EMG in piriformis syndrome diagnosis: Reliability of peroneal H-reflex according to results obtained after surgery, Botox injection and medical treatment

A controlled clinical trial investigating the effects of stretching and compression exercises on electromyography of calf muscles in chronic LBP patients with a deep gluteal syndrome

BACKGROUND

In deep gluteal syndrome (DGS), the piriformis muscle could impinge the sciatic nerve. The FAIR (flexion adduction internal rotation) test is a provocation test used to identify sciatic nerve irritation caused by this muscle. Compression and stretching exercises are usually prescribed to treat this syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of these two treatments on surface electromyography (sEMG) of the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior in patients with low back pain (LBP) and DGS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five participants were allocated to three groups of stretching exercise, compression or control. In addition to 15 min of heat and 15 min of electrical nerve stimulation for pain relief, participants in the compression exercise (CE) group received self-compression exercise, those in the stretching exercise (SE) group received self-stretching exercise and those in the control group received no extra interventions. For the two intervention groups, three sets of two minutes of exercise with two minutes of rest in between were applied. The sEMG amplitude values of the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles of the affected buttock side of any one group while performing the FAIR test were compared to the others. Pain and disability were assessed and the changes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After the intervention period, no group demonstrated a change in the sEMG of the gastrocnemius or tibialis anterior muscles (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the change in this variable between groups (Mean difference (95% CI) of gastrocnemius was ranged over= -4.04 to 7.72 (-19.44 to 23.14); p = 0.603); (Mean difference (95% CI) of tibialis anterior muscles was ranged from - 2.44 to -6.43 (-18.28 to 9.31); p = 0.550).; Pain and disability also decreased significantly in all three study groups (p < 0.05). However, only the disability of patients who performed stretching exercises improved compared to the compression exercise group (Mean difference (95% CI) = -12.62 (-20.41 to -4.38); p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Neither stretching nor compression exercises altered the sEMG of the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles in patients with DGS. Furthermore, performing stretching exercises improved disability compared to the other interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was retrospectively registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ( www.irct.ir ) on 10/01/2017 as IRCT201604178035N4. URL of the record: https://en.irct.ir/trial/8473 .

Piriformis syndrome

Piriformis syndrome is a condition that is proposed to result from compression of the sciatic nerve, either in whole or in part, in the deep gluteal space by the piriformis muscle. The prevalence of piriformis syndrome depends upon the diagnostic criteria being used and the population studied but is estimated by some to be 5%-6% in all cases of low back, buttock, and leg pain and up to 17% of patients with chronic low back pain. While the sciatic nerve may pierce the piriformis muscle in about 16% of healthy individuals, this frequency is no different in those with the syndrome; thus, the relationship to this anatomic finding is unclear. The most common symptoms are buttock pain, external tenderness over the greater sciatic notch, and aggravation of the pain through sitting. Many clinical signs are reported for piriformis syndrome, but the sensitivity and specificity are unclear, in part because of the lack of a uniformly accepted case definition. In the majority of cases in the literature, it appears that the diagnosis is more ascribed to a myofascial condition rather than a focal neuropathy. Electrodiagnostic studies can be useful to exclude other causes of symptoms, but there is no well-accepted test to confirm the presence of piriformis syndrome. Ultrasound imaging may show thickening of the piriformis muscle, but further research is required to confirm that this is correlated with the clinical diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging and neurography may hold promise in the future, but there are not yet sufficient data to support adopting these methods as a standard diagnostic tool. The initial treatment of piriformis syndrome is typically conservative management with the general rehabilitation principles similar to other soft tissue musculoskeletal conditions. Local anesthetic, botulinum toxin, and/or corticosteroid injections have been reported by some to be beneficial for diagnostic or treatment purposes. Surgical interventions have also been used with variable success.

Use of botulinum neurotoxin in the treatment of piriformis syndrome: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pain, functional and adverse outcomes of patients with piriformis syndrome who received botulinum neurotoxin injection, and to determine the optimal dosing of botulinum neurotoxin and choices of modality used during this intervention.

LITERATURE SURVEY

Systematic review of relevant clinical studies published in English language using PubMed/Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases from October 1, 2002 to October 6, 2020.

METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive search was performed to identify all studies addressing the treatment of piriformis syndrome with botulinum toxin. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data based on a set of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. 23 full-text articles were identified of which consensus was achieved for seven articles for data extraction and quality assessment. The qualities and risk of potential bias of the seven studies were appraised using the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NIH) Study Quality Assessment tools for case controls, cohort studies and randomized trials.

SYNTHESIS

Seven studies (n = 152 patients) were included consisting of three randomized controlled studies (RCTs), two case control studies and two cohort studies. The qualities of these studies were: Two good and one fair for the RCTs, fair for both the case controls and one good and fair for the cohort studies. Most studies reported some reduction in pain using various modalities to guide injection (CT, EMG, US or fluoroscopy). However, the included studies were heterogeneous, making it difficult to quantify pain reduction. There was minimal description of other functional outcomes. Botulinum toxin A doses range from 100 to 300U. Mild adverse effects were reported with no medical intervention needed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is fair quality of evidence to suggest botulinum toxin is safe to reduce pain in piriformis syndrome. There is insufficient data to quantify pain reduction and to describe other functional outcomes. The optimal dose of botulinum toxin A remains unclear. Modalities to guide botulinum injection into the piriformis muscle remain heterogeneous.

Acute piriformis syndrome mimicking cauda equina syndrome: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

This report depicts a rare case of acutely developed urinary retention as well as sensory and motor disturbances caused by formation of a large hematoma within the piriformis muscle, which caused compression of nerves within the suprapiriform and infrapiriform foramina, thus imitating cauda equina syndrome. Although cases of acute lumbosacral plexopathy have been described, this case is the first time both urinary retention and sensory and motor disturbances were present.

OBSERVATIONS

The most useful tools for diagnosis of acute piriformis syndrome are detailed patient history, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvic region, and electrophysiological testing performed by an experienced electrophysiologist. As a result of diligent rehabilitation, including physiotherapy and electrostimulation, the patient was able to successfully recover, regardless of acute compression of the sacral plexus that lasted 6 days.

LESSONS

Clinicians should actively ask about previous pelvic trauma when taking a patient history in similar cases, especially if the patient is receiving anticoagulation treatment. If MRI of the lumbar spine does not reveal any pathologies, MRI of the pelvic region should be performed. Acute surgical decompression is crucial for preserving neurological function. In similar cases, it is possible to differentiate between spinal cord, cauda equina, and pelvic lesions using electrophysiological studies.