Familial occurrence of classical and idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a facial pain disorder characterized by intense and paroxysmal pain that profoundly affects quality of life and presents complex challenges in diagnosis and treatment. TN can be categorized as classical, secondary and idiopathic. Epidemiological studies show variable incidence rates and an increased prevalence in women and in the elderly, with familial cases suggesting genetic factors. The pathophysiology of TN is multifactorial and involves genetic predisposition, anatomical changes, and neurophysiological factors, leading to hyperexcitable neuronal states, central sensitization and widespread neural plasticity changes. Neurovascular compression of the trigeminal root, which undergoes major morphological changes, and focal demyelination of primary trigeminal afferents are key aetiological factors in TN. Structural and functional brain imaging studies in patients with TN demonstrated abnormalities in brain regions responsible for pain modulation and emotional processing of pain. Treatment of TN involves a multifaceted approach that considers patient-specific factors, including the type of TN, with initial pharmacotherapy followed by surgical options if necessary. First-line pharmacological treatments include carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine. Surgical interventions, including microvascular decompression and percutaneous neuroablative procedures, can be considered at an early stage if pharmacotherapy is not sufficient for pain control or has intolerable adverse effects or contraindications.

Trigeminal and Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia and glossopharyngeal neuralgia are craniofacial pain syndromes characterized by recurrent brief shock-like pains in the distributions of their respective cranial nerves. In this article, the authors aim to summarize each condition's characteristics, pathophysiology, and current pharmacotherapeutic and surgical interventions available for managing and treating these conditions.

Therapeutic Approach for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review

This umbrella review aimed to determine the various drugs used to treat trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and to evaluate their efficacies as well as side effects by surveying previously published reviews. An online search was conducted using PubMed, CRD, EBSCO, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library with no limits on publication date or patients' gender, age, and ethnicity. Reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials pertaining to drug therapy for TN, and other relevant review articles added from their reference lists, were evaluated. Rapid reviews, reviews published in languages other than English, and reviews of laboratory studies, case reports, and series were excluded. A total of 588 articles were initially collected; 127 full-text articles were evaluated after removing the duplicates and screening the titles and abstracts, and 11 articles were finally included in this study. Except for carbamazepine, most of the drugs had been inadequately studied. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine continue to be the first choice for medication for classical TN. Lamotrigine and baclofen can be regarded as second-line drugs to treat patients not responding to first-line medication or for patients having intolerable side effects from carbamazepine. Drug combinations using carbamazepine, baclofen, gabapentin, ropivacaine, tizanidine, and pimozide can yield satisfactory results and improve the tolerance to the treatment. Intravenous lidocaine can be used to treat acute exaggerations and botulinum toxin-A can be used in refractory cases. Proparacaine, dextromethorphan, and tocainide were reported to be inappropriate for treating TN. Anticonvulsants are successful in managing trigeminal neuralgia; nevertheless, there have been few studies with high levels of proof, making it challenging to compare or even combine their results in a statistically useful way. New research on other drugs, combination therapies, and newer formulations, such as vixotrigine, is awaited. There is conclusive evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological drugs in the treatment of TN.

Electrophysiological characterization of a CaV3.1 calcium channel mutation linked to trigeminal neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia is a rare and debilitating disorder that affects one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve, leading to severe pain attacks and a poor quality of life. It has been reported that the Ca_V3.1 T-type calcium channel may play an important role in trigeminal pain and a recent study identified a new missense mutation in the CACNA1G gene that encodes the pore forming α1 subunit of the Ca_V3.1 calcium channel. The mutation leads to a substitution of an Arginine (R) by a Glutamine (Q) at position 706 in the I-II linker region of the channel. Here, we used whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings to evaluate the biophysical properties of Ca_V3.1 wild-type and R706Q mutant channels expressed in tsA-201 cells. Our data indicate an increase in current density in the R706Q mutant, leading to a gain-of-function effect, without changes in the voltage for half activation. Moreover, voltage clamp using an action potential waveform protocol revealed an increase in the tail current at the repolarization phase in the R706Q mutant. No changes were observed in the voltage-dependence of inactivation. However, the R706Q mutant displayed a faster recovery from inactivation. Hence, the gain-of-function effects in the R706Q Ca_V3.1 mutant have the propensity to impact pain transmission in the trigeminal system, consistent with a contribution to trigeminal neuralgia pathophysiology.

Microvascular Decompression Versus Gamma Knife Surgery in Patients with Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

There are 2 cardinal approaches for drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia (TN), including microvascular decompression (MVD) and gamma knife surgery (GKS). This study aimed to compare the results of MVD versus GKS in the treatment of drug-resistant TN.

METHODS

The search strategy was formulated in accordance with PRISMA recommendations for publications retrieved from electronic databases, such as PubMed, Scopus, and web of science. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were examined for relevant research. The meta-analysis was conducted by combining data using odds ratios.

RESULTS

Four papers were included in our study. 582 patients were treated with MVD, and 607 patients were treated with GKS for drug-resistant TN. Findings revealed that MVD related to higher rates of pain relief and lower rates of pain recurrence compared to GKS. It seems that GKS had lower post-procedural complications in our review.

CONCLUSIONS

MVD and GKS both reduce pain in patients with drug-resistant TN, but MVD was superior to GKS in pain relief. Furthermore, recurrence rate was lower. Post-operative complications except facial numbness were higher in MVD.