Dressings and drains in posterior spine surgery and their effect on wound complications

PICO™ (Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy) Dressing Use as Postoperative Prophylaxis for Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study

Introduction Surgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the dreaded complications of spinal surgery. These typically develop within the first 30 days following surgery. The overall pooled incidence of SSIs is reported at 3.1%. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been employed for the management of open wounds and soft tissue injury. There has been a recent trend towards the use of closed incision NPWT (ciNPT), such as PICO. There are only a few studies evaluating the prophylactic use of ciNPT in spinal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prophylactic use of PICO dressings can reduce SSI incidence and complications in spinal surgery. Methods Data were collected retrospectively for patients undergoing spinal surgery, with a PICO dressing used for closed surgical incisions, from February 2021 to October 2022. Each patient was followed up for 30 days. The results were compared with local hospital infection control statistics for previous years. Results A total of 50 patients underwent spinal surgery and had PICO dressings post-operatively. None of the patients developed a seroma. Two out of 50 (4.0%) patients developed wound dehiscence and then subsequent SSI (1 superficial, 1 deep). These were managed conservatively with the use of antibiotics and prolonged ciNPT. None of these patients returned to the theatre. The average SSI incidence from previous years was 9.27 ± 4.14 per annum (1.15%), but with an average of 77.3% of these requiring a return to theatres. Conclusion Our study reflects that there is no difference in the incidence rates for SSIs for patients who have PICO dressings versus those having standard occlusive dressings as post-operative closed surgical incision site wound closure following spinal surgery. For those who do develop SSIs, there was no difference in the rates of return to theatres among the two patient populations.

Role of Spinal Surgery Drainage Techniques in Postoperative Outcomes: Insights From a Comprehensive Literature Review

Postoperative management often demands the introduction of several strategies in an attempt to minimize complication rates. One of the routine strategies includes the use of spinal drains, which have been questioned for their efficacy in improving postoperative outcomes. However, its role in postoperative outcomes is still debated. In general, this elucidation of an extensive literature review supports the synthesis of current evidence regarding the role of spinal drains in infection rates, hematoma formation, and overall patient recovery. A comprehensive search of PubMed from 2000 to 2024 was performed, focusing on studies investigating the use of spinal drains in spinal surgeries and their associated postoperative outcomes. It followed the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The inclusion criteria were studies related to spinal surgeries, excluding case reports, reviews, and editorials, and limited to articles published in English. Quality assessment was performed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. A total of 19 studies were included, with different designs and varied sample sizes. The sample size was from 25 to 2,446 patients. Findings on infection rates were mixed; while one group of studies showed no significant differences in patients with and without drains, another group showed a reduced rate of reoperation for surgical site infections in patients with drains. In general, hematoma formation rates were reported to be the same across groups, while a few studies indicated that drains were more effective in managing wound exudates compared to no drains. Recovery outcomes indicated that patients who had a wound drain were more likely to stay in the hospital longer, although an improvement was noticed with time-driven wound drain removal, which resulted in shorter hospital stays and earlier ambulation. The use of spinal drains in postoperative spinal surgery presents both benefits and drawbacks. Spinal drains can assist in the management of wound exudates, and earlier detection of infection complications increases hospital stays and complications. Indeed, whether to use spinal drains or not should be an individual decision, weighing the potential benefits and risks. Future studies need to be done in order to establish clear guidelines for the use of drainage systems in various spinal surgical cases.

Wound Closure and Wound Dressings in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery From the AO Spine Surveillance of Post-Operative Management

STUDY DESIGN

An e-mail-based online survey for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgeons.

OBJECTIVE

Wound closure and dressing techniques may vary according to the discretion of the surgeon as well as geographical location. However, there are no reports on most common methods. The purpose of this study is to clarify the consensus.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed via email to AO Spine members. Responses from 164 ASD surgeons were surveyed. The regions were divided into 5 regions: Europe and South Africa (ESA), North America (NA), Asia Pacific (AP), Latin America (LA), and Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Wound closure methods were evaluated by glue(G), staples(S), external non-absorbable sutures (ENS), tapes(T), and only subcuticular absorbable suture (SAS). Wound Dressings consisted of dry dressing (D), plastic occlusive dressing (PO), G, Dermabond Prineo (DP).

RESULTS

The number of respondents were 57 in ESA, 33 in NA, 36 in AP, 22 in LA, and 16 in MENA. S (36.4%) was the most used wound closure method. This was followed by ENS (26.2%), SAS (14.4%), G (11.8%), and T (11.3%). S use was highest in ESA (44.3%), NA (28.6%), AP (31.7%), and MENA (58.8%). D was used by 50% of surgeons postoperatively. AP were most likely to use PO (36%). 21% of NA used DP, while between 0%-9% of surgeons used it in the rest of the world.

CONCLUSION

Wound closure and dressings methods differ in the region. There are no current guidelines with these choices. Future studies should seek to standardize these choices.

Similar Short-Term Outcomes of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery with or without Drainage: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

The use of closed suction drains post posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is common practice, although evidence on its impact is limited compared to that for knee and hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to assess the effect of closed suction drainage on short-term post-operative outcomes in AIS surgery. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted, including studies comparing outcomes with and without drainage. Data on blood loss, transfusions, hospital stay, and complications were collected and subjected to meta-analysis. Five studies involving 772 patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in blood transfusion rates (p = 0.107) or hospital stay (p = 0.457) between groups. Complications, including surgical site infections, were more common without drainage, though not statistically significant (p = 0.356). Reintervention rates were higher in the no-drainage group, but not significantly (p = 0.260). Overall, this review found no significant short-term outcome differences, suggesting clinical judgment should guide drainage decisions. Further research, particularly with enhanced recovery protocols, is warranted to clarify drainage's role in AIS surgery.

Surgeon Preference Regarding Wound Dressing Management in Lumbar Fusion Surgery: An AO Spine Global Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the global practice pattern of wound dressing use after lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions.

METHODS

A survey issued by AO Spine Knowledge Forums Deformity and Degenerative was sent out to AO Spine members. The type of postoperative dressing employed, timing of initial dressing removal, and type of subsequent dressing applied were investigated. Differences in the type of surgery and regional distribution of surgeons' preferences were analyzed.

RESULTS

Right following surgery, 60.6% utilized a dry dressing, 23.2% a plastic occlusive dressing, 5.7% glue, 6% a combination of glue and polyester mesh, 2.6% a wound vacuum, and 1.2% other dressings. The initial dressing was removed on postoperative day 1 (11.6%), 2 (39.2%), 3 (20.3%), 4 (1.7%), 5 (4.3%), 6 (0.4%), 7 or later (12.5%), or depending on drain removal (9.9%). Following initial dressing removal, 75.9% applied a dry dressing, 17.7% a plastic occlusive dressing, and 1.3% glue, while 12.1% used no dressing. The use of no additional coverage after initial dressing removal was significantly associated with a later dressing change (p < 0.001). Significant differences emerged after comparing dressing management among different AO Spine regions (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Most spine surgeons utilized a dry or plastic occlusive dressing initially applied after surgery. The first dressing was more frequently changed during the first 3 postoperative days and replaced with the same type of dressing. While dressing policies tended not to vary according to the type of surgery, regional differences suggest that actual practice may be based on personal experience rather than available evidence.

Correlation between blood glucose level and poor wound healing after posterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with type 2 diabetes

To investigate the correlation of blood glucose level with poor wound healing (PWH) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). From January 2016 to January 2023, a case-control study was conducted to analyse the clinical data of 400 patients with T2D who were treated by PLIF and internal fixation at our hospital. The following data were recorded: gender; age; body mass index (BMI); surgical stage; average perioperative blood glucose level; perioperative blood glucose variance; perioperative blood glucose coefficient of variation; glycated haemoglobin level; preoperative levels of total protein, albumin and haemoglobin; postoperative levels of total protein, albumin and haemoglobin; surgical time; intraoperative bleeding volume; operator; postoperative drainage volume; and postoperative drainage tube removal time of each group. The indicators for monitoring blood glucose variability (GV) included the SD of blood glucose level (SDBG), coefficient of variation (CV) and maximum amplitude of variation (LAGE) before and after surgery. According to the diagnostic criteria for PWH, patients with postoperative PWH were determined and assigned to two groups: Group A (good wound healing group; n = 330 patients) and Group B (poor wound healing group; n = 70 patients). The preoperative and postoperative blood GV indicators, namely SDBG, CV and LAGE, were compared between these two groups. We also determined the relationship between perioperative blood GV parameters and PWH after PLIF surgery and its predictive value through correlation analysis and receiver-operating characteristic curve. Of the 400 enrolled patients, 70 patients had PWH. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between the two groups in the course of diabetes, mean fasting blood glucose (MFBG), SDBG, CV, LAGE, preoperative hypoglycaemic program, surgical segment, postoperative drainage time, incision length and other factors (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were noted in factors such as gender, age, body mass index, hypertension, coronary heart disease, admission fasting blood glucose, preoperative haemoglobin A1c, surgical time, intraoperative bleeding volume, intraoperative blood transfusion volume and postoperative drainage volume (p > 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values of preoperative SDBG, CV and LAGE were 0.6657, 0.6432 and 0.6584, respectively. The cut-off values were 1.13 mmol/L, 6.97% and 0.75 mmol/L, respectively. The AUC values for postoperative SDBG, CV and LAGE were 0.5885, 0.6255 and 0.6261, respectively. The cut-off values were 1.94 mmol/L, 24.32% and 2.75 mmol/L, respectively. The multivariate ridge regression analysis showed that preoperative MFBG, SDBG, CV and LAGE; postoperative SDBG, CV and LAGE; postoperative long drainage time; and multiple surgical segments were independent risk factors for T2D patients to develop surgical site infection after PLIF (p < 0.05). The perioperative blood GV in patients with T2D is closely related to the occurrence of PWH after PLIF. Reducing blood GV may help to reduce the occurrence of PWH after PLIF.

Local contamination is a major cause of early deep wound infections following open posterior lumbosacral fusions

PURPOSE

Postoperative surgical site infection in patients treated with lumbosacral fusion has usually been thought to be caused by perioperative contamination. With the proximity of these incisions to the perineum, this study sought to determine if contamination by gastrointestinal and/or urogenital flora should be considered as a major cause of this complication.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of adults treated with open posterior lumbosacral fusions between 2014 and 2021 to identify common factors in deep postoperative infection and the nature of the infecting organisms. Cases of tumor, primary infection and minimally invasive surgery were excluded.

RESULTS

489 eligible patients were identified, 20 of which required debridement deep to the fascia (4.1%). Mean age, operative time, estimated blood loss and levels fused were similar between both groups. The infected group had a significantly higher BMI. The mean time from primary procedure to debridement was 40.8 days. Four patients showed no growth, 3 showed Staphylococcus sp. infection (Perioperative Inside-Out) requiring debridement at 63.5 days. Thirteen showed infection with intestinal or urogenital pathogens (Postoperative Outside-In) requiring debridement at 20.0 days. Postoperative Outside-In infections led to debridement 80.3 days earlier than Perioperative Inside-Out infections (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

65% of deep infections in patients undergoing open lumbosacral fusion were due to early contamination by pathogens associated with the gastrointestinal and/or urogenital tracts. These required earlier debridement than Staphylococcus sp.

INFECTIONS

There should be renewed focus on keeping these pathogens away from the incision during the early stages of wound healing.

Wound drain in lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative disease: an experimental, multicenter, randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Drains for surgical wound management are frequently used in spine surgery. They are often used to decrease the incidence of postoperative hematoma and decrease wound tension. No conclusive evidence in the literature supports using drains to avoid complications in degenerative lumbar spine surgery.

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate wound drains in patients with lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative disorders based on clinical outcomes, complications, hematocrit, and length of stay.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter randomized prospective controlled clinical trial.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We enrolled surgical candidates for posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for degenerative disorders from October 2019 to August 2021. Patients were randomized into the drain or nondrain group at nine hospitals. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients aged 40 to 80 years with lumbar and radicular pain, lumbar degenerative disorder, and primary surgery up to three levels. The exclusion criteria were bleeding abnormalities, bleeding >2,500 mL and dural tears.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Preoperative data including Oswestry disability index (ODI), SF-36, lumbar and lower extremity visual analog scale (VAS), body mass index (BMI), hematocrit, and temperature were recorded. Surgical parameters, including surgical time, complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative temperature and hematocrit (days 1 and 4), dressing saturation, and length of hospital stay (LOS), were registered.

METHODS

The two groups were assessed preoperatively, perioperatively and at the 1-month follow-up. A REDCap database was used for registration. Data analysis was performed using classical statistics.

RESULTS

One hundred one patients were enrolled using the Redcap database, and 93 patients were evaluated at the final follow-up. Forty-five patients were randomized to the drain group, and 48 were randomized to the nondrain group. The preoperative characteristics were equivalent in both groups: demographic aspects, pain, ODI, SF-36, BMI, hematocrit, and spine pathology. Surgical time, EBL and complications were similar, with no difference between the groups. No difference was found between BMI and complications. No difference was observed in dressing saturation or postoperative temperature between the groups. The postoperative day 4 hematocrit was higher in the nondrain group [36.4% (32-39)] than in the drain group [34% (29.7-37.6)] without statistically differences (p=.054). The LOS was higher in the drain group [4 (3-5) days] than in the nondrain group [3 (2-4) days] (p=.007). The quality-of-life score, SF-36, was higher in the nondrain group [67.9 (53.6-79.2)] than in the drain group [56.7 (49.1-66)] (p=.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Nondrain patients presented shorter LOS and better outcomes, with similar complication rates. No difference was found between BMI and complications. Based on this study, in patients undergoing primary posterior spinal decompression and fusion up to three levels for degenerative lumbar disorders, we do not recommend the use of postoperative drains.

Drain vs. no-drain for acetabular fractures after treatment via a modified stoppa approach: A retrospective study

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of close suction drainage (CSD) and no-CSD after a modified Stoppa approach for the surgical fixation of acetabular fractures.

Methods

This retrospective study included 49 consecutive acetabular fracture patients, who presented to a single level I trauma center for surgical fixation, using a modified Stoppa approach from January 2018 to January 2021. All surgeries were performed by a senior surgeon using the same approach, and the patients were divided into two groups based on whether CSD was used after the operation. Details of the patient demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative indicators, reduction quality, intra and postoperative blood transfusion, clinical outcomes, and incision-related complications were collected.

Results

No significant differences were found in the demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative indicators, reduction quality, clinical outcomes, and incision-related complications between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). The use of CSD was associated with a significantly higher postoperative blood transfusion volume (P = 0.034) and postoperative blood transfusion rate (P = 0.027). In addition, there was a significant difference in postoperative temperatures, especially on postoperative Day 2 (no-CSD 36.97 ± 0.51°C vs. CSD 37.34 ± 0.69°C, P = 0.035), and higher visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, especially on postoperative Day 1 (no-CSD 3.00 ± 0.93 vs. CSD 4.14 ± 1.43, P = 0.002) and 3 (no-CSD 1.73 ± 0.94 vs. CSD 2.48 ± 1.08, P = 0.013).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that routine use of CSD should not be recommended for patients with acetabular fractures after surgical fixation using a modified Stoppa approach.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Spinal Surgery

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has demonstrated promise in the management of surgical site infections as well as assisting in surgical wound healing. In this manuscript, we describe the mechanisms and applications of NPWT for surgical wounds and existing evidence for NPWT in cardiac, plastic, and general surgery, followed by a discussion of the emerging evidence base for NPWT in spinal surgery. We also discuss the different applications of NPWT for open wounds and closed incisions, and the promise of newer closed-incision NPWT (ciNPWT) devices. There is nominal but promising prospective evidence on NPWT's efficacy in select at-risk populations for post-operative wound complications after spinal surgery. As there is currently a paucity of robust clinical evidence on its efficacy, rigorous randomized prospective clinical trials are needed.

Waterproof dressing combined with sodium chloride to promote healing in acute wounds: a case report from an Indonesian hospital

In this case study, the wound healing process of a patient who had undergone an appendectomy and whose wound was treated with waterproof dressing was analysed, and the coverage of granulation tissue was tracked. This study aimed to re-evaluate the use of waterproof dressing, combined with sodium chloride, on acute wounds in an Indonesian hospital. Data were collected and evaluated through the use of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) observation method. A waterproof dressing and sodium chloride (NaCl) were administered once every 2 days to promote wound healing. After three rounds (14 days) of using waterproof dressing, granulation tissue formed over the surface of the wound base. The end result of healing by primary intention was complete return to function, with minimal scarring and loss of skin appendages. Waterproof dressing was considered to be effective and characterised by the formation of 93.2% granulation tissue; epithelialisation was observed covering between 75-100% of the wound area. No complications occurred during the intervention.

Lumbar surgical drains do not increase the risk of infections in patients undergoing spine surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to characterize if the use of surgical drains or length of drain placement following spine surgery increases the risk of post-operative infection.

METHODS

Records of patients undergoing elective spinal surgery at a tertiary care center were collected between May 5, 2016 and August 16, 2018. Pre-operative baseline characteristics were recorded including patient's demographics and comorbidities. Intraoperative procedure information was documented related to procedure type, blood loss, and antibiotics used. Following surgery, patients were then further subdivided into two groups: patients who were discharged with a spinal surgical site drain and patients who did not receive a drain. Post-operative surgical variables included length of stay (LOS), drain length, number of antibiotics given, and type of post-operative infection. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 671 patients were included in the current study, 386 (57.5%) with and 285 (42.5%) without the drain. The overall infection rate was 5.7% with 6.22% among patients with the drain compared to 4.91% in patients without drain. The univariate analysis identified the following variables to be significantly associated with the infection: total number of surgical levels, spinal region, blood loss, redosing of antibiotics, length of stay, length of drain placement, and number of antibiotics (P < 0.05). However, the multivariate analysis none of the predictors was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study shows that the placement of drain does not increase rate of infection, irrespective of levels, length of surgery, or approach.

What is the role of incisional vacuum therapy in challenging spinal wounds? A single centre experience

OBJECTIVE

A surgical approach to the treatment of spinal defects and disorders has become more common because of the medical and technological advancements achieved in the last decade. This rising trend in spinal surgeries is associated with adverse events, most notably wound complications. From its introduction, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has proved to be essential in the management of complex wounds and in speeding up wound recovery. The aim of this study is to investigate the use of incisional NPWT in patients undergoing spinal surgery and its role in the prevention of wound complications.

METHOD

This study is a retrospective medical chart review conducted on patients who underwent spinal surgery and received incisional vacuum therapy as part of their treatment. The apparatus was applied intraoperatively following the spinal surgery for all patients included in this study. All surgical procedures were conducted between September 2019 and May 2020. Data entry and analysis were performed between September and October 2020.

RESULTS

A total of five patients' records were reviewed. In our healthcare centre, three patients developed seroma, one developed haematoma, four required revision surgery and one patient required re-operation. There was no wound dehiscence and none of the wounds became infected. Mean length of hospital stay was 11.2 days (standard deviation (SD): 9.5 days) and mean operation time was 333 minutes (SD: 86.4 minutes).

CONCLUSION

There is a scarcity of data on the role of incisional vacuum therapy in the prevention of wound complications associated with spine surgeries. Our study showed promising results for the use of incisional NPWT in the management of spinal wounds. Further research is required in order to enhance wound care by exploiting this potentially beneficial approach.

Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis and Wound Management in Spine Surgery

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a potentially devastating complication of spinal surgery that increases patient morbidity and healthcare costs. SSIs have complex and multifactorial etiologies; therefore, there are numerous opportunities for prevention and risk mitigation. The aim of this narrative review was to describe the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of SSIs in spine surgery with an emphasis on postoperative wound care. We list and describe the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative evidence-based interventions that can be applied to potentially prevent SSI after spinal surgery.

Which Criterion for Wound Drain Removal is Better Following Posterior 1-Level or 2-Level Lumbar Fusion With Instrumentation: Time Driven or Output Driven?

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the outcomes of 2 different criteria (time driven and output driven) for wound drain removal and identify which one is better.

METHODS

743 patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion with instrumentation involving 1 or 2 motion segments were enrolled in this study. Based on the different criteria for drain removal, the patients were divided into 2 groups. The drains were discontinued by time driven (postoperative day 2) in group I and output driven (<50 ml per day) in group II. Demographic characteristics, perioperative parameters and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics in both groups were comparable. The postoperative drain output, total blood loss, postoperative timing of ambulation, and postoperative duration of hospital stay in group I were lower than those in group II (P < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of patients requiring postoperative blood transfusion in group II, but not to a level of statistical significance (P = 0.054). There was no statistical significant difference in the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) or symptomatic spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that there are more benefits of wound drain removal by time driven than that by output driven for patients undergoing posterior 1-level or 2-level lumbar fusion with instrumentation, including less postoperative drain output, less total blood loss, earlier postoperative timing of ambulation and less postoperative duration of hospital stay without increasing the incidence of postoperative SSI or symptomatic SEH.

Prevalence of surgical site infection after orthopaedic surgery with two types of drainage at three public hospitals in Iran

INTRODUCTION

Orthopaedic surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most important and prevalent because implanted devices are used in such surgeries which increase the risk of infection. This study aimed to examine the incidence of infection in orthopaedic surgeries and related factors in a group of public hospitals in Iran.

METHODS

This analytical cross-sectional study was condcuted in 2018. Data were collected about the incidence of infection and related factors including use/non-use of drains and well as types of drain . The presence of SSIs were determined using a researcher-devised Wound Infection Checklist (WIC) and microbial cultures.

RESULTS

Of 110 included patients undergoing orthopaedic surgeries, 18.2% had an infection. The highest rate of infection was associated with lower extremity surgeries following tibia and fibula fractures. The incidence of infection among individuals under the age of 35 years was also higher. Emergency procedures demonstrated a higher incidence of infection. No significant relationship was observed between use of wound drains and development of SSIs.

CONCLUSION

Reducing the incidence of orthopaedic infection can be achieved by focusing more attention on open fractures occurring in the lower extremity. Use of surgical drains for the sole purpose of reducing the rate of infection is not effective. Accordingly, infection provention protocols should be implemented in orthopaedic surgery units to control and reduce rates of infection.

Complexities of spine surgery in obese patient populations: a narrative review

The obese population is particularly challenging to the spine surgeon in all phases of care. A narrative literature review was performed to review difficulties in spine surgery on the obese patient population and techniques for mitigation. We specifically aimed to assess several topics with regard to this population: patient selection and preoperative care; intraoperative and surgical techniques; and postoperative care, outcomes, and complications. The literature review demonstrated that obese patients are at increased surgical risk with spine surgery due to a variety of factors at all stages of intervention. Preoperatively, obese patients have worse outcomes with physical therapy and present technical difficulties for injections. Transport to a hospital, imaging, resuscitation, and intubation are all challenged by increased body habitus. Intraoperatively, obese patients have increased operative times, blood loss, surgical site infections, and nerve palsies. Patient positioning and intraoperative imaging may be limited. Surgery itself may be technically challenging due to body habitus and minimally invasive techniques are becoming more prevalent in this population. Postoperatively, several studies demonstrate that obese patients have inferior outcomes compared with nonobese counterparts. Patient selection is a key for elective interventions, and appropriate infrastructure aids in the ultimate outcomes for both elective and nonelective surgical treatments. Overall, obese patients present several challenges to the spine surgeon, and certain precautions can be undertaken preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively to mitigate the associated risks to optimize outcomes.

The Effect of Prolonged Postoperative Antibiotic Administration on the Rate of Infection in Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Surgery Requiring a Closed-Suction Drain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Closed-suction drains are frequently used following posterior spinal surgery. The optimal timing of antibiotic discontinuation in this population may influence infection risk, but there is a paucity of evidence. The aim of this study was to determine whether postoperative antibiotic administration for 72 hours (24 hours after drain removal as drains were removed on the second postoperative day) decreases the incidence of surgical site infection compared with postoperative antibiotic administration for 24 hours.

METHODS

Patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar spinal surgery managed with a closed-suction drain were prospectively randomized into 1 of 2 groups of postoperative antibiotic durations: (1) 24 hours, or (2) 24 hours after drain removal (72 hours). Drains were discontinued on the second postoperative day. The duration of antibiotic administration was not blinded. All subjects received a single dose of preoperative antibiotics, as well as intraoperative antibiotics if the surgical procedure lasted >4 hours. The primary outcome was the rate of complicated surgical site infection (deep or organ or space) within 1 year of the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

The trial was terminated at an interim analysis, when 552 patients were enrolled, for futility with respect to the primary outcome. In this study, 282 patients were randomized to postoperative antibiotics for 24 hours and 270 patients were randomized to postoperative antibiotics for 72 hours. A complicated infection developed in 17 patients (6.0%) in the 24-hour group and in 14 patients (5.2%) in the 72-hour group (p = 0.714). The superficial infection rate did not differ between the groups (p = 0.654): 9.6% in the 24-hour group compared with 8.1% in the 72-hour group. Patients in the 72-hour group had a median hospital stay that was 1 day longer (p < 0.001). At 1 year, patient-rated outcomes including leg and back pain and physical and mental functioning were not different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The extension of postoperative antibiotics for 72 hours, when a closed-suction drain is required, was not associated with a reduction in the rate of complicated surgical site infection after posterior thoracolumbar spinal surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of Levels of Evidence.

Closed Wound Subfascial Suction Drainage in Posterior Fusion Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Randomized Control Study

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized control study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the complication rate in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery with and without drainage.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PSF is the mainstay of surgical treatment for AIS. Drains are commonly used despite contradictory findings in the literature for their having any clear advantage.

METHODS

A total of 100 AIS patients undergoing instrumented PSF were blindly randomized into two groups of either a deep drain or no drain. The collected data included wound follow-up findings, hemoglobin, hematocrit, vital signs and fever levels, and mean 20 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were randomly allocated to the "no drain" group and 48 to the "drain" group. There were no differences in patient characteristics, surgical data, and hemoglobin and hematocrit levels between the two groups. Only 4 units of packed cells were given in total. Fever during the first postoperative 1 to 3 days was equal, but increased in the no drain group on day 6 (P = 0.017). Length of hospitalization was equal (6 days) for all the patients. The mean follow-up period was 20 months [8.5-30.7 (SD 6.4)]. Complications included one case (1.9%) of pneumonia in the "no-drain" group, wound dehiscence in two cases (3.8%) in the "no-drain" group and in one case (2.1%) in the "drain" group, and two cases (3.8%) of superficial wound infection in the "no-drain" group. There was no case of deep infection in either group.

CONCLUSION

The current results indicate that there is no advantage to deep drainage in AIS patients undergoing PSF. The number of wound healing complications was low and identical for both the drain and no-drain groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Development of best practices to minimize wound complications after complex tethered spinal cord surgery: a modified Delphi study

OBJECTIVEComplications after complex tethered spinal cord (cTSC) surgery include infections and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. With little empirical evidence to guide management, there is variability in the interventions undertaken to limit complications. Expert-based best practices may improve the care of patients undergoing cTSC surgery. Here, authors conducted a study to identify consensus-driven best practices.METHODSThe Delphi method was employed to identify consensual best practices. A literature review regarding cTSC surgery together with a survey of current practices was distributed to 17 board-certified pediatric neurosurgeons. Thirty statements were then formulated and distributed to the group. Results of the second survey were discussed during an in-person meeting leading to further consensus, which was defined as ≥ 80% agreement on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree).RESULTSSeventeen consensus-driven best practices were identified, with all participants willing to incorporate them into their practice. There were four preoperative interventions: (1, 2) asymptomatic AND symptomatic patients should be referred to urology preoperatively, (3, 4) routine preoperative urine cultures are not necessary for asymptomatic AND symptomatic patients. There were nine intraoperative interventions: (5) patients should receive perioperative cefazolin or an equivalent alternative in the event of allergy, (6) chlorhexidine-based skin preparation is the preferred regimen, (7) saline irrigation should be used intermittently throughout the case, (8) antibiotic-containing irrigation should be used following dural closure, (9) a nonlocking running suture technique should be used for dural closure, (10) dural graft overlay should be used when unable to obtain primary dural closure, (11) an expansile dural graft should be incorporated in cases of lipomyelomeningocele in which primary dural closure does not permit free flow of CSF, (12) paraxial muscles should be closed as a layer separate from the fascia, (13) routine placement of postoperative drains is not necessary. There were three postoperative interventions: (14) postoperative antibiotics are an option and, if given, should be discontinued within 24 hours; (15) patients should remain flat for at least 24 hours postoperatively; (16) routine use of abdominal binders or other compressive devices postoperatively is not necessary. One intervention was prioritized for additional study: (17) further study of additional gram-negative perioperative coverage is needed.CONCLUSIONSA modified Delphi technique was used to develop consensus-driven best practices for decreasing wound complications after cTSC surgery. Further study is required to determine if implementation of these practices will lead to reduced complications. Discussion through the course of this study resulted in the initiation of a multicenter study of gram-negative surgical site infections in cTSC surgery.

The relationship between surgical site drains and reoperation for wound-related complications following posterior cervical spine surgery: a multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVEUse of surgical site drains following posterior cervical spine surgery is variable, and its impact on outcomes remains controversial. Studies of drain use in the lumbar spine have suggested that drains are not associated with reduction of reoperations for wound infection or hematoma. There is a paucity of studies examining this relationship in the cervical spine, where hematomas and infections can have severe consequences. This study aims to examine the relationship between surgical site drains and reoperation for wound-related complications following posterior cervical spine surgery.METHODSThis study is a multicenter retrospective review of 1799 consecutive patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression with instrumentation at 4 tertiary care centers between 2004 and 2016. Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed for associations with drain placement and return to the operating room.RESULTSOf 1799 patients, 1180 (65.6%) had a drain placed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified history of diabetes (OR 1.37, p = 0.03) and total number of levels operated (OR 1.32, p < 0.001) as independent predictors of drain placement. Rates of reoperation for any surgical site complication were not different between the drain and no-drain groups (4.07% vs 3.88%, p = 0.85). Similarly, rates of reoperation for surgical site infection (1.61% vs 2.58%, p = 0.16) and hematoma (0.68% vs 0.48%, p = 0.62) were not different between the drain and no-drain groups. However, after adjusting for history of diabetes and the number of operative levels, patients with drains had significantly lower odds of returning to the operating room for surgical site infection (OR 0.48, p = 0.04) but not for hematoma (OR 1.22, p = 0.77).CONCLUSIONSThis large study characterizes current practice patterns in the utilization of surgical site drains during posterior cervical decompression and instrumentation. Patients with drains placed did not have lower odds of returning to the operating room for postoperative hematoma. However, the authors' data suggest that patients with drains may be less likely to return to the operating room for surgical site infection, although the absolute number of infections in the entire population was small, limiting the analysis.

Open-label randomized controlled trial to compare wound dressings for patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Surgical wounds are covered to prevent bleeding, absorb the exudates, and provide a barrier against external contamination. Currently, in our hospital, after orthopedic surgery, traditional occlusive dressing of sterile gauze and non-woven hypoallergenic adhesive tape is placed. Some of the newest dressings have been shown to reduce the incidence of blisters compared with traditional dressing or colloid adhesive dressings. However, there are no comparative evaluations between the different types of dressings and their contribution to the overall results of the healing process.

Methods/design

This is a randomized, controlled, open-label trial to compare five types of dressings used in total knee and hip arthroplasty surgical wounds. A total of 550 patients will be randomly allocated to one of the following dressings: (1) traditional occlusive dressing, (2) Aquacel Surgical^®, (3) Mepilex^® Border Post-Op, (4) OpSite Post-Op Visible, or (5) UrgoTul^® Absorb Border. The dressing assigned is placed right after surgery. Patients will be followed up to 14 days after surgery when the dressing is definitively removed and will be tracked up to 3 months to record any late complications. During the immediate postoperative period and patient hospitalization and at the ambulatory visits after discharge, every time that the dressing is changed, nurses perform the study assessments. The main study outcome will be the percentage of patients with skin integrity at all times when the dressing has been changed. Skin integrity is a composite of the absence of blisters, erosion, erythema, maceration, swelling, wound dehiscence, and purulent exudates. Secondary outcomes include time to first change of dressing; percentage of patients with presence/absence of blisters, erosion, erythema, maceration, swelling, wound dehiscence, and purulent exudates; number of dressing changes needed; days of hospital stay; and nurse and patient satisfaction.

Differences in the main variable between each treatment group and group 1 will be tested by means of a chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Subgroup analyses of diabetic and non-diabetic patients, patients with a body mass index of more than 30 or not more than 30, and type of surgery (hip or knee) are planned.

Discussion

The results of this study will be useful for clinical decision making by giving information on the contribution of the dressings studied to the outcome of the wound and may also show which dressing offers better results depending on the characteristics of patients.

Trial registration

This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03190447). Retrospectively registered on 16 June 2017.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2755-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Post-operative drain use in patients undergoing decompression and fusion: incidence of complications and symptomatic hematoma

Background

Surgical drains are commonly used after spine surgery to minimize infection and hematoma formation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of post-operative complications after spinal decompression and fusion with and without a subfascial drain.

Methods

The medical records of 139 adult (≥18 years old) spinal deformity patients undergoing elective spinal decompression and fusion at a major academic institution were reviewed. We identified 116 (83.5%) who had a post-operative drain and 23 (16.5%) who did not have a postoperative drain (No-Drain: n=23; Drain-Use: n=116). Patient demographics, comorbidities, intra- and post-operative complication rates were collected for each patient. The primary outcome investigated in this study was the rate of post-operative complications, specifically surgical site infections (SSI) and hematoma formation.

Results

Patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between both cohorts, with the body mass index (BMI) slightly higher in the Drain-Use cohort (No-Drain: 26.1 kg/m²vs. Drain-Use: 29.1 kg/m², P=0.02). Operative time and the median number of levels fused were similar between the cohorts. The postoperative complications profile was similar between both cohorts, including deep and superficial SSIs (P=0.52 and P=0.66, respectively), and incidence of hematoma formation (P=0.66). Length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly higher for the Drain-use cohort compared to the No-Drain cohort (5.0 vs. 2.8 days, P<0.0001). There were no significant differences in the 30-day hospital readmission rate or incidence of 30-day wound dehiscence, draining wound, incision & drainage (I & D), or bleeding between both patient groups.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the use of postoperative subfascial drains in patients undergoing spinal decompression with fusion may not be associated with a reduction in SSIs or hematoma formation.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of wound drains in non-instrumented lumbar decompression surgery

Wound drains are routinely used in lumbar decompressive surgery (LDS). However, it remains unclear whether this practice helps to prevent symptomatic epidural hematoma formation and associated complications, particularly following non-instrumented procedures. A systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore completed to critically appraise the literature. The search protocol was conducted using the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Articles meeting the following criteria were included: (i) examined patients undergoing LDS; (ii) included cases receiving post-operative wound drains; (iii) detailed adverse outcomes including symptomatic epidural hematomas or wound infection; and (iv) were published in English in a peer-reviewed journal. Pooled risk differences (RD) for adverse outcomes were calculated using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Three Level 1b prospective randomized studies and five Level 2b retrospective cohort studies were included, from which 5327 cases were identified as having received a surgical drain and 773 were identified as having received no drainage following non-instrumented LDS. There was no difference between groups in the risk of symptomatic epidural hematoma (RD = 0.02; 95% CI -0.02 - 0.06, p = 0.28) or post-operative infection (RD = 0.00; 95% CI -0.01 - 0.01, p = 0.91). In conclusion, symptomatic epidural hematomas and infection are rare following non-instrumented LDS, with incidence rates unaffected by the routine use of wound drainage.

Risk factors for wound complications following spine surgery

Background

Wound complications, including surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound dehiscence, are among the most common complications following spine surgery often leading to readmission. The authors sought to identify preoperative characteristics predictive of wound complications after spine surgery.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for years 2012-2014 was reviewed for patients undergoing spine surgery, defined by the Current Procedural Terminology codes. Forty-four preoperative and surgical characteristics were analyzed for associations with wound complications.

Results

Of the 99,152 patients included in this study, 2.2% experienced at least one wound complication (superficial SSI: 0.9%, deep SSI: 0.8%, organ space SSI: 0.4%, and dehiscence: 0.3%). Multivariate binary logistic regression testing found 10 preoperative characteristics associated with wound complications: body mass index ≥30, smoker, female, chronic steroid use, hematocrit <38%, infected wound, inpatient status, emergency case, and operation time >3 hours. A risk score for each patient was created from the number of characteristics present. Receiver operating characteristic curves of the unweighted and weighted risk scores generated areas under the curve of 0.701 (95% CI: 0.690-0.713) and 0.715 (95% CI: 0.704-0.726), respectively. Patients with unweighted risk scores >7 were 25-fold more likely to develop a wound complication compared to patients with scores of 0. In addition, mortality rate, reoperation rate, and total length of stay each increased nearly 10-fold with increasing risk score.

Conclusion

This study introduces a novel risk score for the development of wound dehiscence and SSIs in patients undergoing spine surgery, using new risk factors identified here.

Rigenera protocol in the treatment of surgical wound dehiscence

The effective management of post-operative wounds is important to prevent potential complications such as surgical-site infections and wound dehiscence. The purpose of this study was to treat wound dehiscence in elderly patients who were subjected to orthopaedic surgical interventions. The dehisced wounds were treated with autologous micro-grafts obtained using a promising CE-certified medical device called Rigeneracons. This instrument is a biological disruptor of human tissues able to specifically select progenitor cells that, as already reported in previous studies, maintain high cell viability but mainly have a high regenerative potential, allowing the repair of damaged tissues. Autologous micro-grafts obtained by Rigeneracons are ready to use and can be applied alone or in combination with biological scaffolds directly on the injured area. We observed in our patients a complete remission of dehisced wounds, on average, after 30 days from micro-grafts application and a total wound re-epithelialisation after 1 year from the surgical intervention. In conclusion, although we reported only three patients, autologous micro-grafts can be considered a promising approach for the treatment of dehisced wounds, improving the wound-healing process and in general the patient's quality of life without using other dressings.

Risk factors for surgical site infections after neurosurgery: A focus on the postoperative period

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) after neurosurgery has potentially devastating consequences.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted over a period of 24 months in a university center. All adult patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures, with exception of open skull fractures, were included. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors.

RESULTS

We included 949 patients. Among them, 43 were diagnosed with SSI (4.5%). A significant reduction in postneurosurgical SSI from 5.8% in 2009 to 3.0% in 2010 (P = .04) was observed. During that period, an active surveillance with regular feedback was established. The most common microorganisms isolated from SSI were Staphylococcus aureus (23%), Enterobacteriaceae (21%), and Propionibacterium acnes (12%). We identified the following independent risk factors for SSI postcranial surgery: intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay ≥7 days (odds ratio [OR] = 6.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-21.7), duration of drainage ≥3 days (OR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.1-11), and cerebrospinal fluid leakage (OR = 5.6; 95% CI, 1.1-30). For SSIs postspinal surgery, we identified the following: ICU length of stay ≥7 days (OR = 7.2; 95% CI, 1.6-32.1), coinfection (OR = 9.9; 95% CI, 2.2-43.4), and duration of drainage ≥3 days (OR = 5.7; 95% CI, 1.5-22).

CONCLUSION

Active surveillance with regular feedback proved effective in reducing SSI rates. The postoperative period is associated with overlooked risk factors for neurosurgical SSI. Infection control measures targeting this period are therefore promising.