Visualization of subdural electrodes with fusion CT scan/MRI during neuronavigation-guided epilepsy surgery

Investigation of subdural electrode displacement in invasive epilepsy surgery workup using neuronavigation and intraoperative MRI

OBJECTIVES

One of the main obstacles of electrode implantation in epilepsy surgery is the electrode shift between implantation and the day of explantation. We evaluated this possible electrode displacement using intraoperative MRI (iopMRI) data and CT/MRI reconstruction.

METHODS

Thirteen patients (nine female, four male, median age 26 ± 9.4 years) suffering from drug-resistant epilepsy were examined. After implantation, the position of subdural electrodes was evaluated by 3.0 T-MRI and thin-slice CCT for 3D reconstruction. Localization of electrodes was performed with the volume-rendering technique. Post-implantation and pre-explantation 1.5 T-iopMRI scans were coregistered with the 3D reconstructions to determine the extent of electrode dislocation.

RESULTS

Intraoperative MRI at the time of explantation revealed a relevant electrode shift in one patient (8%) of 10 mm. Median electrode displacement was 1.7 ± 2.6 mm with a coregistration error of 1.9 ± 0.7 mm. The median accuracy of the neuronavigation system was 2.2 ± 0.9 mm. Six of twelve patients undergoing resective surgery were seizure free (Engel class 1A, median follow-up 37.5 ± 11.8 months).

CONCLUSION

Comparison of pre-explantation and post-implantation iopMRI scans with CT/MRI data using the volume-rendering technique resulted in an accurate placement of electrodes. In one patient with a considerable electrode dislocation, the surgical approach and extent was changed due to the detected electrode shift.

ABBREVIATIONS

ECoG: electrocorticography; EZ: epileptogenic zone; iEEG: invasive EEG; iopMRI: intraoperative MRI; MEG: magnetoencephalography; PET: positron emission tomography; SPECT: single photon emission computed tomography; 3D: three-dimensional.

The interactive electrode localization utility: software for automatic sorting and labeling of intracranial subdural electrodes

PURPOSE

Existing methods for sorting, labeling, registering, and across-subject localization of electrodes in intracranial encephalography (iEEG) may involve laborious work requiring manual inspection of radiological images.

METHODS

We describe a new open-source software package, the interactive electrode localization utility which presents a full pipeline for the registration, localization, and labeling of iEEG electrodes from CT and MR images. In addition, we describe a method to automatically sort and label electrodes from subdural grids of known geometry.

RESULTS

We validated our software against manual inspection methods in twelve subjects undergoing iEEG for medically intractable epilepsy. Our algorithm for sorting and labeling performed correct identification on 96% of the electrodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The sorting and labeling methods we describe offer nearly perfect performance and the software package we have distributed may simplify the process of registering, sorting, labeling, and localizing subdural iEEG grid electrodes by manual inspection.

MULTI-MODALITY IMAGE REGISTRATION FOR SUBDURAL ELECTRODE LOCALIZATION

Surgical treatment has been proved to be an effective way to control seizures for some kinds of intractable epilepsy. The electrocorticogram (ECoG) recorded from subdural electrodes has become an important technique for defining epileptogenic zones before surgery in clinical practice. The exact location of subdural electrodes has to be determined to establish the connection between electrodes and epileptogenic zones. Artifacts caused by the electrodes can severely affect the quality of CT imaging and sequentially image registration. In this paper, we discussed the performance of mean squares and the Mattes mutual information metric methods in multimodal image registration for subdural electrode localization. Since the skull can be regarded as a rigid body, rigid registration is sufficient for the purpose of subdural electrode localization. The vital parameter for the rigid registration is rotation. The translation result depends on the result of rotation. Both the methods performed well in the determination of the rotation center. Rotation angles of different image pairs of the same volume pair fluctuated a lot. Based on the image acquisition process, we assume that the images within the same volume pair should have the same transformation parameters for registration. Results show that the mean rotation angles of images within one dataset are approximate to the manual results that are considered to be the actual result for registration despite their fluctuation range.

Electrode localization for planning surgical resection of the epileptogenic zone in pediatric epilepsy

PURPOSE

In planning for a potentially curative resection of the epileptogenic zone in patients with pediatric epilepsy, invasive monitoring with intracranial EEG is often used to localize the seizure onset zone and eloquent cortex. A precise understanding of the location of subdural strip and grid electrodes on the brain surface, and of depth electrodes in the brain in relationship to eloquent areas is expected to facilitate pre-surgical planning.

METHODS

We developed a novel algorithm for the alignment of intracranial electrodes, extracted from post-operative CT, with pre-operative MRI. Our goal was to develop a method of achieving highly accurate localization of subdural and depth electrodes, in order to facilitate surgical planning. Specifically, we created a patient-specific 3D geometric model of the cortical surface from automatic segmentation of a pre-operative MRI, automatically segmented electrodes from post-operative CT, and projected each set of electrodes onto the brain surface after alignment of the CT to the MRI. Also, we produced critical visualization of anatomical landmarks, e.g., vasculature, gyri, sulci, lesions, or eloquent cortical areas, which enables the epilepsy surgery team to accurately estimate the distance between the electrodes and the anatomical landmarks, which might help for better assessment of risks and benefits of surgical resection.

RESULTS

Electrode localization accuracy was measured using knowledge of the position of placement from 2D intra-operative photographs in ten consecutive subjects who underwent intracranial EEG for pediatric epilepsy. Average spatial accuracy of localization was 1.31 ± 0.69 mm for all 385 visible electrodes in the photos.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with previously reported approaches, our algorithm is able to achieve more accurate alignment of strip and grid electrodes with minimal user input. Unlike manual alignment procedures, our algorithm achieves excellent alignment without time-consuming and difficult judgements from an operator.

Localization of dense intracranial electrode arrays using magnetic resonance imaging

Intracranial electrode arrays are routinely used in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with medically refractory epilepsy, and recordings from these electrodes have been increasingly employed in human cognitive neurophysiology due to their high spatial and temporal resolution. For both researchers and clinicians, it is critical to localize electrode positions relative to the subject-specific neuroanatomy. In many centers, a post-implantation MRI is utilized for electrode detection because of its higher sensitivity for surgical complications and the absence of radiation. However, magnetic susceptibility artifacts surrounding each electrode prohibit unambiguous detection of individual electrodes, especially those that are embedded within dense grid arrays. Here, we present an efficient method to accurately localize intracranial electrode arrays based on pre- and post-implantation MR images that incorporates array geometry and the individual's cortical surface. Electrodes are directly visualized relative to the underlying gyral anatomy of the reconstructed cortical surface of individual patients. Validation of this approach shows high spatial accuracy of the localized electrode positions (mean of 0.96 mm ± 0.81 mm for 271 electrodes across 8 patients). Minimal user input, short processing time, and utilization of radiation-free imaging are strong incentives to incorporate quantitatively accurate localization of intracranial electrode arrays with MRI for research and clinical purposes. Co-registration to a standard brain atlas further allows inter-subject comparisons and relation of intracranial EEG findings to the larger body of neuroimaging literature.