O, Torino C, Abelardo D, Cianci V, Iudice A, Bisulli F, Bonanni P, Caggia E, D'Aniello A, Di Bonaventura C, DiFrancesco JC, Domina E, Dono F, Gambardella A, Marini C, Marrelli A, Matricardi S, Morano A, Paladin F, Renna R, Piccioli M, Striano P, Ascoli M, Ferlazzo E, Aguglia U. Perampanel as only add-on epilepsy treatment in elderly: A subgroup analysis of real-world data from retrospective, multicenter, observational study. J Neurol Sci 2023; 455:122797. [PMID: 37976793 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.122797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Drug management of epilepsy in the elderly presents unique but data on this population are scarce. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) used as only add-on to a background anti-seizure medication (ASM) in the elderly in a real-world setting. METHODS We performed a subgroup analysis of patients aged ≥65 years included in a previous 12-month multicenter study on adults. Treatment discontinuation, seizure frequency, and adverse events were recorded at 3, 6 and 12 months after PER introduction. Sub-analyses by early (≤1 previous ASM) or late PER add-on were also conducted. RESULTS The sample included 65 subjects (mean age: 75.7 ± 7.2 years), with mainly focal (73.8%) epilepsy. The mean PER daily dose was ≈4 mg during all follow-up. Retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 90.5%, 89.6%, and 79.4%ly. The baseline median normalized per 28-day seizure number significantly decreased at 3-, 6- and 12-month visits. One year after PER introduction, the responder rate (≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency) was 89.7%, with a seizure freedom rate of 72.4%. Adverse events occurred in 22 (34.9%) patients with dizziness and irritability being the most frequent. No major differences between early (41 patients, 63.1%), and late add-on groups were observed. CONCLUSION Adjunctive PER was effective and well-tolerated when used as only add-on treatment in elderly people with epilepsy in clinical practice, thus representing a suitable therapeutic option in this age category.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Pascarella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Sara Gasparini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Lucia Manzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Oreste Marsico
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Claudia Torino
- Clinical Epidemiology and Physiopathology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension of Reggio Calabria, National Council of Research, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Domenico Abelardo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Vittoria Cianci
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Alfonso Iudice
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Neurology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Bisulli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Full Member of the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (EpiCARE), Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Treviso, Italy
| | | | | | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Fedele Dono
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Antonio Gambardella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Neurologic Clinic, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Carla Marini
- Child Neurology and Psychiatric Unit, G. Salesi Pediatric Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alfonso Marrelli
- Neurophysiopathology Unit, Epilepsy Center, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Rosaria Renna
- Neurological Clinic and Stroke Unit, "Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Marta Piccioli
- UOC Neurology, PO San Filippo Neri, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Striano
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Edoardo Ferlazzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy.
| | - Umberto Aguglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gao L, Lu Q, Wang Z, Yue W, Wang G, Shao X, Guo Y, Yi Y, Hong Z, Jiang Y, Xiao B, Cui G, Gao F, Hu J, Liang J, Zhang M, Wang Y. Efficacy and safety of perampanel as early add-on therapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures: a multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1236046. [PMID: 37712083 PMCID: PMC10499319 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1236046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background No interventional study has been conducted in China to assess efficacy and safety of perampanel in treating Chinese patients with epilepsy, nor has there been any study on perampanel early add-on therapy in China. This interventional study aimed to assess efficacy and safety of perampanel as an early add-on treatment of focal-onset seizures (FOS) with or without focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) in Chinese patients. Methods In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 4 interventional study, Chinese patients ≥ 12 years old with FOS with or without FBTCS who failed anti-seizure medication (ASM) monotherapy from 15 hospitals in China were enrolled and treated with perampanel add-on therapy (8-week titration followed by 24-week maintenance). The primary endpoint was 50% responder rate. Secondary endpoints included seizure-freedom rate and changes in seizure frequency from baseline. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and drug-related TEAEs were recorded. Results The full analysis set included 150 patients. The mean maintenance perampanel dose was 5.9 ± 1.5 mg/day and the 8-month retention rate was 72%. The 50% responder rate and seizure-freedom rate for all patients during maintenance were 67.9 and 30.5%, respectively. Patients with FBTCS had higher 50% responder rate (96.0%) and seizure-freedom rate (76.0%) during maintenance. Patients on concomitant sodium valproate had a significantly higher seizure-freedom rate than those on concomitant oxcarbazepine. Eight-six (55.1%) patients experienced treatment-related TEAEs, and the most common TEAEs were dizziness (36.5%), hypersomnia (11.5%), headache (3.9%), somnolence (3.2%), and irritability (3.2%). Withdrawal due to TEAEs occurred to 14.7% of the patients. Conclusion Perampanel early add-on was effective and safe in treating Chinese patients≥12 years old with FOS with or without FBTCS.Clinical trial registrationwww.chictr.org.cn, Identifier ChiCTR2000039510.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lehong Gao
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Lu
- Department of Neurology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zan Wang
- Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Wei Yue
- Department of Neurology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Guoping Wang
- Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Xiaoqiu Shao
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Guo
- Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yonghong Yi
- Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, Department of Neurology, Institute of Neuroscience, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhen Hong
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuwu Jiang
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Epilepsy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Xiao
- Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Guiyun Cui
- Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Feng Gao
- Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiasheng Hu
- Department of Neurology, Wuhan Children's Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jianmin Liang
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Meiyun Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuping Wang
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Beijing, China
- Center of Epilepsy, Institute of Sleep and Consciousness Disorders, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Neuromedical Technology Innovation Center of Hebei Province, Hebei Hospital of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Perversi F, Costa C, Labate A, Lattanzi S, Liguori C, Maschio M, Meletti S, Nobili L, Operto FF, Romigi A, Russo E, Di Bonaventura C. The broad-spectrum activity of perampanel: state of the art and future perspective of AMPA antagonism beyond epilepsy. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1182304. [PMID: 37483446 PMCID: PMC10359664 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1182304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Glutamate is the brain's main excitatory neurotransmitter. Glutamatergic neurons primarily compose basic neuronal networks, especially in the cortex. An imbalance of excitatory and inhibitory activities may result in epilepsy or other neurological and psychiatric conditions. Among glutamate receptors, AMPA receptors are the predominant mediator of glutamate-induced excitatory neurotransmission and dictate synaptic efficiency and plasticity by their numbers and/or properties. Therefore, they appear to be a major drug target for modulating several brain functions. Perampanel (PER) is a highly selective, noncompetitive AMPA antagonist approved in several countries worldwide for treating different types of seizures in various epileptic conditions. However, recent data show that PER can potentially address many other conditions within epilepsy and beyond. From this perspective, this review aims to examine the new preclinical and clinical studies-especially those produced from 2017 onwards-on AMPA antagonism and PER in conditions such as mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, idiopathic and genetic generalized epilepsy, brain tumor-related epilepsy, status epilepticus, rare epileptic syndromes, stroke, sleep, epilepsy-related migraine, cognitive impairment, autism, dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases, as well as provide suggestions on future research agenda aimed at probing the possibility of treating these conditions with PER and/or other AMPA receptor antagonists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cinzia Costa
- Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- Neurological Clinic, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Angelo Labate
- Neurophysiopatology and Movement Disorders Clinic, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Claudio Liguori
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Epilepsy Center, Neurology Unit, University Hospital “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Maschio
- Center for Tumor-Related Epilepsy, UOSD Neuro-Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Meletti
- Neurology Department, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic, and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Lino Nobili
- Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, IRCCS Istituto G. Gaslini, Genova, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Child and Maternal Health (DINOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Felicia Operto
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
- Department of Science of Health, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Andrea Romigi
- Sleep Medicine Center, Neurological Mediterranean Institute IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
- Psychology Faculty, International Telematic University Uninettuno, Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Russo
- Department of Science of Health, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hou L, Yang J, Zhang X, Li N, Li S, Zhang L, Zhao J, Wang Q. Efficacy and tolerability of perampanel in patients with seizures in real-world clinical practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1139514. [PMID: 37056989 PMCID: PMC10086234 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1139514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically review the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel (PER) when used as add-on treatment or monotherapy in patients with epilepsy aged 12 years and older in routine clinical practice.Methods: Electronic and clinical trials databases were searched for observational studies of PER published up to 1 March 2022. The outcomes of interest were responder rates, adverse effects (AEs), and withdrawal rates. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the potential factors that might affect the efficacy and safety of PER usage.Results: A total of 56 studies, which included 10,688 patients, were enrolled. The results showed that after 3, 6, and 12 months of PER treatment, the pooled 50% responder rates in patients with epilepsy were 50.0% (95% CI: 0.41–0.60), 44.0% (95% CI: 0.38–0.50), and 39.0% (95% CI: 0.31–0.48), respectively, and the pooled seizure-free rates were 24.0% (95% CI: 0.17–0.32), 21.0% (95% CI: 0.17–0.25), and 20.0% (95% CI: 0.16–0.24), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed that the efficacy of PER could be affected by the way in which PER is administrated. Patients in the groups where PER was used as the first add-on, primary monotherapy, or combined with non–enzyme-inducing AEDs (non-EIAEDs) displayed a high 50% responder rate and seizure-free rate when compared with those in the late add-on, conversion therapy, or combined with the EIAEDs groups, respectively. Furthermore, the incidences of AEs at 3, 6, and 12 months of PER treatment were 46% (95% CI: 0.38–0.55), 52.0% (95% CI: 0.43–0.60), and 46.0% (95% CI: 0.40–0.52), respectively. The withdrawal rates due to AEs were 8.0% (95% CI: 0.06–0.11), 16.0% (95% CI: 0.13–0.20), and 16% (95% CI: 0.11–0.21) at 3, 6, and 12 months of PER treatment, respectively. Subgroup analyses showed a higher withdrawal rate in the rapid (30%, 95% CI: 0.22–0.38) than in the slow (12%, 95% CI: 0.06–0.18) titration group.Conclusion: Altogether, PER was effective and could be fairly tolerated in both short-term and long-term usage in patients with epilepsy in routine clinical practice. Furthermore, PER appeared to be more effective when PER was used as the first add-on, monotherapy, or concomitant with non-EIAEDs.Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022384532.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liyan Hou
- Dalian Medical University Library, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Jingjing Yang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xuan Zhang
- National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Drug-Research and Development R & D of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Na Li
- National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Drug-Research and Development R & D of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Sheng Li
- National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Drug-Research and Development R & D of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Dalian Medical University Library, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- *Correspondence: Lei Zhang, ; Jie Zhao, ; Qingshan Wang,
| | - Jie Zhao
- National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Drug-Research and Development R & D of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- *Correspondence: Lei Zhang, ; Jie Zhao, ; Qingshan Wang,
| | - Qingshan Wang
- National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Drug-Research and Development R & D of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- School of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- *Correspondence: Lei Zhang, ; Jie Zhao, ; Qingshan Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rollo E, Romozzi M, Vollono C, Calabresi P, Geppetti P, Iannone LF. Antiseizure Medications for the Prophylaxis of Migraine during the Anti- CGRP Drugs Era. Curr Neuropharmacol 2023; 21:1767-1785. [PMID: 36582062 PMCID: PMC10514541 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x21666221228095256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine and epilepsy are fundamentally distinct disorders that can frequently coexist in the same patient. These two conditions significantly differ in diagnosis and therapy but share some widely- used preventive treatments. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are the mainstay of therapy for epilepsy, and about thirty different ASMs are available to date. ASMs are widely prescribed for other neurological and non-neurological conditions, including migraine. However, only topiramate and valproic acid/valproate currently have an indication for migraine prophylaxis supported by high-quality evidence. Although without specifically approved indications and with a low level of evidence or recommendation, several other ASMs are used for migraine prophylaxis. Understanding ASM antimigraine mechanisms, including their ability to affect the pro-migraine calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling pathway and other pathways, may be instrumental in identifying the specific targets of their antimigraine efficacy and may increase awareness of the neurobiological differences between epilepsy and migraine. Several new ASMs are under clinical testing or have been approved for epilepsy in recent years, providing novel potential drugs for migraine prevention to enrich the treatment armamentarium and drugs that inhibit the CGRP pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Rollo
- Dipartimento Universitario di Neuroscienze, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marina Romozzi
- Dipartimento Universitario di Neuroscienze, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Catello Vollono
- Dipartimento Universitario di Neuroscienze, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Neurofisiopatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze dell’invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa-Collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Calabresi
- Dipartimento Universitario di Neuroscienze, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Neurologia, Dipartimento di Scienze dell’invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa-Collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Luigi F. Iannone
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gasparini S, Ferlazzo E, Neri S, Cianci V, Iudice A, Bisulli F, Bonanni P, Caggia E, D'Aniello A, Di Bonaventura C, DiFrancesco JC, Domina E, Dono F, Gambardella A, Marini C, Marrelli A, Matricardi S, Morano A, Paladin F, Renna R, Striano P, Pascarella A, Ascoli M, Aguglia U. Effectiveness of perampanel as the only add-on: Retrospective, multicenter, observational real-life study on epilepsy patients. Epilepsia Open 2022; 7:687-696. [PMID: 36082380 PMCID: PMC9712478 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Perampanel (PER) is indicated as adjunctive antiseizure medication (ASM) in adolescents and adults with epilepsy. Data from clinical trials show good efficacy and tolerability, while limited information is available on the routine clinical use of PER, especially when used as only add-on treatment. METHODS We performed an observational, retrospective, multicenter study on people with focal or generalized epilepsy aged >12 years, consecutively recruited from 52 Italian epilepsy centers. All patients received PER as the only add-on treatment to a background ASM according to standard clinical practice. Retention rate, seizure frequency, and adverse events were recorded at 3, 6, and 12 months after PER introduction. Subanalyses by early or late use of PER and by concomitant ASM were also conducted. RESULTS Five hundred and three patients were included (age 36.5 ± 19.9 years). Eighty-one percent had focal epilepsy. Overall, the retention rate was very high in the whole group (89% at 12 months) according with efficacy measures. No major differences were observed in the subanalyses, although patients who used PER as early add-on, as compared with late add-on, more often reached early seizure freedom at 3-month follow-up (66% vs 53%, P = .05). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 25%, far less commonly than in PER randomized trials. SIGNIFICANCE This study confirms the good efficacy and safety of PER for focal or generalized epilepsy in real-life conditions. We provide robust data about its effectiveness as only add-on treatment even in patients with a long-standing history of epilepsy and previously treated with many ASMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Gasparini
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesMagna Græcia University of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan “Bianchi‐Melacrino‐Morelli Hospital”Reggio CalabriaItaly
| | - Edoardo Ferlazzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesMagna Græcia University of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan “Bianchi‐Melacrino‐Morelli Hospital”Reggio CalabriaItaly
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research CouncilCatanzaroItaly
| | - Sabrina Neri
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesMagna Græcia University of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan “Bianchi‐Melacrino‐Morelli Hospital”Reggio CalabriaItaly
| | - Vittoria Cianci
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan “Bianchi‐Melacrino‐Morelli Hospital”Reggio CalabriaItaly
| | - Alfonso Iudice
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of NeurologyUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
| | - Francesca Bisulli
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor SciencesAlma Mater Studiorum‐University of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology UnitScientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio MedeaTrevisoItaly
| | | | | | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences"Sapienza" University of RomeRomeItaly
| | - Jacopo C. DiFrancesco
- Department of Neurology, ASST S. Gerardo HospitalUniversity of Milano‐BicoccaMonzaItaly
| | | | - Fedele Dono
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science"G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti‐PescaraChietiItaly
| | - Antonio Gambardella
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesMagna Græcia University of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research CouncilCatanzaroItaly
- Neurologic ClinicMagna Græcia University of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly
| | - Carla Marini
- Child Neurology and Psychiatric Unit, G. Salesi Pediatric HospitalUnited Hospitals of AnconaAnconaItaly
| | - Alfonso Marrelli
- Neurophysiopathology Unit, Epilepsy CenterSan Salvatore HospitalL'AquilaItaly
| | - Sara Matricardi
- Child Neurology and Psychiatric Unit, G. Salesi Pediatric HospitalUnited Hospitals of AnconaAnconaItaly
| | | | | | - Rosaria Renna
- Unit of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis CenterRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, IFORomeItaly
| | - Pasquale Striano
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina GasliniGenovaItaly
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child HealthUniversity of GenovaGenoaItaly
| | - Angelo Pascarella
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesMagna Græcia University of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly
| | | | - Umberto Aguglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesMagna Græcia University of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan “Bianchi‐Melacrino‐Morelli Hospital”Reggio CalabriaItaly
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research CouncilCatanzaroItaly
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Estévez-María JC, Garamendi-Ruiz I. The real-world effectiveness and safety of perampanel in Europe: A scoping review. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 134:108777. [PMID: 35816832 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In order to characterize the real-world effectiveness and safety of perampanel during clinical use in Europe, we conducted a structured literature search and scoping review of real-world studies conducted in Europe in adolescents (aged ≥ 12 years) or adults who were prescribed perampanel for focal epilepsy or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the context of idiopathic generalized epilepsy, published between January 2016 and July 2021. We identified 29 relevant studies (20 retrospective and 9 prospective) in 3608 patients; median study duration was 12 months. Most patients (76.1%) were receiving two or more antiseizure drugs (ASDs) when perampanel was initiated. The maintenance perampanel dose ranged from 2 to 16 mg/day (most commonly 6 mg/day). Retention rate at 12 months ranged from 46% to 90.5% (median 71.1%). The proportion of patients who were free of seizures during perampanel ranged from 1.8% to 84.6%, but were consistently below 20% in studies where patients had received an average of ≥5 prior ASDs and above 20% where patients had received an average of <5 prior ASDs. The proportion of patients who achieved ≥50% reduction in seizures during perampanel ranged from 20.0% to 85.7%. Across all studies, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) ranged from 18.2% to 67.4% (median 37.1%) and discontinuation due to AEs from 6.2% to 56% (median 12.5%). Discontinuation rates tended to be higher in UK studies than in studies from Italy or Spain. The most commonly reported individual AEs were dizziness/vertigo (median incidence 13.7%), somnolence (median 11.9%), aggression (median 9.8%), irritability (median 9.1%), and cognitive deficits (median 7.0%). There was no relationship between the overall rate of AEs and perampanel dose, perampanel plasma levels, or number of concomitant medications. Our global overview of European observational studies with perampanel provides evidence that this agent is effective and safe in clinical practice in a range of countries, patients, and settings.
Collapse
|
12
|
Suwanpakdee P, Saksritavee B, Likasitthananon N, Simasathien T, Deesudchit T, Khongkhatithum C, Viravan S, Nabangchang C. Perampanel as adjunctive therapy in drug resistant epilepsy in adolescents and children waiting for epilepsy surgery: A multicenter observational study in Thailand. Seizure 2022; 100:103-108. [PMID: 35820301 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) in real-world settings in patients between 1 month and 18 years of age with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) waiting for epilepsy surgery. METHODS In this multicenter study, patients between 1 month and 18 years of age with DRE treated with PER between January 2020 and June 2021 were selected. The study outcome was effectiveness of PER treatment reported as reduction in seizure frequency and seizure freedom rate. Effectiveness was assessed at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 days after initiation of PER. Tolerability profiles were reported as adverse events according to the observations of the patients' family members and physician. RESULTS Eighty-five patients treated with PER were included in the study. The mean initial dose and mean maximum dose of adjunctive PER was 2 mg/day and 5.8 mg/day, respectively. The mean seizure frequency (rate/week) was 41.3, 25.4, 18.9, 14.3, 11.2, 11.1 and 8.9 seizures at baseline, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 days, respectively; the reduction in the mean seizure frequency at all timepoints was significant compared at the baseline (p<0.001). At 180 days, ≥75% seizure reduction was seen in 64.9% (37/57) of the patients and seizure freedom was achieved in 36.8% (21/57). Drowsiness, ataxia, and behavioral changes were the common adverse events observed, and these improved after the dose of PER was reduced. No discontinuation of PER was required due to side effects or intolerance. CONCLUSION In real-world settings, PER is well tolerated and effective in seizure control in pediatric and adolescent patients with DRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piradee Suwanpakdee
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Burachat Saksritavee
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Napakjira Likasitthananon
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thitiwan Simasathien
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tayard Deesudchit
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chaiyos Khongkhatithum
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sorawit Viravan
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Charcrin Nabangchang
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mammì A, Ferlazzo E, Gasparini S, Bova V, Neri S, Labate A, Mastroianni G, Bianco CL, Cianci V, Aguglia U. Psychiatric and Behavioural Side Effects Associated With Perampanel in Patients With Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. A Real-World Experience. Front Neurol 2022; 13:839985. [PMID: 35321512 PMCID: PMC8936072 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.839985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Psychiatric and behavioural side effects are common, undesirable effects associated with antiseizure medication use. Temporal lobe epilepsy is the most common focal epilepsy in adults and it is frequently associated with drug resistance. Patients with intractable epilepsy are more likely to have psychiatric and behavioural side effects when taking antiseizure medications and seem to be at higher risk for psychiatric comorbidities. Perampanel is a novel anti-seizure medication approved for focal and generalised epilepsies as add-on therapy. This is a 12-week short-term observational prospective study on people with focal epilepsy consecutively recruited from an Italian tertiary epilepsy centre, aimed to compare incidence and severity of psychiatric and behavioural side effects associated with perampanel use in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy as compared to other focal epilepsies. All patients received add-on perampanel according to indication and clinical judgement. Incidence and severity of psychiatric and behavioural side effects were rated by Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. All patients enrolled answered the questionnaire before starting perampanel and after 12 weeks of treatment. We found no significant difference in terms of incidence and severity of psychiatric and behavioural side effects associated with perampanel in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy as compared to other focal epilepsies. In line with the literature, the most common adverse effects were “irritability” for both groups and “aggression” for patients with other focal epilepsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Mammì
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital BMM, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Edoardo Ferlazzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital BMM, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Sara Gasparini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital BMM, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Valentina Bova
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital BMM, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Sabrina Neri
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital BMM, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Angelo Labate
- Neurology Unit, Department of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mastroianni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital BMM, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Concetta Lo Bianco
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital BMM, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Vittoria Cianci
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital BMM, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Umberto Aguglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital BMM, Reggio Calabria, Italy
- *Correspondence: Umberto Aguglia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fong YO, Huang P, Hsu CY, Yang YH. Effects of Perampanel on Seizure Control, Cognition, Behavior, and Psychological Status in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review. J Clin Neurol 2022; 18:653-662. [DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2022.18.6.653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-On Fong
- Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Poyin Huang
- Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Neuroscience Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chung Yao Hsu
- Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Neuroscience Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Han Yang
- Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Neuroscience Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- School of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, Colleague of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Im K, Lee SA, Kim JH, Kim DW, Lee SK, Seo DW, Lee JW. Long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy: Three-year extension study. Epilepsy Behav 2021; 125:108407. [PMID: 34785411 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy. METHODS This retrospective study represented the 3-year extension phase of a multicenter, open-label, phase 4, prospective study of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy. Seizure and safety outcomes were assessed annually from the start of the extension study, and the retention rate was calculated from the start of perampanel exposure in the original study. RESULTS The 50% responder and seizure freedom rates were 84.8% and 58.7%, respectively, during the third year and 71.7% and 32.6%, respectively, during the entire 3-year period of the extension study. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year retention rates were 62.5%, 53.1%, and 52.1%, respectively. Efficacies were higher in patients that were aged >55 years, male, and receiving ≤4 mg of perampanel. Perampanel was generally well tolerated; 47.3% of patients experienced at least one adverse event during the 3 years of extension (46 adverse events (AEs) in 35 patients). The most common AEs were dizziness (33.8%), somnolence (5.4%), anger (4.1%), and irritability (4.1%). AEs were resolved with perampanel dose reduction or discontinuation in 10 (13.5%) and 12 (16.2%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION Long-term treatment with perampanel as a first add-on therapy did not raise new safety signals in patients with focal epilepsy. Especially at low perampanel doses (≤4 mg/day), sustained improvement in seizure control was achieved, which could potentially avoid adverse drug reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayeong Im
- Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Ahm Lee
- Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Ji Hyun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Neurology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Kun Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Won Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hatano K, Fujimoto A, Yamamoto T, Enoki H, Okanishi T. Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation following Corpus Callosotomy for Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11111395. [PMID: 34827393 PMCID: PMC8615502 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11111395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for residual seizures after corpus callosotomy (CC) has not yet been fully investigated. We hypothesized that seizure control would be improved by VNS after CC. The purpose of this study was to compare seizure frequency between patients with implantation of a VNS generator (post-VNS group) or without VNS (non-post-VNS group) following CC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent CC between January 2009 and May 2019 in our institution. We evaluated proportions of ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (responders) and seizure reduction rate 1 and 2 years after VNS. To investigate factors related to responders, uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed regarding age, number of anti-seizure medications (ASMs), addition of novel ASMs (levetiracetam, lacosamide or perampanel), and post-VNS or non-post-VNS status. Results: Thirteen post-VNS patients and 24 non-post-VNS patients were analyzed in this study. Responder rate at 1 year after VNS differed significantly between the post-VNS group (53.9%) and non-post-VNS group (12.5%, p = 0.017). Number of ASMs at the time of CC and post-VNS were significantly associated with responders in univariate analyses (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13–0.88, p = 0.025 and OR 8.2, 95%CI 1.6–41.6, p = 0.011, respectively), whereas age, sex, seizure frequency, and addition of novel ASMs were not. In multivariate analysis, the presence of VNS procedures after CC was the only factor favorably associated with responder status (OR 82.2, 95%CI 1.55–4355.7, p = 0.03). Conclusions: VNS therapy after CC may increase the proportion of responders independent of the addition of novel ASMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Hatano
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Nakaku, Hamamatsu 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan; (K.H.); (T.Y.); (H.E.); (T.O.)
| | - Ayataka Fujimoto
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Nakaku, Hamamatsu 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan; (K.H.); (T.Y.); (H.E.); (T.O.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Nakaku, Hamamatsu 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-53-474-2222; Fax: +81-53-475-7596
| | - Takamichi Yamamoto
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Nakaku, Hamamatsu 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan; (K.H.); (T.Y.); (H.E.); (T.O.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Nakaku, Hamamatsu 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hideo Enoki
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Nakaku, Hamamatsu 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan; (K.H.); (T.Y.); (H.E.); (T.O.)
| | - Tohru Okanishi
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Nakaku, Hamamatsu 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan; (K.H.); (T.Y.); (H.E.); (T.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Brito da Silva A, Pennifold J, Henley B, Chatterjee K, Bateman D, Whittaker RW, Joshi A, Kumar H, Nicholson C, Baker MR, Greenhill SD, Walsh R, Seri S, Jones RSG, Woodhall GL, Cunningham MO. The AMPA receptor antagonist perampanel suppresses epileptic activity in human focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsia Open 2021; 7:488-495. [PMID: 34653311 PMCID: PMC9436284 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is one of the most common malformations causing refractory epilepsy. Dysregulation of glutamatergic systems plays a critical role in the hyperexcitability of dysplastic neurons in FCD lesions. The pharmacoresistant nature of epilepsy associated with FCD may be due to a lack of well‐tolerated and precise antiepileptic drugs that can target glutamate receptors. Here, for the first time in human FCD brain slices, we show that the established, noncompetitive α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist, perampanel has potent antiepileptic action. Moreover, we demonstrate that this effect is due to a reduction in burst firing behavior in human FCD microcircuits. These data support a potential role for the treatment of refractory epilepsy associated with FCD in human patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anderson Brito da Silva
- Institute of Neuroscience, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Henry Wellcome Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.,CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, 70040-020, Brazil
| | - Jane Pennifold
- Aston Brain Centre, Aston University, School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK
| | - Ben Henley
- Aston Brain Centre, Aston University, School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK
| | - Koustav Chatterjee
- Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata, 700017, West Bengal, India
| | - David Bateman
- Department of Neurology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland, Tyne & Wear, SR4 7TP, UK
| | - Roger W Whittaker
- Institute of Neuroscience, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Henry Wellcome Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.,Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - Abhijit Joshi
- Department of Neuropathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - Hrishikesh Kumar
- Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata, 700017, West Bengal, India
| | - Claire Nicholson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - Mark R Baker
- Institute of Neuroscience, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Henry Wellcome Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.,Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - Stuart D Greenhill
- Aston Brain Centre, Aston University, School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK
| | - Richard Walsh
- Children's Epilepsy Surgery Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK
| | - Stefano Seri
- Children's Epilepsy Surgery Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK
| | - Roland S G Jones
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
| | - Gavin L Woodhall
- Aston Brain Centre, Aston University, School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK
| | - Mark O Cunningham
- Institute of Neuroscience, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Henry Wellcome Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.,Discipline of Physiology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang R, Qiao S, Fang X, Wang K, Shi Y, Du Q, Yang T, Liu X. Efficacy and Tolerability of Perampanel as Adjunctive Therapy in Chinese Patients With Focal-Onset Seizures: An Observational, Prospective Study. Front Neurol 2021; 12:731566. [PMID: 34526963 PMCID: PMC8435584 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.731566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel (PER) in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures, with or without secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Methods: Fifty-six patients aged 14-72 years were recruited consecutively in this single-center prospective observational study. All patients received PER as add-on treatment on the basis of clinical judgment. Seizure frequency, adverse events (AEs), and retention rates were obtained at 3 and 6 months after PER introduction. Results: The overall response rates were 60 and 71.1% after 3 and 6 months, respectively, and the freedom of seizures at the same points were reached in 8 and 15.8%. The retention rates were 89.3% at the 3-month follow-up and 67.9% at the 6-month follow-up. The overall incidence of adverse events was 55.4%. The leading reported AEs were dizziness (39.3%) and somnolence (25%). Conclusions: Our study confirmed the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive PER in Chinese patients in real-life conditions. Based on our treatment experience, a lower maintenance dose of PER would be needed in Chinese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranran Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Shan Qiao
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiqin Fang
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Kemo Wang
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yanting Shi
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Qianwen Du
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Tingting Yang
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xuewu Liu
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Institute of Epilepsy, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Davis Jones G, Stavropoulos I, Ibrahim K, Tristram M, Neale M, Jory C, Adcock J, Esposito M, Hamandi K, Shankar R, Rugg-Gunn F, Elwes R, Sen A. An evaluation of the effectiveness of perampanel in people with epilepsy who have previously undergone resective surgery and/or implantation of a vagal nerve stimulator. Epilepsy Behav 2021; 116:107738. [PMID: 33517199 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
About 30% of people with epilepsy (PWE) are drug-resistant. Those with focal seizures may be suitable for epilepsy surgery. Those not amenable to resective surgery can be considered for vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). However, after operative procedures, around 50% of patients continue to experience seizures. A multi-center retrospective study assessing perampanel effectiveness and tolerability for PWE who have undergone surgical resection and/or VNS implantation was performed. The primary outcome was ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency while secondary outcomes included side effects (SEs), dose-related effectiveness, and toxicity. The median perampanel dose was 6 mg. Only one PWE became seizure free. A ≥50% decrease in seizure frequency was observed in 52.8% of the post-resection group and 16.9% of the VNS group (p < 0.001), while SEs were seen in 44.8% and 41.1%, respectively. Perampanel doses greater than 8 mg led to better response in both groups, especially in the post-VNS cohort. SEs were not dose-related and the safety profile was similar to previous observational studies. Perampanel can be beneficial in these two super-refractory epilepsy groups, particularly in PWE with seizures after surgical resection. Doses of more than 8 mg appear to be well tolerated and may be more effective than lower doses in PWE after surgical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Davis Jones
- Oxford Epilepsy Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Ioannis Stavropoulos
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK; Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Kareem Ibrahim
- Oxford Epilepsy Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Maggie Tristram
- Oxford Epilepsy Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Marcus Neale
- Oxford Epilepsy Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Caryn Jory
- Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Threemilestone Industrial Estate, Truro, UK
| | - Jane Adcock
- Oxford Epilepsy Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Michelle Esposito
- The Welsh Epilepsy Centre, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF144XW, UK
| | - Khalid Hamandi
- The Welsh Epilepsy Centre, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF144XW, UK
| | - Rohit Shankar
- Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Threemilestone Industrial Estate, Truro, UK; University of Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
| | - Fergus Rugg-Gunn
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, and UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Robert Elwes
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Arjune Sen
- Oxford Epilepsy Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|