Usefulness of combined CARTO electroanatomical mapping and manifest entrainment in ablating adenosine triphosphate-sensitive atrial tachycardia originating from the atrioventricular node vicinity

Discrimination of atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from atrial tachycardia by the V-A-A-V response

INTRODUCTION

The electrophysiological discrimination between fast-slow (F/S-) atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (NRT) and atrial tachycardia (AT) originating from the interatrial septum remains challenging. While a V-A-A-V response may occur immediately after ventricular induction or entrainment of either tachycardia, the electrophysiological dissimilarities in that response between the two tachycardias remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify a diagnostic indicator discriminating F/S-AVNRT from AT by examining the difference in the V-A-A-V response between the two tachycardias.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 17 patients with F/S-AVNRT [7 with common-form F/S-AVNRT using a typical slow pathway (SP) and 10 with superior type F/S-AVNRT using a superior SP] and 10 patients with reentrant AT. All 27 patients presented with long RP supraventricular tachycardia and an initial V-A-A-V response upon ventricular induction or entrainment. The V-A-A-V response in patients with F/S-AVNRT was due to dual atrial responses. We measured the interval between the first (A1) and second atrial electrogram (A2) of V-A-A-V and calculated ΔAA by subtracting A1-A2 from the tachycardia cycle length.

RESULTS

V-A-A-V responses were observed most often upon ventricular induction of F/S-AVNRT (6±5 times) as well as AT (6±6 times; P = 0.87). The V-A-A-V response upon ventricular entrainment was observed in a single patient with F/S-AVNRT versus 10 all patients with AT (P<0.001). ΔAA ranged between -80 and 228 ms in F/S-AVNRT and between -184 and 26 ms in AT. A ΔAA >26 ms predicted a diagnosis of F/S-AVNRT with a 76% sensitivity and 100% specificity, while a ΔAA ←80 ms predicted a diagnosis of AT with a 50% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

ΔAA is a useful, confirmatory, diagnostic indicator of F/S-AVNRT versus AT associated with the V-A-A-V response. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Adenosine-sensitive atrial tachycardia originating from the para-Hisian region with a slow conduction zone in the anteroseptal left atrium

Adenosine-sensitive atrial tachycardias (ATs) originating from the para-Hisian region have been reported, and the responsible mechanism is considered to be reentry. As an alternative strategy to ablation at the earliest activation site (EAS) close to the atrioventricular node, previous reports safely eliminated these ATs at the entrance of the slow conduction zone, indicated by a manifest entrainment-guided strategy, but no report has successfully ablated those ATs using the same strategy in the left atrium. We describe a case of adenosine-sensitive AT originating from the para-Hisian region that could be eliminated at a remote site from the EAS indicated by the demonstration of manifest entrainment from the high anteroseptal left atrium. <Learning objective: Previous reports safely eliminated adenosine-sensitive atrial tachycardias (ATs) originating from the vicinity of the atrioventricular (AV) node at the entrance of the slow conduction zone (SCZ), indicated by a manifest entrainment-guided strategy. There may be cases with the SCZ in the left atrium (LA), but radiofrequency application on the anteroseptum of the LA near the AV annulus has a potential risk of causing an AV block. Therefore, that strategy in the LA can be a reasonable option.>.