A real-world analysis of factors associated with high healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with myasthenia gravis receiving second-line treatment

Economic and societal burden of myasthenia gravis in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden: A population-based registry study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and the economic burden of myasthenia gravis (MG) are significant, but existing studies rarely include comprehensive nationwide data. We examined HCRU and direct and indirect costs associated with MG overall and by disease severity in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from nationwide health and social care registries. All individuals ≥18 years of age with ≥2 International Classification of Diseases diagnoses of MG between 2000 and 2020 were included. HCRU, direct (inpatient and outpatient contacts, medication) and indirect costs (early retirement, sick leave, death), and associated factors were calculated.

RESULTS

The full study cohort comprised 8622 people with MG (pwMG). Mean annual numbers of all-cause secondary health care contacts for pwMG were 3.4 (SD = 8.3), 7.0 (SD = 12.3), and 2.9 (SD = 3.9), with mean annual total costs of €12,185, €9036, and €5997 per person in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, respectively. Inpatient periods, involving 77%-89% of study participants in the three countries, contributed most to direct costs, whereas the majority of indirect costs resulted from early retirement in Denmark and Finland, and sick leave periods in Sweden. Mean annual total costs were highest with very severe MG (€19,570-€33,495 per person across the three countries). Female sex and comorbidities, such as mental and behavioral disorders and severe infections, were also associated with higher total costs.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based study shows a high level of HCRU and a significant direct and indirect economic burden of MG across three Nordic countries, especially for severe forms of MG.

Predictors of High Healthcare Cost Among Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Combined Machine Learning and Regression Approach from a US Payer Perspective

BACKGROUND

High healthcare costs could arise from unmet needs. This study used random forest (RF) and regression methods to identify predictors of high costs from a US payer perspective in patients newly diagnosed with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).

METHODS

Adults with gMG (first diagnosis = index) were selected from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database (2017-2021). Predictors of high healthcare costs were measured 12 months pre-index (main cohort) and during both the 12 months pre- and post-index (subgroup). Top 50 predictors of high costs [≥ $9404 (main cohort) and ≥ $9159 (subgroup) per-patient-per-month] were identified with RF models; the magnitude and direction of association were estimated with multivariable modified Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

The main cohort and subgroup included 2739 and 1638 patients, respectively. In RF analysis, the most important predictors of high costs before/on the index date were index MG exacerbation, all-cause inpatient admission, and number of days with corticosteroids. After the index date, these were immunoglobulin and monoclonal antibody use and number of all-cause outpatient visits and MG-related encounters. Adjusting for the top 50 predictors, post-index immunoglobulin use increased the risk of high costs by 261%, monoclonal antibody use by 135%, index MG exacerbation by 78%, and pre-index all-cause inpatient admission by 27% (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis links patient characteristics both before the formal MG diagnosis and in the first year to high future healthcare costs. Findings may help inform payers on cost-saving strategies, and providers can potentially shift to targeted treatment approaches to reduce the clinical and economic burden of gMG.

Cost-effectiveness of eculizumab and efgartigimod for the treatment of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Eculizumab and efgartigimod were approved to treat anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (anti-AChR Ab-positive gMG). These relatively new biological treatments provide a more rapid onset of action and improved efficacy compared with conventional immunosuppressive treatments, but at a higher cost.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of eculizumab and, separately, efgartigimod, each added to conventional therapy vs conventional therapy alone, among patients with refractory anti-AChR Ab-positive gMG and those with anti-AChR Ab-positive gMG, respectively.

METHODS

A Markov model with 4 health states was developed, evaluating costs and utility with a 4-week cycle length and lifetime time horizon from a health care system perspective and a modified societal perspective including productivity losses from patients and caregiver burden. Model inputs were informed by key clinical trials and relevant publications identified from targeted literature reviews, and drug costs were identified from Micromedex Red Book. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs; cost per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained) were calculated for each comparison.

RESULTS

Among the corresponding populations, lifetime costs and QALYs, respectively, for eculizumab were $5,515,000 and 11.85, and for conventional therapy, $308,000 and 10.29, resulting in an ICER of $3,338,000/QALY gained. For efgartigimod, lifetime costs and QALYs, respectively, were $6,773,000 and 13.22, and for conventional therapy, $322,000 and 9.98, yielding an ICER of $1,987,000/QALY gained. After applying indirect costs in a modified societal perspective, the ICERs were reduced to $3,310,000/QALY gained for eculizumab and $1,959,000/QALY gained for efgartigimod.

CONCLUSIONS

Eculizumab and efgartigimod are rapidly acting and effective treatments for myasthenia gravis. However, at their current price, both therapies greatly exceeded common cost-effectiveness thresholds, likely limiting patient access to these therapies.

Long-Term Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs among Patients with Myasthenia Gravis: A Swedish Nationwide Population-Based Study

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare costs and societal impact of myasthenia gravis (MG), a potentially life-threatening rare, chronic neuromuscular disease, are sparsely studied. We assessed healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs among patients with newly diagnosed (ND) and preexisting (PE) MG in Sweden.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective cohort study used data from four linkable Swedish nationwide population-based registries. Adult MG patients receiving pharmacological treatment for MG and having ≥24-month follow-up during the period January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 1,275 patients were included in the analysis, of which 554 patients were categorized into the ND MG group and 721 into the PE MG group. Mean (±SD) age was 61.3 (±17.4) years, and 52.3% were female. In the first year post-diagnosis, ND patients had significantly higher utilization of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (96.0% vs. 83.9%), corticosteroids (59.6% vs. 45.8%), thymectomy (12.1% vs. 0.7%), and plasma exchange (3.8% vs. 0.6%); had higher all-cause (70.9% vs. 35.8%) and MG-related (62.5% vs. 18.4%) hospitalization rates with 11 more hospitalization days (all p < 0.01) and an increased risk of hospitalization (odds ratio [95% CI] = 4.4 [3.43, 5.64]) than PE MG. In year 1 post-diagnosis, ND MG patients incurred EUR 7,302 (p < 0.01) higher total all-cause costs than PE MG, of which 84% were estimated to be MG-related and the majority (86%) were related to inpatient care. These results remained significant also after controlling for baseline demographics and comorbidities (p < 0.01). In year 2 post-diagnosis, the all-cause medical costs decreased by ∼55% for ND MG from year 1 and were comparable with PE MG.

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, MG patients required significantly more healthcare resources in year 1 post-diagnosis than PE MG primarily due to more pharmacological treatments, thymectomies, and associated hospitalizations. These findings highlight the need to better understand potential factors including disease characteristics associated with increased health resource use and costs and need for more efficacious treatments early in the disease course.

A retrospective observational study on characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource use of patients with myasthenia gravis in England

Background

There are limited data on the real-world healthcare resource use (HCRU) and management costs of myasthenia gravis (MG) in England.

Objective

This study aims to assess the burden of disease for patients with MG in England.

Design

A retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients diagnosed with MG, using data from the Hospital Episode Statistics data warehouse.

Methods

Patients with a first-ever recorded diagnosis of MG between 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2020 were followed up until 30 June 2021 or death, whichever occurred first. Post-diagnosis patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs were described. Costs were evaluated using National Health Service reference costs.

Results

A total of 9087 patients with a median follow-up time of 2.9 years (range, 1.7-4.3 years) were included. The mean age at diagnosis was 66.5 years and 53% of the patients were male. A large proportion of patients (72.8%) were admitted as inpatients during follow-up with a mean number of 1.3 admissions. Patients hospitalized for MG-related complications spent a mean of 9.7 days per patient-year in the hospital. During follow-up, 599 (6.6% of the total cohort) and 163 (1.8%) patients had a record of rescue therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange (PLEX), respectively. Rituximab was administered to 81 (0.9%) patients and 268 (2.9%) patients underwent thymectomy. In those patients receiving rescue therapy or rituximab, >10% received at least three cycles of the same treatment. The average annual cost of hospital admissions across all patients treated with IVIg, PLEX, and rituximab were £907,072, £689,979, and £146,726, respectively.

Conclusion

A majority of MG patients required hospitalization or accident and emergency attendance, resulting in high HCRU and costs. A subset of patients required rescue therapy (including IVIg and PLEX), rituximab administration, ventilation, or thymectomy.

Healthcare resource utilization, costs and treatment associated with myasthenia gravis exacerbations among patients with myasthenia gravis in the USA: a retrospective analysis of claims data

Aim: There are limited data on the clinical and economic burden of exacerbations in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). We assessed patient clinical characteristics, treatments and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with MG exacerbation. Patients & methods: This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with MG identified by commercial, Medicare or Medicaid insurance claims from the IBM® MarketScan® database. Eligible patients had two or more MG diagnosis codes, without evidence of exacerbation or crisis in the baseline period (12 months prior to index [first eligible MG diagnosis]). Clinical characteristics were evaluated at baseline and 12 weeks before each exacerbation. Number of exacerbations, MG treatments and HCRU costs associated with exacerbation were described during a 2-year follow-up period. Results: Among 9352 prevalent MG patients, 34.4% (n = 3218) experienced ≥1 exacerbation after index: commercial, 53.0% (n = 1706); Medicare, 39.4% (n = 1269); and Medicaid, 7.6% (n = 243). During follow-up, the mean (standard deviation) number of exacerbations per commercial and Medicare patient was 3.7 (7.0) and 2.7 (4.1), respectively. At least two exacerbations were experienced by approximately half of commercial and Medicare patients with ≥1 exacerbation. Mean total MG-related healthcare costs per exacerbation ranged from $26,078 to $51,120, and from $19,903 to $49,967 for commercial and Medicare patients, respectively. AChEI use decreased in patients with multiple exacerbations, while intravenous immunoglobulin use increased with multiple exacerbations. Conclusion: Despite utilization of current treatments for MG, MG exacerbations are associated with a high clinical and economic burden in both commercial and Medicare patients. Additional treatment options and improved disease management may help to reduce exacerbations and disease burden.

The economic burden of individuals living with generalized myasthenia gravis and facing social determinants of health challenges

Objective

Better understanding the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) barriers from the patient perspective is crucial to improve holistic patient support in generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), a rare autoimmune disorder with high disease and treatment burden. The objective of this study was to identify economic challenges experienced by individuals living with gMG and SDOH barriers to better address current unmet needs.

Methods

Adults (18-75 years) living with gMG and experiencing SDOH barriers in the United States were recruited to a mixed-methods study including qualitative interviews and a web-based quantitative survey. Quotas were implemented to include a balanced spread of baseline demographic categories including insurance type, living environment, and employment status among the study sample. Direct and indirect economic challenges were identified by degree of concern.

Results

The survey was completed by 38 individuals living with gMG, the majority of whom were enrolled in public insurance and not employed. The most commonly reported major economic concerns were managing funds for emergency care (66%), loss of income (61%), and non-medical expenses (58%), highlighting the diversity of economic challenges. Individuals who were using public insurance plans, living in non-urban environments, and unemployed experienced pronounced challenges around managing non-medical costs and accessing government assistance.

Conclusion

Both direct and indirect costs were emphasized as major concerns among individuals living with gMG and SDOH barriers. Increasing access to relevant, personalized, and holistic resources, including care management, should be prioritized to improve disease management and outcomes for individuals living with gMG.