A reappraisal of the common carotid artery as an access site in interventional procedures for acute stroke therapies

Rescue carotid puncture for ischemic stroke treated by endovascular therapy: a multicentric analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) can be challenging in older patients with supra-aortic tortuosity. Rescue carotid puncture (RCP) can be an alternative in case of supra-aortic catheterization failure by femoral access, but data regarding RCP are scarce. We sought to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of RCP for AIS treated by EVT.

METHODS

Patients treated by EVT with RCP were included from January 2012 to December 2019 in the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) multicentric registry. Main outcomes included reperfusion rates ( ≥ TICI2B), 3 month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) and 3 month mortality. We also performed an additional systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA checklist to summarize previous studies on RCP.

RESULTS

25 patients treated by EVT with RCP were included from the ETIS registry. RCP mainly concerned elderly patients (median age 85 years, range 73-92) with supra-aortic tortuosity (n=16 (64%)). Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was used for nine patients (36%). Successful reperfusion was achieved in 64%, 87.5% of patients were dependent at 3 months, and 3 month mortality was 45.8%. The systematic review yielded comparable results. In pooled individual data, there was a shift toward better functional outcome in patients with successful reperfusion (median (IQR) 4 (2-6) vs 6 (4-6), p=0.011).

CONCLUSION

RCP mainly concerned elderly patients admitted for AIS with anterior LVO with supra-aortic tortuosity. The procedure seemed feasible, notably for patients treated with IVT, and led to significant reperfusion rates at the end of procedure, but with pronounced unfavorable outcomes at 3 months. RCP should be performed under general anesthesia to avoid life-threatening complications and ensure airways safety. Finally, RCP led to low rates of closure complications, emphasizing that this concern should not withhold RCP, if indicated.

Endovascular remodeling of tortuous cervical segments of the internal carotid artery that hinder the management of complex intracranial aneurysms

Introduction: Severe tortuosity of the cervical segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA) may hamper the navigation of intravascular devices for the management of complex intracranial aneurysms and even conventional techniques of ICA access can fail. In a group of selected cases, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of carotid stenting to straighten the Severe tortuosity for direct navigation of the devices. Methods: A case series of 16 patients harboring 18 intracranial aneurysms with a difficult endovascular approach because of a cervical ICA with Severe tortuosity were prospectively recruited at our institution from January 2005 to December 2007. When traditional means of correction could not surmount this obstacle, an overlap stenting with a distal-to-proximal technique was used to overcome the Severe tortuosity. The efficacy of the procedure was defined as the ability to reach and be able to treat the target lesion with a smooth navigation of the endovascular devices. Safety was documented by procedure-related complications. Results: The straightening of the vessel by the stent helped to overcome pitfalls, making possible an obstacle-free navigation of the endovascular devices to the target lesion in all cases. In 5 cases with severe or double kinking, a distal transfer of the curve beyond the stent was observed, without impact on the efficacy of the procedure. One case of periprocedural related technical complication occurred with a permanent stroke. During the follow-up period (22.7 ± 8.4 months) no case of stent-related stroke or severe hyperplasia was observed. Conclusions: Carotid stenting is an available option when a cervical ICA with Severe tortuosity hampers a smooth catheterization of the intracranial circulation, in carefully selected cases. It allows a relatively safe and free navigation and/or deployment of additional endovascular devices needed for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms.