Anterior cervical stabilization using a semi-constrained cervical plate and titanium mesh cage for single level corpectomy

A novel anatomic titanium mesh cage for reducing the subsidence rate after anterior cervical corpectomy: a finite element study

Fusion with a titanium mesh cage (TMC) has become popular as a conventional method after cervical anterior corpectomy, but postoperative TMC subsidence has often been reported in the literature. We designed a novel anatomic cervical TMC to reduce the postoperative subsidence rate. According to the test process specified in the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) F2267 standard, three-dimensional finite element analysis was used to compare the anti-subsidence characteristics of a traditional TMC (TTMC) and novel TMC (NTMC). Through analysis, the relative propensity values of a device to subside (Kp) of the TTMC and NTMC were 665.5 N/mm and 1007.2 N/mm, respectively. A higher Kp measurement is generally expected to indicate that the device is more resistant to subsidence into a vertebral body. The results showed that the novel anatomic titanium mesh cage (NTMC) significantly improved the anti-subsidence performance after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), which was approximately 51.3% higher than that of the traditional titanium mesh cage.

Determining the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable and Nonexpandable Titanium Cages in Cervical Fusion Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Expandable cages have been increasingly used in cervical and lumbar reconstructions; however, there is a paucity in the literature on how they compare with traditional nonexpandable cages in the cervical spine. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis, comparing the clinical and radiologic outcomes of expandable versus nonexpandable corpectomy cage use in the cervical spine.

METHODS

A database search identified studies detailing the outcomes of expandable and nonexpandable titanium cage use in the cervical spine. These studies were screened using the PRISMA protocol. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were used with a 95% confidence interval. Two analyses were carried out for each outcome: one including all studies and the other including only studies reporting on exclusively 1-level and 2-level cases.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included. The mean change in segmental lordosis was significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 6.72 vs. 3.69°, P < 0.001; 1-level and 2-level, 6.81° vs. 4.31°, P < 0.001). The mean change in cervical lordosis was also significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 5.71° vs. 3.11°, P = 0.027; 1-level and 2-level, 5.71° vs. 2.07°, P = 0.002). No significant difference was found between the complication rates (all, P = 0.43; 1-level and 2-level, P = 0.94); however, the proportion of revisions was significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 0.06 vs. 0.02, P = 0.03; 1-level and 2-level, 0.08 vs. 0.01, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of expandable cages may carry a modest improvement in radiologic outcomes compared with nonexpandable cages in the cervical spine; however, they may also lead to a higher rate of revisions based on our analyses.

Comparative Analysis of 2 Different Types of Titanium Mesh Cage for Single-level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion in Terms of Postoperative Subsidence and Sagittal Alignment

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective observatory analysis study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the differences in clinical and radiologic outcomes among patients who underwent anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) using titanium mesh cage (TMC) with end-caps and patients who underwent ACCF using TMC without end-cap.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

TMC has been widely used as an effective treatment option for ACCF. However, the subsidence of TMC has been observed frequently in the early postoperative period in some cases, resulting in related clinical complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent single-level ACCF using TMC from September 2008 to June 2014 at our institute were retrospectively reviewed. Patients treated with TMC with end-cap were classified as an end-cap group, while patients treated with TMC without end-cap classified as a control group. The round press-fit-type end-caps with 2.5-degree angulation were used at both ends of the cage for the end-cap group. Patients were followed postoperatively for a minimum of 36 months with radiologic evaluation.

RESULTS

The subsidence was lower in the end-cap group (4.3±3.6 vs. 4.8±3.0, P<0.01), with lower rates of severe subsidence (≥3 mm) than the control group (34.2% vs. 52.1%, P<0.01). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for neck pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI) was reported significantly less in the study group, which showed a positive correlation with lesser severe subsidence. Also, the characteristics of subsidence differed between the 2 groups. In the end-cap group, slippage type subsidence occurred, resulting in better sagittal alignment than that in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing single-level ACCF, using TMC with end-cap provided better clinical results and similar fusion rate, compared with using TMC without end-cap. The end-cap decreased the severity of postoperative subsidence and related neck pain. Also, sagittal alignment was well preserved, suggesting it may contribute to cervical lordosis.

Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Titanium Mesh Cages for Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Pathologies: A Literature Review

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are 2 effective and safe surgical treatments of degenerative cervical pathologies and are associated with a high percentage of excellent clinical outcomes when a graft or device must be used during the surgery, such as an allograft, autograft, nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide cages, poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cages, and titanium mesh cages (TMCs). Although TMCs have been used in cervical surgeries for almost 2 decades, no specific reviews have been performed introducing the state of this material. Thus, in the present review, we discuss the status of using TMCs in anterior cervical surgeries.

Studies that tested the usage of TMCs in treating degenerative cervical pathologies were included in this review. The development and progress of TMCs, the biomechanical analysis of TMCs, the radiological and clinical assessment of TMCs, the advantages and disadvantages of using TMCs, and their prospects for future applications as a device of ACCF and ACDF in treating degenerative cervical pathologies are discussed.

Studies included in this review showed that TMCs can provide sufficient biomechanical stability. Furthermore, the TMCs used in anterior cervical fusion avoid the donor-site morbidity and achieve a solid bony fusion. However, there are some shortcomings. The structural characteristics and the design of TMCs cause the TMC subsidence rate to remain high, thus resulting in multiple related complications.

We believe that due to the virtues of TMCs, they are worthy of application and promotion. However, the structure of TMCs should be further optimized to reduce the TMC subsidence rate and subsidence-related complications, ultimately achieving excellent clinical results.

Preventing Construct Subsidence Following Cervical Corpectomy: The Bump-stop Technique

Cervical corpectomy is a viable technique for the treatment of multilevel cervical spine pathology. Despite multiple advances in both surgical technique and implant technology, the rate of construct subsidence can range from 6% for single-level procedures to 71% for multilevel procedures. In this technical note, we describe a novel technique, the bump-stop technique, for cervical corpectomy. The technique positions the superior and inferior screw holes such that the vertebral bodies bisect them. This allows for fixation in the dense cortical bone of the endplate while providing a buttress to corpectomy cage subsidence. We then discuss a retrospective case review of 24 consecutive patients, who were treated using this approach, demonstrating a lower than previously reported cage subsidence rate.

[Results to 4-year follow-up of the treatment of the cervical stenosis by corpectomy, titanium mesh cage and anterior plate fixation]

BACKGROUND

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is caused by cervical stenosis. Several techniques have been described for the treatment of multilevel disease, such as the anterior corpectomy with titanium mesh cage and anterior cervical plate placement, which has the advantage of performing a wider decompression and using the same bone as graft. However, it has caused controversy since the collapse of the mesh cage continues being a major limitation of this procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A prospective 4-year follow-up study was conducted in 7 patients diagnosed with cervical stenosis, who were treated surgically by one level corpectomy with titanium mesh cage and anterior cervical plate placement, evaluating them by radiographs and clinical scales.

RESULTS

7 patients, 5 women and 2 males were studied. The most common level was C5 corpectomy (n=4). The Neck Disability Index (NDI) preoperative average was 30.01±24.32 and 4-year postoperative 16.90±32.05, with p=0.801. The preoperative and 4-year postoperative Nürick was 3.28± 48 and 3.14±1.21 respectively, with p=0.766. Preoperative lordosis was 14.42±8.03 and 4-year postoperative 17±11.67 degrees, with p=0.660. The immediate postoperative and 4-year postoperative subsidence was 2.69±2.8 and 6.11±1.61 millimeters respectively, with p=0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the small sample, the subsidence of the mesh cage is common in this procedure. No statistically significant changes were observed in the lordosis or Nürick scale and NDI.

Evaluation of anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cages after 1- or 2-level corpectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study of 117 patients

Objective

To retrospectively compare the efficacy of the titanium mesh cage (TMC) and the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cage (n-HA/PA66 cage) for 1- or 2-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).

Methods

A total of 117 consecutive patients with MCSM who underwent 1- or 2-level ACCF using a TMC or an n-HA/PA66 cage were studied retrospectively at a mean follow-up of 45.28±12.83 months. The patients were divided into four groups according to the level of corpectomy (1- or 2-level corpectomy) and cage type used (TMC or n-HA/PA66 cage). Clinical and radiological parameters were used to evaluate outcomes.

Results

At the one-year follow-up, the fusion rate in the n-HA/PA66 group was higher, albeit non-significantly, than that in the TMC group for both 1- and 2-level ACCF, but the fusion rates of the procedures were almost equal at the final follow-up. The incidence of cage subsidence at the final follow-up was significantly higher in the TMC group than in the n-HA/PA66 group for the 1-level ACCF (24% vs. 4%, p = 0.01), and the difference was greater for the 2-level ACCF between the TMC group and the n-HA/PA66 group (38% vs. 5%, p = 0.01). Meanwhile, a much greater loss of fused height was observed in the TMC group compared with the n-HA/PA66 group for both the 1- and 2-level ACCF. All four groups demonstrated increases in C2-C7 Cobb angle and JOA scores and decreases in VAS at the final follow-up compared with preoperative values.

Conclusion

The lower incidence of cage subsidence, better maintenance of the height of the fused segment and similar excellent bony fusion indicate that the n-HA/PA66 cage may be a superior alternative to the TMC for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy, in particular for 2-level ACCF.

Evaluation of a new type of titanium mesh cage versus the traditional titanium mesh cage for single-level, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data in an academic institution.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new type of titanium mesh cage (TMC) in single-level, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients consecutive with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) from cervical degenerative spondylosis and isolated ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were treated with a single-level ACCF using either a new type of TMC (28 patients, group A) or the traditional TMC (30 patients, group B). We evaluated the patients for TMC subsidence, cervical lordosis (C2-C7 Cobb and Cobb of fused segments) and fusion status for a minimum of 30 months postoperatively based on spine radiographs. In addition, neurologic outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores. Neck pain was evaluated using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The loss of height of the fused segments was less for group A than for group B (0.8 ± 0.3 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4 mm) (p < 0.01); also, there was a lower rate of severe subsidence (≥3 mm) in group A (4 %, 1/28) than in group B (17 %, 5/30) (p < 0.01). There were no differences in the C2-C7 Cobb and Cobb of fused segments between the groups preoperatively or at final follow-up (p > 0.05), but the Cobb of fused segments immediately postoperative were significantly less for group B than for group A (p < 0.01). All patients, however, had successful fusion (100 %, each). Both groups had marked improvement in the JOA score after operation (p < 0.01), with no significant differences in the JOA recovery ratio (p > 0.05). The postoperative VAS neck pain scores for group A were significantly less than that for group B (p < 0.05); severe subsidence was correlated with neck pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The new type of TMC provides comparable clinical results and fusion rates with the traditional TMC for patients undergoing single-level corpectomy. The new design TMC decreases postoperative subsidence (compared to the traditional TMC); the unique design of the new type of TMC matches the vertebral endplate morphology which appears to decrease the severity of subsidence-related neck pain in follow-up.

Long-term follow-up of cervical radiographic sagittal spinal alignment after 1- and 2-level cervical corpectomy for the treatment of spondylosis of the subaxial cervical spine causing radiculomyelopathy or myelopathy: a retrospective study

Object

Few data exist regarding long-term outcomes after cervical corpectomy for spondylotic cervical myelopathy and radiculomyelopathy. In this retrospective review, long-term radiographic outcomes are reported for 130 patients after 1- or 2-level cervical corpectomy for spondylotic myelopathy or radiculomyelopathy.

Methods

Electronic medical records including clinical data and radiographic images during a 15-year period (1993–2008) were reviewed at the Cincinnati Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. All patients underwent radiographic follow-up for at least 12 months (range 12–156, mean 45 ± 39.3 months), as well as clinical follow-up performed by neurosurgery staff for a mean of 29.3 ± 39.6 months (range 4–156 months). Clinical parameters at surgery and last examination included the Chiles modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) Myelopathy Scale. Measurements included cervical spine sagittal alignment on lateral radiographs preoperatively and postoperatively, focal Cobb angles at operated levels, and C2–7 regional alignment. Statistical analysis included the Student t-test and chi-square test. Perioperative complications and additional surgery in the cervical spine were recorded.

Results

The mJOA scores improved from a mean of 11.91 ± 2.4 preoperatively to 14.9 ± 2.33 postoperatively. The mean sagittal lordosis of the C2–7 spine increased from −16.2° ± 9.2° preoperatively to −18.5° ± 11.9° at last follow-up. Focal Cobb angles averaged a slight kyphotic angulation of 4.1° ± 2.3° at latest radiographic follow-up; of note, 7 patients (5.4%), all who had cylindrical titanium mesh cages (CTMCs), showed severe kyphotic angulation (+8.4° ± 2.4°). Patients with preoperative myelopathy showed clinical improvement at follow-up. The fusion rate was 96.2%; 3 of the 5 patients with radiographic evidence of nonfusion were smokers. Patients with postoperative kyphosis had significantly more chronic neck pain (visual analog scale score >4 lasting more than 6 months) and visits related to pain (p <0.01). Those with CTMCs had higher rates of postoperative kyphosis, chronic neck pain, and visits related to pain, irrespective of the number of levels fused (p <001). At latest follow-up, although a kyphotic increase occurred in the focal cervical sagittal Cobb angles, lordosis increased in C2–7 sagittal Gore angles. Two patients (1.5%) underwent revision of the implanted graft and/or hardware, and 5 patients (3.8%) had another procedure for adjacent-level pathologies 1–9 years later (mean 4.4 ± 2.7 years).

Conclusions

Long-term follow-up data in our veteran population support cervical corpectomy as an effective, long-lasting treatment for spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine. Use of CTMCs without end caps was associated with statistically significant increased postoperative kyphotic angulation and chronic pain. Despite an increase in focal kyphosis over time, regional cervical sagittal lordotic alignment had increased at the latest follow-up. Further investigation will include the association of chronic neck pain and postoperative kyphosis, and high fusion rates among a veteran population of heavy smokers.