The effect of intra-articular glucocorticosteroids and exercise on symptoms and bone marrow lesions in knee osteoarthritis: a secondary analysis of results from a randomized controlled trial

The effects of exercise and intra-articular injections versus exercise alone for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review of the evidence

Objective

Current treatment for knee Osteoarthritis (OA) includes exercise and intra-articular injections with corticosteroid (CS), hyaluronic acid (HA), etc., which address OA-related pain and functional limitation. While these interventions can be given together, little is known about the efficacy of a multi-modal approach. The purpose of this scoping review is to examine studies that compare combining exercise and intra-articular knee injections to exercise alone for the management of knee OA.

Methods

A search was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, and Clinicaltrials.gov with MeSH terms "knee osteoarthritis" AND "exercise" AND "injections". Abstracts were screened to meet inclusion criteria of both intervention groups including exercise and one group receiving an injection for treatment of knee OA. Full text articles were screened to meet inclusion criteria and rated using the Pedro Scale.

Results

11 studies that met inclusion criteria. The included studies utilized CS, hyaluronic acid (HA), and Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC), botulinum toxin A, or a combination of dextrose and lidocaine injections. Most studies included supervised exercise interventions with all studies including strengthening of the quadriceps. CS and exercise compared to exercise alone showed similar improvements in pain. The HA injection studies yielded mixed results with two studies finding HA and exercise was not superior than exercise alone while two other studies found that HA and exercise were superior.

Conclusion

There was a paucity of literature investigating multimodal approaches. Most of the included studies did not find superior effects of adding a knee injection to exercise compared to exercise alone for knee OA.

How Effective Are Non-Operative Intra-Articular Treatments for Bone Marrow Lesions in Knee Osteoarthritis in Adults? A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a progressive joint disease and a leading source of chronic pain and disability. OA-bone marrow lesions (BMLs) are a recognised aetiopathological feature of KOA. Several intra-articular injectable therapies are recommended and used for management of KOA. This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of intra-articular therapies for improving OA-BMLs and reducing pain in adults with KOA. The study was conducted following registered review protocol (PROSPERO CRD42020189461) and six bibliographic databases, and two clinical trial registries were searched. We included eight randomised clinical trials involving 1294 participants, reported in 12 publications from 2016 to 2021. Two studies of sprifermin, one of autologous protein solution (APS) and one of high-dose TissueGene-C, reported a positive effect on OA-BMLs under 1-year follow-up. Two studies with corticosteroids reported mixed findings with no beneficial effect beyond 14 weeks of follow-up. One study assessing platelet-rich plasma found no significant improvement in OA-BMLs at 12 months follow-up. Knee pain was improved in two studies evaluating TissueGene-C and one study assessing APS; the remaining studies found no improvement in knee pain. Overall, we found mixed evidence on the efficacy of intra-articular therapy for improving OA-BMLs in KOA. Additional studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the effect of various intra-articular therapies on OA-BMLs in KOA.

Critical appraisal of intra-articular glucocorticoid injections for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee

OBJECTIVE

Intra-articular (IA) injections of glucocorticoids (GCs) have been shown to decrease pain, increase mobility, and improve quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Concerns about cartilage loss with IA GCs have prompted reconsideration of their use in knee OA. This review has three objectives: 1) critically review the clinical, molecular, and structural effects of IA GCs in knee OA; 2) provide a design for a clinical trial aimed at improving our understanding of the long-term consequences of IA GCs; and 3) provide practical guidance on the use of IA GCs in patients with knee OA based on current information.

DESIGN

A narrative review of current literature on the use of IA GCs for OA of the knee.

RESULTS

Important questions remain to be fully answered with respect to IA GCs, including long-term effects on all aspects of the structural and molecular environment of the knee, and identification of factors that can reliably predict a positive or negative response to IA GCs.

CONCLUSIONS

While awaiting results from an appropriately designed study, several provisional statements regarding IA GCs can be put forward: 1) IA GCs appear to be a relatively safe option that is effective in specific patients with symptomatic knee OA; 2) there is no definitive evidence that IA GCs accelerate joint deterioration to an important extent or hastens the requirement for knee replacement; and 3) there are few contraindications to IA GCs and injection-associated complications are rare when IA GCs are delivered with proper technique.

Percutaneous Skeletal Fixation of Painful Subchondral Bone Marrow Edema of the Knee

Purpose

To investigate the change in patient-reported pain after percutaneous skeletal fixation (PSF) and to determine the success rate of PSF in the prevention of additional intervention for the treatment of painful subchondral bone marrow edema (SBME) of the knee over a 2-year postoperative period.

Methods

This was a retrospective, single-surgeon analysis of patients undergoing PSF for painful, atraumatic SBME of the knee confirmed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years, pain localized to the area of edema, failure of nonsurgical intervention (4 weeks of physical therapy and non-steroidal medication use), and absence of tricompartmental Kellgren–Lawrence grade 4 osteoarthritis. All patients underwent arthroscopy, followed by isolated PSF without additional chondral procedures. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale scores were compared. The primary outcome measure of success was defined as a lack of additional intervention. This included viscosupplementation, corticosteroid injection, or conversion to arthroplasty.

Results

A total of 74 patients with a mean age of 47.2 years and average follow-up time of 38.9 months (range 24-61 months) were evaluated. Successful treatment was noted in 61 patients (82.4%). Of the 13 patients who did not respond to PSF, 5 (6.8%) had been converted to arthroplasty, 11 received viscosupplementation, and 8 required cortisone injections. The average visual analog scale score decreased from 7.55 preoperatively to 3.16 at 2-year follow-up (P < .001). The average body mass index of successfully treated patients (28.2) was significantly less than that of the patients experiencing failure (32.2) (P = .001).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing PSF for the treatment of painful SBME may expect a decrease in knee pain and low rates of additional intervention over a 2-year postoperative period.

Level of Evidence

Level IV; Therapeutic Case Series

Circular RNA CircCDH13 contributes to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis via CircCDH13/miR-296-3p/PTEN axis

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are involved in a variety of human diseases; however, the function of circRNAs in osteoarthritis (OA) remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the role of CircCDH13 in OA and its underlying mechanisms. CircRNA expression profiles in OA and normal cartilage tissues were detected by microarray. The expression pattern, functional role, and mechanisms of CircCDH13 in OA were studied in vitro and in vivo. Gain-of-function and loss-of-function approaches were used to demonstrate the participation of CircCDH13 in OA. The regulatory relationship between CircCDH13 and miR-296-3p and miR-296-3p and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) was predicted by bioinformatics and verified by RNA pulldown and luciferase assay. Adeno-associated virus was also used to reveal the role and mechanisms of CircCDH13 in destabilization of medial meniscus (DMM)-induced OA mice. The upregulation of CircCDH13 in OA cartilage tissues significantly induces chondrocyte apoptosis, promotes extracellular matrix (ECM) catabolism, and inhibits ECM anabolism. Mechanistically, CircCDH13 contributes to OA pathogenesis by functioning as a sponge of miR-296-3p and regulating the miR-296-3p-PTEN pathway. Silencing of CircCDH13 in vivo markedly alleviated DMM-induced OA in mice. Our study revealed an important role of CircCDH13 in OA pathogenesis. Silencing of CircCDH13 could reduce chondrocyte apoptosis, inhibit ECM catabolism, and promote ECM anabolism through the miR-296-3p-PTEN pathway. It provides a potential target for developing effective interventions in treating OA.

Zoledronic acid plus methylprednisolone versus zoledronic acid or placebo in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid (ZA) plus intravenous methylprednisolone (VOLT01) to ZA, and placebo for knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

A single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was carried out. Adults (aged ⩾50 years) with knee osteoarthritis, significant knee pain [⩾40 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS)], and magnetic resonance imaging-detected bone marrow lesion (BML) were randomized to receive a one-off administration of VOLT01, ZA, or placebo. The primary hypothesis was that VOLT01 was superior to ZA in having a lower incidence of acute phase responses (APRs) over 3 days. Secondary hypotheses were that VOLT01 was noninferior to ZA, and both treatments were superior to placebo in decreasing BML size over 6 months and in improving knee pain [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and VAS] and function (WOMAC) over 3 and 6 months.

Results

A total of 117 patients (62.2 ± 8.1 years, 63 women) were enrolled. The incidence of APRs was similar in the VOLT01 (90%) and ZA (87%) groups (p = 0.74). VOLT01 was superior to ZA in improving knee pain and function after 6 months and noninferior to ZA in reducing BML size. However, BML size change was small in all groups and there were no between-group differences. Compared with placebo, VOLT01 but not ZA improved knee function and showed a trend toward improving knee pain after 6 months.

Conclusions

Administering intravenous methylprednisolone with ZA did not reduce APRs or change knee BML size over 6 months, but in contrast to ZA or placebo, it may have a beneficial effect on symptoms in knee osteoarthritis.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000039785.