Embryological basilar apex disposition as a risk factor of basilar apex aneurysm

Vertebral Artery Access Considerations in Coil Embolization of Small Superior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Coiling of small superior cerebellar artery aneurysms (sSCAAs) is challenging. We aimed to describe anatomic considerations in the vertebral and basilar artery (VA and BA) morphology for decision making in the coiling of sSCAAs.

METHODS

Eleven patients with sSCAAs (<5 mm) treated at our institution between April 2015 and February 2022 were included to show our concept of deciding access routes in the coiling of sSCAAs. The access route was decided on the basis of VA characteristics, BA curvature, and aneurysm laterality. Adequate aneurysm occlusion on angiography (Raymond-Roy grading scale I and II), good outcome (modified Rankin Score 0-2) at the last follow-up, and adverse outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Simple coiling (n = 2), a balloon-assisted technique (n = 3), and stent-assisted technique (n = 6) were selected. At the last follow-up (median 13.0 months), adequate aneurysm occlusion and good outcome were obtained in all 9 patients (n = 10). Adverse outcomes were not observed. When VA dominance was equal, in the straight BA, the microcatheter insertion into the ipsilateral VA to the aneurysm was favorable to form a "fulcrum" on the contralateral side and obtain microcatheter stability. When an aneurysm was on the concave aspect of the curved BA, microcatheter insertion into the ipsilateral VA was favorable. As for the convex aspect's aneurysm location, the microcatheter insertion into the contralateral VA can be favored. Further, we described the VA origin classification as it relates to ease of access from a transradial approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebrobasilar morphology may be important in deciding access routes in the coiling of sSCAAs.

Congenital and acquired anomalies of the basilar artery: A pictorial essay

INTRODUCTION

The basilar artery is one of the two cases in our body where an arterial vessel is formed by the union of two others - the vertebral arteries. It provides vascular supply to essential structures for the main vital functions; the posterior cerebral arteries originate from it as terminal branches, and form part of the anastomotic circle of Willis.

IMAGING FINDINGS

Congenital and acquired anomalies of the basilar trunk are described. We provide a schematic and detailed representation of normal anatomical variants - mainly represented by the fenestrated basilar artery or the persistence of carotid-basilar anastomosis; course anomalies are also illustrated, with reference to neuro-vascular conflicts and dolichoectasia. Among congenital anomalies, this pictorial review also shows the variants of the basilar origin, such as in the case of basilar trunk arising from only one of the two vertebral arteries, and the calibre changes - which are represented by aneurysm and hypoplasia. The latter appears to be a risk factor for posterior circulation stroke, when associated with a bilateral posterior foetal variant.Among the acquired forms, this pictorial essay describes some clinical cases of dissections, non-congenital aneurysms, thrombosis and tumour with vascular encasing or compression of basilar artery.

CONCLUSION

CT angiography and MRI allow us to study the posterior intracranial circulation in detail, providing useful pre-treatment information. Therefore, knowledge of congenital or acquired anomalies of the basilar artery is essential for radiologists, neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons.

The relationship between non-aneurysmal spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage and basilar tip anatomy

Objective

Non-aneurysmal spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (NASAH) has a good prognosis, but its cause has not been clearly identified. In this study, we assessed the clinical and radiological features of NASAH and suggested an anatomical relationship between the basilar tip anatomy and NASAH.

Methods

From August 2013 to May 2020, 21 patients were diagnosed with NASAH at our institution. We evaluated the clinical features of NASAH. NASAH was classified into a perimesencephalic pattern and aneurysmal pattern according to the distribution of hemorrhage based on initial brain computed tomography. Digital subtraction angiography was used to classify the basilar tip anatomy into symmetric cranial fusion, symmetric caudal fusion, or asymmetric fusion types.

Results

Of the 21 patients, twenty patients had a good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 1–2; Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 4–5). These patients showed improvement in mRS and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at the last follow-up (P=.003 and P=.016, respectively). Eighteen patients with NASAH (85.7%) had the caudal fusion type, and only three patients with NASAH (14.3%) had the cranial fusion type. Seven patients with the perimesencephalic pattern (77.8%) had the caudal fusion type, and eleven patients with the aneurysmal pattern (91.7%) had the caudal fusion type.

Conclusions

In NASAH patients, the caudal fusion tends to occur frequently among patients with basilar tip anatomy. In the case of the caudal fusion, the perforators around the basilar tip would be more susceptible to hemodynamic stress, which could contribute to the occurrence of NASAH.

Imaging markers of intracranial aneurysm development: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Imaging markers of intracranial aneurysm (IA) development are not well established.

PURPOSE

To provide an overview of imaging markers of IA development.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed and Embase up to December 1st 2020 using predefined criteria. Thirty-six studies met our inclusion criteria. We performed a quantitative summary of the included studies.

RESULTS

We found converging evidence for A1 segment asymmetry as an anatomical marker of anterior communicating artery (Acom) aneurysm development, and moderate evidence for several other markers. No hemodynamic markers yielded converging or moderate evidence. There was large heterogeneity across studies, especially in the definitions of imaging markers and study outcomes used. Due to the poor methodological quality of many studies and unavailability of effect sizes or crude data to calculate effect sizes, a formal meta-analysis was not possible. Many studies had poor methodological quality and varied inmarkerdefinitions and outcome measuresused, which prevented us from performing a formal meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We only identified A1 segment asymmetry as an imaging marker of Acom aneurysm development with converging evidence. A meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of marker definitions and outcomes used, and poor methodological quality of many studies. Future studies should use robust study designs and uniformly defined imaging markers and outcome measures.