Nicotine replacement therapy in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Systematic review of the literature, and survey of Canadian practice

Nicotine Replacement Therapy Does Not Reduce Headaches Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

A significant number of patients admitted for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are active smokers and are at risk of developing nicotine withdrawal symptoms (e.g., cravings, irritability, insomnia, headaches, etc.). This study aimed to evaluate the use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) regarding headache severity and analgesics consumption.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using prospectively collected data from 2014 to 2019 in the neurointensive care unit of the Hospices Civils in Lyon, France. We performed a propensity score matching analysis. The covariables used were age, sex, initial World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies score, Hijdra sum score, and factors associated with pain following aSAH (history of chronic pain, anxiety, or depression). Smokers received NRT through a transdermal device. The primary end point was headache control. Secondary end points were mean numerical pain rating scale score and analgesics consumption.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-five patients were included among 523 patients hospitalized for aSAH. Fifty-one patients underwent nicotine substitution and were matched to 51 unsubstituted patients. The headache control rate was not different between the two groups (43.1% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.736). The mean numeric pain rating scale score in the substituted group was 2.2 (1.1-3.5) and 2.4 (1.6-3.1) in the unsubstituted group (p = 0.533). The analgesics consumption (acetaminophen, tramadol, and morphine) was the same in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NRT in the acute phase of aSAH does not seem to have an impact on the intensity of headaches or analgesics consumption.

Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Smokers with Acute Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An International Survey

INTRODUCTION

Smoking prevalence is twice as high among patients admitted to hospital because of the acute condition of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) as in the general population. Smoking cessation may improve the prognosis of aSAH, but nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) administered at the time of aSAH remains controversial because of potential adverse effects such as cerebral vasospasm. We investigated the international practice of NRT use for aSAH among neurosurgeons.

METHODS

The online SurveyMonkey software was used to administer a 15-question, 5-min online questionnaire. An invitation link was sent to those 1425 of 1988 members of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) who agreed to participate in surveys to assess treatment strategies for withdrawal of tobacco smoking during aSAH. Factors contributing to physicians' posture towards NRT were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 158 physicians from 50 nations participated in the survey (response rate 11.1%); 68.4% (108) were affiliated with university hospitals and 67.7% (107) practiced at high-volume neurovascular centers with at least 30 treated aSAH cases per year. Overall, 55.7% (88) of physicians offered NRT to smokers with aSAH, 22.1% (35) offered non-NRT support including non-nicotine medication and counselling, while the remaining 22.1% (35) did not actively support smoking cessation. When smoking was not possible, 42.4% (67) of physicians expected better clinical outcomes when prescribing NRT instead of nicotine deprivation, 36.1% (57) were uncertain, 13.9% (22) assumed unaffected outcomes, and 7.6% (12) assumed worse outcomes. Only 22.8% (36) physicians had access to a local smoking cessation team in their practice, of whom half expected better outcomes with NRT as compared to deprivation.

CONCLUSIONS

A small majority of the surveyed physicians of the EANS offered NRT to support smoking cessation in hospitalized patients with aSAH. However, less than half believed that NRT could positively impact clinical outcome as compared to deprivation. This survey demonstrated the lack of consensus regarding use of NRT for hospitalized smokers with aSAH.

Smoking-cessation pharmacotherapy for patients with stroke and TIA: Systematic review

Data regarding the efficacy and safety of smoking-cessation pharmacotherapy after stroke are lacking. We systematically reviewed data on this topic by searching Medline, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov to identify randomized clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline, and bupropion in patients with stroke and TIA. We included studies that reported rates of smoking cessation, worsening or recurrent cerebrovascular disease, seizures, or neuropsychiatric events. We identified 2 RCTs and 6 observational studies; 3 included ischemic stroke and TIA, 2 subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and 3 did not specify. Four studies assessed efficacy; cessation rates ranged from 33% to 66% with pharmacological therapy combined with behavioral interventions versus 15% to 46% without, but no individual study demonstrated a statistically significant benefit. Safety data for varenicline and buopropion in ischemic stroke were scarce. Patients with SAH who received NRT had more seizures (9% vs 2%; P = 0.024) and delirium (19% vs 7%; P = 0.006) in one study, but less frequent vasospasm in 3 studies. In conclusion, combined with behavioral interventions, smoking-cessation therapies resulted in numerically higher cessation rates. Limited safety data may prompt caution regarding seizures and delirium in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.