Effects of a 10-week toe-out gait modification intervention in people with medial knee osteoarthritis: a pilot, feasibility study

Determining Individualized Foot Progression Angle for Reduction of Knee Medial Compartment Loading during Stepping

PURPOSE

Modifying foot progression angle (FPA), the angle between the line from the heel to the second metatarsal head and the line of progression, can reduce peak knee adduction moment (pKAM). However, determining the optimal FPA that minimizes pKAM without inducing unnatural walking patterns can be challenging. This study investigated the FPA-pKAM relationship using a robotic stepping trainer to assess the feasibility of determining the optimal FPA based on this relationship. In addition, it examined knee moments during stepping with three different FPAs, as stepping is a recommended exercise for knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation.

METHODS

Twenty-six asymptomatic individuals stepped on a robotic stepping trainer, which measured six-axis footplate-reaction forces/torques and three-dimensional ankle kinematics to determine external knee moments. The robot rotated the footplates slowly (~0.5 deg·s -1 ) between 10°-toe-out and 10°-toe-in while participants stepped continuously, unaware of the footplate rotations. The slope of pKAM-FPA relationship during continuous stepping was determined. Peak three-dimensional knee moments were compared between the 10°-toe-in, 0°-FPA, and 10°-toe-out FPAs with repeated-measures ANOVA. Multiple linear regression determined the covariates that predicted pKAM during stepping.

RESULTS

Eighteen participants had lower pKAM and KAM impulse with 10°-toe-in than 10°-toe-out ( P < 0.001) and 0°-FPA ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively; called toe-in responders). Conversely, eight participants reduced pKAM and KAM impulse with 10°-toe-out compared with 0°-FPA ( P < 0.001, P = 0.017) and 10°-toe-in ( P = 0.026, P = 0.004; called toe-out responders). A linear pKAM-FPA relationship was determined for each individual, and its slope (the pKAM rate with FPA) was positive for toe-in responders ( P < 0.01) and negative for toe-out responders ( P = 0.02). Regression analysis revealed that smaller pKAM with toe-in, in toe-in responders, was explained by increased tibia medial tilt, tibia internal rotation, footplate-reaction lateral force, footplate-reaction anterior force, and decreased footplate-reaction internal rotation torque.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals may exhibit different responses to FPA modification during stepping. The slope and intercept of the linear pKAM-FPA relationship can be determined for individual subjects. This allows for a targeted pKAM reduction through guided FPA positioning and potentially offers subject-specific precision knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation.

Toe-in and toe-out gait retraining interventions for individuals with knee osteoarthritis trial: A pilot randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Gait retraining, through altering foot progression angle, has the potential to reduce pain and offload the medial tibiofemoral compartment in people with knee osteoarthritis. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of toe-in and toe-out gait retraining on self-reported pain and physical function, and proxy measures of medial knee load, in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Twenty participants with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis were randomly allocated to receive either toe-in or toe-out gait retraining for six-weeks, consisting of weekly clinician-supervised sessions and ≥ 30 min of daily self-practice. Feedback was guided by wearable sensors and a pressure-sensitive mat. Primary outcomes included recruitment rate, data completeness, adverse events, adherence, achievability, and intervention acceptability. Secondary outcomes were proxy measures of medial knee load, and self-reported pain and physical function. Differences in feasibility and self-reported outcomes were interpreted via sample t-test using intention-to-treat analysis. The effect of the intervention group on knee biomechanics was evaluated using linear mixed modelling.

FINDINGS

Recruitment was acceptable (n = 4/month) with excellent data completeness (93 %) and attendance (82 %). Acceptability was moderate and similar between groups. There were no differences in average knee pain and physical function between groups over time, and both groups reduced maximum knee pain following the intervention (35 % improvement, p = 0.012). There were no differences in biomechanical outcomes between groups over time.

INTERPRETATION

Toe-in and toe-out gait retraining is feasible and improves pain in people with knee osteoarthritis. A full-scale randomised clinical trial is warranted and should consider individualising the intervention.

The effect of foot position on hip and ankle kinematics and kinetics during walking in static calibration trials

Three-dimensional gait analysis has been used extensively in research. During walking, the external hip adduction moment (EHAM) has been used as a surrogate measure of joint loading in individuals with hip osteoarthritis and inconsistency between previous studies could be attributed to the inconsistency of static standing trials. The present study was designed to examine the effects of static trial foot position on hip and ankle kinetics and kinematics variables during walking. Twelve participants were recruited and completed three static trials: 20° toe-out, straight (0°), and 20° toe-in. Five walking trials (own pace and shoes) were collected. The dynamic trials were analysed using three static trials. The first-peak, trough, and second-peak EHAMs and other hip and ankle kinematics and kinetics were compared between the conditions using repeated-measures analysis of variance. The first peak, trough, and second peak EHAMs showed a significant increase during movement from 20° toe-in to 20° toe-out by 5.87 %, 7.74 %, and 7.68 %, respectively. Furthermore, significant changes were found in hip flexion angle, hip sagittal plane range of motion angle, hip adduction and abduction angles, hip internal and external rotation angles, hip internal rotation moment, ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion moments, and ankle inversion and eversion moments. In this study, the change in foot position during the within-subject trials affected the first peak, trough, and second peak EHAMs and other kinetic and kinematic variables during walking. Therefore, this study highlights the importance to standardise the foot position in static trials to avoid masking or accentuating the actual changes.

Effects of gait intervention using the draw-in maneuver on knee joint function and the thoracic kyphosis angle in knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate whether the knee adduction moment (KAM) could be reduced by a short instruction in the Draw-in (DI) maneuver in healthy adults, and whether knee joint function would improve with a longer DI gait intervention in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHOD

In Study 1, healthy adults received 10 minutes supervised instruction in DI gait in and then practiced the gait independently for 10 minutes. Three-dimensional motion analysis measurement was performed in each phase. In Study 2, patients with OA performed a 20-minute DI gait intervention daily for 6 weeks. At baseline and after 6 weeks, knee pain, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the MOS 8 item Short-Form Health Survey, thoracic kyphosis angle, knee joint range of motion, knee extension muscle strength, hip abduction muscle strength, and activity level were evaluated.

RESULTS

In Study 1, the DI gait to decrease KAM could be learning following only 10 minutes of instruction and 10 minutes of self-practice in healthy adults. In Study 2, knee pain was reduced by 19 % and the thoracic kyphosis angle was reduced by 2.6° after 6 weeks. No significant changes in other parameters were detected, and the implementation rate was 86 ± 14 %.

SIGNIFICANCE

In healthy adults, DI gait instruction for 10 minutes of instruction and 10 minutes of self-practice reduced the KAM. In patients with knee OA, 20 minutes of DI gait per day for 6 weeks may reduce knee pain and thoracic kyphosis.

IMU-Based Kinematics Estimation Accuracy Affects Gait Retraining Using Vibrotactile Cues

Wearable sensing using inertial measurement units (IMUs) is enabling portable and customized gait retraining for knee osteoarthritis. However, the vibrotactile feedback that users receive directly depends on the accuracy of IMU-based kinematics. This study investigated how kinematic errors impact an individual's ability to learn a therapeutic gait using vibrotactile cues. Sensor accuracy was computed by comparing the IMU-based foot progression angle to marker-based motion capture, which was used as ground truth. Thirty subjects were randomized into three groups to learn a toe-in gait: one group received vibrotactile feedback during gait retraining in the laboratory, another received feedback outdoors, and the control group received only verbal instruction and proceeded directly to the evaluation condition. All subjects were evaluated on their ability to maintain the learned gait in a new outdoor environment. We found that subjects with high tracking errors exhibited more incorrect responses to vibrotactile cues and slower learning rates than subjects with low tracking errors. Subjects with low tracking errors outperformed the control group in the evaluation condition, whereas those with higher error did not. Errors were correlated with foot size and angle magnitude, which may indicate a non-random bias. The accuracy of IMU-based kinematics has a cascading effect on feedback; ignoring this effect could lead researchers or clinicians to erroneously classify a patient as a non-responder if they did not improve after retraining. To use patient and clinician time effectively, future implementation of portable gait retraining will require assessment across a diverse range of patients.

Delivering Load-Modifying Gait Retraining Interventions via Telehealth in People With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

We aimed to investigate the effects of delivering 3 gait retraining interventions (toe-in, toe-out, and placebo gait) on proxy measures of medial knee load (early- and late-stance peak knee adduction moment [KAM], KAM impulse, and varus thrust) in people with knee osteoarthritis, using a hybrid model of face-to-face and telehealth-delivered sessions over 5 months. This was an originally planned 3-arm randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. However, during the 2021 COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown in Sydney, Australia, the study became a pilot randomized controlled trial with the remainder of interventions delivered via telehealth. Nine individuals with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis were allocated to receive either a toe-in, toe-out, or posture re-education (placebo) gait retraining intervention. Primary outcomes of early- and late-stance peak KAM, KAM impulse, and varus thrust were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Eight participants returned for their follow-up gait assessment. Participants in both active intervention groups (toe-in and toe-out) achieved foot progression angle changes at follow-up. Overall, knee biomechanics in the placebo group did not change at follow-up. It is possible to achieve biomechanical changes in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis when delivering gait retraining interventions via a hybrid model of face-to-face and telehealth.

Clinically significant effects of gait modification on knee pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Knee pain is the main symptom of knee osteoarthritis. Walking is effective against knee pain, and some studies have shown that gait modification can also relieve this condition. However, the quality of evidence for the clinically significant effects of gait modification on knee pain has not been examined.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the level of evidence for the clinically significant effects of gait modification on knee pain and determine if the effects are greater than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

METHODS

We comprehensively searched electronic databases such as MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Intervention studies with experimental groups who received gait modification and control groups who did not were evaluated. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the level of evidence.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. All were included in the systematic review and two in the meta-analysis. Results showed that gait modification have significant effects (p= 0.02), and the quality of evidence was very low. However, several studies have revealed that the effects of gait modification, when used as a foot-focused intervention, were greater than the MCID.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that there is a lack of high-quality evidence that supports the general efficacy of gait modification. Although based on low-quality evidence, when applied to the foot, it may have clinically significant effects.

Toe-in and toe-out gait retraining interventions to reduce proxy measures of medial knee joint load in people with medial knee osteoarthritis: Protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Our primary aim is to determine the effect of a six-week toe-in, toe-out and active placebo gait retraining program on proxy measures of medial knee joint load and varus thrust in people with medial knee osteoarthritis. Our secondary aim is to determine the intervention effects on patient reported outcomes and physical function and determine if changes are maintained at three-months follow-up.

METHODS

We will conduct a three-arm randomised placebo-controlled trial. Ninety participants with medial knee osteoarthritis will be randomised and stratified via varus thrust status (presence/absence) to: toe-in, toe-out or placebo gait retraining (an intervention that does not change proxy measures of medial knee joint load). The intervention involves weekly clinician-supervised sessions with biofeedback, knee osteoarthritis education, motor learning and behaviour change principles, and daily gait retraining practice. Primary outcomes are proxy measures of medial knee joint load: knee adduction moment (early- and late-stance peaks and impulse), and varus thrust (presence/absence). Secondary outcomes include pain, physical function, medication and health care utilisation, quality of life, work ability, treatment blinding, intervention credibility and other biomechanical outcomes. Assessment timepoints are at baseline, six weeks (post intensive training), and three-months following the six-week intervention.

CONCLUSION

Our trial will determine whether toe-in or toe-out gait retraining is most effective at reducing proxy measures of medial knee joint load and varus thrust in people with medial knee osteoarthritis. This study will also evaluate if toe-in or toe-out gait retraining interventions are superior at improving pain, physical function and quality of life compared to placebo.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This clinical trial protocol is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000414819).

Association of tibial acceleration during walking to pain and impact loading in adults with knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Higher impact loading during walking is implicated in the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis. Accelerometry enables the measurement of peak tibial acceleration outside the laboratory. We characterized the relations of peak tibial acceleration to knee pain and impact loading during walking in adults with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Adults with knee osteoarthritis reported knee pain then walked at a self-selected speed on an instrumented treadmill for 3 min with an ankle-worn inertial measurement unit. Ground reaction forces and tibial acceleration data were sampled for 1 min. Vertical impact peaks, and average and peak instantaneous load rates were determined and averaged across 10 steps. Peak tibial acceleration was extracted for all steps and averaged. Pearson's correlations and multiple linear regression analyses assessed the relation of peak tibial acceleration to pain and impact loading metrics, independently and after controlling for gait speed and pain.

FINDINGS

Higher peak tibial acceleration was associated with worse knee pain (r = 0.39; p = 0.01), and higher vertical average (r = 0.40; p = 0.01) and instantaneous (r = 0.46; p = 0.004) load rates. After adjusting for gait speed and pain, peak tibial acceleration was a significant predictor of vertical average (R2 = 0.33; p = 0.003) and instantaneous (R2 = 0.28; p = 0.02) load rates, but not strongly associated with vertical impact peak.

INTERPRETATIONS

Peak tibial acceleration during walking is associated with knee pain and vertical load rates in those with knee osteoarthritis. Clinicians can easily access measures of peak tibial acceleration with wearable sensors equipped with accelerometers. Future work should determine the feasibility of improving patient outcomes by using peak tibial acceleration to inform clinical management.

The use of technology to support lifestyle interventions in knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review

Introduction

Technological tools that promote the adoption of physical activity to increase individuals' functional ability in knee osteoarthritis (OA) are desired to support lifestyle interventions. However, there is little consensus as to the current use of such supportive interventions for knee OA. The aim of this scoping review is therefore to provide an overview on the current use of technology within lifestyle interventions for individuals with knee OA.

Methods

Scoping review as per PRISMA guidance. Structured search of Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, ELSEVIER, IEEExplore, GOOGLE Scholar, MEDLINE, PEDRO, PUBMED, WEB OF SCIENCE from 2010 to 2020 inclusive. Hits were screened by title and abstract and then full text review based on pre-defined criteria. Results were synthesised and pooled by theme for reporting.

Results

2508 papers were identified, and following review, 78 studies included. Papers included interventions for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (n ​= ​31), total or partial knee arthroplasty (n ​= ​20) and developmental work in healthy controls (n ​= ​27). Of the 78 studies, 47 were carried out in laboratory settings and 31 in the field. The identified themes included Movement measurement (n ​= ​24), Tele-rehabilitation (n ​= ​22), Biofeedback (n ​= ​20), Directly applied interventions (n ​= ​3), Virtual or augmented reality (n ​= ​5) and Machine learning (n ​= ​4).

Conclusions

The predominant current use of technology in OA lifestyle interventions is through well-established telecommunication and commercially available activity, joint angle and loading based measurement devices, while integrating new advanced technologies seems a longer-term goal. There is great potential for the engineering and clinical community to use technology to develop systems that offer real-time feedback to patients and clinician as part of rehabilitative interventions to inform treatment.

Peak Tibiofemoral Contact Forces Estimated Using IMU-Based Approaches Are Not Significantly Different from Motion Capture-Based Estimations in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Altered tibiofemoral contact forces represent a risk factor for osteoarthritis onset and progression, making optimization of the knee force distribution a target of treatment strategies. Musculoskeletal model-based simulations are a state-of-the-art method to estimate joint contact forces, but they typically require laboratory-based input and skilled operators. To overcome these limitations, ambulatory methods, relying on inertial measurement units, have been proposed to estimated ground reaction forces and, consequently, knee contact forces out-of-the-lab. This study proposes the use of a full inertial-capture-based musculoskeletal modelling workflow with an underlying probabilistic principal component analysis model trained on 1787 gait cycles in patients with knee osteoarthritis. As validation, five patients with knee osteoarthritis were instrumented with 17 inertial measurement units and 76 opto-reflective markers. Participants performed multiple overground walking trials while motion and inertial capture methods were synchronously recorded. Moderate to strong correlations were found for the inertial capture-based knee contact forces compared to motion capture with root mean square error between 0.15 and 0.40 of body weight. The results show that our workflow can inform and potentially assist clinical practitioners to monitor knee joint loading in physical therapy sessions and eventually assess long-term therapeutic effects in a clinical context.

Remotely delivered, individualized, and self-directed gait modification for knee osteoarthritis: A pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Gait modification interventions have reported variable results and relied on in-person biofeedback limiting clinical accessibility. Our objective was to assess a remotely delivered and self-directed gait modification for knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

This was an unblinded, 2-arm, delayed control, randomized pilot trial (NCT04683913). Adults aged ≥50 years with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis were randomized to an immediate group (Week 0: Baseline, Intervention; Week 6: Follow-up, Week 10: Retention) or delayed group (Week 0: Baseline, Wait Period, Week 6: Secondary Baseline, Intervention, Week 12: Follow-up, Week 16: Retention). Participants practiced modifying their foot progression angle "as much as was comfortable" while receiving support via weekly telerehabilitation appointments and remote monitoring with an instrumented shoe. Primary outcomes included participation, foot progression angle modification magnitude, confidence, difficulty, and satisfaction while secondary outcomes included symptoms and knee biomechanics during gait.

RESULTS

We screened 134 people and randomized 20. There was no loss to follow up and 100% attendance at the telerehabilitation appointments. By follow up, participants reported high confidence (8.6/10), low difficulty (2.0/10), and satisfaction (75%) with the intervention and no significant adverse events. Foot progression angle was modified by 11.4° ± 5.6, which was significantly different (p < 0.001, η²_g = 0.8) when compared between groups. No other between-group differences were significant, while several significant pre-post improvements in pain (d = 0.6, p = 0.006) and knee moments (d = 0.6, p = 0.01) were observed.

INTERPRETATION

A personalized, self-directed gait modification supported with telerehabilitation is feasible, and the preliminary effects on symptoms and biomechanics align with past trials. A larger trial is warranted to evaluate efficacy.

Simulated Tibiofemoral Joint Reaction Forces for Three Previously Studied Gait Modifications in Healthy Controls

Gait modifications, such as lateral trunk lean (LTL), medial knee thrust (MKT), and toe-in gait (TIG), are frequently investigated interventions used to slow the progression of knee osteoarthritis. The Lerner knee model was developed to estimate the tibiofemoral joint reaction forces (JRF) in the medial and lateral compartments during gait. These models may be useful for estimating the effects on the JRF in the knee as a result of gait modifications. We hypothesized that all gait modifications would decrease the JRF compared to normal gait. Twenty healthy individuals volunteered for this study (26.7 ± 4.7 years, 1.75 ± 0.1 m, 73.4 ± 12.4 kg). Ten trials were collected for normal gait as well as for the three gait modifications: LTL, MKT, and TIG. The data were used to estimate the JRF in the first and second peaks for the medial and lateral compartments of the knee via opensim using the Lerner knee model. No significant difference from baseline was found for the first peak in the medial compartment. There was a decrease in JRF in the medial compartment during the loading phase of gait for TIG (6.6%) and LTL (4.9%) and an increasing JRF for MKT (2.6%). but none was statistically significant. A significant increase from baseline was found for TIG (5.8%) in the medial second peak. We found a large variation in individual responses to gait interventions, which may help explain the lack of statistically significant results. Possible factors influencing these wide ranges of responses to gait modifications include static alignment and the impacts of variation in muscle coordination strategies used, by participants, to implement gait modifications.

Sex-Specific associations between hip muscle strength and foot progression angle

The foot progression angle (FPA) influences knee loading during gait, but its determinants are unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare FPA between males and females and also examine the association between lower extremity kinematics during gait, hip strength, and the FPA. 25 males and 25 females completed 5 gait trials while FPA and frontal and transverse plane hip and knee angles were calculated from the dominant limb during the foot flat portion of stance. Hip extensor/flexor, abductor/adductor, and internal/external rotator strength were evaluated using maximum voluntary isometric contractions. One-way MANOVAs compared gait and strength outcomes. Stepwise regression assessed the association between FPA, and MVIC and kinematics after accounting for speed in males and females. There was no difference in FPA between sexes (p > 0.05), but females had greater frontal and transverse plane hip angles compared with males (all p < 0.05). Greater hip abduction (p = 0.02) strength was associated with greater FPA, but only in males. In males, greater hip abductor strength may contribute to a more neutral position of the foot during gait, which could help maintain an equal knee loading distribution. Our results suggest that there are sex specific control strategies to achieve a similar FPA during gait.

Personalization improves the biomechanical efficacy of foot progression angle modifications in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis

Modifying the foot progression angle during walking can reduce the knee adduction moment, a surrogate measure of medial knee loading. However, not all individuals reduce their knee adduction moment with the same modification. This study evaluates whether a personalized approach to prescribing foot progression angle modifications increases the proportion of individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis who reduce their knee adduction moment, compared to a non-personalized approach. Individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis (N=107) walked with biofeedback instructing them to toe-in and toe-out by 5° and 10° relative to their self-selected angle. We selected individuals' personalized foot progression angle as the modification that maximally reduced their larger knee adduction moment peak. Additionally, we used lasso regression to identify which secondary kinematic changes made a 10° toe-in gait modification more effective at reducing the first knee adduction moment peak. Seventy percent of individuals reduced their larger knee adduction moment peak by at least 5% with a personalized foot progression angle modification, which was more than (p≤0.002) the 23-57% of individuals who reduced it with a uniformly assigned 5° or 10° toe-in or toe-out modification. When toeing-in, greater reductions in the first knee adduction moment peak were related to an increased frontal-plane tibia angle (knee more medial than ankle), a more valgus knee abduction angle, reduced contralateral pelvic drop, and a more medialized center of pressure in the foot reference frame. In summary, personalization increases the proportion of individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis who may benefit from a foot progression angle modification.

Effects of neuromuscular gait modification strategies on indicators of knee joint load in people with medial knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of neuromuscular gait modification strategies on indicators of medial knee joint load in people with medial knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINAHL and PubMed) were searched for studies of gait interventions aimed at reducing medial knee joint load indicators for adults with medial knee osteoarthritis. Studies evaluating gait aids or orthoses were excluded. Hedges' g effect sizes (ES) before and after gait retraining were estimated for inclusion in quality-adjusted meta-analysis models. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (k = 17; n = 362) included two randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCT), four randomised cross-over trials, two case studies and nine cohort studies. The studies consisted of gait strategies of ipsilateral trunk lean (k = 4, n = 73), toe-out (k = 6, n = 104), toe-in (k = 5, n = 89), medial knee thrust (k = 3, n = 61), medial weight transfer at the foot (k = 1, n = 10), wider steps (k = 1, n = 15) and external knee adduction moment (KAM) biofeedback (k = 3, n = 84). Meta-analyses found that ipsilateral trunk lean reduced early stance peak KAM (KAM1, ES and 95%CI: -0.67, -1.01 to -0.33) with a dose-response effect and reduced KAM impulse (-0.37, -0.70 to -0.04) immediately after single-session training. Toe-out had no effect on KAM1 but reduced late stance peak KAM (KAM2; -0.42, -0.73 to -0.11) immediately post-training for single-session, 10 or 16-week interventions. Toe-in reduced KAM1 (-0.51, -0.81 to -0.20) and increased KAM2 (0.44, 0.04 to 0.85) immediately post-training for single-session to 6-week interventions. Visual, verbal and haptic feedback was used to train gait strategies. Certainty of evidence was very-low to low according to the GRADE approach.

CONCLUSION

Very-low to low certainty of evidence suggests that there is a potential that ipsilateral trunk lean, toe-out, and toe-in to be clinically helpful to reduce indicators of medial knee joint load. There is yet little evidence for interventions over several weeks.

Abnormal Foot Progression Angle Kinematics in Cervical Dystonia Improved After Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine: A Prospective Case Series

Introduction Cervical dystonia (CD), a rare disorder, is the most common form of dystonia, a movement disorder. Impairments in activities of daily living and quality of life may result from chronic pain, perceived stigma, difficulty walking, and/or lack of control over movements. Studies of treatments for difficulty walking in CD have been inconclusive. Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) has been used to improve gait biomechanics in other health conditions. Foot progression angle (FPA) while walking indicates functional gait abnormalities that increase the risk of knee injury and osteoarthritis. Objective The aim of this study is to test if five-weekly treatments using an OMM sequence designed for CD improved abnormal gait biomechanics in individuals with CD by identifying and addressing somatic dysfunctions. Methods In this prospective case series, independently ambulating individuals with CD symptom onset before the age of 40 years, not due to traumatic injury, were evaluated utilizing validated scales for severity (Toronto western spasmodic torticollis rating scale [TWSTRsI]) and symptoms affecting quality of life (Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile [CDIP-58]), physical examination, and FPA before and after five-weekly OMM treatments. Lower body joint range of motion and angles were captured in a clinical gait lab by nine cameras collecting three-dimensional Whole-body position data during three trials of one gait cycle at participant-selected walking speed. The FPA waveforms during the gait cycle were quantified by Vicon Nexus and Polygon applications. Pretreatment and posttreatment results were compared to established healthy gait waveforms and tested by repeated measures ANOVA (α=0.05). Results Pretreatment waveforms in CD had a mean 5.13° of excess FPA during gait cycle phases requiring lower-extremity pronation compared to previously published age-gender-matched healthy waveforms. There was 96% improvement in pronation after five treatments, with a mean 0.21° (p=0.041) of excess FPA. Mean TWSTRs and CDIP-58 scores improved. On physical examination, the rotational direction of C2 vertebrae was contralateral to neck muscle hypertonicity. Vertical sphenobasilar synchondrosis strains were present in those with anterotorticollis. Participants had ipsilateral anterolateral neck muscle and anterolateral abdominal wall muscle hypertonicity. All patients had pelvic somatic dysfunctions with left-side superior relative to right-side and restriction from lower-extremity pronation (i.e., supination dysfunctions). Conclusion The FPA was significantly improved after treatment. This OMM sequence was well tolerated and may be useful for improving gait kinematics in individuals with CD. Randomized, controlled, long-term studies are needed to determine effectiveness.

Predicting knee adduction moment response to gait retraining with minimal clinical data

Knee osteoarthritis is a progressive disease mediated by high joint loads. Foot progression angle modifications that reduce the knee adduction moment (KAM), a surrogate of knee loading, have demonstrated efficacy in alleviating pain and improving function. Although changes to the foot progression angle are overall beneficial, KAM reductions are not consistent across patients. Moreover, customized interventions are time-consuming and require instrumentation not commonly available in the clinic. We present a regression model that uses minimal clinical data—a set of six features easily obtained in the clinic—to predict the extent of first peak KAM reduction after toe-in gait retraining. For such a model to generalize, the training data must be large and variable. Given the lack of large public datasets that contain different gaits for the same patient, we generated this dataset synthetically. Insights learned from a ground-truth dataset with both baseline and toe-in gait trials (N = 12) enabled the creation of a large (N = 138) synthetic dataset for training the predictive model. On a test set of data collected by a separate research group (N = 15), the first peak KAM reduction was predicted with a mean absolute error of 0.134% body weight * height (%BW*HT). This error is smaller than the standard deviation of the first peak KAM during baseline walking averaged across test subjects (0.306%BW*HT). This work demonstrates the feasibility of training predictive models with synthetic data and provides clinicians with a new tool to predict the outcome of patient-specific gait retraining without requiring gait lab instrumentation.

Gait retraining is a conservative intervention for knee osteoarthritis shown to reduce pain and improve function. Although customizing a treatment plan for each patient results in a better therapeutic response, customization cannot yet be performed outside of the gait laboratory, preventing research advances from becoming part of clinical practice. Our work aimed to build a model that accurately predicts whether a patient with knee osteoarthritis will benefit from non-invasive gait retraining using measures that can be easily collected in the clinic. To overcome the lack of large datasets required to train predictive models, we generated data synthetically (N = 138) based on limited ground-truth examples, and we provide experimental evidence for the model’s ability to generalize to real data (N = 15). Our results contribute toward a future in which clinicians can use data collected in the clinic to easily identify patients who would respond to therapeutic gait retraining.

The dynamic characteristics of the center of pressure for toe-out gait: implications for footwear design

Background

Toe-out gait is often used as a conservative technique to reduce knee adduction moment, which has been targeted to modify knee osteoarthritis progression. The center of pressure (COP) can not only be used to evaluate gait stability, but is also more reliable and practical than local plantar pressures as it does not depend on accurate foot zone divisions. However, to the authors’ knowledge, few study has reported the influence of the foot progression angle on the dynamic characteristics of the COP.

Research question

The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of the deliberately toe-out gait on the COP trajectory and stability during walking in healthy individuals.

Methods

Thirty healthy young adults were asked to walk along an 8-m walkway. A Footscan 1 m pressure plate was used to measure the center of pressure during walking.

Results

Compared to the normal gait, the COP of the toe-out gait shifted laterally during the initial contact phase, and shifted laterally and anteriorly during the forefoot contact phase. The mean anterior–posterior velocity of COP reduced by 0.109 m/s during the foot flat phase and the duration of the foot flat phase and forefoot push off phase increased by 4.5% and reduced by 7.0%, respectively.

Significance

Compared to the normal gait, the findings of this study suggest that biomechanical alteration of foot under our experimental conditions may decrease gait stability and increase forefoot load during toe-out walking. The situation may be improved by well-designed footwear or custom-made insole and the biomechanics analysis method can be used to test the efficacy of therapeutic footwear or insole for individuals with deliberately toe-out walking.

Graphical Abstract

Gait modification with subject-specific foot progression angle in people with moderate knee osteoarthritis: Investigation of knee adduction moment and muscle activity

BACKGROUND

Subject-specific foot progression angle (SSFPA) as a personalized gait modification is a novel approach to specifically reducing knee adduction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of gait modification with SSFPA on the knee adduction moment and muscle activity in people with moderate knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

METHODS

In this clinical trial, nineteen volunteers with moderate KOA were instructed to walk in four different foot progression angle conditions (5° toe-out, 10° toe-out, 5° toe-in, and 10° toe-in) to determine SSFPA that caused the greatest reduction in the greater peak of the knee adduction moment (PKAM). Immediately and after 30 minutes of gait modification with SSFPA, peak root means square (PRMS) and medial and lateral co-contraction index (CCI) were evaluated in the knee muscles.

RESULT

Walking with 10° toe-in showed the most reduction in the greater PKAM (17.52 ± 15.39%) compared to 5° toe-in (7.1 ± 19.14%), 10° toe-out (1.26 ± 23.13%), and 5° toe-out (7.64 ± 16.71%). As the immediate effect, walking with SSFPA caused a 20.71 ± 12.07% reduction in the greater PKAM than the basic FPA (p < 0.001). After 30 minutes of gait retraining, the greater PKAM decreased by 10.36 ± 26.24%, but this reduction was not significant (p = 0.17). In addition, PRMS of lateral gastrocnemius increased (p = 0.04), and lateral CCI increased 10.72% during late stance (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest the immediate effect of gait modification with SSFPA on decreasing the knee adduction moment. After gait retraining with SSFPA, the increase of lateral muscle co-contraction may enhance lateral knee muscle co-activity to unload the medial knee compartment. Clinical Trial Register Number: IRCT20101017004952N8.

Trunk lean and toe out gait strategies impact on lower limb joints

Gait retraining as a non-invasive prospective approach to restore mechanical loading at the knee joint and slowing down knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression shows great promise. However, the impact of gait modifications such as an increase in foot progression angle (FPA) or lateral trunk lean (LTL) on the ankle and hip is not yet well understood. Thus, the goal of this study is to provide insight on the impact of FPA and LTL on the sagittal and frontal external moments at the ankle and hip of healthy participants. We hypothesize that there is an optimum, for which an increase in FPA and/or LTL minimize the knee adduction moment (KAM) without increasing significantly the frontal and sagittal external moments at the ankle and hip during gait. To test this hypothesis, 23 participants performed walking trials with modified FPA and/or LTL angles following a real-time visual feedback. The hypothesis was not confirmed and while not all the gait modifications performed by the participants in this study reduced the KAM, they significantly increased the sagittal moment at the ankle and the frontal moment at the hip. This study highlights the importance to consider the biomechanical consequences of gait modifications on the ankle and hip before considering a clinical application of gait retraining approaches.

Conservative interventions to improve foot progression angle and clinical measures in orthopedic and neurological patients - A systematic review and meta-analysis

To establish the comparative effects of conservative interventions on modifying foot progression angle (FPA) in children and adults with orthopaedic and neurological disease was the main aim of the literature review. Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies evaluating the effects of conservative interventions on correcting the FPA. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020143512). Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion and quality. Studies that assessed conservative interventions that could have affected the FPA and objectively measured the FPA were included. Within group Mean Differences (MD) and Standardized Mean Differences (SMDs) of the interventions were calculated for the change in FPA and gait performance (walking speed, stride/step length) and clinical condition (pain). Intervention effects on FPA were synthesized via meta-analysis or qualitatively. 41 studies were identified. For patients with knee osteoarthritis gait training interventions (MD = 6.69° and MD = 16.06°) were significantly more effective than mechanical interventions (MD = 0.44°) in modifying the FPA towards in-toeing (p < 0.00001). Increasing or decreasing the FPA significantly improved pain in patients with medial knee OA. Results were inconclusive for the effectiveness of gait training and mechanical devices in patients with neurological diseases. Gait feedback training is more effective than external devices to produce lasting improvements in FPA, reduce pain, and maintain gait performance in patients with medial knee OA. However, in neurological patients, the effects of external devices on improvements in FPA depends on the interaction between patient-specific impairments and the technical properties of the external device.

Effect of Electroacupuncture on Gut Microbiota in Participants With Knee Osteoarthritis

A close relationship between knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and gut microbiota has recently been described. Herein, we aim to investigate the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) on gut microbiota in participants with KOA. We conducted a study of 60 participants with KOA and 30 matched healthy controls (HCs). Sixty participants were allocated to either EA group (n=30) or sham acupuncture (SA) group (n=30). Five obligatory acupoints and three adjunct acupoints were punctured in the EA group. Eight non-acupoints that were separated from conventional acupoints or meridians were used for the SA group. Participants in both groups received 24 sessions within eight weeks. Fecal microbial analyses by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing were carried out after collecting stools at T0 and T8 weeks (Four samples with changed defecation habits were excluded). The results showed that both Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score (P=0.043) and NRS score (P=0.002) decreased more in EA group than those in SA group. Moreover, EA could reverse more KOA-related bacteria including Bacteroides, [Eubacterium]_hallii_group, Agathobacter and Streptococcus. The number of significantly different genera between KOA patients and HCs were less after EA treatment than that after SA treatment. This meant that EA modified the composition of the gut microbiome, making it closer to healthy people, while not significantly affecting the microbial diversity. Two genera including Agathobacter (P=0.0163), Lachnoclostridium (P=0.0144) were statistically increased than baseline in EA group (paired Wilcoxon rank sum test). After EA treatment, Bacteroides (P=0.0394) was more abundant and Streptococcus (P=0.0306) was significantly reduced in patients who demonstrated adequate response than in those with inadequate response (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Spearman correlation test between gut microbe and KOA clinical outcomes indicated that Bacteroides and Agathobacter was negatively correlated with NRS score, WOMAC total score, and WOMAC pain, stiffness and pain scores (P<0.001 or 0.05 or 0.01), while Streptococcus was positively correlated with them (P<0.05 or 0.01). Our study suggests that EA contributes to the improvement of KOA and gut microbiota could be a potential therapeutic target.

The Relationship Between Changes in Movement and Activity Limitation or Pain in People With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To report whether changes in knee joint movement parameters recorded during functional activities relate to change in activity limitation or pain after an exercise intervention in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN

Etiology systematic review.

LITERATURE SEARCH

Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and AMED) were searched up to January 22, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials or cohort studies of exercise interventions for people with knee OA that assessed change in knee joint movement parameters (moments, kinematics, or muscle activity) and clinical outcomes (activity limitation or pain).

DATA SYNTHESIS

A descriptive synthesis of functional activities, movement parameters, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

From 3182 articles, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria, and almost all were of low quality. Gait was the only investigated functional activity. After exercise, gait parameters changed 26% of the time, and clinical outcomes improved 90% of the time. A relationship between group-level changes in gait parameters and clinical outcomes occurred 24.5% of the time. Two studies directly investigated an individual-level relationship, reporting only 1 significant association out of 8 correlations tested.

CONCLUSION

Most studies reported no change in gait-related movement parameters despite improvement in clinical outcomes, challenging the belief that changing movement parameters is always clinically important in people with knee OA. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(10):492-502. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.10418.

Recent Advances in the Neural Control of Movements: Lessons for Functional Recovery

We review the current views on the control and coordination of movements following the traditions set by Nikolai Bernstein. In particular, we focus on the theory of neural control of effectors - from motor units to individual muscles, to joints, limbs, and to the whole body - with spatial referent coordinates organized into a hierarchy with multiple few-to-many mappings. Further, we discuss synergies ensuring stability of natural human movements within the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis. Synergies are organized within the neural control hierarchy based on the principle of motor abundance. Movement disorders are discussed as consequences of an inability to use the whole range of changes in referent coordinates (as in spasticity) and an inability to ensure controlled stability of salient variables as reflected in indices of multi-element synergies and their adjustments in preparation to actions (as in brain disorders, including Parkinson's disease, multiple-system atrophy, and stroke). At the end of the review, we discuss possible implications of this theoretical approach to peripheral disorders and their rehabilitations using, as an example, osteoarthritis. In particular, "joint stiffening" is viewed as a maladaptive strategy, which can compromise stability of salient variables during walking.

Wearable Real-Time Haptic Biofeedback Foot Progression Angle Gait Modification to Assess Short-Term Retention and Cognitive Demand

Foot progression angle gait (FPA) modification is an important part of rehabilitation for a variety of neuromuscular and musculoskeletal diseases. While wearable haptic biofeedback could enable FPA gait modification for more widespread use than traditional tethered, laboratory-based approaches, retention, and cognitive demand in FPA gait modification via wearable haptic biofeedback are currently unknown and may be important to real-life implementation. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of wearable haptic biofeedback to assess short-term retention and cognitive demand during FPA gait modification. Ten healthy participants performed toe-in (target 10 degrees change in internal rotation) and toe-out (target 10 degrees change in external rotation) haptic gait training trials followed by short-term retention trials, and cognitive multitasking trials. Results showed that participants were able to initially respond to the wearable haptic feedback to modify their FPA to adopt the new toe-in (9.7 ± 0.8 degree change in internal rotation) and toe-out (8.9 ± 1.0 degree change in external rotation) gait patterns. Participants retained the modified gait pattern on average within 3.9 ± 3.6 deg of the final haptic gait training FPA values. Furthermore, cognitive multitasking did not influence short-term retention in that there were no differences in gait performance during retention trials with or without cognitive multitasking. These results demonstrate that wearable haptic biofeedback can be used to assess short-term retention and cognitive demand during FPA gait modification without the need for traditional, tethered systems.

Sensor-Based Gait Retraining Lowers Knee Adduction Moment and Improves Symptoms in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The present study compared the effect between walking exercise and a newly developed sensor-based gait retraining on the peaks of knee adduction moment (KAM), knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI), knee flexion moment (KFM) and symptoms and functions in patients with early medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). Eligible participants (n = 71) with early medial knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade I or II) were randomized to either walking exercise or gait retraining group. Knee loading-related parameters including KAM, KAAI and KFM were measured before and after 6-week gait retraining. We also examined clinical outcomes including visual analog pain scale (VAS_P) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at each time point. After gait retraining, KAM₁ and VAS_P were significantly reduced (both Ps < 0.001) and KOOS significantly improved (p = 0.004) in the gait retraining group, while these parameters remained similar in the walking exercise group (Ps ≥ 0.448). However, KAM₂, KAAI and KFM did not change in both groups across time (Ps ≥ 0.120). A six-week sensor-based gait retraining, compared with walking exercise, was an effective intervention to lower medial knee loading, relieve knee pain and improve symptoms for patients with early medial knee OA.

Association between the toe angle and bony factors in the transverse plane for osteoarthritic knees compared with healthy knees

BACKGROUND

The association between the toe angle and bony rotational factors is critical to explain issues related to the onset and progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to clarify the association between the toe angle and each of the femoral and tibial transvers direction relative to gait direction, rotational knee alignment, and bony torsional deformity for the subjects with knee OA.

METHODS

This study evaluated 58 knees in 24 healthy elderly (72 ± 5 years) and 34 varus knee OA (72 ± 6 years). A three-dimensional (3D) assessment system was used on 3D models and biplanar long-leg radiographs with the toe angle reflecting gait direction, applying a 3D-to-2D image registration technique. The main parameters on the transverse plane were: (1) toe angle, (2) transverse direction of the femur and tibia relative to the gait direction, (3) femoral neck anteversion, (4) condylar twist angle, (5) tibial torsion, and (6) rotational knee alignment.

RESULTS

The alignment parameters, except for the tibial transverse direction, were different between healthy and osteoarthritic knees. In knee OA, the femoral neck anteversion - femoral transverse direction (p = 0.001), femoral transverse direction - tibial transverse direction (p < 0.001), and tibial transverse direction - toe angle (p < 0.001) were associated.

CONCLUSIONS

The osteoarthritic knees showed that the femoral neck anteversion was associated with the femoral transverse direction, which determined the tibial transverse direction by adjusting the rotational knee alignment, leading to the toe angle.

Acupoint injection in improving pain and joint function of knee osteoarthritis patients: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis is a common chronic progressive disease, which seriously affects the quality of life of the middle-aged and elderly, and even leads to disability. More and more evidence shows that acupoint injection is beneficial to the clinical treatment of knee osteoarthritis, but there are differences in the efficacy of different acupoints and injection drugs, and there is no systematic review to assess this therapy at present. The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupoint injection in improving pain and joint function in patients with knee osteoathrosis.

METHODS

According to the retrieval strategy, we will search from CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Chinese Biomedical Science, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials of acupoint injection in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis from the establishment of the database to February 2021. The study will be screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the Cochrane risk bias assessment tool will be used to evaluate the quality of the study. Revman 5.4 software is used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

This study will evaluate the efficacy of acupoint injection in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis by evaluating the total effective rate, the degree of pain relief, joint function score, adverse reactions, and so on.

CONCLUSION

This study will provide reliable evidence-based basis for the clinical application of acupoint injection in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Private information from individuals will not be published. This systematic review also does not involve endangering participant rights. Ethical approval will not be required. The results may be published in a peer-reviewed journal or disseminated at relevant conferences.OSF Registration number-doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/M5FTK.

Tibiofemoral Contact Measures During Standing in Toe-In and Toe-Out Postures

Knee osteoarthritis is thought to result, in part, from excessive and unbalanced joint loading. Toe-in and toe-out gait modifications produce alterations in external knee joint moments, and some improvements in pain over the short- and long-term. The aim of this study was to probe mechanisms of altered joint loading through the assessment of tibiofemoral contact in standing with toe-in and toe-out positions using an open magnetic resonance scanner. In this study, 15 young, healthy participants underwent standing magnetic resonance imaging of one of their knees in 3 foot positions. Images were analyzed to determine contact in the tibiofemoral joint, with primary outcomes including centroid of contact and contact area for each compartment and overall. The centroid of contact shifted laterally in the lateral compartment with both toe-in and toe-out postures, compared with the neutral position (P < .01), while contact area in the medial and lateral compartments showed no statistical differences. Findings from this study indicate that changes in the loading anatomy are present in the tibiofemoral joint with toe-in and toe-out and that a small amount of lateralization of contact, especially in the lateral compartment, does occur with these altered lower limb orientations.

A neural network to predict the knee adduction moment in patients with osteoarthritis using anatomical landmarks obtainable from 2D video analysis

OBJECTIVE

The knee adduction moment (KAM) can inform treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis; however, measuring the KAM requires an expensive gait analysis laboratory. We evaluated the feasibility of predicting the peak KAM during natural and modified walking patterns using the positions of anatomical landmarks that could be identified from video analysis.

METHOD

Using inverse dynamics, we calculated the KAM for 86 individuals (64 with knee osteoarthritis, 22 without) walking naturally and with foot progression angle modifications. We trained a neural network to predict the peak KAM using the 3-dimensional positions of 13 anatomical landmarks measured with motion capture (3D neural network). We also trained models to predict the peak KAM using 2-dimensional subsets of the dataset to simulate 2-dimensional video analysis (frontal and sagittal plane neural networks). Model performance was evaluated on a held-out, 8-person test set that included steps from all trials.

RESULTS

The 3D neural network predicted the peak KAM for all test steps with r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.78. This model predicted individuals' average peak KAM during natural walking with r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.86 and classified which 15° foot progression angle modifications reduced the peak KAM with accuracy = 0.85. The frontal plane neural network predicted peak KAM with similar accuracy (r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.85) to the 3D neural network, but the sagittal plane neural network did not (r2( Murray et al., 2012) 2 = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

Using the positions of anatomical landmarks from motion capture, a neural network accurately predicted the peak KAM during natural and modified walking. This study demonstrates the feasibility of measuring the peak KAM using positions obtainable from 2D video analysis.

Relationship between kinematic gait parameters during three gait modifications designed to reduce peak knee abduction moment

PURPOSE

Gait modifications designed to change a single kinematic parameter have reduced first peak internal knee abduction moment (PKAM). Prior research suggests unintended temporospatial and kinematic changes occur naturally while performing these modifications. We aimed to investigate i) the concomitant kinematic and temporospatial changes and ii) the relationship between gait parameters during three gait modifications (toe-in, medial knee thrust, and trunk lean gait).

METHODS

Using visual real-time biofeedback, we collected 10 trials for each modification using individualized target gait parameters based on participants' baseline mean and standard deviation. Repeated measures ANOVA was performed to determine significant differences between conditions. Mixed effects linear regression models were then used to estimate the linear relationships among variables during each gait modification. All modifications reduced KAM by at least 5%.

RESULTS

Modifications resulted in numerous secondary changes between conditions such as increased knee abduction during toe-in gait and increased knee flexion with medial knee thrust. Within gait modifications, relationships between kinematic parameters were similar for toe-in gait and medial knee thrust (i.e. increased toe-in and decreased knee abduction), while increased trunk lean showed no relationship with any other kinematic parameters during trunk lean trials.

CONCLUSION

Two main mechanisms were found as a result of this investigation; the first being a pattern of toeing-in, knee abduction, flexion, and internal hip rotation, while trunk lean modification presented as a separate gait pattern with limited secondary changes. Future studies should consider providing feedback on multiple linked parameters, as it may feel more natural and optimize KAM reductions.

Magnetometer-Free, IMU-Based Foot Progression Angle Estimation for Real-Life Walking Conditions

Foot progression angle (FPA) is vital in many disease assessment and rehabilitation applications, however previous magneto-IMU-based FPA estimation algorithms can be prone to magnetic distortion and inaccuracies after walking starts and turns. This paper presents a foot-worn IMU-based FPA estimation algorithm comprised of three key components: orientation estimation, acceleration transformation, and FPA estimation via peak foot deceleration. Twelve healthy subjects performed two walking experiments to evaluation IMU algorithm performance. The first experiment aimed to validate the proposed algorithm in continuous straight walking tasks across seven FPA gait patterns (large toe-in, medium toe-in, small toe-in, normal, small toe-out, medium toe-out, and large toe-out). The second experiment was performed to evaluate the proposed FPA algorithm for steps after walking starts and turns. Results showed that FPA estimations from the IMU-based algorithm closely followed marker-based system measurements with an overall mean absolute error of 3.1±1.3 deg, and the estimation results were valid for all steps immediately after walking starts and turns. This work could enable FPA assessment in environments where magnetic distortion is present due to ferrous metal structures and electrical equipment, or in real-life walking conditions when walking starts, stops, and turns commonly occur.

Decreasing the ambulatory knee adduction moment without increasing the knee flexion moment individually through modifications in footprint parameters: A feasibility study for a dual kinetic change in healthy subjects

Gait retraining is gaining in interest to reduce loading associated to knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression. So far, interventions focused on reducing the peak knee adduction moment (pKAM) and it remains unclear if this can be done individually without increasing the peak knee flexion moment (pKFM). Additionally, while modifying foot progression angle (FPA) and step width (SW) is common, little is known about modifications in stride length (SL). This study aimed at characterizing the feasibility of a dual kinetic change, consisting in reducing the pKAM by at least 10% without increasing the pKFM. It also aimed to evaluate the added value of SL modifications in achieving the dual kinetic change. Gait trials with modifications in FPA, SW and SL were recorded for 11 young healthy subjects in a laboratory equipped with an augmented-reality system displaying instruction footprints on the floor. All participants achieved the dual kinetic change with at least one of the modifications. Seven participants achieved it with FPA modification, three with SW modification, and seven with SL modification. In conclusion, this study showed that it is feasible to achieve the dual kinetic change individually through subject-specific modifications in footprint parameters, suggesting that, in the future, gait retraining could aim for more specific kinetic changes than simply pKAM reductions. Modifying SL allowed achieving the dual kinetic change, stressing out the value of this parameter for gait retraining, in addition to FPA and SW. Finally, an augmented-reality approach was introduced to help footprint parameter modifications in the framework of knee OA.

Electroacupuncture versus manual acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled pilot trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the feasibility of evaluating the comparative effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) relative to manual acupuncture (MA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

METHODS

A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in Beijing from September 2017 to January 2018. A total of 60 participants with KOA were randomly allocated to either EA (n = 30) or MA (n = 30) groups. Participants in the EA group were treated with EA at six to seven local traditional acupuncture points or ah shi points, and two to three distal points. Participants in the MA group had the same schedule as the EA group except that the electrical apparatus featured a working power indicator without actual current output, constituting a sham EA procedure, in order to blind participants. Both groups received 24 sessions over 8 weeks. The primary outcome was response rate, defined as a change of ⩾50% from baseline in the total scores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included pain, stiffness, function, quality of life, and acupuncture-related adverse events (AEs) at 4 and 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 60 participants randomized, 53 (88%) completed the study. Response rates were 43% for the EA group and 30% for the MA group by the intention-to-treat analysis. Although significant differences were observed in WOMAC pain, stiffness, and function scores within both groups, between-group differences at 8 weeks did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio = 1.75 (95% confidence interval = 0.593-5.162)). Rates of AEs were low and similarly distributed between groups.

CONCLUSION

Both EA and MA interventions in KOA were feasible and appeared safe. Whether or not EA may have a stronger impact on pain and function requires further evaluation through larger, adequately powered, randomized controlled trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03274713.

How foot progression angle affects knee adduction moment and angular impulse in people with and without medial knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate effects of foot progression angle (FPA) modification on the first and second peaks of external knee adduction moment (EKAM) and knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI) in individuals with and without medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) during level walking.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to February 2020 by two independent reviewers. Included studies compared FPA modification (toe-in or toe-out gait) interventions to lower EKAM and/or KAAI with natural walking. Studies were required to report the first or second peaks of EKAM or KAAI.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included and more than 85% of included patients were graded with Kellgren-Lawrence II-IV knee OA. Toe-in gait reduced the first EKAM peak (standard mean difference (SMD): -0.75; 95%CI: -1.05~-0.45) and KAAI (SMD: -0.46; 95%CI: -0.86~-0.07), while toe-out gait reduced the second EKAM peak (SMD: -1.04; 95%CI: -1.34~-0.75) in healthy individuals. For patients with knee OA, toe-out gait reduced the second EKAM peak (SMD: -0.53; 95%CI: -0.75~-0.31) and KAAI (SMD: -0.26; 95%CI: -0.49~-0.03) while toe-in gait did not affect both EKAM peaks and KAAI.

CONCLUSION

Discrepancy in biomechanical effects of FPA modification was demonstrated between individuals with and without medial knee OA. Compared with natural walking, both toe-in and toe-out gait may be more effective in lowering EKAM and KAAI in healthy individuals. Toe-out gait may reduce EKAM and KAAI in patients with mild to severe knee OA. There is insufficient data from patients with early-stage knee OA, indicating future research is required.

Portable, automated foot progression angle gait modification via a proof-of-concept haptic feedback-sensorized shoe

Modifying the foot progression angle (FPA) is a non-pharmacological, non-surgical treatment option for knee osteoarthritis, however current widespread adoption has been limited by the requirement of laboratory-based motion capture systems. We present the first customized haptic feedback-sensorized shoe for estimating and modifying FPA during walking gait, which includes an electronic inertial and magnetometer module in the sole for estimating FPA, and two vibration motors attached to the medial and lateral shoe lining for providing vibrotactile feedback. Feasibility testing was performed by comparing FPA performance while wearing the haptic feedback-sensorized shoe with the training targets. Participants performed five walking trials with five randomly-presented FPA targets (10° toe-in, 0°, 10° toe-out, 20° toe-out, and 30° toe-out) of 2 min each on a treadmill. Overall average FPA performance error across all conditions was 0.2 ± 4.1°, and the overall mean absolute FPA performance error across all conditions was 3.1 ± 2.6°. Reducing the size of the no-feedback window resulted in less performance error during walking. This study demonstrates that a novel haptic feedback-sensorized shoe can be used to effectively train FPA modifications. The haptic feedback-sensorized shoe could potentially be used for FPA gait modification outside of specialized camera-based motion capture laboratories as a conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis or other related clinical applications requiring FPA assessment and modification in daily life.

Orthoses versus gait retraining: Immediate response in improving physical performance measures in healthy and medial knee osteoarthritic adults

The conservative techniques of treating knee osteoarthritis (kOA) include wearing orthoses such as knee braces and laterally wedged insoles and applying gait modification techniques such as toe-in gait and toe-out gait. This study aimed at assessing the immediate effects of these techniques in improving physical function of healthy and kOA participants. Five Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) recommended performance-based tests were randomly applied to measure physical function: (1) 30-second chair stand test (30CST), (2) 40-m (4 × 10) fast-paced walk test (40FPW), (3) stair climb test (SCT), (4) timed up and go test (TUGT) and (5) 6-minute walk test (6MWT) during a single-visit on 20 healthy and 20 kOA patients (age: 59.5 ± 7.33 and 61.5 ± 8.63 years, BMI: 69.95 ± 9.86 and 70.45 ± 8.80 kg/m²). The interventions included natural gait, toe-out gait, toe-in gait, laterally wedged insoles and knee brace. Analysis was performed through repeated-measures ANOVA and independent sample t-test. 30CST and TUGT showed no significant differences for the five test conditions (p > 0.05). Toe-out showed profound effects via pairwise comparison in impairing the physical function while knee brace improved it during 40FPW, SCT and 6MWT. In general, all the tested conservative techniques except laterally wedged insoles had immediate effects on physical performance measures in both healthy and medial knee osteoarthritis participants. The valgus knee brace improved the parameters the most, while toe-out gait impaired them the most. Future studies can develop strategies for improving gait retraining methods on the basis of issues identified by this study.

Effect of walking with a modified gait on activation patterns of the knee spanning muscles in people with medial knee osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate muscle activation patterns and co-contraction around the knee in response to walking with modified gait patterns in patients with medial compartment knee-osteoarthritis (KOA).

DESIGN

40 medial KOA patients walked on an instrumented treadmill. Surface EMG activity from seven knee-spanning muscles (gastrocnemius, hamstrings, quadriceps), kinematics, and ground reaction forces were recorded. Patients received real-time visual feedback on target kinematics to modify their gait pattern towards three different gait modifications: Toe-in, Wider steps, Medial Thrust. The individualized feedback aimed to reduce their first peak knee adduction moment (KAM) by ≥10%. Changes in muscle activations and medial/lateral co-contraction index during the loading response phase (10-35% of the gait cycle) were evaluated, for the steps in which ≥10% KAM reduction was achieved.

RESULTS

Data from 30 patients were included in the analyses; i.e. all who could successfully reduce their KAM in a sufficient number of steps by ≥10%. When walking with ≥10% KAM reduction, Medial Thrust gait (KAM -31%) showed increased flexor activation (24%), co-contraction (17%) and knee flexion moment (35%). Isolated wider-step gait also reduced the KAM (-26%), but to a smaller extent, but without increasing muscle activation amplitudes and co-contraction. Toe-in gait showed the greatest reduction in the KAM (-35%), but was accompanied by an increased flexor activation of 42% and hence an increased co-contraction index.

CONCLUSION

Gait modifications that are most effective in reducing the KAM also yield an increase in co-contraction, thereby compromising at least part of the effects on net knee load.

Reductions in peak knee abduction moment in three previously studied gait modification strategies

BACKGROUND

First peak internal knee abduction moment (KAM) has been associated with knee osteoarthritis. Gait modification including trunk lean, medial knee thrust, and toe-in gait have shown to reduce KAM. Due to heterogeneity between study designs, it remains unclear which strategy is most effective. We compared the effects of these modifications in healthy individuals to determine their effectiveness to reduce KAM, internal knee extension moment (KEM), and medial contact force (MCF).

METHODS

Twenty healthy individuals volunteered for this study (26.7 ± 4.7 years, 1.75 ± 0.1 m, 73.4 ± 12.4 kg). Using real-time biofeedback, we collected 10 trials for each modification using individualized gait parameters based on participants' baseline mean and standard deviation (SD). Two sizes of each modification were tested: 1-3 SD greater (toe-in and trunk lean) or lesser (knee adduction) than baseline for the first five trials and 3-5 SD greater or lesser than baseline for the last five trials.

RESULTS

A significant main effect was found for KAM and KEM (p < .001). All modifications reduced KAM from baseline by at least five percent; however, only medial knee thrust and small trunk lean resulted in significant KAM reductions. Only medial knee thrust reduced KEM from baseline. MCF was unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Medial knee thrust was superior to trunk lean and toe-in modifications in reducing KAM. Subsequent increases in KEM and variation in individual responses to modification suggests that future interventions should be individualized by type and magnitude to optimize KAM reductions and avoid detrimental effects.

Effects of Toe-Out and Toe-In Gaits on Lower-Extremity Kinematics, Dynamics, and Electromyography

Toe-in and toe-out gait modifications have received increasing attention as an effective, conservative treatment for individuals without severe osteoarthritis because of its potential for improving knee adduction moment (KAM) and knee flexion moment (KFM). Although toe-in and toe-out gaits have positive effects on tibiofemoral (TF) joint pain in the short term, negative impacts on other joints of the lower extremity may arise. The main purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare the effects of foot progression angle (FPA) gait modification with normal walking speeds in healthy individuals on lower-extremity joint, ground reaction force (GRF), muscle electromyography, joint moment, and TF contact force. Experimental measurements using the Vicon system and multi-body dynamics musculoskeletal modelling using OpenSim were conducted in this study. Gait analysis of 12 subjects (n = 12) was conducted with natural gait, toe-in gait, and toe-out gait. One-way repeated measures of ANOVA (p < 0.05) with Tukey’s test was used for statistical analysis. Results showed that the toe-in and toe-out gait modifications decreased the max angle of knee flexion by 8.8 and 12.18 degrees respectively (p < 0.05) and the max angle of hip adduction by 1.28 and 0.99 degrees respectively (p < 0.05) compared to the natural gait. Changes of TF contact forces caused by FPA gait modifications were not statistically significant; however, the effect on KAM and KFM were significant (p < 0.05). KAM or combination of KAM and KFM can be used as surrogate measures for TF medial contact force. Toe-in and toe-out gait modifications could relieve knee joint pain probably due to redistribution of TF contact forces on medial and lateral condylar through changing lateral contact centers and shifting bilateral contact locations.

Gait alteration strategies for knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of joint loading via generic and patient-specific musculoskeletal model scaling techniques

Gait modifications and laterally wedged insoles are non-invasive approaches used to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. However, the outcome of these alterations is still a controversial topic. This study investigates how gait alteration techniques may have a unique effect on individual patients; and furthermore, the way we scale our musculoskeletal models to estimate the medial joint contact force may influence knee loading conditions. Five patients with clinical evidence of medial knee osteoarthritis were asked to walk at a normal walking speed over force plates and simultaneously 3D motion was captured during seven conditions (0°-, 5°-, 10°-insoles, shod, toe-in, toe-out, and wide stance). We developed patient-specific musculoskeletal models, using segmentations from magnetic resonance imaging to morph a generic model to patient-specific bone geometries and applied this morphing to estimate muscle insertion sites. Additionally, models were created of these patients using a simple linear scaling method. When examining the patients' medial compartment contact force (peak and impulse) during stance phase, a 'one-size-fits-all' gait alteration aimed to reduce medial knee loading did not exist. Moreover, the different scaling methods lead to differences in medial contact forces; highlighting the importance of further investigation of musculoskeletal modeling methods prior to use in the clinical setting.

Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes between Partial Fibulectomy and Drug Conservative Treatment for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

Background

Upper partial fibulectomy has been preliminarily proved to have the efficacy for pain alleviation and improvement of function in patients with mild to moderate medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, the previous studies lack the control group with other treatments. The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled study is to compare the clinical and biomechanical effects between upper partial fibulectomy and drug conservative treatment on improvement of clinical pain, function, and gait for patients with mild to moderate medial knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and further discuss its biomechanical mechanism.

Methods

From August 2016 to February 2017, 49 and 48 patients with mild to moderate medial KOA were allocated to fibulectomy and drug groups. We assessed the patients' visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, limb alignment, passive flexion/extension range of motion (ROM) of the knee, and 3D gait kinematics and kinetics parameters before and after intervention. Repeated-measures ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc assessment and multivariate analysis of variance were applied for intragroup and intergroup comparisons, respectively.

Results

The improvement in the fibulectomy group on the VAS pain score, HSS knee score, walking speed, and walking knee range of motion (ROM) was statistically better than that in the drug group. The decreased overall peak knee adduction moment (KAM) (decreased by 16.1%) and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle (decreased by 0.99° from a more varus alignment to a more neutral alignment) of the affected and operated side 1 year after surgery were observed in the fibulectomy group.

Conclusion

This research demonstrated that as a biomechanical intervention, upper partial fibulectomy can be a better choice in pain relief and function and gait improvement than drug conservative treatment for patients with early-stage knee OA. The long-term clinical outcomes, indication, and rationale for the improvement in clinical symptoms should be investigated further.

How toe-out foot positioning influences body-dynamics during a sit-to-stand task

BACKGROUND

Toe-out foot positioning is increasingly analyzed as a compensatory body-mechanical strategy to reduce pain and joint constraints in people with degenerative joint disease during gait. However, its influence during functional tasks, such as sit-to-stand, has not been reported.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How uni- and bilateral toe-out foot positioning influence body-dynamics during a STS task?

METHODS

The study was conducted on 15 healthy participants. Seven feet conditions were tested: neutral (N); right toe-out angle of 10° (U10), 20° (U20), and 30° (U30); bilateral toe-out angle of 10° (B10), 20° (B20), and 30° (B30). Execution time, trunk kinematic, vertical ground reaction force ratio as well as maximal knee and hip joint moments were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found across conditions in the STS execution time (p = 0.036) showing a main effect on temporal parameters using both uni- and bilateral toe-out foot positioning. A significant difference between conditions was also obtained for the vertical force ratio (p = 0.018) and the maximal knee flexion moment (p = 0.008). Post-hoc tests demonstrated a significant difference on force ratio and on knee flexion moment only while using a more pronounced unilateral toe-out foot positioning.

SIGNIFICANCE

The influence of toe-out foot positioning on body-dynamics during STS supports the idea of an alteration of body-mechanical strategy, as reported in literature gait studies. The results could have an impact on the management of patients using these strategies in order to reduce the onset of secondary joint diseases such as osteoarthritis.

Unsupervised gait retraining using a wireless pressure-detecting shoe insole

BACKGROUND

The knee adduction moment (KAM) is a surrogate measure of mediolateral distribution of loads across the knee joint and is correlated with progression and severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Existing biomechanical approaches for unloading the arthritic medial knee compartment vary in their effectiveness in reducing KAM. This study employed a completely wireless, pressure-detecting shoe insole capable of generating auditory feedback via a smartphone.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To investigate whether auditory cues from a smartphone can prompt subjects to adjust their gait pattern and reduce KAM.

METHODS

Nineteen healthy subjects underwent gait training inside the lab (Phase 1) and received auditory cues during mid- and terminal stance to medialize their foot COP (center-of-pressure). This initial training period was continued unsupervised while walking around campus (Phase 2).

RESULTS

After Phase 1, subjects reduced their KAM by 20.6% (p =  0. 001), a finding similar to a previous study that used a wired, lab-based insole system. After further unsupervised training outside the lab during Phase 2, subjects were able to execute the newly learned gait pattern without auditory feedback still showing a KAM reduction of 17.2% (p <  0.001). Although, speed at Phase 2 was lower than at baseline (p =  0.013), this reduction had little effect on KAM (r = 0.297, p =  0.216). In addition, the adduction angular impulse was reduced (p =  0.001), despite the slower speed.

SIGNIFICANCE

Together, these results suggest that the wireless insole is a promising tool for gait retraining to lower the KAM and will be implemented in a home-based clinical trial of gait retraining for subjects with knee OA.

Ankle Joint and Rearfoot Biomechanics During Toe-In and Toe-Out Walking in People With Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Toe-in and toe-out walking are 2 strategies that have been shown to be effective in reducing the knee adduction moment in people with knee osteoarthritis. However, despite a positive biomechanical impact on the knee, altering foot rotation may impart unintended forces or joint positions on the ankle that could impact joint health. The kinematic and kinetic changes at the ankle during toe-in or toe-out walking have yet to be examined.

OBJECTIVE

To examine ankle/rearfoot biomechanics during toe-in and toe-out walking in those with knee osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

Single-session repeated measures design to compare ankle biomechanics during walking with 4 different foot rotations.

SETTING

University motion analysis laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample (N = 15) of males and females with a diagnosis of medial knee osteoarthritis confirmed by radiographs.

METHODS

Participants walked in 4 conditions guided by real-time biofeedback: (1) toe-in (+10°), (2) zero rotation (0°), (3) toe-out (-10°), and (4) toe-out (-20°). Ankle and rearfoot kinematics and kinetics were examined during barefoot over-ground walking.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ankle joint angles, moments, moment impulses, and foot rotation.

RESULTS

Overall, toe-in compared to toe-out walking decreased (P = .03) peak rearfoot eversion (toe-in = -1.6°; 10° toe-out = -3.7°; 20° toe-out = -4.1°). Toe-in compared to toe-out walking also increased rearfoot inversion at initial contact (7.4° vs 3.1° at 10° toe-out and 1.9° at 20° toe-out; P < .001) and frontal plane rearfoot angle excursion (9.0° vs 6.8° at 10° toe-out and 6.0° at 20° toe-out; P < .006). Toe-in compared to all other conditions increased peak external ankle inversion moments (0.04 Nm/kg vs 0.02 Nm/kg at 0°, 0.02 Nm/kg at 10° toe-out, and 0.01 Nm/kg at 20° toe-out; P < .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Toe-in and toe-out walking require different ankle/rearfoot biomechanics, though no differences in discomfort were observed. Longer-term studies are required to properly assess these relationships in knee osteoarthritis populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Effects of foot progression angle adjustment on external knee adduction moment and knee adduction angular impulse during stair ascent and descent

Foot progression angle adjustment was shown to reduce external knee adduction moment (EKAM) and knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI) during level ground walking. However, evidence on effects of foot progression angle adjustment on the above surrogate measures of medial knee loading during stair climbing is limited. Hence, this study examined the effects of toe-in and toe-out gait on EKAM and KAAI during stair ascent and descent. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected from thirty-two healthy adults during stair ascent and descent with toe-in, toe-out and natural gait. A repeated measures ANOVA indicated that toe-in gait significantly reduced the first EKAM peak (P < 0.001) and KAAI (P = 0.002), while toe-out gait significantly increased the first (P < 0.001) and second (P = 0.04) EKAM peaks and KAAI (P < 0.001) when compared with natural gait during stair ascent. During stair descent, toe-in gait significantly reduced the first (P < 0.001) and second (P = 0.032) EKAM peaks and KAAI (P < 0.001), whilst toe-out gait significantly increased the first EKAM peak (P = 0.022) and KAAI (P = 0.028) when compared with natural gait. In conclusion, toe-in gait was found to be a viable strategy in reducing medial knee loading during stair climbing.