The utilization of MGMT promoter methylation testing in United States hospitals for glioblastoma and its impact on prognosis

Analysis of gliomas DNA methylation: Assessment of pre-analytical variables

Precision oncology is driven by molecular biomarkers. For glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common malignant adult primary brain tumor, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase ( MGMT ) gene DNA promoter methylation is an important prognostic and treatment clinical biomarker. Time consuming pre-analytical steps such as biospecimen storage before fixing, sampling, and processing are major sources of errors and batch effects, that are further confounded by intra-tumor heterogeneity of MGMT promoter methylation. To assess the effect of pre-analytical variables on GBM DNA methylation, tissue storage/sampling (CryoGrid), sample preparation multi-sonicator (PIXUL) and 5-methylcytosine (5mC) DNA immunoprecipitation (Matrix MeDIP-qPCR/seq) platforms were used. MGMT promoter CpG methylation was examined in 173 surgical samples from 90 individuals, 50 of these were used for intra-tumor heterogeneity studies. MGMT promoter methylation levels in paired frozen and formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples were very close, confirming suitability of FFPE for MGMT promoter methylation analysis in clinical settings. Matrix MeDIP-qPCR yielded similar results to methylation specific PCR (MS-PCR). Warm ex-vivo ischemia (37°C up to 4hrs) and 3 cycles of repeated sample thawing and freezing did not alter 5mC levels at MGMT promoter, exon and upstream enhancer regions, demonstrating the resistance of DNA methylation to the most common variations in sample processing conditions that might be encountered in research and clinical settings. 20-30% of specimens exhibited intratumor heterogeneity in the MGMT DNA promoter methylation. Collectively these data demonstrate that variations in sample fixation, ischemia duration and temperature, and DNA methylation assay technique do not have significant impact on assessment of MGMT promoter methylation status. However, intratumor methylation heterogeneity underscores the need for histologic verification and value of multiple biopsies at different GBM geographic tumor sites in assessment of MGMT promoter methylation. Matrix-MeDIP-seq analysis revealed that MGMT promoter methylation status clustered with other differentially methylated genomic loci (e.g. HOXA and lncRNAs), that are likewise resilient to variation in above post-resection pre-analytical conditions. These MGMT -associated global DNA methylation patterns offer new opportunities to validate more granular data-based epigenetic GBM clinical biomarkers where the CryoGrid-PIXUL-Matrix toolbox could prove to be useful.

Cancer Registration, Molecular Marker Status, and Adherence to the WHO 2016 Classification of Pathology Reports for Glioma Diagnosed during 2017-2019 in Belgium

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to cross-check and, if necessary, adjust registered ICD-O-3 topography and morphology codes with the findings in pathology reports available at the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR) for glioma patients. Additionally, integration of molecular markers in the pathological diagnosis and concordance with WHO 2016 classification is investigated.

METHODS

Since information regarding molecular tests and corresponding conclusions are not available as structured data at population level, a manual screening of all pseudonymized pathology reports available at the BCR for registered glioma patients (2017-2019) was conducted. ICD-O-3 morphology and topography codes from the BCR database (based on information as provided by hospital oncological care programmes and pathology laboratories), were, at tumour level, cross-checked with the data from the pathology reports and, if needed, specified or corrected. Relevant molecular markers (IDH1/2, 1p19q codeletion, promoter region of the MGMT gene [MGMTp]) were manually extracted from the pathology reports.

RESULTS

In 95.3% of gliomas, the ICD-O-3 morphology code was correct. Non-specific topography codes were specified in 9.3%, while 3.3% of specific codes were corrected. The IDH status was known in 75.2% of astrocytic tumours. The rate of correct integrated diagnoses varied from 47.6% to 56.4% among different gliomas. MGMTp methylation status was available in 32.2% of glioblastomas.

CONCLUSION

Both the integration of molecular markers in the conclusion of the pathology reports and the delivery of those reports to the BCR can be improved. The availability of distinct ICD-O-3 codes for each molecularly defined tumour entity within the WHO classification would increase the consistency of cancer registration, facilitate population level research and international benchmarking.

Prognostic value of O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation in isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant gliomas

Background

Patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas have been associated with longer survival time than those that are IDH wild-type. Previous studies have shown the prognostic value of O ⁶ -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), which are predominantly IDH wild-type. Little is known of the prognostic value of MGMT methylation status for IDH mutant gliomas.

Methods

We retrospectively identified IDH mutant gliomas patients between 2011 and 2020 that were tested for MGMT promoter methylation. We generated Kaplan-Meier estimator curves and performed Cox proportional hazard models for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) to compare the outcomes of MGMT promoter methylated versus MGMT unmethylated patients.

Results

Of 419 IDH mutant gliomas with MGMT promoter methylation testing, we identified 54 GBMs, 223 astrocytomas, and 142 oligodendrogliomas. 62.3% patients had MGMT methylated tumors while 37.7% were MGMT unmethylated. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, median OS for all MGMT methylated patients was 17.7 years and 14.6 years for unmethylated patients. Median PFS for all MGMT methylated patients was 7.0 years and for unmethylated patients 5.2 years. After univariate subgroup analysis, MGMT methylation is only prognostic for OS and PFS in GBM, and for OS in anaplastic oligodendroglioma and anaplastic oligodendroglioma for OS. In multivariate analysis, MGMT unmethylated GBM patients carry a higher risk of death (HR 7.72, 95% CI 2.10-28.33) and recurrence (HR 3.85, 95% CI 1.35-10.96).

Conclusions

MGMT promoter methylation is associated with better OS and PFS for IDH mutant GBM. MGMT promoter methylation testing for other IDH mutant glioma subtypes may not provide additional information on prognostication.

Bisulfite profiling of the MGMT promoter and comparison with routine testing in glioblastoma diagnostics

Background

Promoter methylation of the DNA repair gene O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is an acknowledged predictive epigenetic marker in glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. Patients with methylated CpGs in the MGMT promoter benefit from treatment with alkylating agents, such as temozolomide, and show an improved overall survival and progression-free interval. A precise determination of MGMT promoter methylation is of importance for diagnostic decisions. We experienced that different methods show partially divergent results in a daily routine. For an integrated neuropathological diagnosis of malignant gliomas, we therefore currently apply a combination of methylation-specific PCR assays and pyrosequencing.

Results

To better rationalize the variation across assays, we compared these standard techniques and assays to deep bisulfite sequencing results in a cohort of 80 malignant astrocytomas. Our deep analysis covers 49 CpG sites of the expanded MGMT promoter, including exon 1, parts of intron 1 and a region upstream of the transcription start site (TSS). We observed that deep sequencing data are in general in agreement with CpG-specific pyrosequencing, while the most widely used MSP assays published by Esteller et al. (N Engl J Med 343(19):1350–1354, 2000. 10.1056/NEJM200011093431901) and Felsberg et al. (Clin Cancer Res 15(21):6683–6693, 2009. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2801) resulted in partially discordant results in 22 tumors (27.5%). Local deep bisulfite sequencing (LDBS) revealed that CpGs located in exon 1 are suited best to discriminate methylated from unmethylated samples. Based on LDBS data, we propose an optimized MSP primer pair with 83% and 85% concordance to pyrosequencing and LDBS data. A hitherto neglected region upstream of the TSS, with an overall higher methylation compared to exon 1 and intron 1 of MGMT, is also able to discriminate the methylation status.

Conclusion

Our integrated analysis allows to evaluate and redefine co-methylation domains within the MGMT promoter and to rationalize the practical impact on assays used in daily routine diagnostics.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13148-022-01244-4.

Utility of Administrative Databases and Big Data on Understanding Glioma Treatment—A Systematic Review

Background Gliomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors where large multicenter clinical and genetic studies have become increasingly popular in their understanding. We reviewed and analyzed the findings from large databases in gliomas, seeking to understand clinically relevant information.

Methods A systematic review was performed for gliomas studied using large administrative databases up to January 2020 (e.g., National Inpatient Sample [NIS], National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [NSQIP], and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program [SEER], National Cancer Database [NCDB], and others).

Results Out of 390 screened studies, 122 were analyzed. Studies included a wide range of gliomas including low- and high-grade gliomas. The SEER database (n = 83) was the most used database followed by NCDB (n = 28). The most common pathologies included glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (n = 67), with the next category including mixes of grades II to IV glioma (n = 31). Common study themes involved evaluation of descriptive epidemiological trends, prognostic factors, comparison of different pathologies, and evaluation of outcome trends over time. Persistent health care disparities in patient outcomes were frequently seen depending on race, marital status, insurance status, hospital volume, and location, which did not change over time. Most studies showed improvement in survival because of advances in surgical and adjuvant treatments.

Conclusions This study helps summarize the use of clinical administrative databases in gliomas research, informing on socioeconomic issues, surgical outcomes, and adjuvant treatments over time on a national level. Large databases allow for some study questions that would not be possible with single institution data; however, limitations remain in data curation, analysis, and reporting methods.

Insight into the Double-Edged Role of Ferroptosis in Disease

Ferroptosis, a newly described type of iron-dependent programmed cell death that is distinct from apoptosis, necroptosis, and other types of cell death, is involved in lipid peroxidation (LP), reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Accumulating evidence has highlighted vital roles for ferroptosis in multiple diseases, including acute kidney injury, cancer, hepatic fibrosis, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Therefore, ferroptosis has become one of the research hotspots for disease treatment and attracted extensive attention in recent years. This review mainly summarizes the relationship between ferroptosis and various diseases classified by the system, including the urinary system, digestive system, respiratory system, nervous system. In addition, the role and molecular mechanism of multiple inhibitors and inducers for ferroptosis are further elucidated. A deeper understanding of the relationship between ferroptosis and multiple diseases may provide new strategies for researching diseases and drug development based on ferroptosis.

Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective cohort study

Aim:

Investigate real-world outcomes and healthcare utilization of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) related to O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter testing and methylation.

Patients & methods:

US Oncology Network data were analyzed for patients receiving first-line (1L) treatment for GBM.

Results:

Most patients received 1L radiation with temozolomide. Unadjusted median overall survival (OS) was higher in tested versus untested (median:18.1 vs 11.8 months) and in methylated versus unmethylated (median: 25.5 vs 12.4 months). Untested status, unmethylated MGMT and older age were associated with reduced OS and longer 1L treatment with increased OS. Similar findings were observed for progression-free survival. Utilization was similar between cohorts.

Conclusion:

In community oncology practices, MGMT methylation and testing were predictive of better survival in GBM.

We studied the characteristics and survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in community-based oncology practices. These patients had received temozolomide and radiotherapy with surgery, which is the standard of care for GBM. We were interested in how patient survival was related to methylation of the O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter. The study showed that patients with methylated versus unmethylated MGMT GBM survived longer. However, patients who were tested for methylation, whether MGMT was methylated or not, also survived longer. This may be because patients who get tested also get better care in general.

DNA Repair Pathways in Cancer Therapy and Resistance

DNA repair pathways are triggered to maintain genetic stability and integrity when mammalian cells are exposed to endogenous or exogenous DNA-damaging agents. The deregulation of DNA repair pathways is associated with the initiation and progression of cancer. As the primary anti-cancer therapies, ionizing radiation and chemotherapeutic agents induce cell death by directly or indirectly causing DNA damage, dysregulation of the DNA damage response may contribute to hypersensitivity or resistance of cancer cells to genotoxic agents and targeting DNA repair pathway can increase the tumor sensitivity to cancer therapies. Therefore, targeting DNA repair pathways may be a potential therapeutic approach for cancer treatment. A better understanding of the biology and the regulatory mechanisms of DNA repair pathways has the potential to facilitate the development of inhibitors of nuclear and mitochondria DNA repair pathways for enhancing anticancer effect of DNA damage-based therapy.

Prognostic and predictive impact of MGMT promoter methylation in grade 3 gliomas

BACKGROUND

Grade 3 gliomas are aggressive primary brain tumors. Promoter methylation of methyl guanine methyl transferase (MGMT) has been associated with a favorable prognosis in patients with glioblastoma, but the impact of MGMT promoter methylation in patients with grade 3 gliomas is less clear. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the utilization of MGMT testing in patients with Grade 3 glioma, as well its prognostic and predictive value.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried (2004-2016) for patients with newly diagnosed grade 3 glioma without 1p19q codeletion. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis, along with Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Of 20,488 total patients, 1,209 (5.0%) had MGMT testing. Of these patients, 561 (46.4%) were MGMT methylated (mMGMT), and 648 (53.6%) were MGMT unmethylated (uMGMT). mMGMT patients experienced greater median overall survival (OS) than both uMGMT patients as well as patients with no MGMT status reported (p < 0.05 for both). mMGMT was associated with improved OS for patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiation or adjuvant radiation, but not for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or no adjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study to date describing the utilization of and outcomes for mMGMT patients with grade 3 glioma. The present results demonstrate that mMGMT is a prognostic factor and possibly a predictive biomarker, and is currently under-utilized within the US. MGMT methylation status could be used to risk-stratify and select patients for treatment intensification.

IMPORTANCE OF STUDY

The present study is the largest of its kind to examine the prognostic and predictive impact of MGMT methylation (mMGMT) amongst patients with Grade 3 Glioma. The results suggest that mMGMT is prognostic, as amongst all patients, mMGMT was associated with improved overall survival. These results also suggest that mMGMT is predictive, as patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiation or adjuvant radiation therapy did have improved overall survival with mMGMT, though there was no difference in overall survival observes amongst patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or those patients receiving no adjuvant treatment. The study also found that only 5% of patients nationwide with Grade 3 Glioma are tested for MGMT.

Hypermethylation of the IRAK3-Activated MAPK Signaling Pathway to Promote the Development of Glioma

Objective

This study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the involvement of abnormal DNA methylation in the development of glioma and identify potential new targets for glioma therapy.

Methods

The GSE79122 chip achieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database containing 69 glioma samples and 9 normal samples was analyzed. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MS-PCR or MSP), reverse transcription-PCR, and Western blot analysis were used to confirm the methylation level and expression level of the interleukin receptor-associated kinase (IRAK3) gene in glioma cells, 36 glioma samples, and the corresponding normal samples. In vitro, the proliferation, apoptosis rate, migration, and invasion abilities of glioma cells were detected by Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, Transwell assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and flow cytometry, respectively. Besides, the xenograft assay of nude mice was used to confirm the effect of the IRAK3 on glioma in vivo.

Results

Microarray analysis showed that the IRAK3 was one of the most hypermethylated genes in glioma, and the related mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway was activated. More experiments supported the higher methylation level and lower expression level of the IRAK3 in glioma tissues and cell lines. The viability, migration, and invasion ability of glioma cells significantly reduced and the apoptosis rate increased with the overexpression and demethylation of the IRAK3 in vitro. Besides, treatment with the MAPK signaling pathway inhibitor PD325901 alone or the overexpression or demethylation of the IRAK3 had a similar effect as the overexpression or demethylation of the IRAK3 alone in glioma cells. In vivo, xenotransplantation experiments in nude mice confirmed that the overexpression and demethylation of the IRAK3 and suppression of the MAPK signaling pathway inhibited the development of glioma.

Conclusion

IRAK3 inhibited the development of glioma progression through the MAPK signaling pathway.

MGMT promoter methylation status testing to guide therapy for glioblastoma: refining the approach based on emerging evidence and current challenges

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor, with a universally poor prognosis. The emergence of molecular biomarkers has had a significant impact on histological typing and diagnosis, as well as predicting patient survival and response to treatment. The methylation status of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl-transferase (MGMT) gene promoter is one such molecular biomarker. Despite the strong evidence supporting the role of MGMT methylation status in prognostication, its routine implementation in clinical practice has been challenging. The methods and optimal cutoff definitions for MGMT status determination remain controversial. Variation in detection methods between laboratories presents a major challenge for consensus. Moreover, consideration of other clinical and genetic/epigenetic factors must also be incorporated into treatment decision making. In this review, we distill the available evidence to summarize our position on the optimal use of available assays, and propose strategies for resolving cases with equivocal methylation status and a framework for incorporating this important assay into research and clinical practice.

ACSL4 suppresses glioma cells proliferation via activating ferroptosis

Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4) is a member of the long chain family of acyl-CoA synthetase proteins, which have recently been shown to serve an important role in ferroptosis. Previous studies have suggested that ferroptosis is involved in the occurrence of glioma; however, the role of ACSL4 in glioma remains unknown. In the present study, a reduction of ferroptosis in human glioma tissues and glioma cells was observed. Subsequently, it was demonstrated that the expression of ACSL4 was also downregulated in human glioma tissues and cells. A ferroptosis inhibitor and inducer were used to investigate the effects of ferroptosis on viability. The results showed that promoting ferroptosis inhibited the proliferation of glioma cells, and that the use of inducers had the reverse effect. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the reduction in ACSL4 expression may have been involved in ferroptosis and proliferation in glioma. Overexpression of ACSL4 decreased expression of glutathione peroxidase 4 and increased the levels of ferroptotic markers, including 5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic (HETE), 12-HETE and 15-HETE. Additionally, ACSL4 overexpression resulted in an increase in lactate dehydrogenase release and a reduction in cell viability. The opposite results were observed when ACSL4 was silenced. These findings suggest that ACSL4 regulates ferroptosis and proliferation of glioma cells. To further investigate the mechanism underlying ACSL4-mediated regulation of proliferation in glioma cells, cells were treated with small interfering (si)-ACSL4 and sorafenib, a ferroptosis inducer. sorafenib attenuated the ability of siRNA-mediated silencing of ACSL4, thus improving cell viability. These results demonstrate that ACSL4 protects glioma cells and exerts anti-proliferative effects by activating a ferroptosis pathway and highlight the pivotal role of ferroptosis regulation by ACSL4 in its protective effects on glioma. Therefore, ACSL4 may serve as a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of glioma.

A Critical Overview of Targeted Therapies for Glioblastoma

Over the past century, treatment of malignant tumors of the brain has remained a challenge. Refinements in neurosurgical techniques, discovery of powerful chemotherapeutic agents, advances in radiotherapy, applications of biotechnology, and improvements in methods of targeted delivery have led to some extension of length of survival of glioblastoma patients. Refinements in surgery are mentioned because most of the patients with glioblastoma undergo surgery and many of the other innovative therapies are combined with surgery. However, cure of glioblastoma has remained elusive because it requires complete destruction of the tumor. Radical surgical ablation is not possible in the brain and even a small residual tumor leads to rapid recurrence that eventually kills the patient. Blood-brain barrier (BBB) comprising brain endothelial cells lining the cerebral microvasculature, limits delivery of drugs to the brain. Even though opening of the BBB in tumor core occurs locally, BBB limits systemic chemotherapy especially at the tumor periphery, where tumor cells invade normal brain structure comprising intact BBB. Comprehensive approaches are necessary to gain maximally from promising targeted therapies. Common methods used for critical evaluation of targeted therapies for glioblastoma include: (1) novel methods for targeted delivery of chemotherapy; (2) strategies for delivery through BBB and blood-tumor barriers; (3) innovations in radiotherapy for selective destruction of tumor; (4) techniques for local destruction of tumor; (5) tumor growth inhibitors; (6) immunotherapy; and (7) cell/gene therapies. Suggestions for improvements in glioblastoma therapy include: (1) controlled targeted delivery of anticancer therapy to glioblastoma through the BBB using nanoparticles and monoclonal antibodies; (2) direct introduction of genetically modified bacteria that selectively destroy cancer cells but spare the normal brain into the remaining tumor after resection; (3) use of better animal models for preclinical testing; and (4) personalized/precision medicine approaches to therapy in clinical trials and translation into practice of neurosurgery and neurooncology. Advances in these techniques suggest optimism for the future management of glioblastoma.