Biomechanical effect of the extent of vertebral body fracture on the thoracolumbar spine with pedicle screw fixation: An in vitro study

Defining and measuring objective and subjective spinal stiffness: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Examine and identify the breadth of definitions and measures of objective and subjective spinal stiffness in the literature, with a focus on clinical implications.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted to determine what is known about definitions and measures of the specific term of spinal stiffness. Following the framework by Arksey and O'Malley, eligible peer-reviewed studies identified using PubMed, Ebsco health, and Scopus were included if they reported definitions or measures of spinal stiffness. Using a data abstraction form, the studies were classified into four themes: biomechanical, surgical, pathophysiological, and segmental spinal assessment. To identify similarities and differences between studies, sixteen categories were generated.

RESULTS

In total, 2426 records were identified, and 410 met the eligibility criteria. There were 350 measures (132 subjective; 218 objective measures) and 93 indicators of spinal stiffness. The majority of studies (n = 69%) did not define stiffness.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the breadth of objective and subjective measures that are both clinically and methodologically diverse. There is no consensus regarding a standardised definition of stiffness in the reviewed literature.

Comparative finite element analysis of posterior short segment fixation constructs with or without intermediate screws in the fractured vertebrae for the treatment of type a thoracolumbar fracture

Six-screw short-segment posterior fixation for thoracolumbar fractures, which involves intermediate screws at the fractured vertebrae has been proposed to reduce the rates of kyphosis recurrence and implant failure. Yet, little is known about the mechanisms and biomechanical responses by which intermediate screws at the fracture vertebrae enhance fixation strength. The objective of this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties that are associated with the augmentation of intermediate screws in relation to the severity of type A thoracolumbar fracture using finite element analysis. Short-segment stabilization models with or without augmentation screws at fractured vertebrae were established based on finite element model of moderate compressive fractures, severe compressive fractures and burst fractures. The spinal stiffness, stresses at the implanted hardware, and axial displacement of the bony defect were measured and compared under mechanical loading conditions. All six-screw stabilization showed a decreased range of motion in extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation compared to the traditional four-screw fixation models. Burst thoracolumbar fracture benefited more from augmentation of intermediate screws at the fracture vertebrae. The stress of the rod in six-screw models increased while decreased that of pedicle screws. Our results suggested that patients with more unstable fractures might achieve greater benefits from augmentation of intermediate screws at the fracture vertebrae. Augmentation of intermediate screws at the fracture vertebrae is recommended for patients with higher wedge-shaped or burst fractures to reduce the risk of hardware failure and postoperative re-collapse of injured vertebrae.

A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of the Impact of Different Configurations of Pedicle-Screw-Based Fixation in Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture

The aim of this experimental study was to analyze the impact of applying different configurations of the transpedicular fixation system on selected mechanical parameters of the thoracolumbar spine under conditions of its instability (after simulated fracture). Five study groups were tested: physiological, with compression fracture of the vertebra, with two-segment fixation, with three-segment fixation, and with four-segment fixation. Each of the analyzed study groups was subjected to axial compression, flexion, and extension. Based on the conducted experimental tests, the mechanical parameters, i.e., stiffness coefficient and dissipation energy, were determined for all groups under consideration. The stiffness value of two-segment fixation is significantly lower than the physiological value (during flexion and extension). The use of long-segment fixation considered in two configurations (three- and four-segment fixation) may result in excessive stiffness of the system due to the high stiffness values achieved (approx. 25–30% higher than the physiological values in the case of compression and on average 60% higher in the case of flexion). The use of long-segment fixator design shows better results than short-segment fixation. Considering both biomechanical and clinical aspects, three-segment fixation seems to be a compromise solution as it saves the patient from more extensive stiffening of the spinal motion segments.

Numerical Evaluation of Spinal Stability after Posterior Spinal Fusion with Various Fixation Segments and Screw Types in Patients with Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Finite Element Analysis

The aim of this study was to analyze the spinal stability and safety after posterior spinal fusion with various fixation segments and screw types in patients with an osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fracture based on finite element analysis (FEA). To realize various osteoporotic vertebral fracture conditions on T12, seven cases of Young’s modulus, namely 0%, 1%, 5%, 10%, 25%, 50%, and 100% of the Young’s modulus, for vertebral bones under intact conditions were considered. Four types of fixation for thoracolumbar fracture on T12 (fixed with T11-L1, T10-T11-L1, T11-L1-L2, and T10-T11-L1-L2) were applied to the thoracolumbar fusion model. The following screw types were considered: pedicle screw (PS) and cortical screw (CS). Using FEA, four motions were performed on the fixed spine, and the stress applied to the screw, peri-implant bone (PIB), and intervertebral disc (IVD) and the range of motion (ROM) were calculated. The lowest ROM calculated corresponded to the T10-T11-L1-L2 model, while the closest to the intact situation was achieved in the T11-L1-L2 fixation model using PS. The lowest stress in the screw and PB was detected in the T10-T11-L1-L2 fixation model.

A Hybrid Uniplanar Pedicle Screw System with a New Intermediate Screw for Minimally Invasive Spinal Fixation: A Finite Element Analysis

Purpose

A hybrid pedicle screw system for minimally invasive spinal fixation was developed based on the uniplanar pedicle screw construct and a new intermediate screw. Its biomechanical performance was evaluated using finite element (FE) analysis.

Methods

A T12-L2 FE model was established to simulate the L1 vertebral compression fracture with Magerl classification A1.2. Six fixation models were developed to simulate the posterior pedicle screw fracture fixation, which were divided into two subgroups with different construct configurations: (1) six-monoaxial/uniplanar/polyaxial pedicle screw constructs and (2) four-monoaxial/uniplanar/polyaxial pedicle screw constructs with the new intermediate screw. After model validation, flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation with 7.5 Nm moments and preloading of 500 N vertical compression were applied to the FE models to compare the biomechanical performances of the six fixation models with maximum von Mises stress, range of motion, and maximum displacement of the vertebra.

Results

Under four loading scenarios, the maximum von Mises stresses were found to be at the roots of the upper or lower pedicle screws. In the cases of flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation, the maximum von Mises stress of the uniplanar screw construct lay in between the monoaxial and polyaxial screw constructs in each subgroup. Considering lateral bending, the uniplanar screw construct enabled to lower the maximum von Mises stress than monoaxial and polyaxial pedicle screw constructs in each subgroup. Two subgroups showed comparable results of the maximum von Mises stress on the endplates, range of motion of T12-L1, and maximum displacement of T12 between the corresponding constructs with the new intermediate screw or not.

Conclusions

The observations shown in this study verified that the hybrid uniplanar pedicle screw system exhibited comparable biomechanical performance as compared with other posterior short-segment constructs. The potential advantage of this new fixation system may provide researchers and clinical practitioners an alternative for minimally invasive spinal fixation with vertebral augmentation.

Posterior short segment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture

The choice of the type of stabilization device in the osteosynthesis of dorso-lumbar spine fractures remains a subject of controversy. The present study aims to evaluate the efficiency of short segment in patients suffering post-traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. This study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology of the Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia. All our patients had a spinal osteosynthesis via the posterior approach with a short segment pedicle screw fixation. We established a record of the pre and post-operative data, the functional results in the post-operative stage during the follow-up period and in retrospect according to the Denis Pain Scale, as well as the Oswestry score. The correction was evaluated by determining the relative gain and loss at the last period of retrospect: vertebral kyphosis, regional kyphosis, Gardner Segment Kyphotic Deformity (GSKD), and computed tomography (CT) scan in retrospect to check the quality of the arthrodesis. The average Oswestry score was 14%. Twenty-nine patients had an Oswestry score ≤40%. The relative gain obtained postoperatively was 57.3% for vertebral kyphosis, 67.2% for regional kyphosis and 71.3% for Gardner kyphosis deformity; while the loss of correction at the last follow-up was 0.6° for vertebral kyphosis, 1.5° for regional kyphosis and 0.9° for GSKD. No cases of non-union were reported. The short segment fixation makes it possible to limit operating time, the abundance of bleeding and the aggression of the soft tissues.

How to improve the safety of bicortical pedicle screw insertion in the thoracolumbar vertebrae: analysis base on three-dimensional CT reconstruction of patients in the prone position

BACKGROUND

Through the comparison of three-dimensional CT reconstruction between the supine position and the prone position, the relative position of thoracolumbar great vessels and vertebral body was studied, and the shortest safe distance between them was measured to improve the safety of bicortical pedicle screw insertion and reduce the risk of vascular injury.

METHODS

Forty adults were selected to participate the research. Three-dimensional reconstruction of thoracolumbar (T9-L3) CT was performed in the prone position and the supine position. The relative distance between the Aorta/Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) and vertebral body was obtained as AVD/VVD respectively. The relative angle of the Aorta/ IVC and the vertebral body was calculated as ∠AOY/∠VOY. Self-controlled experiments were carried out in the prone and the supine positions, and the data obtained were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical software.

RESULTS

The AVD of the prone position and the supine position was the shortest at T12 (3.18 ± 0.68 mm), but the difference was not statistically significant. The aorta of the T9-L3 segment was shifted from the anterolateral to the anteromedial. The ∠AOY of the other groups differed significantly between the prone and supine positions in all vertebrae except T12 and L1 (P < 0.05), and the aorta in the prone position was more anteromedial than that of supine position. With regard to VVD/∠VOY, there was no significant difference between the prone and supine positions (P ≥ 0.05), and the minimum VVD of L3 segment is greater than 5.4 mm. The IVC has no obvious mobility and is fixed in the range of 20 ° ~ 30 ° near the midline.

CONCLUSION

When using bicortical anchoring of pedicle screws, it is safe to ensure that the protruding tips of the screw is less than 3 mm. Due to the mobility of the aorta in different postures and individual differences in anatomy, the prone position CT can help doctors to make better preoperative plans and decisions.

Vertebroplasty and vertebroplasty in combination with intermediate bilateral pedicle screw fixation for OF4 in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective single-Centre cohort study

Background

Although various studies have described the outcomes and complications of each treatment for OF 4 in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), there is still no consensus on the optimal treatment regimen. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of OF 4 in patients with OVCFs treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) compared with PV in combination with intermediate bilateral pedicle screw fixation (IBPSF).

Methods

A total of 110 patients with OF 4 in OVCFs from January 2011 to December 2013 were reviewed retrospectively and divided into two groups (group A: PV, group B: PV + IBPSF). According to the guidelines of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU), OF 4 consists of 3 fracture types. The clinical and radiographic assessments were observed preoperatively, postoperatively, and during follow-up.

Results

The patients were followed for an average of 60.50 ± 15.20 months (group A) and 58.20 ± 17.60 months (group B) without significant differences. No significant differences were found in BMD, BMI and cement volume between the two groups, but differences were found for operation time, blood loss, and hospitalization time. The VAS and ODI scores improved better significantly at the final follow-up in group B but not in group A. Compared with the preoperative values, the postoperative kyphosis angle and loss of fractured segment height significantly improved, but the difference between the groups was significant after 3 months postoperatively. The loss of angular correction and fractured segment height in group A were greater than those in group B. A total of 15 cases of cement leakage were observed in group A and 8 cases in group B, and no complications or revision surgeries were observed in either group. Thirteen new fractures occurred (11 in group A and 2 in group B), which was significant.

Conclusion

PV with IBPSF could provide effective restoration and maintenance of fractured segment height and segment alignment as well as a lower rate of complications of OF 4 in OVCFs.

Is Short Same-Segment Fixation Really Better than Short-Segment Posterior Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures?

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study assessed whether short same-segment fixation (SSSF) is better than short-segment posterior fixation (SSPF) for reducing thoracolumbar fractures, improving the kyphosis angle, maintaining vertebral height, or reducing the incidence of broken screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In clinical practice, single-segment thoracolumbar fractures were then more likely to be treated with SSPF that included pedicle fixation at the level of the fracture (short same-segment fixation, or SSSF). Whether SSSF could really achieve vertebral height recovery, improve the kyphosis, reduce postoperative kyphosis loss, and reduce the incidence of internal fixation failure better than SSPF.

METHODS

Patients treated with SSPF or SSSF at our institution during 2006 to 2014 were reviewed. Effects of thoracolumbar fracture reduction, improved kyphosis angle, and maintaining vertebral height were compared between groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors related to instrumentation breakage and correlation analysis to assess possible relations between loss of correction of the kyphosis angle (LAWAC) and other factors.

RESULTS

Altogether, 130 patients were enrolled (53 SSPF, 77 SSSF). SSPF (22F, 31M) group's mean (range) age was 37.7 (16-60) years, and the follow-up was 26.2 (9-120) months. SSSF (27F, 50M) group's mean (range) age was 39.3 (17-61) years, and the follow-up was 23.2 (9-60) months. All patients underwent either internal fixation or screw repair. Immediately postoperatively, restoration after middle vertebral fractures was better in SSSF patients than in SSPF patients (P = 0.003), with no differences in other fracture-related factors (P > 0.05). Only LAWAC was significantly associated with instrumentation breakage (P < 0.05). Also, immediately postoperatively, the anterior/posterior vertebral heights ratio was negatively related to LAWAC.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle fixation of the fracture did not obtain better recovery of anterior or posterior vertebral heights nor did it improve AWA restoration. There was no significant difference in LAWAC between groups or in the incidence of broken screws. LAWAC may increase the incidence of broken screws.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Finite element analysis of the influence of three-joint spinal complex on the change of the intervertebral disc bulge and height

This study evaluated the changes of height and bulging occurring in individual layers of the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc for 3 load scenarios (axial compression, flexion, and extension). The numerical model of a single motion segment of the thoracic spine was analysed for 2 different configurations, ie, for the model of a physiological segment and a segment with the posterior column removed. In the physiological segment, all annulus fibrosus layers decrease in height regardless of the applied load, bulging outside the intervertebral disc. Removal of the posterior column increases mobility and disrupts the load transfer system, with the lamellae bulging into the intervertebral disc.

A finite element study on posterior short segment fixation combined with unilateral fixation using pedicle screws for stable thoracolumbar fracture

The objective of this study was to use finite element models to investigate the biomechanics of stable thoracolumbar burst fracture repair using unilateral short-segment fixation and 4 alternate pedicle screw systems.Four posterior pedicle screw systems were compared for unilateral short-segment fixation using finite element models: intermediate bilateral short pedicle screw fixation, intermediate bilateral long pedicle screw fixation, intermediate unilateral short pedicle screw fixation, and intermediate unilateral long pedicle screw fixation. We compared range of motion (ROM), von Mises stresses on the implants, and stress on the intervertebral discs superior and inferior to the injured vertebra during simulated spinal movements.There were no significant differences in ROM, von Mises stress, or intervertebral disc stress among the 4 intermediate pedicle screw fixation techniques for all spinal movements evaluated. In addition, there were no consolidated trends depicting beneficial differences between the short and long screw models, or between the unilateral and bilateral screw models.ROM, von Mises stress, and intervertebral disc stress are the same across the 4, posterior short-segment fixation techniques evaluated using finite element models. The simplest technique-posterior short segment fixation combined with intermediate unilateral short pedicle screw fixation-is a feasible treatment strategy for stable thoracolumbar fracture.

The mechanism of thoracolumbar burst fracture may be related to the basivertebral foramen

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The basivertebral foramen (BF), located in the middle posterior wall of the vertebral body, may induce local weakness and contribute to the formation of a retropulsed bone fragment (RBF) in thoracolumbar burst fracture (TLBF). We hypothesize that the mechanism of TLBF is related to the BF.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to clarify the relationship between RBFs and the BF in TLBFs, and to explain the results using biomechanical experiments and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

STUDY DESIGN

A comprehensive research involving clinical radiology, micro-CT, and biomechanical experiments on cadaveric spines was carried out.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 162 consecutive patients diagnosed with TLBF with RBFs, drawn from 256 patients who had reported accidents or injuries to their thoracolumbar spine, comprised the patient sample.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Dimensions and location of the RBFs in relation to the BF were the outcome measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Computed tomography reconstruction imaging was used to measure the dimensions and location of RBFs in 162 patients (length, height, width of RBF and vertebral body). Furthermore, micro-CT scans were obtained of 10 cadaveric spines. Each vertebral body was divided into three layers (superior, middle, and inferior), and each layer was divided further into nine regions (R1-R9). Microarchitecture parameters were calculated from micro-CT scans, including bone volume fraction (BV/TV), connectivity (Conn.D), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and bone mineral density (BMD). Differences were analyzed between regions and layers. Burst fractures were simulated on cadaveric spines to explore the fracture line location and test the relationship between RBFs and BF.

RESULTS

Retropulsed bone fragment width was usually one-third of the width of the vertebral body, whereas RBF length and height were approximately half of the corresponding vertebral body dimensions. Measures of trabecular bone quality were generally lowest in those central and superior regions of the vertebral body which are adjacent to the BF and which are most affected by burst fracture. In simulated TLBFs, the fracture line went across the vertex or upper surface of the BF.

CONCLUSIONS

The most vulnerable regions in the vertebral body lie within or just superior to the BF. The central MR2 region in particular is at risk of fracture and RBF formation.

Stepwise resection of the posterior ligamentous complex for stability of a thoracolumbar compression fracture: An in vitro biomechanical investigation

To quantify the mechanical contribution of posterior ligamentous structures to the stability of thoracolumbar compression fractures.Twelve fresh human T11-L3 spinal specimens were harvested in this study. The 1/3 L1 vertebral body was resected in a wedged shape. After the preinjury had been created, the specimens were subjected to flexion-compression to create a fracture model. Resection of the ligaments was performed in a sequential manner from the bilateral facet capsule ligament (FCL), interspinous ligament, and supraspinous ligament (SSL) to the ligamentum flavum at the T12-L1 level. Then, for the intact specimen, fracture model, and ligament disruption steps, the range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) of T12-L1 and L1-L2 were collected for each simulated movement.Sequential transection of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC), ROM, and NZ were increased in all movements at the T12-L1 segment. In the flexion-extension (FE), the ROM and NZ demonstrated significant increases after the fracture model and resection of SSL and LF. In lateral bending (LB), the ROM increased after the fracture and removal of the LF, while the NZ showed a slight increase. In axial rotation, the fracture model and removal of the LF resulted in a significant increase in the ROM, and the NZ showed a slight change after step reduction. For the L1-L2 segment, resection of the FCL led to an increased ROM in LB.With rupture of SSL or LF, the stability of the segment decreased significantly compared with the intact and fracture model, particularly in FE motion, the function of the PLC was considered to be incompetent.

Biomechanical Analysis of a Pedicle Screw-Rod System with a Novel Cross-Link Configuration

Study Design

The strength effects of a pedicle screw-rod system supplemented with a novel cross-link configuration were biomechanically evaluated in porcine spines.

Purpose

To assess the biomechanical differences between a conventional cross-link pedicle screw-rod system versus a novel cross-link instrumentation, and to determine the effect of the cross-links.

Overview of Literature

Transverse cross-link systems affect torsional rigidity, but are thought to have little impact on the sagittal motion of spinal constructs. We tested the strength effects in pullout and flexion-compression tests of novel cross-link pedicle screw constructs using porcine thoracic and lumbar vertebrae.

Methods

Five matched thoracic and lumbar vertebral segments from 15 porcine spines were instrumented with 5.0-mm pedicle screws, which were then connected with 6.0-mm rods after partial corpectomy in the middle vertebral body. The forces required for construct failure in pullout and flexion-compression tests were examined in a randomized manner for three different cross-link configurations: un-cross-link control, conventional cross-link, and cross-link passing through the base of the spinous process. Statistical comparisons of strength data were analyzed using Student's t-tests.

Results

The spinous process group required a significantly greater pullout force for construct failure than the control group (p=0.036). No difference was found between the control and cross-link groups, or the cross-link and spinous process groups in pullout testing. In flexion-compression testing, the spinous processes group required significantly greater forces for construct failure than the control and cross-link groups (p<0.001 and p=0.003, respectively). However, there was no difference between the control and cross-link groups.

Conclusions

A novel cross-link configuration that features cross-link devices passing through the base of the spinous processes increased the mechanical resistance in pullout and flexion-compression testing compared to un-cross-link constructs. This configuration provided more resistance to middle-column damage under flexion-compression testing than conventional cross-link configuration.

The Mechanical Effect of Rod Contouring on Rod-Screw System Strength in Spine Fixation

OBJECTIVE

Rod-screw fixation systems are widely used for spinal instrumentation. Although many biomechanical studies on rod-screw systems have been carried out, but the effects of rod contouring on the construct strength is still not very well defined in the literature. This work examines the mechanical impact of straight, 20° kyphotic, and 20° lordotic rod contouring on rod-screw fixation systems, by forming a corpectomy model.

METHODS

The corpectomy groups were prepared using ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene samples. Non-destructive loads were applied during flexion/extension and torsion testing. Spine-loading conditions were simulated by load subjections of 100 N with a velocity of 5 mm min(-1), to ensure 8.4-Nm moment. For torsional loading, the corpectomy models were subjected to rotational displacement of 0.5° s(-1) to an end point of 5.0°, in a torsion testing machine.

RESULTS

Under both flexion and extension loading conditions the stiffness values for the lordotic rod-screw system were the highest. Under torsional loading conditions, the lordotic rod-screw system exhibited the highest torsional rigidity.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that the lordotic rod-screw system was the most rigid among the systems tested and the risk of rod and screw failure is much higher in the kyphotic rod-screw systems. Further biomechanical studies should be attempted to compare between different rod kyphotic angles to minimize the kyphotic rod failure rate and to offer a more stable and rigid rod-screw construct models for surgical application in the kyphotic vertebrae.

Trans-Endplate Pedicle Pillar System in Unstable Spinal Burst Fractures: Design, Technique, and Mechanical Evaluation

Background

Short-segment pedicle screw instrumentation (SSPI) is used for unstable burst fractures to correct deformity and stabilize the spine for fusion. However, pedicle screw loosening, pullout, or breakage often occurs due to the large moment applied during spine motion, leading to poor outcomes. The purpose of this study was to test the ability of a newly designed device, the Trans-Endplate Pedicle Pillar System (TEPPS), to enhance SSPI rigidity and decrease the screw bending moment with a simple posterior approach.

Methods

Six human cadaveric spines (T11-L3) were harvested. A burst fracture was created at L1, and the SSPI (Moss Miami System) was used for SSPI fixation. Strain gauge sensors were mounted on upper pedicle screws to measure screw load bearing. Segmental motion (T12-L2) was measured under pure moment of 7.5 Nm. The spine was tested sequentially under 4 conditions: intact; first SSPI alone (SSPI-1); SSPI+TEPPS; and second SSPI alone (SSPI-2).

Results

SSPI+TEPPS increased fixation rigidity by 41% in flexion/extension, 28% in lateral bending, and 37% in axial rotation compared with SSPI-1 (P<0.001), and it performed even better compared to SSPI-2 (P<0.001 for all). Importantly, the bending moment on the pedicle screws for SSPI+TEPPS was significantly decreased 63% during spine flexion and 47% in lateral bending (p<0.001).

Conclusion

TEPPS provided strong anterior support, enhanced SSPI fixation rigidity, and dramatically decreased the load on the pedicle screws. Its biomechanical benefits could potentially improve fusion rates and decrease SSPI instrumentation failure.

TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES FIXED WITH INTERMEDIATE PINS BY THE POSTERIOR APPROACH

Objective:Radiographic evaluation of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with unconvencional transpedicular fixation, which includes additional fixation of the fractured vertebra associated with transverse connector - Crosslink clamp.Methods:Retrospective study evaluating a total of 68 patients operated at the Hospital do Trabalhador de Curitiba, Orthopedics Service, of which 15 were eligible for the study. All patients were treated with posterior pedicle fixation and intermediate screw. The assessment by the Cobb angle method was performed on preoperative, immediate postoperative and one year after surgery radiographs.Results:It was observed an average reduction of kyphosis of 8.3o (77%), with a loss of 1.34o in late postoperative compared to the immediate postoperative period.Conclusion:The method of fixation of burst-type fractures of the thoracolumbar spine by the posterior approach with intermediate screw was effective in maintaining the reduction achieved in the immediate postoperative period and after one year of evolution.

Palliative transpedicular partial corpectomy without anterior vertebral reconstruction in lower thoracic and thoracolumbar junction spinal metastases

Background

The thoracolumbar junction is the transition from a stiff (thoracic spine) to a mobile zone (lumbar spine) and is relatively unstable compared with the thoracic and lumbar portions of the spine. The need for anterior reconstruction after a corpectomy has been emphasized by several authors. However, for patients with a relatively short life expectancy, anterior reconstruction may be unnecessary. Posterior instrumentation alone may be sufficient to provide pain relief and stability for such patients. The goal of this study was to assess the postoperative outcomes and survival rates of patients with tumor metastases of the lower thoracic spine and thoracolumbar junction (T10–L1) who underwent transpedicular partial corpectomy without anterior vertebral reconstruction.

Methods

From November 2001 to February 2015, 29 patients diagnosed with symptomatic spinal cord compression caused by tumor metastasis involving T10 to L1 underwent palliative surgery that involved a posterolateral transpedicular partial corpectomy without anterior reconstruction. The surgical indication was neurologic progression. A follow-up was conducted for all of the patients, including reviewing medical records and performing an examination in the outpatient department.

Results

The patients ranged in age from 33 to 83 years (mean, 61.6 years). Neurologic improvement by at least one Frankel grade was noted in 75.9 % of the patients (N = 22). Neither intraoperative mortality nor implant failure was reported. The median survival rate was 7.43 months (range, 0.47–28 months).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that the stability of implants can be maintained up to 28 months with satisfying functional outcome after a palliative posterolateral transpedicular partial corpectomy without anterior reconstruction.

Biomechanical evaluation of the Facet Wedge: a refined technique for facet fixation

PURPOSE

Purpose of this paper is to evaluate the primary stability of a new approach for facet fixation the so-called Facet Wedge (FW) in comparison with established posterior fixation techniques like pedicle screws (PS) and translaminar facet screws (TLS) with and without anterior cage interposition.

METHODS

Twenty-four monosegmental fresh frozen non-osteoporotic human motion segments (L2-L3 and L4-L5) were tested in a two-arm biomechanical study using a robot-based spine tester. Facet Wedge was compared with pedicle screws and translaminar screws as a stand-alone device and in combination with an anterior fusion cage.

RESULTS

Pedicle screws, FW and translaminar screws could stabilize an intact motion segment effectively. Facet Wedge was comparable to PS for lateral bending, extension and flexion and slightly superior for axial rotation. Facet Wedge showed a superior kinematic capacity compared to translaminar screws.

CONCLUSIONS

Facet Wedge offers a novel posterior approach in achieving primary stability in lumbar spinal fixation. The results of the present study showed that the Facet Wedge has a comparable primary stability to pedicle screws and potential advantages over translaminar screws.

Biomechanical study comparing a new combined rod-plate system with conventional dual-rod and plate systems

Most anterior spinal instrumentation systems are designed as either a plate or dual-rod system and have corresponding limitations. Dual-rod designs may offer greater adjustability; however, this system also maintains a high profile and lacks a locking design. Plate systems are designed to be stiffer, but the fixed configuration is not adaptable to the variety of vertebral body shapes. The authors designed a new combined rod-plate system (D-rod) to overcome these limitations and compared its biomechanical performance with the conventional dual-rod and plate system. Eighteen pig spinal specimens were divided into 3 groups (6 per group). An L1 corpectomy was performed and fixed with the D-rod (group A; n=6), Z-plate (Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tennessee) (group B; n=6), or Ventrofix (Synthes, Paoli, Pennsylvania) (group C; n=6) system. T13-L2 range of motion was measured with a 6 degrees of freedom (ie, flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation) spine simulator under pure moments of 6.0 Nm. The D-rod and Ventrofix specimens were significantly stiffer than the Z-plate specimens (P<.05) based on results obtained from lateral bending and flexion-extension tests. The D-rod and Z-plate specimens were significantly stiffer than the Ventrofix specimens (P<.05) in axial rotation. The D-rod combines the advantages of the plate and dual-rod systems, where the anterior rod exhibits the design of a low-profile locking plate, enhanced stability, and decreased interference of the surrounding vasculature. The posterior rods function in compression and distraction, and the dual-rod system offers greater adjustability and control over screw placement. The results indicate that it may provide adequate stability for anterior thoracolumbar reconstruction.

Biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: An experimental study

BACKGROUND

Use of a pedicle screw at the level of fracture, also known as an intermediate screw, has been shown to improve clinical results in managing lumbar fracture, but there is a paucity of biomechanical studies to support the claim. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding intermediate pedicle screws at the level of a fracture on the stiffness of a short-segment pedicle fixation using monoaxial or polyaxial screws and to compare the strength of monoaxial and polyaxial screws in the calf spine fracture model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Flexibility of 12 fresh-frozen calf lumbar spine specimens was evaluated in all planes. An unstable burst fracture model was created at the level of L3 by the pre-injury and dropped-mass technique. The specimens were randomly divided into monoaxial pedicle screw (MPS) and polyaxial pedicle screw (PPS) groups. Flexibility was retested without and with intermediate screws (MPSi and PPSi) placed at the level of fracture in addition to standard screws placed at L2 and L4.

RESULTS

The addition of intermediate screws significantly increased the stability of the constructs, as measured by a decreased range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, and lateral bending in both MPS and PPS groups (P < 0.05). There was neither any significant difference in the ROM in the spines of the two groups before injury, nor a difference in the ROM between the MPSi and PPSi groups (P > 0.05), but there was a significant difference between MPS and PPS in flexion and extension in the short-segment fixation group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of intermediate screws at the level of a burst fracture significantly increased the stability of short-segment pedicle screw fixation in both the MPS and PPS groups. However, in short-segment fixation group, monoaxial pedicle screw exhibited more stability in flexion and extension than the polyaxial pedicle screw.

Estudo biomecânico da fixação pedicular curta na fratura-explosão toracolombar

OBJETIVO: Comparar a rigidez biomecânica entre a coluna toracolombar intacta, a coluna com fratura explosão e a coluna com fratura explosão associada à fixação pedicular curta em suínos. MÉTODOS: 30 amostras de coluna toracolombar (T11-L3) de suínos foram divididas em três grupos com 10 amostras cada. O Grupo 1 representava a coluna intacta, o Grupo 2 representava a coluna com fratura explosão e o Grupo 3 a fratura explosão associada à fixação pedicular curta. Foi realizado o corte ósseo em "V" do terço médio do corpo vertebral comprometendo a coluna anterior e média de L1 para simular a fratura explosão. No Grupo 3 foi realizada a fixação pedicular com Pinos de Schanz. Os grupos foram submetidos ao teste biomecânico em compressão axial controlada. Os parâmetros de carga (N) e deslocamento (mm) eram gerados em um gráfico instantâneo e a rigidez (N/mm) foi determinada. O teste era interrompido quando ocorria uma queda súbita na curva no gráfico indicando falência da amostra. RESULTADOS: A rigidez das colunas fraturadas foi 53% menor do que a rigidez das colunas intactas, sendo essa diferença estatisticamente significativa (p < 0,05). A fixação pedicular curta apresentou uma rigidez 50% maior do que a coluna fraturada. Esse aumento foi estatisticamente significativo (p < 0,05). A rigidez da fixação pedicular curta foi 30% menor do que a rigidez das colunas intactas. Essas diferenças foram estatisticamente significativas (p < 0,05). CONCLUSÃO: A fixação pedicular curta não é suficiente para restabelecer a rigidez da coluna intacta nos testes biomecânicos in vitro de compressão axial pura em modelos de fratura toracolombar de suínos.

The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation

There are three basic concepts that are important to the biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation. First, the outer diameter of the screw determines pullout strength, while the inner diameter determines fatigue strength. Secondly, when inserting a pedicle screw, the dorsal cortex of the spine should not be violated and the screws on each side should converge and be of good length. Thirdly, fixation can be augmented in cases of severe osteoporosis or revision. A trajectory parallel or caudal to the superior endplate can minimise breakage of the screw from repeated axial loading. Straight insertion of the pedicle screw in the mid-sagittal plane provides the strongest stability. Rotational stability can be improved by adding transverse connectors. The indications for their use include anterior column instability, and the correction of rotational deformity.