Usefulness of entrainment mapping using the activation sequence of the last captured excitation in complex dual-loop atrial tachycardia

Is proximal coronary sinus involved in the circuit in some cases of ECG "typical" atrial flutter?

AIM

It is commonly conceived that coronary sinus (CS) participates in atrial flutter (AFL) circuit but limited to the fibers surrounding its ostium. We evaluated the involvement of proximal CS in typical AFL.

METHODS

Twenty AFL patients underwent entrainment mapping using postpacing interval minus AFL cycle length (PPI-AFL CL) including CS where a decapolar catheter was positioned with proximal bipole 1 cm from the ostium.

RESULTS

We compared patients with proximal CS within the circuit (group 1, PPI-AFL CL ≤ 20 ms + concealed entrainment) and those without (group 2, PPI-AFL CL > 20 ms). Group 1 patients were older, 77.5 ± 4 vs 71 ± 12 years (P < 0.05). No difference was found in AFL CL, PPI-AFL CL at cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) entry, plateau, and septal site. Group 1 patients had shorter PPI-AFL CL at proximal CS (9 ± 3 vs 40 ± 15 ms; P < 0.001) and fragmented mesodiastolic CS atrial potentials (APs) (106 ± 27 vs 58.5 ± 22 ms; P < 0.001). A mid-septal unexcitable scar was found in five of eight group 1 patients vs one of 12 group 2 patients (P < 0.05). All were ablated at CTI. A patient had AFL recurrence and underwent a second attempt: PPI-AFL CL was 60 ms at CTI entry and less than or equal to 20 ms at septal CTI and proximal CS; AFL was terminated 1 cm inside CS, applying RF at a fragmented AP.

CONCLUSION

Proximal CS appears to be involved in a substantial subset of typical AFL patients, in whom advanced age, fragmented CS APs, and the presence of right atrial scar are prevalent. Proximal CS might be considered as an un-"innocent by-stander," but able, in rare cases, to generate a second AFL circuit.