Short-term cognitive changes after surgery in patients with unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis

Comprehensive Outcome Assessment and Quality of Life Following Epilepsy Surgery

BACKGROUND

Seizure freedom without deficits is the primary goal for epilepsy surgery. However, patients with medically refractory epilepsy commonly suffer from many co-morbidities related to mood, cognition, and sleep as well as social problems and resultant stigma. While epilepsy surgery literature does describe quality of life (QOL) and neuropsychological outcomes, there is a paucity of information on various common non-seizure outcomes, especially pertaining to mood, sleep, cognition, and social aspects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of various non-seizure parameters on post-epilepsy surgery QOL.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients operated for refractory epilepsy at least 1 year prior to initiation of this study were included and classified as seizure-free (group 1) or non-seizure-free (group 2). QOL was assessed using the QOLIE-31 instrument; patients with a T score less than 40 were categorized as "poor QOL." Non-seizure parameters assessed were cognition, mood disturbances, social improvement, social stigma, and sleep disturbances. Categorization into "good" and "poor" outcome subgroups on each item was carried out by dichotomization of scores.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (16 F) [mean age 23.5 ± 5.6 years] were evaluated; 26 were seizure-free (group 1). In this group, impaired memory, lower language scores, depression, not having been employed, not receiving education prior to surgery, and experiencing social stigma were factors significantly associated with poor QOL. In group 2, all patients had poor QOL scores.

CONCLUSION

Non-seizure factors related to common epilepsy co-morbidities and social issues are highly prevalent among seizure-free patients reporting poor QOL after epilepsy surgery.

Surgery procedures in temporal lobe epilepsies

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common cause of refractory epilepsy amenable for surgical treatment and seizure control. Surgery for TLE is a safe and effective strategy. The seizure-free rate after surgical resection in patients with mesial or neocortical TLE is about 70%. Resective surgery has an advantage over stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of seizure outcomes for mesial TLE patients. Both techniques have similar results for safety, cognitive outcomes, and associated costs. Stereotactic radiosurgery should therefore be seen as an alternative to open surgery for patients with contraindications for or with reluctance to undergo open surgery. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has also shown promising results as a curative technique in mesial TLE but needs to be more deeply evaluated. Brain-responsive stimulation represents a palliative treatment option for patients with unilateral or bilateral MTLE who are not candidates for temporal lobectomy or who have failed a prior mesial temporal lobe resection. Overall, despite the expansion of innovative techniques in recent years, resective surgery remains the reference treatment for TLE and should be proposed as the first-line surgical modality. In the future, ultrasound therapies could become a credible therapeutic option for refractory TLE patients.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of resective surgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) versus selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH) on seizure-free outcome in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, using both direct and indirect evidence from the literature.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for original research articles and systematic reviews comparing ATL versus SAH, and ATL or SAH versus medical management (MM). The outcome was seizure freedom at 12 months of follow-up or longer. Direct pairwise meta-analyses were conducted, followed by a random-effect Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) combining direct and indirect evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight articles were included (18 compared ATL vs SAH, 1 compared ATL vs SAH vs MM, 8 compared ATL vs MM, and 1 compared SAH vs MM). Direct pairwise meta-analyses showed no significant differences in seizure-free outcome of ATL versus SAH (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.39; p=0.201), but the odds of seizure-free outcome were higher for ATL versus MM (OR 29.16, 95% CI 10.44 to 81.50; p<0.00001), and SAH versus MM (OR 28.42, 95% CI 10.17 to 79.39; p<0.00001). NMA also showed that the odds of seizure-free outcome were no different in ATL versus SAH (OR 1.15, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.84-1.15), but higher for ATL versus MM (OR 27.22, 95% CrI 15.38-27.22), and SAH versus MM (OR 23.57, 95% CrI 12.67-23.57). There were no significant differences between direct and indirect comparisons (all p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Direct evidence, indirect evidence and NMA did not identify a difference in seizure-free outcome of ATL versus SAH.

Correlation of neuropsychological and metabolic changes after epilepsy surgery in patients with left mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis

Background

Epilepsy surgery often causes changes in cognition and cerebral glucose metabolism. Our aim was to explore relationships between pre- and postoperative cerebral metabolism as measured with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and neuropsychological test scores in patients with left mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS), who were rendered seizure-free after epilepsy surgery.

Results

Thirteen patients were included. All had neuropsychological testing and an interictal FDG-PET scan of the brain pre- and postoperative. Correlations between changes in neuropsychological test scores and metabolism were examined using statistical parametric mapping (SPM). There were no significant changes in the neuropsychological test scores pre- and postoperatively at the group level. Decreased metabolism was observed in the left mesial temporal regions and occipital lobe. Increased metabolism was observed in the bi-frontal and right parietal lobes, temporal lobes, occipital lobes, thalamus, cerebellum, and vermis. In these regions, we did not find a correlation between changes in metabolism and neuropsychological test scores. A significant negative correlation, however, was found between metabolic changes in the precuneus and Boston Naming Test (BNT) scores.

Conclusions

There are significant metabolic decreases in the left mesial temporal regions and increases in the bi-frontal lobes; right parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes; right thalamus; cerebellum; and vermis in patients with left MTLE-HS who were rendered seizure-free after epilepsy surgery. We could not confirm that these changes translate into significant cognitive changes. A significant negative correlation was found between changes in confrontation naming and changes in metabolism in the precuneus. We speculate that the precuneus may play a compensatory role in patients with postoperative naming difficulties after left TLE surgery. Understanding of these neural mechanisms may aid in designing cognitive rehabilitation strategies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0385-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Short-term neurocognitive outcomes following anterior temporal lobectomy

Changes in cognitive function are a well established risk of anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL). Deficits in verbal memory are a common postoperative finding, though a small proportion of patients may improve. Postoperative evaluation typically occurs after six to 12months. Patients may benefit from earlier evaluation to identify potential needs; however, the results of a formal neuropsychological assessment at an early postoperative stage are not described in the literature. We compared pre- and postoperative cognitive function for 28 right ATL and 23 left ATL patients using repeated measures ANOVA. Changes in cognitive function were compared to ILAE seizure outcome. The mean time to postoperative neuropsychological testing was 11.1weeks (SD=6.7weeks). There was a side×surgery interaction for the verbal tasks: immediate memory recall (F(1,33)=20.68, p<0.001), short delay recall (F(1,29)=4.99, p=0.03), long delay recall (F(1,33)=10.36, p=0.003), recognition (F(1,33)=5.69, p=0.02), and naming (F(1,37)=15.86, p<0.001). This indicated that the left ATL group had a significant decrement in verbal memory following surgery, while the right ATL group experienced a small but significant improvement. For the right ATL group, there was a positive correlation between ILAE outcome and improvement in immediate recall (r=-0.62, p=0.02) and long delay recall (r=-0.57, p=0.03). There was no similar finding for the left ATL group. This study demonstrates that short-interval follow-up is effective in elucidating postoperative cognitive changes. Right ATL was associated with improvement in verbal memory, while left ATL resulted in a decrement in performance. Improvement in the right ATL group was related to improved seizure outcome. Short-interval follow-up may lend itself to the identification of patients who could benefit from early intervention.