1
|
Szameitat AJ, Shen S, Conforto A, Sterr A. Cortical activation during executed, imagined, observed, and passive wrist movements in healthy volunteers and stroke patients. Neuroimage 2012; 62:266-80. [PMID: 22584231 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2011] [Revised: 04/27/2012] [Accepted: 05/05/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Motor imagery, passive movement, and movement observation have been suggested to activate the sensorimotor system without overt movement. The present study investigated these three covert movement modes together with overt movement in a within-subject design to allow for a fine-grained comparison of their abilities in activating the sensorimotor system, i.e. premotor, primary motor, and somatosensory cortices. For this, 21 healthy volunteers underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In addition we explored the abilities of the different covert movement modes in activating the sensorimotor system in a pilot study of 5 stroke patients suffering from chronic severe hemiparesis. Results demonstrated that while all covert movement modes activated sensorimotor areas, there were profound differences between modes and between healthy volunteers and patients. In healthy volunteers, the pattern of neural activation in overt execution was best resembled by passive movement, followed by motor imagery, and lastly by movement observation. In patients, attempted overt execution was best resembled by motor imagery, followed by passive movement, and lastly by movement observation. Our results indicate that for severely hemiparetic stroke patients motor imagery may be the preferred way to activate the sensorimotor system without overt behavior. In addition, the clear differences between the covert movement modes point to the need for within-subject comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André J Szameitat
- Department of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boyd R, Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Abbott DF, Badawy R, Gilmore R, Provan K, Tournier JD, Macdonell RAL, Jackson GD. INCITE: A randomised trial comparing constraint induced movement therapy and bimanual training in children with congenital hemiplegia. BMC Neurol 2010; 10:4. [PMID: 20064275 PMCID: PMC2832893 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-10-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2009] [Accepted: 01/12/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Congenital hemiplegia is the most common form of cerebral palsy (CP) accounting for 1 in 1300 live births. These children have limitations in capacity to use the impaired upper limb and bimanual coordination deficits which impact on daily activities and participation in home, school and community life. There are currently two diverse intensive therapy approaches. Traditional therapy has adopted a bimanual approach (BIM training) and recently, constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) has emerged as a promising unimanual approach. Uncertainty remains about the efficacy of these interventions and characteristics of best responders. This study aims to compare the efficacy of CIMT to BIM training to improve outcomes across the ICF for school children with congenital hemiplegia. METHODS/DESIGN A matched pairs randomised comparison design will be used with children matched by age, gender, side of hemiplegia and level of upper limb function. Based on power calculations a sample size of 52 children (26 matched pairs) will be recruited. Children will be randomised within pairs to receive either CIMT or BIM training. Both interventions will use an intensive activity based day camp model, with groups receiving the same dosage of intervention delivered in the same environment (total 60 hours over 10 days). A novel circus theme will be used to enhance motivation. Groups will be compared at baseline, then at 3, 26 and 52 weeks following intervention. Severity of congenital hemiplegia will be classified according to brain structure (MRI and white matter fibre tracking), cortical excitability using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), functional use of the hand in everyday tasks (Manual Ability Classification System) and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). Outcomes will address neurovascular changes (functional MRI, functional connectivity), and brain (re)organisation (TMS), body structure and function (range of motion, spasticity, strength and sensation), activity limitations (upper limb unimanual capacity and bimanual motor coordination), participation restrictions (in home, school and recreation), environmental (barriers and facilitators to participation) and quality of life. DISCUSSION This paper outlines the theoretical basis, study hypotheses and outcome measures for a matched pairs randomised trial comparing CIMT and BIM training to improve outcomes across the ICF. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12609000912280.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roslyn Boyd
- Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Brain Research Institute, Florey Neuroscience Institutes (Austin), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Leanne Sakzewski
- Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Brain Research Institute, Florey Neuroscience Institutes (Austin), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jenny Ziviani
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - David F Abbott
- Brain Research Institute, Florey Neuroscience Institutes (Austin), Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Radwa Badawy
- Brain Research Institute, Florey Neuroscience Institutes (Austin), Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rose Gilmore
- Brain Research Institute, Florey Neuroscience Institutes (Austin), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kerry Provan
- Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jacques-Donald Tournier
- Brain Research Institute, Florey Neuroscience Institutes (Austin), Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard AL Macdonell
- Brain Research Institute, Florey Neuroscience Institutes (Austin), Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Graeme D Jackson
- Brain Research Institute, Florey Neuroscience Institutes (Austin), Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|