Evaluation and management of small dural tears in primary lumbar spinal decompression and discectomy surgery

Indirect Fistula: A New Terminology for Cerebrospinal Fluid Fistula With Different 'Apparent Origin' and 'Real Origin'

Fistulas are abnormal communications between body cavities. They can occur between the CNS and the extracranial space, presenting clinically as CSF leaks. Due to the variety of features, multiple classifications have been implemented to better study this pathology. A systematic review was conducted using the Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science databases. Observational studies such as cohort studies, case reports, case series, cross-sectional studies, systematic reviews, and publications that assess the classification of CSF leaks were included. The systematic review identified 29 publications that met the required criteria for inclusion. Although the primary focus of most of these publications was not on classification, they briefly mentioned it. The included publications describe classifications according to etiology, exiting flow pressure, anatomic site, and some new classification proposals. Of the 29 included studies, 11 referred to the appearance of CSF rhinorrhea or otorrhea with no relationship between the cause or site of origin and the site of the CSF leak. However, none of these publications names this situation. These results clearly indicate that a term for this circumstance needs to be established; none of the previously listed publications provide a name for this condition. This systematic review aims to demonstrate the necessity of implementing a new term to describe CSF leaks where the 'apparent origin' does not correspond to the 'real origin.' The results show no existing term that considers such cases; therefore, we propose the term 'Indirect Fistula' to designate these cases.

Stand-Alone Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Lumbar Fixation to Indirectly Decompress the Neural Elements in Spinal Stenosis: A Radiographic Assessment Case Series

BACKGROUND

 The ideal surgical treatment of lumbar canal stenosis remains controversial. Although decompressive open surgery has been widely used with good clinical outcome, minimally invasive indirect decompression techniques have been developed to avoid the complications associated with open approaches. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiologic outcome and safety of the indirect decompression achieved with stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative pathologies.

METHODS

 Twenty-eight patients presenting with spinal degenerative diseases including concomitant central and/or lateral stenosis were treated with stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Radiographic measurements were made on axial and sagittal magnetic resonance (MR) images, performed before surgery and after a mean follow-up period of 25.2 months. Measurements included spinal canal and foraminal areas, and anteroposterior canal diameter.

RESULTS

 Percutaneous screw fixation was performed in 35 spinal levels. Measurements on the follow-up MR images showed statistically significant increase in the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal and the neural foramen, from a mean of 88.22 and 61.05 mm2 preoperatively to 141.52 and 92.18 mm2 at final follow-up, respectively. The sagittal central canal diameter increased from a mean of 4.9 to 9.1 mm at final follow-up. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) both improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

 Stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a safe and effective technique for indirect decompression of the spinal canal and neural foramina in lumbar degenerative diseases. This minimally invasive technique may provide the necessary decompression in cases of common degenerative lumbar disorders with ligamentous stenosis.

Use of tissue sealant patch (TachoSil) in the management of cerebrospinal fluid leaks after anterior cervical spine discectomy and fusion

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a fast, sutureless technique to repair anterior cervical dural tears. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of cervical degenerative diseases. Although uncommon, incidental durotomy with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak during ACDF is a potentially serious complication. Yet, its technical management for the prevention of CSF leak is controversial.

METHODS

Between September 2012 and June 2018 we encountered seven cases (2 female/5 male) presenting with intraoperative CSF leaks secondary to incidental dural tears during ACDF surgery. All the cases were surgically treated using a topical fibrin sealant patch (TachoSil) with high adesive strength and fibrin glue (Tisseel). Intraoperative source of leakage, time to leakage control, quantity of Sealant Sponge used and postoperative complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Dural tears were tipically the result of dissection of adherent posterior longitudinal ligament and/or calcified disc from the cervical dural sac to allow full decompression of the spinal cord. Effective repair of dural tear defined as cessation of CSF leak after topical sealant agents application was achieved no later than one minute in all cases. Evident clinical and/or radiological postoperative CSF leak was used to determine the patient's postoperative result. Postoperative CSF leak was not evident during a minimum 6 months follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, we have reported our experience with a new sealing technique to manage CSF leaks from iatrogenic cervical dural lacerations. Tachosil tissue sealant patch is a rapid sutureless technique that may help in repairing introperatively incidental dural tears, thus reducing the risk of postoperative CSF leaks. To our knowledge, this is the first series to report the use of Tachosil adhesive sealant patch for the treatment of incidental dural tears during anterior cervical discectomy.

Dural Injury Treatment with a Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach: A Case Report and Description of Surgical Technique

Introduction

The objective of this study was to describe a surgical technique that uses transforaminal full-endoscopic access, which is different from the existing protocol, and to demonstrate another method of dural tear repair during endoscopic spine surgery.

Background

Endoscopic spine surgery was initially described for lumbar disc pathologies. Technical advances and new materials have made it possible to treat cervical and thoracic spinal degenerative disorders. These advances have also made it possible to treat surgical complications, notably dural tears with CSF fistulas. The literature indicates that the incidence of these injuries ranges from 1% to 17%.

Materials and Methods

Descriptive technical note of innovative and improved endoscopic surgical procedure exemplified with illustrative clinical case and comparative literature review.

Results

There is only one report describing a full-endoscopic suture technique for dural sac repair. The gold standard for treatment of the most significant nonpunctate lesions continues to be a conversion to open surgery for lesion closure. Conversion can be problematic because most surgeries are performed under sedation and local anesthesia.

Conclusions

In this case report and the new endoscopic suture technique described here, we show that primary correction of dural tears through endoscopy is possible. In addition to representing a paradigm break in solving one of the main complications of these procedures, it can expand the possibilities of spine endoscopy.

Open epidural blood patch to augment durotomy repair in lumbar spine surgery: surgical technique and cohort study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Incidental durotomy during elective spine surgery is relatively common. While usually benign and self-limited, it can be associated with morbidity, increased cost, and medicolegal ramifications. Dural repair typically involves performing a primary closure using a suture or dural staple; repairs are then frequently augmented with a sealant, patch, or fat/fascial graft. Although primary repair of an incidental durotomy is standard practice, the ideal secondary sealant or augment choice remains unclear. A wide variety of commercially available dural sealant options exist, and while none have demonstrated consistent superiority, all are associated with single-use costs in the hundreds to thousands of dollars and have concerns regarding swelling, local inflammation, or short-lived dural adherence.

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to compare the results of dural repair augmentation using an open intraoperative epidural blood patch to a hydrogel technique.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective comparative cohort study at an academic referral center PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery from March 2017 to January 2021 who sustained an incidental durotomy. Patients undergoing surgery for infection were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was failure of the repair as determined by a return to the operating room for re-exploration of a persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak within 30 days of the index procedure. A secondary outcome was the incidence of a postoperative positional headache, and if present, the method used to obtain resolution. The primary predictor was use of a suture and hydrogel technique ("hydrogel" group), or the use of an epidural blood patch ("EBP" group).

METHODS

The method for applying an open epidural blood patch is presented in detail and involves primarily repairing the durotomy followed by allowing whole blood to pool and clot in the operative field until the durotomy is completely covered. This was compared with a group of patients undergoing secondary augmentation with commercially available hydrogel. In both groups, mechanical resistance to CSF leakage was confirmed with direct visualization and a Valsalva maneuver, respectively. Patients were instructed to remain flat until the morning after surgery. Chart review was used for data abstraction on preoperative, demographic, perioperative, and postoperative clinical factors. To compare between the hydrogel and EBP group, Wilcoxon rank-sum testing was used to test for non-parametric comparisons of means, and chi-square testing between binomial data.

RESULTS

Of 732 patients during the study period, forty-eight patients met study criteria. Twenty-five patients were in the hydrogel group and 23 in the EBP group. Mean age was 69.3 years (standard error 1.3 years). Patients were predominantly female (n = 31, 64.6%) with a mean BMI of 29.5 (SE 0.8), with no significant baseline differences between the hydrogel and EBP groups. Two patients in the hydrogel group (8.0%) and two in the EBP group (8.7%) had mild positional headaches postoperatively that resolved without intervention within 24 hours. One (4.3%) patient in the EBP group had positional headaches following an initial headache-free period; this patient was returned to the operating room and no evidence of a persistent CSF leak was found despite meticulous exploration.

CONCLUSIONS

An open, intraoperatively placed epidural blood patch may be an efficacious and cost-effective way to manage an incidental durotomy. This method merits further study as an allergy-free, no swell, cost-neutral method of dural repair augmentation.

Pedicled Multifidus Muscle Flap To Treat Inaccessible Dural Tear In Spine Surgery: Technical Note And Preliminary Experience

OBJECTIVE

To assess the usefulness, feasibility, and limitations of pedicled multifidus muscle flaps (PMMFs) for the treatment of inaccessible dural tears during spine surgery.

METHODS

The technique of PMMF harvesting was investigated together with relevant anatomy. We prospectively evaluated 8 patients treated with the PMMF technique between January 2017 and December 2019. Results were compared with a retrospective series of 9 patients treated with a standard technique between January 2014 and December 2016. Inclusion criteria were inaccessible dural tear or dural tear judged not amenable to direct repair because of tissue loosening. Exclusion criteria were surgical treatment of intradural disease. Clinical and demographic data of all patients were collected. Clinical evaluations were performed according to American Spinal Injury Association criteria and Oswestry Disability Index. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography was performed in all patients. The primary end point was wound healing (cerebrospinal fluid leakage, infection, and fluid collection); secondary end points were neurologic outcome and complications.

RESULTS

Control group: 1 death as a result of wound infection secondary to cerebrospinal fluid fistula and 2 patients needed lumbar subarachnoid drain; neurologic outcome: 3 patients improved and 6 were unchanged. Flap group: no wound-related complications were observed; neurologic outcome: 3 patients improved and 5 were unchanged. No flap-related complications were described. Flap harvesting was feasible in all cases, with an average 20 minutes adjunctive surgical time.

CONCLUSIONS

The PMMF technique was feasible and safe; in this preliminary experience, its use is associated with lower complications as a result of dural tears but larger series are needed to confirm its effectiveness.

Post-surgical thoracic spinal cord herniation following an unrepaired dural defect: a rare complication

Surgery for ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) comes with a relatively high risk of dural tear. We report a 50-year-old woman, who presented with symptomatic spinal stenosis from OLF at T11-T12 and lower lumbar spondylosis for which a single stage posterior decompression and instrumented fusion of both sites was done. Removal of the OLF resulted in a small dural tear with intact arachanoid which was covered using a fibrin sealant. In the first post-operative day, the patient's neurology started deteriorating. An MR scan was done to look for hematoma. It showed the spinal cord herniating out of the thecal sac at the operated level. Emergency re-operation was done to reduce the herniation and the dural defect was repaired. The patient gradually recovered to her best functional status. Based on this experience, we advise primary repair of inadvertent durotomies.

Prognostic impact of intra- and postoperative management of dural tear on postoperative complications in primary degenerative lumbar diseases

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for complications associated with dural tear (DT), including the types of DT, and the intra- and postoperative management of DT.

Patients and Methods

Between 2012 and 2017, 12 171 patients with degenerative lumbar diseases underwent primary lumbar spine surgery. We investigated five categories of potential predictors: patient factors (sex, age, body mass index, and primary disease), surgical factors (surgical procedures, operative time, and estimated blood loss), types of DT (inaccessible for suturing/clipping and the presence of cauda equina/nerve root herniation), repair techniques (suturing, clipping, fibrin glue, polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel, and polyglycolic acid sheet), and postoperative management (drainage duration). Postoperative complications were evaluated in terms of dural leak, prolonged bed rest, headache, nausea/vomiting, delayed wound healing, postoperative neurological deficit, surgical site infection (SSI), and reoperation for DT. We performed multivariable regression analyses to evaluate the predictors of postoperative complications associated with DT.

Results

In total, 429/12 171 patients (3.5%) had a DT. Multivariable analysis revealed that PEG hydrogel significantly reduced the incidence of dural leak and prolonged bed rest, and that patients treated with sealants (fibrin glue and PEG hydrogel) significantly less frequently suffered from headache. A longer drainage duration significantly increased the incidence of headache, nausea/vomiting, and delayed wound healing. Headache and nausea/vomiting were significantly more prevalent in younger female patients. Postoperative neurological deficit and reoperation for DT significantly depended on the presence of cauda equina/nerve root herniation. A longer operative time was the sole independent risk factor for SSI and was also a risk factor for dural leak, prolonged bed rest, and nausea/vomiting.

Conclusion

Sealants, particularly PEG hydrogel, may be useful in reducing symptoms related to cerebrospinal fluid leakage, whereas prolonged drainage may be unnecessary. Younger female patients should be carefully treated when DT occurs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1115–1121.

Results of TachoSil® associated with fibrin glue as dural sealant in a series of patients with spinal intradural tumors surgery. Technical note with a review of the literature

A major problem of surgery for intradural spinal tumors (IST) is the occurrence in the post-operative period of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. To the best of our knowledge, here we report on the largest series of IST patients in whom the TachoSil® associated to fibrin glue was used as dural sealant in this kind of surgery. Moreover, we extensively reviewed the literature reporting the results of TachoSil® in spine surgery. The data of 35 consecutive surgically treated IST patients were reviewed. In all cases TachoSil® associated with fibrin glue was used as dural sealant. Mean age was 58.14 ± 15.56 years and mean follow-up (FU) was 23.20 ± 9.76 months. The Modified McCormick Scale (MMS) was used to assess the functional status of patients pre-operatively and at latest FU. All article dealing with the use of TachoSil® in spine surgery were included in the literature review. A CSF collection (treated conservatively with needle aspiration and bed rest with no consequence) was observed only in 1 out of 35 cases. No wound infection nor adverse reaction to the TachoSil® occurred during the FU. At latest FU we observed an improvement of MMS grade in 23 patients (65.71%) and a stable functional status in 12 cases (34.28%). According to our experience and the literature review using the TachoSil® after dural closure is safe and effective in IST surgery. Better standardized studies are needed to establish the usefulness of TachoSil® for incidental dural tear in degenerative spine surgery.

Iatrogenic dural tear in endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery: full endoscopic dural suture repair (Youn's technique)

BACKGROUND

With the advancement of minimally invasive spinal surgery, endoscopic lumbar decompression has been widely used for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal diseases. Iatrogenic dural tear is a relatively common complication in endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery. The golden standard of treatment for iatrogenic dural tear is immediate open conversion and direct repair under microscopic visualization. Recently, most of endoscopic spinal surgery is performed under local anesthesia. So, conversion to open surgery is very embarrassing situation because of the need of additional general anesthesia. But, direct endoscopic dural repair is very difficult procedure due to the limitation of manipulation. No report showed direct dural suture under full endoscopic situation.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this surgical technique is to provide a method of full endoscopic dural suture repair without conversion to open surgery.