Elongated ascending aorta predicts a short distance between his-bundle potential recording site and coronary sinus ostium

The impact of His bundle location and direction on the efficacy and safety of ablation

BACKGROUND

The impact of the His bundle location and distance from the ablation site on ablation efficacy and complication risk remains unexplored. We determined the correlation between age, height, body mass index (BMI), and the His bundle location, and whether the distance between the His bundle and ablation target (DHIS-ABL) affects ablation safety and efficacy.

METHODS

Overall, 346 patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and 96 with atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT) were retrospectively analyzed. The distance between the His bundle and the coronary sinus ostium (DHis-CS), the height of the His bundle (HHIS), and DHIS-ABL were measured. Electrocardiograms were obtained 3 months post-ablation to assess recurrence and complications.

RESULTS

Multiple linear regression showed that HHIS was negatively correlated with age in both groups. In AVNRT patients, DHIS-ABL was associated with age, height, and BMI; DHIS-CS was only negatively correlated with age. In AVRT patients, there was no significant correlation between the DHIS-ABL and age, height, or BMI. The recurrence rates in the AVNRT and AVRT groups were 0.9% and 8.7%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with DHIS-ABL ≤ 10 mm had a higher recurrence rate than those with DHIS-ABL > 10 mm (p = .013). The incidence of third-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) complications was 0.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

HHIS was negatively correlated with age but not with height and BMI. The DHIS-ABL correlated with age, height, and BMI in AVNRT patients. A short DHIS-ABL led to a higher rate of supraventricular tachycardia recurrence; whether this affects AVB risk warrants further studies with larger sample sizes.

Differences in routes of guiding catheters for left coronary artery according to access sites assessed by the combined angiography-computed tomography system

Differences in guiding catheters (GCs) manipulations and selections among different access sites are currently unclear. We examined the differences in the routes of GCs for the left coronary artery (LCA) among the right radial, left radial, and femoral approaches. We used a combined angiography-computed tomography (CT) system that enabled to perform CT scans during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We enrolled 88 patients who underwent CT scans during LCA PCI or percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation. To evaluate the route of GCs, we analyzed the positions of the catheter's contact point on the contralateral aortic wall to the LCA ostium, which were expressed by the angle formed by the vertical line and the diagonal line from the GC shaft to the center of the aorta. The procedures were performed via the right radial in 47 cases, left radial in 20, and femoral approach in 21. The positions of the catheter's contact point were significantly different depending on the approaches (interquartile range - 3.7 [- 14.3 to 7.8], - 46.5 [- 76.9 to - 9.3], and - 30.7 [- 39.4 to - 22.4] degrees, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that access sites and LCA ostium locations had significant impacts on the positions of the catheter's contact point. The routes of LCA GCs were different among the right radial, left radial, and femoral approaches.