Use of Bone Health Evaluation in Orthopedic Surgery: 2019 ISCD Official Position

Systemic Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Among Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Most periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses. However, it remains unknown how many patients were diagnosed who had osteoporosis before injury or received the proper evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment after injury.

METHODS

We identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femur fractures treated with a modular fluted tapered stem from 2000 to 2018 at one institution. The mean patient age was 75 years (range, 35 to 94), 50% were women, and the mean BMI was 29 (range, 17 to 60). We identified patients who had osteoporosis or osteopenia diagnoses, a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), bone mineral density (BMD) testing, an endocrinology consult, and osteoporosis medications. Age-appropriate BMD testing was defined as no later than one year after the recommended ages of 65 (women) or 70 years (men). The mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 4 to 21).

RESULTS

Falls from standing height caused 94% of fractures and thus, by definition, qualified as osteoporosis-defining events. The prevalence of osteoporosis diagnosis increased from 20% before periprosthetic fracture to 39% after (P < 0.001). The prevalence of osteopenia diagnosis increased from 13% before the fracture to 24% after (P < 0.001). The prevalence of either diagnosis increased from 24% before fracture to 44% after (P < 0.001). No patients had documented FRAX scores before fracture, and only 2% had scores after. The prevalence of BMD testing was 21% before fracture and 22% after (P = 0.88). By the end of the final follow-up, only 16% had received age-appropriate BMD testing. The proportion of patients who had endocrinology consults increased from 6% before the fracture to 25% after (P < 0.001). The proportion on bisphosphonate therapy was 19% before fracture and 25% after (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most periprosthetic fractures following THA are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses, there remain major gaps in diagnosis, screening, endocrinology follow-up, and treatment. Like non-arthroplasty fragility fractures, a systematic approach is needed after periprosthetic fractures.

Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Hip Fractures are Commonly Classified as Having Osteoporosis Based on DXA Measurements

Periprosthetic femoral hip fractures are subject to an increasing incidence and are often considered to be related to osteoporosis. However, there are no available studies that have determined the frequency of osteoporosis in affected patients using gold standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In this retrospective comparative study, we analyzed the DXA results of 40 patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures who were treated surgically in our department. DXA measurements were performed at the total hip and the lumbar spine to determine bone mineral density T-scores. Data were compared to two age-, sex-, and BMI-matched control groups in which patients underwent DXA prior to aseptic revision surgery for other causes or primary THA (consisting of 40 patients each). The mean T-score in the periprosthetic fracture cohort was significantly lower (- 1.78 ± 1.78) than that of the aseptic revision (- 0.65 ± 1.58, mean difference - 1.13 [95% CI - 1.88 to - 0.37]; p = 0.001) and the primary THA cohort (- 0.77 ± 1.34, mean difference - 1.01 [95% CI - 1.77 to - 0.26]; p = 0.005). Accordingly, osteoporosis was detected more frequently (45%) in the fracture cohort compared to patients undergoing aseptic revision (12.5%) and primary THA (10%). In conclusion, almost half of the patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures have osteoporosis according to DXA measurements. A regular assessment of bone health in THA enables identification of patients with osteoporosis who likely benefit from initiation of osteoporosis medication and cemented stem fixation.

Evaluating osteoporosis and bone quality in the aging spine: modern considerations for surgical management in the geriatric population

Surgical management paradigms of spinal pathologies in the aging population carry inherent substantial risks, with surgical complications being more prevalent among patients with osteoporosis compared to those with normal bone mineral density. In this narrative review, we aim to highlight important clinical understanding and considerations in perioperative evaluation and management of patients elected to undergo spinal surgery. Osteoporosis is a well-defined risk factor for mechanical complications following spinal surgery, and as such, perioperative optimization of bone health in the setting of surgery for geriatric patients remains a critical research area alongside intraoperative surgical augmentation techniques. Surgical techniques to circumvent challenges with instrumentation of poor bone mineral density have included augmentation of pedicle screw fixation, including segmental bicortical screw fixation techniques, cement augmentation with fenestrated screws, or use of expandable pedicle screws to improve bone-implant interface. Judicious selection of treatment modalities and subsequent perioperative optimization is paramount to minimize surgical complications. Contemporary guidelines and evolving paradigms in perioperative evaluation, optimization, and management of the aging spine include the advent of quantitatively evaluating computed tomography (CT) via assessment of the magnitude of Hounsfield units. Prescribing pharmacotherapeutic agents and monitoring bone health requires a multidisciplinary team approach, including endocrinologists and geriatricians to coordinate high-quality care for advanced-age patients who require surgical management of their spinal disorders.

Effects of Abaloparatide on Bone Mineral Density in Proximal Femoral Regions Corresponding to Arthroplasty Gruen Zones: A Study of Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Low hip bone mineral density (BMD) in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures, implant instability, and other complications. Recently, emphasis has been placed on bone health optimization: treating low BMD prior to a planned orthopaedic implant procedure in an effort to normalize BMD and reduce the potential risk of future complications. Abaloparatide is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved osteoanabolic agent for men and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and a candidate drug for bone health optimization that, in addition to benefits at the spine, increases hip BMD and reduces nonvertebral fracture risk. We hypothesized that abaloparatide would improve BMD in proximal femoral regions surrounding a virtual THA stem.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis obtained dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) hip scans from 500 randomly selected postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from the Phase-3 Abaloparatide Comparator Trial in Vertebral Endpoints (ACTIVE, NCT01343004) study after 0, 6, and 18 months of abaloparatide (250 patients) or placebo (250 patients). Hip DXA scans underwent 3-dimensional (3D) modeling via 3D-Shaper, followed by virtual resection of the proximal femur and simulated placement of a tapered, flat-wedge hip stem that guided delineation of the Gruen zones that were fully (zones 1 and 7) or largely (zones 2 and 6) captured in the scanning region. Integral, cortical, and trabecular volumetric BMD, cortical thickness, and cortical surface BMD (the product of cortical volumetric BMD and cortical thickness) were determined for each zone.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, the abaloparatide group showed greater increases in integral volumetric BMD in all zones at months 6 and 18; cortical surface BMD in zones 1, 6, and 7 at month 6; cortical thickness, cortical volumetric BMD, and cortical surface BMD in all zones at month 18; and trabecular volumetric BMD in zones 1 and 7 at months 6 and 18.

CONCLUSIONS

Abaloparatide increases BMD in proximal femoral regions that interact with and support femoral stems, suggesting that abaloparatide may have value for preoperative or potentially perioperative bone health optimization in patients with osteoporosis undergoing THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Chronic Oral Corticosteroid Use and 10-Year Incidence of Major Complications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Oral corticosteroids are the primary treatment for several autoimmune conditions. The risk of long-term implant, bone health, and infectious-related complications in patients taking chronic oral corticosteroids before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is unknown. We compared the 10-year cumulative incidence of revision, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), fragility fracture (FF), and periprosthetic fracture following TKA in patients who had and did not have preoperative chronic oral corticosteroid use.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a national database. Primary TKA patients who had chronic preoperative oral corticosteroid use were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Disease 9 and 10 codes. Exclusion criteria included malignancy, osteoporosis treatment, trauma, and < 2-year follow-up. Primary outcomes were 10-year cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause revision (ACR), aseptic revision, PJI, FF, and periprosthetic fracture. A Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were utilized. Overall, 611,596 patients were identified, and 5,217 (0.85%) were prescribed chronic corticosteroids. There were 10,000 control patients randomly sampled for analysis.

RESULTS

Corticosteroid patients had significantly higher 10-year HR of FF (HR; 95% confidence interval); P value (1.47; 1.34 to 1.62; P < .001)], ACR (1.21; 1.05 to 1.40; P = .009), and PJI (1.30; 1.01 to 1.69; P = .045) when compared to the control.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients prescribed preoperative chronic oral corticosteroids had higher risks of ACR, PJI, and FF within 10 years following TKA compared to patients not taking corticosteroids. This information can be used by surgeons during preoperative counseling to educate this high-risk patient population about their increased risk of postoperative complications.

Periprosthetic fractures are osteoporotic fractures: missed opportunities for osteoporosis diagnosis

Joint replacement surgery is common in older adults, leading to increasing periprosthetic fracture (PPFx) occurrence. We reviewed all PPFx seen over a 4-year period at an academic hospital. Clinical osteoporosis could be diagnosed based on existing data in 104 (67%) at the time of PPFx. Periprosthetic fractures are generally osteoporosis-related.

PURPOSE

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) cause morbidity, mortality, and cost. This study's purpose was to describe osteoporosis-related data available at the time of PPFx.

METHODS

The electronic medical record (EMR) of PPFx patients seen over 4 years in a university orthopedic practice were reviewed. Demographic data and osteoporosis relevant parameters were collected. Prior DXA studies were reviewed, and L1 Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements were performed on CT scans obtained within 2 years before PPFx. Clinical osteoporosis was defined as prior diagnosis, prescribed osteoporosis treatment, T-score ≤  - 2.5, HU ≤ 100, or prior fracture.

RESULTS

Records of 156 PPFx patients (115 F/41 M), mean (SD) age 75.4 (11.9), were reviewed. Almost all 153/156 (98%) of these fractures were femoral. Falls caused 139 (89%); 12 (8%) were spontaneous. Mean time post-arthroplasty was 7.9 (6.3) years. Prior fragility fracture(s) occurred in 72 (46%); 14 were PPFx. Osteoporosis was previously diagnosed in 45 (29%) and medications prescribed in 41 (26%). Prior to PPFx, DXA data were available in 62, mean (SD) lowest T-score was - 1.9 (0.9) and was ≤  - 2.5 in 19. CT data were available in 46; mean (SD) L1 HU was 79.0 (29.4) and was ≤ 100 in 35. Based on existing data, clinical osteoporosis could have been diagnosed in 104 (67%) at the time of PPFx.

CONCLUSION

Periprosthetic fractures are osteoporosis-related. They occur in older adults, often female, and result from falls; BMD, when assessed, is low. Data available at the time of PPFx often allows osteoporosis diagnosis; this should prompt evaluation and pharmacologic treatment consideration.

Skeletal Status in Patients Scheduled for Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery: Comparison of Discectomy, Decompression, Fusion, and Revision

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate and compare the prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD) and abnormal laboratory bone metabolism parameters in patients undergoing elective primary discectomy, decompression, and fusion and to outline possible differences in these parameters between patients undergoing revision for skeletal vs non-skeletal complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated BMD measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 389 consecutive patients scheduled for elective lumbar spine surgery. Next to demographic characteristics, laboratory bone metabolism parameters were assessed. Group comparisons were performed between primary discectomy, decompression, and fusion. In patients scheduled for revision surgery after fusion, potential differences in the skeletal status between those with skeletal vs non-skeletal complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Osteoporosis by T-score was detected in 6.7%, 11.0% and 14.7% of the patients undergoing discectomy, decompression and fusion, respectively. While vitamin D deficiency (67.6%) and hyperparathyroidism (16.4%) were frequently detected, no differences in laboratory bone metabolism markers could be found between the groups. Female sex (P<.001), higher age (P=.01) and lower BMI (P<.001) were associated with lower BMD. In the cohort of patients undergoing revision surgery due to complications after fusion, those with skeletal complications did not differ in BMD or bone metabolism from those with non-skeletal complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis represents a relevant comorbidity in patients scheduled for elective spine surgery, which is why DXA should be routinely performed in these patients. However, DXA may provide limited information in identifying patients at increased risk for skeletal complications after fusion.

Areal bone mineral density is not associated with femoral stem subsidence in patients younger than 70 years undergoing total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Femoral stem subsidence is a known complication after uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of osteoporosis and to investigate the relationship between areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and subsidence in a cohort of patients younger than 70 years.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients (age 60 ± 6 years; 52 female, 48 male) undergoing uncemented THA using a collarless press fit femoral stem were retrospectively reviewed. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed preoperatively at the proximal femur and lumbar spine, and if not feasible at these sites, at the distal radius. DXA results were compared to a cohort of 100 patients ≥ 70 years scheduled for cemented THA. Age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), canal flare index (CFI), and canal fill ratio (CFR) were assessed. Analysis of stem subsidence and migration was performed on standardized, calibrated radiographs obtained postoperatively and at follow-up.

RESULTS

The frequency of osteoporosis was considerably lower in the study cohort compared to patients ≥ 70 years (7% vs. 19%, p = 0.02). Illustrated by the high CFR (mean 96 ± 4%) in the mid-stem region, a sufficient press fit was achieved. After a mean follow-up of 7.4 months, the mean stem subsidence was 0.9 ± 0.9 mm. Only two patients had subsidence greater than 3 mm, one of whom was morbidly obese and the other diagnosed with severe osteoporosis. There were no correlations between any of the parameters (CFI, CFR, age, sex, BMI) and femoral stem subsidence. In addition, aBMD T-scores showed no correlations with subsidence.

CONCLUSION

aBMD by DXA does not appear to be associated with stem subsidence in patients younger than 70 years and with adequate press fit.

Radiographic Assessment of Bone Quality Using 4 Radiographic Indexes: Canal Diaphysis Ratio Is Superior

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis increases the risk of periprosthetic fracture and loosening in hip arthroplasty. Many methods have been proposed to assess bone quality in X-rays, including both qualitative such as the Dorr classification and quantitative such as the Calcar-Canal Ratio (CCR) and Cortical-Thickness index/Canal-Bone ratio (CTI/CBR). The Canal-Diaphysis ratio (CDR) has been described as a predictor for hip fragility fractures; however, its relationship with bone mineral density (BMD) has not been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation of the Dorr classification, CCR, CTI/CBR, and CDR with BMD of the proximal femur in patients without hip fracture.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients over 45 years of age who had less than 6 months between radiographs and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were evaluated. Measurements of CCR, CBR, CDR, and Dorr classification were performed in all radiographs by 2 independent observers.

RESULTS

The CDR had a high correlation (r = 0.74, P=<0.01) with BMD, whereas the CTI/CBR had a moderate correlation (r = 0.49, P=<0.01), and the CCR had no correlation with BMD (r = 0.06, P = .96). When evaluating the receiver operating characteristic curve, CDR showed the best performance (area under curve [AUC] = 0.75) followed by CBR (AUC = 0.73) and CCR (AUC = 0.61). The optimal cutoff value for the CDR was 0.49, with 100% sensitivity and 58% specificity. The inter- and intra-observer variability was good for all methods. No differences were found between Dorr classification of patients who had or did not have osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

Of all the analyzed methods, the CDR was found to have the best correlation with BMD. This study proposes the use of CDR as a tool for assessing bone quality when deciding the implant fixation method in hip arthroplasty.

Machine Learning for Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Using Knee CT Scans

PURPOSE

To predict whether a patient has osteoporosis/osteopenia using the attenuation of trabecular bone obtained from knee computed tomography (CT) scans.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 273 patients who underwent contemporaneous knee CT scans and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within 1 year. Volumetric segmentation of the trabecular bone of the distal femur, proximal tibia, patella, and proximal fibula was performed to obtain the bone CT attenuation. The data was randomly split into training/validation (78%) and test (22%) datasets and the performance in the test dataset were evaluated. The predictive properties of the CT attenuation of each bone to predict osteoporosis/osteopenia were assessed. Multivariable support vector machines (SVM) and random forest classifiers (RF) were used to predict osteoporosis/osteopenia.

RESULTS

Patients with a mean age (range) of 67.9 (50-87) years, 85% female were evaluated. Seventy-seven (28.2%) of patients had normal bone mineral density (BMD), 140 (51.3%) had osteopenia, and 56 (20.5%) had osteoporosis. The proximal tibia had the best predictive ability of all bones and a CT attenuation threshold of 96.0 Hounsfield Units (HU) had a sensitivity of .791, specificity of .706, and area under the curve (AUC) of .748. The AUC for the SVM with cubic kernel classifier (AUC = .912) was better than the RF classifier (AUC = .683, P < .001) and better than using the CT attenuation threshold of 96.0 HU at the proximal tibia (AUC = .748, P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis/osteopenia can be performed using knee CT scans. Multivariable machine learning models are more predictive than the CT attenuation of a single bone.

Positions of The International Society for Clinical Densitometry and Their Etiology: A Scoping Review

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry convenes a Position Development Conference (PDC) every 2 to 3 years to make recommendations for guidelines and standards in the field of musculoskeletal measurement and assessment. The recommendations pertain to clinically relevant issues regarding the acquisition, quality control, interpretation, and reporting of measures of various aspects of musculoskeletal health. These PDCs have been meeting since 2002 and have generated 214 Adult, 26 FRAX, 41 pediatric, and 9 general nomenclature consideration positions, for a total of 290 positions. All positions are justified by detailed documents that present the background and rationale for each position. However, the linkage to these publications is not maintained by the ISCD or any other publication such that physicians cannot easily understand the etiology of the positions. Further, the wording of many positions has changed over the years after being reviewed by subsequent PDCs. This scoping review captures the references, changes, and timeline associated with each position through the 2019 PDC. It is meant to serve as a guide to clinicians and researchers for intelligent use and application of the positions.

Prevalence of osteoporosis in spinal surgery patients older than 50 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

In spine surgery, poor bone condition is associated with several complications like adjacent segment fractures, proximal junctional kyphosis, and screw loosening. Our study explored the prevalence of osteoporosis in spinal surgery patients older than 50 years through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA criteria. Three electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, were searched from inception to August 2022. We used the random-effects model to calculate the overall estimates, and the heterogeneity was measured using Cochran's Q and I2 tests. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to determine the source of the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Based on the inclusion and criteria, we chose ten studies with 2958 individuals for our analysis. The prevalence of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and osteoporosis/osteopenia in the spinal surgery patients was 34.2% (95%CI: 24.5%-44.6%), 43.5% (95%CI: 39.8%-47.2%), and 78.7% (95%CI: 69.0%-87.0%), respectively. Regarding different diagnoses, the prevalence was highest in patients with lumbar scoliosis (55.8%; 95%CI: 46.8%-64.7%) and the lowest in patients with cervical disc herniation (12.9%; 95%CI: 8.1%-18.7%). In age groups 50-59, 50-69,70-79, the prevalence was 27.8%, 60.4%, 75.4% in females, and 18.9%, 17.4%, 26.1% in males.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a high prevalence of osteoporosis in patients undergoing spine surgery, especially in females, people of older age, and patients who received degenerative scoliosis and compression fractures. Current osteoporosis screening standards for patients undergoing spine surgery may not be adequate. Orthopedic specialists should make more efforts regarding preoperative osteoporosis screening and treatment.

Bone mineral density and microarchitecture change during skeletal growth in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) from the German coast

Across species, the skeletal system shares mutual functions, including the protection of inner organs, structural basis for locomotion, and acting as an endocrine organ, thus being of pivotal importance for survival. However, insights into skeletal characteristics of marine mammals are limited, especially in the growing skeleton. Harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) are common marine mammals in the North and Baltic Seas and are suitable indicators of the condition of their ecosystem. Here, we analyzed whole-body areal bone mineral density (aBMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and lumbar vertebrae by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in neonate, juvenile, and adult harbor seals. Along skeletal growth, an increase in two-dimensional aBMD by DXA was paralleled by three-dimensional volumetric BMD by HR-pQCT, which could be attributed to an increasing trabecular thickness while trabecular number remained constant. Strong associations were observed between body dimensions (weight and length) and aBMD and trabecular microarchitecture (R² = 0.71-0.92, all p < 0.001). To validate the results of the DXA measurement (i.e., the standard method used worldwide to diagnose osteoporosis in humans), we performed linear regression analyses with the three-dimensional measurements from the HR-pQCT method, which revealed strong associations between the two imaging techniques (e.g., aBMD and Tb.Th: R² = 0.96, p < 0.0001). Taken together, our findings highlight the importance of systematic skeletal investigations in marine mammals during growth, illustrating the high accuracy of DXA in this context. Regardless of the limited sample size, the observed trabecular thickening is likely to represent a distinct pattern of vertebral bone maturation. As differences in nutritional status, among other factors, are likely to affect skeletal health, it appears essential to routinely perform skeletal assessments in marine mammals. Placing the results in the context of environmental exposures may allow effective measures to protect their populations.

Intraoperative physician assessment of bone: correlation to bone mineral density

This study evaluated the intraoperative physician assessment (IPA) of bone status at time of total knee arthroplasty. IPA was highly correlated with distal femur and overall bone mineral density. When IPA identifies poor bone status, formal bone health assessment is indicated.

PURPOSE

Intuitively, intraoperative physician assessment (IPA) would be an excellent measure of bone status gained through haptic feedback during bone preparation. However, no studies have evaluated the orthopedic surgeon's ability to do so. This study's purpose, in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), was to relate IPA with (1) the lowest bone mineral density (BMD) T-score at routine clinical sites; and (2) with distal femur BMD.

METHODS

Seventy patients undergoing TKA by 3 surgeons received pre-operative DXA. Intraoperatively, bone quality was assessed on a 5-point scale (1 excellent to 5 poor) based on tactile feedback to preparation. Demographic data, DXA results, and IPA score between surgeons were compared by factorial ANOVA. Lowest T-score and distal femur BMD were associated with IPA using Spearman's correlation.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age and BMI were 65.8 (7.6) years and 31.4 (5.1) kg/m², respectively. Patient demographic data, BMD, and IPA (mean [SD] = 2.74 [1.2]) did not differ between surgeons. IPA correlated with the lowest T-score (R = 0.511) and distal femur BMD (R = 0.603-0.661). Based on the lowest T-score, no osteoporotic patients had an IPA above average, and none with normal BMD was classified as having poor bone.

CONCLUSIONS

IPA is highly correlated with local (distal femur) and overall BMD. This study supports the International Society for Clinical Densitometry position that surgeon concern regarding bone quality should lead to bone health assessment. As IPA is comparable between surgeons, it is logical this can be widely applied by experienced orthopedic surgeons. Future studies evaluating IPA at other anatomic sites are indicated.

Periprosthetic fractures: an unrecognized osteoporosis crisis

Total joint replacement is common and increasing. Many of these patients have low bone mineral density preoperatively, and arthroplasty leads to bone loss. As falls are common before and after arthroplasty, it is unsurprising that periprosthetic fractures, defined as those associated with an orthopedic device, whether a joint replacement or other internal fixation devices, are not rare. These fractures engender morbidity and mortality comparable to osteoporosis-related hip fractures but remain largely unrecognized and untreated by osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease clinicians. Indeed, recent osteoporosis guidelines are silent regarding periprosthetic fractures. The purposes of this clinical review are to briefly describe the epidemiology of arthroplasty procedures and periprosthetic fractures, raise awareness that these fractures are osteoporosis-related, and suggest approaches likely to reduce their occurrence. Notably, bone health evaluation is essential following the occurrence of a periprosthetic fracture to reduce subsequent fracture risk. Importantly, in addition to such secondary fracture prevention, primary prevention, i.e., bone health assessment and optimization prior to elective orthopedic procedures, is appropriate.

CT required to perform robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty can identify previously undiagnosed osteoporosis and guide femoral fixation strategy

Osteoporosis can determine surgical strategy for total hip arthroplasty (THA), and perioperative fracture risk. The aims of this study were to use hip CT to measure femoral bone mineral density (BMD) using CT X-ray absorptiometry (CTXA), determine if systematic evaluation of preoperative femoral BMD with CTXA would improve identification of osteopenia and osteoporosis compared with available preoperative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis, and determine if improved recognition of low BMD would affect the use of cemented stem fixation. Retrospective chart review of a single-surgeon database identified 78 patients with CTXA performed prior to robotic-assisted THA (raTHA) (Group 1). Group 1 was age- and sex-matched to 78 raTHAs that had a preoperative hip CT but did not have CTXA analysis (Group 2). Clinical demographics, femoral fixation method, CTXA, and DXA data were recorded. Demographic data were similar for both groups. Preoperative femoral BMD was available for 100% of Group 1 patients (CTXA) and 43.6% of Group 2 patients (DXA). CTXA analysis for all Group 1 patients preoperatively identified 13 osteopenic and eight osteoporotic patients for whom there were no available preoperative DXA data. Cemented stem fixation was used with higher frequency in Group 1 versus Group 2 (28.2% vs 14.3%, respectively; p = 0.030), and in all cases where osteoporosis was diagnosed, irrespective of technique (DXA or CTXA). Preoperative hip CT scans which are routinely obtained prior to raTHA can determine bone health, and thus guide femoral fixation strategy. Systematic preoperative evaluation with CTXA resulted in increased recognition of osteopenia and osteoporosis, and contributed to increased use of cemented femoral fixation compared with routine clinical care; in this small study, however, it did not impact short-term periprosthetic fracture risk.

Predicting Bone Health Using Machine Learning in Patients undergoing Spinal Reconstruction Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of data collected prospectively.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to create a predictive model of preoperative bone health status in adult patients undergoing adult spinal reconstructive (ASR) surgery using machine learning (ML).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Despite understanding that bone health impacts spine surgery outcomes, spine surgeons lack the tools to risk stratify patients preoperatively to determine who should undergo bone health screening. An ML approach mines patterns in data to determine the risk for poor bone health in ASR patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred and eleven subjects over the age of 30 with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans, who underwent spinal reconstructive surgery were reviewed. Data was collected by manual and automated collection from the electronic health records. The Weka software was used to develop predictive models for multiclass classification of healthy, osteopenia, and osteoporosis (OPO) bone status. Bone status was labeled according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry T scores. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated. The model was evaluated on a test set of unseen data for generalizability.

RESULTS

The prevalence of OPO was 23.22% and osteopenia was 52.61%. The random forest model achieved optimal performance with an average sensitivity of 0.81, specificity of 0.95, and AUC of 0.96 on the training set. The model yielded an averaged sensitivity of 0.64, specificity of 0.78, and AUC of 0.69 on the test set. The model was best at predicting OPO in patients. Numerous patient features exhibited predictive value, such as body mass index, insurance type, serum sodium level, serum creatinine level, history of bariatric surgery, and the use of medications such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Predicting bone health status in ASR patients is possible with an ML approach. Additionally, data mining using ML can find unrecognized risk factors for bone health in ASR surgery patients.

Proposed bone health screening protocol to identify total knee arthroplasty patients for preoperative DXA

This study evaluates a novel, simple bone health screening protocol composed of patient sex, age, fracture history, and FRAX risk to identify total knee arthroplasty patients for preoperative DXA. Findings supported effectiveness, with sensitivity of 1.00 (CI 0.92-1.00) and specificity of 0.54 (CI 0.41-0.68) when evaluating for clinical osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

Bone health optimization is a process where osteoporotic patients are identified, evaluated via modalities such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and treated when indicated. There are currently no established guidelines to determine who needs presurgical DXA. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a simple screening protocol to identify TKA patients for preoperative DXA.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study began on September 1, 2019, and included 100 elective TKA patients. Inclusion criteria were ≥ 50 years and primary TKA. All patients obtained routine clinical DXA. The screening protocol defining who should obtain DXA included meeting any of the following: female ≥ 65, male ≥ 70, fracture history after age 50, or FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk without bone mineral density (BMD) adjustments ≥ 8.4%. Osteoporosis was defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (T-score ≤  - 2.5) or clinically (T-score ≤  - 2.5, elevated BMD-adjusted FRAX risk, or prior hip/spine fracture). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

RESULTS

The study included 68 females and 32 males, mean age 67.2 ± 7.7. T-score osteoporosis was observed in 16 patients while 43 had clinical osteoporosis. Screening criteria recommending DXA was met by 69 patients. Screening sensitivity was 1.00 (CI 0.79-1.00) and specificity was 0.37 (CI 0.27-0.48) for identifying patients with T-score osteoporosis. Similar sensitivity of 1.00 (CI 0.92-1.00) and specificity of 0.54 (CI 0.41-0.68) were found for clinical osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple screening protocol identifies TKA patients with T-score and clinical osteoporosis for preoperative DXA with high sensitivity in this prospective cohort study.

Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in elderly patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a common comorbidity in elderly patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and may increase perioperative complications in orthopedic surgery (e.g., component migration, periprosthetic fractures). As there is no investigation of bone mineral density (BMD) in elderly patients prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Europe, we investigated this issue with a particular focus on a potential treatment gap.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed the BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 109 consecutive elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) scheduled for TKA. In addition to a detailed assessment of osteoporosis and osteopenia, the influence of clinical risk factors and radiological OA severity on BMD was evaluated using group comparisons and linear regression models. In addition, we analyzed differences in BMD between patients scheduled for TKA vs. total hip arthroplasty (THA).

RESULTS

Of the included 109 patients, 19 patients (17.4%) were diagnosed with osteoporosis and 50 (45.9%) with osteopenia. In the osteoporotic patients, a clinically relevant underdiagnosis concomitant with a serious treatment gap was observed in 95.0% of the patients. Body mass index, OA grade, and glucocorticoid use were identified as independent factors associated with BMD. No differences in BMD were found between the patients scheduled for TKA vs. THA.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the high prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in elderly patients, DXA screening should be recommended for patients ≥ 70 years indicated for TKA.

The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease in the USA and the world. It is a subclinical condition until complicated by fracture(s). These fractures place an enormous medical and personal burden on individuals who suffer from them and take a significant economic toll. Any new fracture in an adult aged 50 years or older signifies imminent elevated risk for subsequent fractures, particularly in the year following the initial fracture. What a patient perceives as an unfortunate accident may be seen as a sentinel event indicative of bone fragility and increased future fracture risk even when the result of considerable trauma. Clinical or subclinical vertebral fractures, the most common type of osteoporotic fractures, are associated with a 5-fold increased risk for additional vertebral fractures and a 2- to 3-fold increased risk for fractures at other sites. Untreated osteoporosis can lead to a vicious cycle of recurrent fracture(s), often resulting in disability and premature death. In appropriate patients, treatment with effective antifracture medication prevents fractures and improves outcomes. Primary care providers and medical specialists are critical gatekeepers who can identify fractures and initiate proven osteoporosis interventions. Osteoporosis detection, diagnosis, and treatment should be routine practice in all adult healthcare settings. The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) - formerly the National Osteoporosis Foundation - first published the Clinician's Guide in 1999 to provide accurate information on osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Since that time, significant improvements have been made in diagnostic technologies and treatments for osteoporosis. Despite these advances, a disturbing gap persists in patient care. At-risk patients are often not screened to establish fracture probability and not educated about fracture prevention. Most concerning, the majority of highest risk women and men who have a fracture(s) are not diagnosed and do not receive effective, FDA-approved therapies. Even those prescribed appropriate therapy are unlikely to take the medication as prescribed. The Clinician's Guide offers concise recommendations regarding prevention, risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men aged 50 years and older. It includes indications for bone densitometry as well as fracture risk thresholds for pharmacologic intervention. Current medications build bone and/or decrease bone breakdown and dramatically reduce incident fractures. All antifracture therapeutics treat but do not cure the disease. Skeletal deterioration resumes sooner or later when a medication is discontinued-sooner for nonbisphosphonates and later for bisphosphonates. Even if normal BMD is achieved, osteoporosis and elevated risk for fracture are still present. The diagnosis of osteoporosis persists even if subsequent DXA T-scores are above - 2.5. Ongoing monitoring and strategic interventions will be necessary if fractures are to be avoided. In addition to pharmacotherapy, adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, avoidance of smoking and excessive alcohol intake, weight-bearing and resistance-training exercise, and fall prevention are included in the fracture prevention armamentarium. Where possible, recommendations in this guide are based on evidence from RCTs; however, relevant published data and guidance from expert clinical experience provides the basis for recommendations in those areas where RCT evidence is currently deficient or not applicable to the many osteoporosis patients not considered for RCT participation due to age and morbidity.

Total Joint Arthroplasty and Osteoporosis: Looking Beyond the Joint to Bone Health

BACKGROUND

Metabolic bone diseases in the total joint arthroplasty (TJA) population are undertested and undertreated, leading to increased risk of adverse outcomes such as periprosthetic fractures. This study aims to better characterize the current state of bone care in TJA patients using Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) score risk stratifications.

METHODS

In total, 505 consecutive TJA patients who meet the Endocrine Society guidelines for osteoporosis screening were included for review. They were divided into a high risk or low risk group depending on FRAX scores and were compared based on screening, diagnosis, and treatment of metabolic bone disease. Logistic regression models were used to analyze factors influencing screening and treatment. A population analysis involving 2,000 TJA patients, and a complication analysis involving 40 periprosthetic fracture patients were conducted.

RESULTS

Among high risk patients undergoing TJA, 90% did not receive any pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis, 45% were not treated with vitamin D or calcium, and 88% did not receive bone density testing in the routine care period. Among patients with pre-existing osteoporosis undergoing TJA, 80% were not treated with any osteoporosis medications and 33% of these patients were not taking vitamin D or calcium. Female gender and past fracture history contributed to whether patients received screening and treatment. Patients with periprosthetic hip fractures have significantly higher FRAX scores compared to control THA patients.

CONCLUSION

There are significant gaps in metabolic bone care of the geriatric TJA population regarding both screening and treatment. Metabolic bone care and risk identification with FRAX should be highly considered for TJA patients.

Risk assessment tools for osteoporosis and fractures in 2022

Osteoporosis is one of the frequently encountered non-communicable diseases in the world today. Several hundred million people have osteoporosis, with many more at risk. The clinical feature is a fragility fracture (FF), which results in major reductions in the quality and quantity of life, coupled with a huge financial burden. In recognition of the growing importance, the World Health Organisation established a working group 30 years ago tasked with providing a comprehensive report to understand and assess the risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most widely endorsed technology for assessing the risk of fracture or diagnosing osteoporosis before a fracture occurs, but others are available. In clinical practice, important distinctions are essential to optimise the use of risk assessments. Traditional tools lack specificity and were designed for populations to identify groups at higher risk using a 'one-size-fits-all' approach. Much has changed, though the purpose of risk assessment tools remains the same. In 2022, many tools are available to aid the identification of those most at risk, either likely to have osteoporosis or suffer the clinical consequence. Modern technology, enhanced imaging, proteomics, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and big data science will greatly advance a more personalised risk assessment into the future. Clinicians today need to understand not only which tool is most effective and efficient for use in their practice, but also which tool to use for which patient and for what purpose. A greater understanding of the process of risk assessment, deciding who should be screened, and how to assess fracture risk and prognosis in older men and women more comprehensively will greatly reduce the burden of osteoporosis for patients, society, and healthcare systems worldwide. In this paper, we review the current status of risk assessment, screening and best practice for osteoporosis, summarise areas of uncertainty, and make some suggestions for future developments, including a more personalised approach for individuals.

A Novel Osteoporosis Screening Protocol to Identify Orthopedic Surgery Patients for Preoperative Bone Health Optimization

Introduction

Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in elective orthopedic surgery. While preoperative bone health optimization decreases osteoporosis-related complications, there is an unmet need to establish who may benefit from preoperative dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This study assesses a novel, simple screening protocol to identify orthopedic surgical patients for preoperative DXA.

Materials/Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 628 patients undergoing total knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplasty or thoracolumbar spine fusion. Inclusion criteria were ≥40 years undergoing primary elective surgery. Screening criteria defining who should obtain DXA due to high osteoporosis risk included: female ≥65, male ≥70, fracture history when ≥50 years, or FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk (without bone mineral density [BMD]-adjustments) ≥8.4%. Osteoporosis was defined by World Health Organization criteria [T-score ≤ -2.5], clinical National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) criteria [T-score ≤ -2.5, elevated BMD-adjusted FRAX risk, or prior hip/spine fracture], and modified clinical criteria [NOF criteria simplified to include any non-traumatic prior fracture and FRAX without BMD].

Results

The study included 100 TKAs, 100 THAs, 251 TSAs, and 177 spine fusions, average age 65.6 ± 9.8. DXA was available for 209 patients. Screening criteria recommending DXA was met by 362 patients. For those with DXA, screening sensitivity was .96 (CI: .78 to .99) and specificity was .19 (CI: .14 to .25) for identifying T-score osteoporosis. Similar sensitivity of .99 (CI: .91 to .99) and specificity of .61 (CI: .56 to .66) were found for modified clinical osteoporosis. For modified clinical osteoporosis, 192 patients with osteoporosis met criteria (true pos.), 1 patient with osteoporosis did not meet criteria (false neg.), 170 patients without osteoporosis met criteria (false pos.), and 265 patients without osteoporosis did not meet criteria (true neg.).

Discussion/Conclusion

A simple screening protocol identifies orthopedic surgical candidates at risk of T-score or clinical osteoporosis for preoperative DXA with high sensitivity.

Abaloparatide Effects on Cortical Volumetric BMD and Estimated Strength Indices of Hip Subregions by 3D-DXA in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

In ACTIVE, abaloparatide increased areal BMD (aBMD) of the hip and femoral neck vs teriparatide and placebo in women with osteoporosis. Previously, 3D-processing of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of a subgroup of ACTIVE subjects showed similar increases in trabecular volumetric BMD (Tb.vBMD) and greater increases in cortical vBMD (Ct.vBMD) of the total hip with abaloparatide vs teriparatide. The current analyses from this subgroup describe 2D- and 3D-DXA data for hip subregions. Randomly selected subjects from ACTIVE (n = 250/treatment group) who received 18 mo of placebo, abaloparatide 80 µg, or open-label teriparatide 20 µg by daily subcutaneous injection underwent hip DXA at baseline, and mo 6 and 18 of treatment. Areal BMD of the femoral neck, trochanter, and femoral shaft was determined using standard 2D-DXA and 3D-SHAPER software to retrospectively evaluate changes from baseline in volumetric parameters of these 3 hip subregions, including trabecular and cortical segmentation. Changes in biomechanical parameters cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), section modulus (Z), and buckling ratio were also evaluated. Femoral neck, trochanter, and shaft aBMD increased in the abaloparatide and teriparatide groups at mo 6 and 18 vs placebo, with greater increases for abaloparatide vs teriparatide at the femoral neck at mo 6 and the shaft at mo 6 and 18. All 3 subregions showed similar significant increases in Tb.vBMD with abaloparatide and teriparatide vs placebo, whereas Ct.vBMD of all 3 subregions showed greater increases after 18 mo of abaloparatide vs teriparatide. Biomechanical parameters improved in all subregions with abaloparatide and teriparatide vs placebo, with greater improvements in CSMI and Z of the femoral neck and lower shaft after 6 and 18 mo of abaloparatide vs teriparatide. Differential femoral neck and shaft Ct.vBMD responses may explain the greater increases in CSMI and Z of those subregions with abaloparatide vs teriparatide.

Femur and Tibia BMD Measurement in Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty Candidates

Distal femur BMD declines ∼20% following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) potentially leading to adverse outcomes. BMD knowledge before and following TKA might allow interventions to optimize outcomes. We hypothesized that distal femur and proximal tibial BMD could be reproducibly measured with existing DXA technology. Elective TKA candidates were enrolled and standard clinical DXA plus bilateral PA and lateral knee scans acquired. Manual regions of interest (ROIs) were placed at distal femur and proximal tibia sites based on required TKA machining and periprosthetic fracture location. Intra- and inter-rater BMD reliability was assessed by intra-class correlation (ICC). Custom and standard proximal femur BMD were correlated by linear regression and paired t test evaluated BMD differences between planned surgical and contralateral side. One hundred subjects (68F/32M), mean (SD) age and BMI of 67.2 (7.7) yr and 30.8 (4.8) kg/m² were enrolled. Lowest clinical BMD T-score was < -1.0 in 65% and ≤ -2.5 in 16%; 34 had prior fracture. BMD reproducibility at all custom ROIs was excellent; ICC > 0.96. Mean BMD at custom ROIs ranged from 0.903 to 1.346 g/cm² in the PA projection and 0.891 to 1.429 g/cm² in the lateral. Lower BMD values were observed at the proximal tibia, while the higher measurements were at the femur condyle. Custom knee ROI BMD was highly correlated (p < 0.0001) with total and femur neck with better correlation at ROIs adjacent to the joint (R² = 0.62-0.67, 0.49-0.55 respectively). In those without prior TKA (n = 76), mean BMD was lower (2.8%-6.6%; p < 0.05) in the planned surgical leg at all custom ROIs except the PA tibial regions. Individual variability was present with 82% having a custom ROI with lower BMD (up to 53%) in the planned operative leg. Distal femur and proximal tibial BMD can be measured using custom ROIs with good reproducibility. Suboptimal bone status is common in TKA candidates and distal femur/proximal tibia BMD is often lower on the planned operative side. Routine distal femur/proximal tibial BMD measurement might assist pre-operative interventions, surgical decision-making, subsequent care and outcomes. Studies to evaluate these possibilities are indicated.

Is Radiographic Osteoporotic Hip Morphology A Predictor For High Mortality Following Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures?: Osteoporotic Hip Morphology & Mortality

INTRODUCTION

Factors related to mortality after intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITFF) have been investigated intensively in the literature except for radiographic osteoporotic hip morphology. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between mortality and radiographic osteoporotic hip morphology of patients with ITFF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery between the dates of January 2012 and June 2018 due to ITFF were retrospectively reviewed. Osteoporotic status of the proximal femur was determined based on Singh Index grading and Dorr classification systems on preoperative anteroposterior pelvis radiographs of contralateral hips. The mortality rates of the patients were measured at 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months. For controlling the confounders, multiple regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 321 consecutive ITFFs were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 81.5 ± 6.6 years. All patients were treated with osteosynthesis utilizing a cephalomedullary nail. The overall mortality rates at 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months were 7.2%, 13.4%, 16.2%, 22.7%, respectively. There was 2.196 (1.140 - 4.229) folds increase in the mortality rate of patients with the Dorr type C femurs at 6th month (p=0.019). However, Singh index grade was not significantly associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Patients with Dorr type C femur seem to have 2.1 times increased mortality at 6th months following ITFFs. A simple anteroposterior pelvis radiograph obtained during the initial evaluation of the patients may be used to estimate the mortality rate after ITFF.

Radiographic indexes in AP hip radiographs prior to total hip arthroplasty reveal candidates with low BMD

Using anteroposterior (AP) hip radiograph, we measured several indexes to investigate the association with bone mineral density (BMD) before THA and found a highly effective index to predict femoral BMD. This technique is helpful for both patients and clinicians to identify potential candidates with low BMD to whom DXA examination is particularly recommended.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the study is to identify patients with low bone mineral density (BMD) prior to total hip arthroplasty with the help of AP hip radiographs.

METHODS

Indexes on AP hip radiographs and T-scores from DXA examination of the lumbar spine and the affected hip were acquired from patients before THA. Indexes measured on AP hip radiographs including the canal calcar ratio (CCR), canal flare index (CFI), morphological cortical index (MCI), canal bone ratio (CBR), and canal bone area ratio (CBAR). The relevance between indexes and the T-score of femora was evaluated by correlation analysis, and the diagnostic value of indexes for osteopenia was examined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were included. The average value of CBR-7, CBR-10, and CBAR (7-10) were highly related to the T-score of femora (r =  - 0.592, r =  - 0.634, and r =  - 0.631, respectively, p < 0.0001). Results of the intra- and interobserver variation assessment was excellent. CBR-7, CBR-10, and CBAR (7-10) were significantly different between the non-osteopenia and osteopenia groups (p < 0.0001). CBR-10 had the biggest area under curve (AUC), means the great diagnostic value for osteopenia in the proximal femora (AUC = 0.821, cutoff value = 0.3805).

CONCLUSION

The canal bone ratio at 10 × 10^-2 m under the level of the lesser trochanter proved to be a great indicator of femoral osteopenia. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trail Registry, ChiCTR2000041016. Registered 16 December 2020-Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx .

Effect of Bone Health Optimization on Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment Before Thoracolumbar Fusion

Objective:

Osteoporosis is not rare in thoracolumbar spine fusion patients and may portend poorer surgical outcomes. Implementation of a bone health optimization (BHO) clinic improves osteoporosis screening and treatment in the total joint arthroplasty population. We hypothesize that preoperative osteoporosis is common, under-recognized, and undertreated in thoracolumbar fusion patients and that a BHO clinic will increase preoperative osteoporosis screening rates and pharmacologic osteoporosis treatment in this population.

Methods:

This retrospective case series includes adults older than 30 years who underwent elective thoracolumbar spine fusion at a single tertiary care center before and after creation of a BHO referral clinic. Data collected included preoperative osteoporosis risk factors, prior dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry testing, and prior osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Fracture risk was estimated using the fracture risk assessment tool with and without bone mineral density (BMD), and the US National Osteoporosis Foundation criteria for screening and treatment were applied.

Results:

Ninety patients were included in the pre-BHO group; 53 patients met criteria for BMD measurement, but only 10 were tested within 2 years preoperatively. Sixteen patients (18%) met criteria for osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, but only 5 of the 16 (31%) received osteoporosis medication within 6 months of surgery. There were 87 patients in the post-BHO group, and 19 were referred to the BHO clinic. BMD measurement was done in 17 of the patients (89%) referred to the BHO clinic compared with 10% for those not referred. All patients (n = 7) referred to the BHO clinic meeting treatment criteria received treatment within 6 months before surgery, whereas only 25% of the patients not referred received treatment.

Discussion:

Osteoporosis is not rare in adults undergoing thoracolumbar spine fusion with ∼13% to 18% meeting criteria for pharmacotherapy. Preoperative BHO referral increases screening and treatment.

Best Practice Guidelines for Assessment and Management of Osteoporosis in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Spinal Reconstruction

STUDY DESIGN

Expert consensus study.

OBJECTIVE

This expert panel was created to establish best practice guidelines to identify and treat patients with poor bone health prior to elective spinal reconstruction.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Currently, no guidelines exist for the management of osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients undergoing spinal reconstructive surgery. Untreated osteoporosis in spine reconstruction surgery is associated with higher complications and worse outcomes.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel with 18 experts was assembled including orthopedic and neurological surgeons, endocrinologists, and rheumatologists. Surveys and discussions regarding the current literature were held according to Delphi method until a final set of guidelines was created with over 70% consensus.

RESULTS

Panelists agreed that bone health should be considered in every patient prior to elective spinal reconstruction. All patients above 65 and those under 65 with particular risk factors (chronic glucocorticoid use, high fracture risk or previous fracture, limited mobility, and eight other key factors) should have a formal bone health evaluation prior to undergoing surgery. DXA scans of the hip are preferable due to their wide availability. Opportunistic CT Hounsfield Units of the vertebrae can be useful in identifying poor bone health. In the absence of contraindications, anabolic agents are considered first line therapy due to their bone building properties as compared with antiresorptive medications. Medications should be administered preoperatively for at least 2 months and postoperatively for minimum 8 months.

CONCLUSION

Based on the consensus of a multidisciplinary panel of experts, we propose best practice guidelines for assessment and treatment of poor bone health prior to elective spinal reconstructive surgery. Patients above age 65 and those with particular risk factors under 65 should undergo formal bone health evaluation. We also established guidelines on perioperative optimization, utility of various diagnostic modalities, and the optimal medical management of bone health in this population.Level of Evidence: 5.

Prevalence and treatment rate of osteoporosis in patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Due to age and gender, patients awaiting total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA) are at a higher risk of osteoporosis. In joint arthroplasty, low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for implant osseointegration, durability, and prosthesis complications. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and treatment rate of osteoporosis in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

We applied a comprehensive literature search through PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from inception to July 10, 2021, for studies investigating the prevalence and treatment rate of osteoporosis in TJA patients. The aggregated prevalence was calculated with the random-effects model, and the heterogeneity between studies was checked by Cochran's Q test and quantified by the I² statistic. We performed subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses to determine the source of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by a funnel plot and verified by Egger's test. Anti-osteoporosis treatment for TJA patients was described qualitatively and quantitatively.

RESULTS

Of 4561 citations identified by the search strategy, 11 studies including 3462 patients were eligible for inclusion. The pooled prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in TJA patients was 24.8% (95%CI: 14.1-37.2%) and 38.5% (95%CI: 29.3-48.0%), respectively. The prevalence of osteoporosis/osteopenia in TJA patients was 64.0% (95%CI: 45.8-80.3%). In terms of gender, the pooled prevalence of osteoporosis in males, females, and postmenopausal females were 5.5% (95%CI: 1.5-11.4%), 29.0% (95%CI: 18.3-41.1%), and 38.3% (95%CI: 13.2-67.1%), respectively. The treatment rate of osteoporosis in TJA patients was 32.9% (95%CI: 15.2-53.1%) by a random-effects model.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in patients undergoing TJA, especially in postmenopausal females. However, the treatment rate of osteoporosis is low. Considering the possibility of surgical complications, clinicians should strengthen their awareness of pre-operative BMD assessment and manage osteoporosis in high-risk patients.

Proceedings of the 2021 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Advances in the Management of Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases

The 2021 Virtual Santa Fe Bone Symposium was held August 5-8, with over 300 registered attendees from throughout the USA, and at least 18 other countries. This annual meeting focuses on applying advances in basic science and clinical research to the care of patients with osteoporosis and those with inherited and acquired disorders of bone metabolism. Participants represented a broad range of medical disciplines with an interest in skeletal diseases. These included physicians of many specialties and practice settings, fellows, advanced practice providers, fracture liaison service (FLS) coordinators, clinical researchers, and bone density technologists. There were lectures, case presentations, and panel discussions, all followed by interactive discussions. Breakout sessions included an FLS workshop, Bone Health TeleECHO workshop, special interest groups, meet-and-greet the faculty, and satellite symposia. The agenda covered topics of interest such as strategies for the use of osteoanabolic therapy, prevention of periprosthetic fractures, management of atypical femur fractures, what we know and don't know about vitamin D, advances in the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of skeletal health, controversies and conundrums in osteoporosis care, skeletal health in transgender patients, management of patients with hypophosphatasia and hypophosphatemia, and treat-to-target approaches for managing patients with osteoporosis. The Proceedings of the 2021 Virtual Santa Fe Bone Symposium consists of highlights of each presentation with current strategies for optimizing the care of patients with skeletal disorders.

Computed Tomography as a Characterization Tool for Engineered Scaffolds with Biomedical Applications

The ever-growing field of materials with applications in the biomedical field holds great promise regarding the design and fabrication of devices with specific characteristics, especially scaffolds with personalized geometry and architecture. The continuous technological development pushes the limits of innovation in obtaining adequate scaffolds and establishing their characteristics and performance. To this end, computed tomography (CT) proved to be a reliable, nondestructive, high-performance machine, enabling visualization and structure analysis at submicronic resolutions. CT allows both qualitative and quantitative data of the 3D model, offering an overall image of its specific architectural features and reliable numerical data for rigorous analyses. The precise engineering of scaffolds consists in the fabrication of objects with well-defined morphometric parameters (e.g., shape, porosity, wall thickness) and in their performance validation through thorough control over their behavior (in situ visualization, degradation, new tissue formation, wear, etc.). This review is focused on the use of CT in biomaterial science with the aim of qualitatively and quantitatively assessing the scaffolds’ features and monitoring their behavior following in vivo or in vitro experiments. Furthermore, the paper presents the benefits and limitations regarding the employment of this technique when engineering materials with applications in the biomedical field.

High prevalence and undertreatment of osteoporosis in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

We detected a high prevalence of low bone mineral density assessed by DXA in 268 elderly patients with end-stage osteoarthritis scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (18% osteoporosis, 41% osteopenia). Therefore, and due to the identified concomitant undertreatment, routine DXA measurements should be considered in elderly patients prior to surgery.

INTRODUCTION

Bone quality represents a decisive factor for osseointegration, durability, and complications of an implanted prosthesis. Although the risk of osteoporosis increases with age and the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA) is recommended in elderly patients, a systematic, unbiased analysis of such patients is not available in the literature.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we examined 268 elderly patients (age ≥70 years) who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within 3 months prior to primary THA. Demographics, medical history, radiographic OA grade, and stem fixation method (i.e., cemented or cementless) were obtained.

RESULTS

In total, 153 (57%) cemented and 115 (43%) cementless stem fixations during THA were performed. Forty-nine patients (18%) were diagnosed with osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5), 110 patients (41%) with osteopenia (T-score ≤-1.0), and 109 patients (41%) with normal BMD (T-score >-1.0). Importantly, 36/49 patients (73%) with osteoporosis were not diagnosed before, resulting in a relevant undertreatment. Female sex and low body mass index (BMI) were the main factors negatively influencing the bone mineral density (BMD).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to a high incidence of undiagnosed and untreated osteoporosis in elderly patients with potential effects on the success of osseointegration as well as other clinical outcomes, DXA measurements should be included in the clinical routine for these patients prior to THA.

Osteoporosis in spine surgery patients: what is the best way to diagnose osteoporosis in this population?

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to compare different recognized definitions of osteoporosis in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery to determine which patient population should be considered for preoperative optimization.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients in whom lumbar spine surgery was planned at 2 academic medical centers was performed, and the rate of osteoporosis was compared based on different recognized definitions. Assessments were made based on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), CT Hounsfield units (HU), trabecular bone score (TBS), and fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). The rate of osteoporosis was compared based on different definitions: 1) the WHO definition (T-score ≤ -2.5) at total hip or spine; 2) CT HU of < 110; 3) National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) guidelines; and 4) "expanded spine" criteria, which includes patients meeting NBHA criteria and/or HU < 110, and/or "degraded" TBS in the setting of an osteopenic T-score. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with a DXA scan of the total hip and/or spine performed within 1 year and a lumbar spine CT scan within 6 months of the physician visit.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-four patients were included. The mean age was 68.3 years, with 70.5% female, 96.7% Caucasian, and the mean BMI was 28.8. Fracture history was reported in 53.8% of patients. The proportion of patients identified with osteoporosis on DXA, HUs, NBHA guidelines, and the authors' proposed "expanded spine" criteria was 25.4%, 36.5%, 75%, and 81.9%, respectively. Of the patients not identified with osteoporosis on DXA, 31.3% had osteoporosis based on HU, 55.1% had osteoporosis with NBHA, and 70.4% had osteoporosis with expanded spine criteria (p < 0.05), with poor correlations among the different assessment tools.

CONCLUSIONS

Limitations in the use of DXA T-scores alone to diagnose osteoporosis in patients with lumbar spondylosis has prompted interest in additional methods of evaluating bone health in the spine, such as CT HU, TBS, and FRAX, to inform guidelines that aim to reduce fracture risk. However, no current osteoporosis assessment was developed with a focus on improving outcomes in spinal surgery. Therefore, the authors propose an expanded spine definition for osteoporosis to identify a more comprehensive cohort of patients with potential poor bone health who could be considered for preoperative optimization, although further study is needed to validate these results in terms of clinical outcomes.

Fracture Risk Assessment: An Update

➤

Our ability to accurately identify high fracture risk in individuals has improved as the volume of clinical data has expanded and fracture risk assessment tools have been developed.

➤

Given its accessibility, affordability, and low radiation exposure, dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the standard for osteoporosis screening and monitoring response to treatment.

➤

The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a DXA software add-on that uses lumbar spine DXA imaging to produce an output that correlates with bone microarchitecture. It has been identified as an independent fracture risk factor and may prove useful in further stratifying fracture risk among those with a bone mineral density (BMD) in the osteopenic range (-1.0 to -2.4 standard deviations), in those with low-energy fractures but normal or only mildly low BMD, or in those with conditions known to impair bone microarchitecture.

➤

Fracture risk assessment tools, including the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), Garvan fracture risk calculator, and QFracture, evaluate the impact of multiple clinical factors on fracture risk, even in the absence of BMD data. Each produces an absolute fracture risk output over a defined interval of time. When used appropriately, these enhance our ability to identify high-risk patients and allow us to differentiate fracture risk among patients who present with similar BMDs.

➤

For challenging clinical cases, a combined approach is likely to improve accuracy in the identification of high-risk patients who would benefit from the available osteoporosis therapies.

Osteoporosis: Recent Recommendations and Positions of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research and the International Society for Clinical Densitometry

➤

Osteoporosis is common in orthopaedic patients, not only in those sustaining fragility fractures but also in patients ≥50 years old who are having elective orthopaedic surgery.

➤

The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) has developed consensus-based recommendations for secondary fracture prevention for all patients who are ≥65 years old with a hip or spine fracture.

➤

The ASBMR encourages orthopaedic surgeons to "Own the Bone," by beginning prevention of a secondary fracture during hospitalization for a fragility fracture, if practicable, and arranging follow-up for continued bone health care after discharge.

➤

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) recognized that many poor outcomes and complications of elective orthopaedic surgery are related to osteoporosis.

➤

The ISCD used an evidence-based approach to create official positions to identify which patients ≥50 years old who are having elective orthopaedic surgery should undergo assessment of bone health and how this should be performed.

A pilot study comparing daily teriparatide with monthly cycles of teriparatide and raloxifene

This 6-month pilot study in osteoporotic postmenopausal women evaluated cyclic TPD/RLX compared to daily subcutaneous TPD with the concept of optimizing bone formation. Compared to daily subcutaneous TPD, cyclic therapy showed comparable increase in spine BMD and favorable effects on total proximal femur BMD and cortical thickness.

PURPOSE

There is no cure for osteoporosis; better medications or different approaches with current agents are needed. We hypothesized that monthly cycles of teriparatide (TPD) followed by raloxifene (RLX) might promote ongoing bone formation. Additionally, as TPD might initially adversely affect hip BMD, such effects may be mitigated by a cyclic approach. Therefore, this 6-month pilot study evaluated the effect of cyclic TPD/RLX compared to daily subcutaneous TPD on bone markers, BMD, trabecular bone score (TBS), and hip parameters assessed by 3D modeling.

METHODS

Postmenopausal osteoporotic women (n=26) were randomized to open-label TPD 20 daily or alternating monthly cycles of TPD followed by monthly RLX 60 mg daily. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine (LS), femur, and radius by DXA. To further assess LS BMD, QCT and opportunistic CT (L1 Hounsfield units [HU]) were performed. LS TBS and hip cortical and trabecular parameters were assessed using DXA. Baseline group comparisons were performed by unpaired T-test with change over time evaluated by repeated measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

Participant mean age, BMI, and lowest T-score were 67.0 years, 26.0 kg/m², and -2.7; no between-group differences in serum chemistries, 25(OH)D, or BMD were observed. LS-BMD increased (p<0.001) with TPD or TPD/RLX as measured by DXA (4.8%/5.2%), QCT (13%/9.4%), or HU (15.6%/10.2%) with no between-group difference. TPD/RLX produced beneficial between-group differences in total proximal femur BMD (1.5%, p<0.05) and cortical thickness (1.6%, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with daily TPD, cyclic TPD/RLX comparably increased spine BMD and might have favorable effects on proximal femur BMD and cortical thickness.

Bone mineral density assessment by DXA in rheumatic patients with end-stage osteoarthritis undergoing total joint arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatic diseases have a high risk for joint destruction and secondary osteoarthritis (OA) as well as low bone mineral density (BMD, i.e., osteoporosis). While several factors may lead to low BMD in these patients, the value of BMD measurements in rheumatic patients with end-stage OA scheduled for total joint arthroplasty is unknown.

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study of 50 adults with secondary OA due to rheumatic diseases, we evaluated dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of both hips and the spine performed within 3 months prior to arthroplasty (n = 25 total hip arthroplasty, THA; n = 25 total knee arthroplasty, TKA). We analyzed various demographic and disease-specific characteristics and their effect on DXA results by using group comparisons and multivariate linear regression models.

RESULTS

Although patients undergoing TKA were younger (63.2 ± 14.2 vs. 71.0 ± 10.8 yr., p = 0.035), osteoporosis was observed more frequently in patients scheduled for TKA than THA (32% vs. 12%). Osteopenia was detected in 13/25 patients (52%) in both the THA and TKA cohort. In the THA cohort, female sex, lower BMI and prednisolone use were associated with lower T-score in the hip. In TKA patients, higher OA grade determined by Kellgren-Lawrence score was associated with lower T-score in the hip of the affected side.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis is present in a considerable frequency of rheumatic patients with end-stage OA, and THA and TKA patients show distinct frequencies and risk factors of low BMD. Our findings point to a potential value of DXA regarding preoperative evaluation of bone status.

Reliability of a Risk-Factor Questionnaire for Osteoporosis: A Primary Care Survey Study with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Ground Truth

(1) Purpose: Predisposing factors to osteoporosis (OP) as well as dual-source x-ray densitometry (DXA) steer therapeutic decisions by determining the FRAX index. This study examines the reliability of a standard risk factor questionnaire in OP-screening. (2) Methods: n = 553 eligible questionnaires encompassed 24 OP-predisposing factors. Reliability was assessed using DXA as a gold standard. Multiple logistic regression and Spearman's correlations, as well as the confounding influence of age and body mass index, were analyzed in SPSS (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). (3) Results: Our study revealed low patient self-awareness regarding OP and its risk factors. One out of every four patients reported a positive history for osteoporosis not confirmed by DXA. The extraordinarily high incidence of rheumatoid arthritis and thyroid disorders likely reflect confusion with other diseases or health anxiety. FRAX-determining risk factors such as malnutrition, liver insufficiency, prior fracture without trauma, and glucocorticoid therapy did not correlate with increased OP incidence, altogether demonstrating how inaccurate survey information could influence therapeutic decisions on osteoporosis. (4) Conclusions: Contradictive results and a low level of patient self-awareness suggest a high degree of uncertainty and low reliability of the current OP risk factor survey.

Preoperative bone health assessment and optimization in spine surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the bone health in preoperative spine surgery patients. This information will provide a framework to understand the needs and methods for providing bone health optimization in elective spine surgery patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 104 patients undergoing bone health optimization was performed. Patients were selected based on risk factors identified by the surgeon and suspected compromised bone health. Evaluation included history and examination, laboratory investigations, and bone mineral density (BMD) at 3 sites (femoral neck, lumbar spine, and radius). Patients' bone status was classified using WHO criteria and expanded criteria recommended by the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF). The 10-year Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores of the hip and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) were calculated with and without femoral neck BMD, with spine BMD, and with the trabecular bone score (TBS). Antiresorptive and anabolic agents were provided in accordance with meeting NOF criteria for treatment of osteoporosis.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 69.0 years, and 81% of patients were female. The mean historical height loss was 5.6 cm, and 54% of patients had a history of fracture. Secondary osteoporosis due to chronic renal failure, inflammatory arthritis, diabetes, and steroid use was common (51%). The mean 25-hydroxy vitamin D was 42.4 ng/ml and was normal in 81% of patients, with only 4 patients being deficient. The mean T-scores were -2.09 (SD 0.71) of the femoral neck, -0.54 (1.71) of the lumbar spine, and -1.65 (1.38) of the distal radius. These were significantly different. The 10-year FRAX MOF score was 20.7%, and that for hip fracture was 6.9% using the femoral neck BMD and was not significantly different without the use of BMD. The FRAX risk-adjusted score using the lumbar spine BMD and TBS was significantly lower than that for the hip. Osteoporosis was present in 32.1% according to WHO criteria compared with 81.6% according to NOF criteria. Antiresorptive medications were recommended in 31 patients and anabolic medications in 44 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons can reliably identify patients with poor bone health by using simple criteria, including historical height loss, history of fracture, comorbidities associated with osteoporosis, analysis of available imaging, and calculation of FRAX score without BMD. High-risk patients should have BMD testing and bone health assessment. In patients with osteoporosis, a comprehensive preoperative bone health assessment is recommended and, if warranted, pharmacological treatment should be started.

The association between lower Hounsfield units on computed tomography and cage subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion

OBJECTIVE

One vexing problem after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery is cage subsidence. Low bone mineral density (BMD) may contribute to subsidence, and BMD is correlated with Hounsfield units (HUs) on CT. The authors investigated if lower HU values correlated with subsidence after LLIF.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients undergoing single-level LLIF with pedicle screw fixation for degenerative conditions at the University of California, San Francisco, by 6 spine surgeons was performed. Data on demographics, cage parameters, preoperative HUs on CT, and postoperative subsidence were collected. Thirty-six–inch standing radiographs were used to measure segmental lordosis, disc space height, and subsidence; data were collected immediately postoperatively and at 1 year. Subsidence was graded using a published grade of disc height loss: grade 0, 0%–24%; grade I, 25%–49%; grade II, 50%–74%; and grade III, 75%–100%. HU values were measured on preoperative CT from L1 to L5, and each lumbar vertebral body HU was measured 4 separate times.

RESULTS

After identifying 138 patients who underwent LLIF, 68 met the study inclusion criteria. All patients had single-level LLIF with pedicle screw fixation. The mean follow-up duration was 25.3 ± 10.4 months. There were 40 patients who had grade 0 subsidence, 15 grade I, 9 grade II, and 4 grade III. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, or smoking. There were no significant differences in cage sizes, cage lordosis, and preoperative disc height. The mean segmental HU (the average HU value of the two vertebrae above and below the LLIF) was 169.5 ± 45 for grade 0, 130.3 ± 56.2 for grade I, 100.7 ± 30.2 for grade II, and 119.9 ± 52.9 for grade III (p < 0.001). After using a receiver operating characteristic curve to establish separation criteria between mild and severe subsidence, the most appropriate threshold of HU value was 135.02 between mild and severe subsidence (sensitivity 60%, specificity 92.3%). After univariate and multivariate analysis, preoperative segmental HU value was an independent risk factor for severe cage subsidence (p = 0.017, OR 15.694, 95% CI 1.621–151.961).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower HU values on preoperative CT are associated with cage subsidence after LLIF. Measurement of preoperative HU values on CT may be useful when planning LLIF surgery.

Regional improvements in lumbosacropelvic Hounsfield units following teriparatide treatment

OBJECTIVE

Opportunistic Hounsfield unit (HU) determination from CT imaging has been increasingly used to estimate bone mineral density (BMD) in conjunction with assessments from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The authors sought to compare the effect of teriparatide on HUs across different regions in the pelvis, sacrum, and lumbar spine, as a surrogate measure for the effects of teriparatide on lumbosacropelvic instrumentation.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review of patients who had been treated with at least 6 months of teriparatide was performed. All patients had at least baseline DXA as well as pre- and post-teriparatide CT imaging. HUs were measured in the pedicle, lamina, and vertebral body of the lumbar spine, in the sciatic notch, and at the S1 and S2 levels at three different points (ilium, sacral body, and sacral ala).

RESULTS

Forty patients with an average age of 67 years underwent a mean of 20 months of teriparatide therapy. Mean HUs of the lumbar lamina, pedicles, and vertebral body were significantly different from each other before teriparatide treatment: 343 ± 114, 219 ± 89.2, and 111 ± 48.1, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean HUs at the S1 level for the ilium, sacral ala, and sacral body were also significantly different from each other: 124 ± 90.1, −10.7 ± 61.9, and 99.1 ± 72.1, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean HUs at the S2 level for the ilium and sacral body were not significantly different from each other, although the mean HU at the sacral ala (−11.9 ± 52.6) was significantly lower than those at the ilium and sacral body (p = 0.003 and 0.006, respectively). HU improvement occurred in most regions following teriparatide treatment. In the lumbar spine, the mean lamina HU increased from 343 to 400 (p < 0.001), the mean pedicle HU increased from 219 to 242 (p = 0.04), and the mean vertebral body HU increased from 111 to 134 (p < 0.001). There were also significant increases in the S1 sacral body (99.1 to 130, p < 0.05), S1 ilium (124 vs 165, p = 0.01), S1 sacral ala (−10.7 vs 3.68, p = 0.04), and S2 sacral body (168 vs 189, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant regional variation in lumbar and sacropelvic HUs, with most regions significantly increasing following teriparatide treatment. The sacropelvic area had lower HU values than the lumbar spine, more regional variation, and a higher degree of correlation with BMD as measured on DXA. While teriparatide treatment resulted in HUs > 110 in the majority of the lumbosacral spine, the HUs in the sacral ala remained suggestive of severe osteoporosis, which may limit the effectiveness of fixation in this region.

Bone Health Optimization in Orthopaedic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is associated with adverse orthopaedic surgical outcomes. Bone health optimization is a preoperative intervention intended to reduce the likelihood of postoperative complications. We aimed to characterize a patient cohort referred for bone health optimization to test the hypothesis that poor bone quality is common in orthopaedic surgery and that many such patients meet guidelines for osteoporosis treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 124 patients referred for bone health optimization who were ≥50 years of age and candidates for arthroplasty or thoracolumbar surgery. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) risk factors and dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results were collected. When available, opportunistic computed tomographic (CT) imaging and the trabecular bone score were evaluated. The World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic and National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) treatment guidelines were applied.

RESULTS

All patients were referred by their orthopaedic surgeon; their mean age was 69.2 years, 83% of patients were female, 97% were Caucasian, and 56% had sustained a previous fracture. The mean historical height loss (and standard deviation) was 5.3 ± 3.3 cm for women and 6.0 ± 3.6 cm for men. The mean lowest T-score of the hip, spine, or wrist was -2.43 ± 0.90 points in women and -2.04 ± 0.81 points in men (p < 0.08). Osteoporosis (T-score of ≤-2.5 points) was present in 45% of women and 20% of men; only 3% of women and 10% of men had normal bone mineral density. Opportunistic CT scans identified 60% of patients as likely having osteoporosis. The trabecular bone score identified 34% of patients with degraded bone microarchitecture and 30% of patients with partially degraded bone microarchitecture. The NOF threshold for osteoporosis treatment was met in 91% of patients. Treatment was prescribed in 75% of patients (45% anabolic therapy and 30% antiresorptive therapy).

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis, degraded bone microarchitecture, prior fracture, and elevated fracture risk were common. Given the high prevalence of impaired bone health in this cohort, we believe that bone health screening, including FRAX assessment, should be considered in selected patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery as part of the preoperative optimization for all adults who are ≥50 years of age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.