1
|
Kim D, Lee JH, Kim N, Lim DH, Song JH, Suh CO, Wee CW, Kim IA. Optimizing Recurrent Glioblastoma Salvage Treatment: A Multicenter Study Integrating Genetic Biomarkers From the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (21-02). Neurosurgery 2024; 95:584-595. [PMID: 38511935 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Few studies have used real-world patient data to compare overall treatment patterns and survival outcomes for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). This study aimed to evaluate postprogression survival (PPS) according to the treatment strategy for rGBM by incorporating biomarker analysis. METHODS We assessed 468 adult patients with rGBM who underwent standard temozolomide-based chemoradiation. The impact of predictors on PPS was evaluated in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type rGBM (n = 439) using survival probability analysis. We identified patients who would benefit from reirradiation (re-RT) during the first progression. RESULTS Median PPS was 3.4, 13.8, 6.6, and 10.0 months in the best supportive care (n = 82), surgery (with/without adjuvant therapy, n = 112), chemotherapy alone (n = 170), and re-RT (with/without chemotherapy, n = 75) groups, respectively. After propensity score matching analysis of the cohort, both the surgery and re-RT groups had a significantly better PPS than the chemotherapy-only group; however, no significant difference was observed in PPS between the surgery and re-RT groups. In the surgery subgroup, surgery with chemotherapy ( P = .024) and surgery with radio(chemo)therapy ( P = .039) showed significantly improved PPS compared with surgery alone. In the no-surgery subgroup, radio(chemo)therapy showed significantly improved PPS compared with chemotherapy alone ( P = .047). Homozygous deletion of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B, along with other clinical factors (performance score and progression-free interval), was significantly associated with the re-RT survival benefit. CONCLUSION Surgery combined with radio(chemo)therapy resulted in the best survival outcomes for rGBM. re-RT should also be considered for patients with rGBM at first recurrence. Furthermore, this study identified a specific genetic biomarker and clinical factors that may enhance the survival benefit of re-RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dowook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul , Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon , Korea
| | - Joo Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul , Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul , Korea
| | - Nalee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul , Korea
| | - Do Hoon Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul , Korea
| | - Jin Ho Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul , Korea
| | - Chang-Ok Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bundang CHA Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam , Korea
| | - Chan Woo Wee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul , Korea
| | - In Ah Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul , Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam , Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yalamandala B, Chen YJ, Lin YH, Huynh TMH, Chiang WH, Chou TC, Liu HW, Huang CC, Lu YJ, Chiang CS, Chu LA, Hu SH. A Self-Cascade Penetrating Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Mediated by Near-Infrared II Cell Membrane-Disrupting Nanoflakes via Detained Dendritic Cells. ACS NANO 2024; 18:18712-18728. [PMID: 38952208 PMCID: PMC11256899 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.4c06183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
Immunotherapy can potentially suppress the highly aggressive glioblastoma (GBM) by promoting T lymphocyte infiltration. Nevertheless, the immune privilege phenomenon, coupled with the generally low immunogenicity of vaccines, frequently hampers the presence of lymphocytes within brain tumors, particularly in brain tumors. In this study, the membrane-disrupted polymer-wrapped CuS nanoflakes that can penetrate delivery to deep brain tumors via releasing the cell-cell interactions, facilitating the near-infrared II (NIR II) photothermal therapy, and detaining dendritic cells for a self-cascading immunotherapy are developed. By convection-enhanced delivery, membrane-disrupted amphiphilic polymer micelles (poly(methoxypoly(ethylene glycol)-benzoic imine-octadecane, mPEG-b-C18) with CuS nanoflakes enhances tumor permeability and resides in deep brain tumors. Under low-power NIR II irradiation (0.8 W/cm2), the intense heat generated by well-distributed CuS nanoflakes actuates the thermolytic efficacy, facilitating cell apoptosis and the subsequent antigen release. Then, the positively charged polymer after hydrolysis of the benzoic-imine bond serves as an antigen depot, detaining autologous tumor-associated antigens and presenting them to dendritic cells, ensuring sustained immune stimulation. This self-cascading penetrative immunotherapy amplifies the immune response to postoperative brain tumors but also enhances survival outcomes through effective brain immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhanu
Nirosha Yalamandala
- Department
of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jen Chen
- Department
of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Hui Lin
- Department
of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
- Brain
Research Center, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
| | - Thi My Hue Huynh
- Department
of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsuan Chiang
- Department
of Chemical Engineering, National Chung
Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
| | - Tsu-Chin Chou
- Institute
of Analytical and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
| | - Heng-Wei Liu
- Department
of Neurosurgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei
Medical University, New Taipei
City 23561, Taiwan
- Taipei Neuroscience
Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Department
of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Cheng Huang
- Institute
of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing
Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jen Lu
- Department
of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
- College
of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kwei-San, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Shiun Chiang
- Department
of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
| | - Li-An Chu
- Department
of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
- Brain
Research Center, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
| | - Shang-Hsiu Hu
- Department
of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
- Institute
of Analytical and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alhalabi OT, Dao Trong P, Kaes M, Jakobs M, Kessler T, Oehler H, König L, Eichkorn T, Sahm F, Debus J, von Deimling A, Wick W, Wick A, Krieg SM, Unterberg AW, Jungk C. Repeat surgery of recurrent glioma for molecularly informed treatment in the age of precision oncology: A risk-benefit analysis. J Neurooncol 2024; 167:245-255. [PMID: 38334907 PMCID: PMC11023957 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04595-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgery for recurrent glioma provides cytoreduction and tissue for molecularly informed treatment. With mostly heavily pretreated patients involved, it is unclear whether the benefits of repeat surgery outweigh its potential risks. METHODS Patients receiving surgery for recurrent glioma WHO grade 2-4 with the goal of tissue sampling for targeted therapies were analyzed retrospectively. Complication rates (surgical, neurological) were compared to our institutional glioma surgery cohort. Tissue molecular diagnostic yield, targeted therapies and post-surgical survival rates were analyzed. RESULTS Between 2017 and 2022, tumor board recommendation for targeted therapy through molecular diagnostics was made for 180 patients. Of these, 70 patients (38%) underwent repeat surgery. IDH-wildtype glioblastoma was diagnosed in 48 patients (69%), followed by IDH-mutant astrocytoma (n = 13; 19%) and oligodendroglioma (n = 9; 13%). Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 50 patients (71%). Tissue was processed for next-generation sequencing in 64 cases (91%), and for DNA methylation analysis in 58 cases (83%), while immunohistochemistry for mTOR phosphorylation was performed in 24 cases (34%). Targeted therapy was recommended in 35 (50%) and commenced in 21 (30%) cases. Postoperatively, 7 patients (11%) required revision surgery, compared to 7% (p = 0.519) and 6% (p = 0.359) of our reference cohorts of patients undergoing first and second craniotomy, respectively. Non-resolving neurological deterioration was documented in 6 cases (10% vs. 8%, p = 0.612, after first and 4%, p = 0.519, after second craniotomy). Median survival after repeat surgery was 399 days in all patients and 348 days in GBM patients after repeat GTR. CONCLUSION Surgery for recurrent glioma provides relevant molecular diagnostic information with a direct consequence for targeted therapy under a reasonable risk of postoperative complications. With satisfactory postoperative survival it can therefore complement a multi-modal glioma therapy approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Obada T Alhalabi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philip Dao Trong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Kaes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Jakobs
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division for Stereotactic Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kessler
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hannah Oehler
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- CCU Neuropathology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Wick
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandro M Krieg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas W Unterberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Jungk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kosianova А, Pak O, Bryukhovetskiy I. Regulation of cancer stem cells and immunotherapy of glioblastoma (Review). Biomed Rep 2024; 20:24. [PMID: 38170016 PMCID: PMC10758921 DOI: 10.3892/br.2023.1712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GB) is one of the most adverse diagnoses in oncology. Complex current treatment results in a median survival of 15 months. Resistance to treatment is associated with the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs). The present review aimed to analyze the mechanisms of CSC plasticity, showing the particular role of β-catenin in regulating vital functions of CSCs, and to describe the molecular mechanisms of Wnt-independent increase of β-catenin levels, which is influenced by the local microenvironment of CSCs. The present review also analyzed the reasons for the low effectiveness of using medication in the regulation of CSCs, and proposed the development of immunotherapy scenarios with tumor cell vaccines, containing heterogenous cancer cells able of producing a multidirectional antineoplastic immune response. Additionally, the possibility of managing lymphopenia by transplanting hematopoietic stem cells from a healthy sibling and using clofazimine or other repurposed drugs that reduce β-catenin concentration in CSCs was discussed in the present study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Аleksandra Kosianova
- Medical Center, School of Medicine and Life Science, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russian Federation
| | - Oleg Pak
- Medical Center, School of Medicine and Life Science, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russian Federation
| | - Igor Bryukhovetskiy
- Medical Center, School of Medicine and Life Science, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li C, Xi S, Chen Y, Guo C, Zhang J, Yang Q, Wang J, Sai K, Zeng J, Wang J, Zhang Z, Ke C, Chen Z. Clinical significance of histopathological features of paired recurrent gliomas: a cohort study from a single cancer center. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:8. [PMID: 36597096 PMCID: PMC9811748 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10484-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the histopathological characteristics of paired recurrent gliomas and their clinical significance. METHODS Glioma patients who received both primary surgery and reoperation when recurrence at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from June 2001 to June 2019 were enrolled. Clinical and pathological characteristics were analyzed retrospectively, and histopathology of reoperation specimens was divided into three categories according to tumor cell activity and the degree of necrosis: active group, low-activity group, and necrosis group. RESULTS A total of 89 patients were included in this study. The 2016 WHO grade of the first operation pathology and IDH1 status were related to survival time after the first operation, but there was no significant association with survival time after reoperation. The time interval between primary and reoperation was shorter for primary high-grade glioma and/or IDH1 wild-type tumor patients than for low-grade glioma and/or IDH1 mutant tumor patients (P < 0.001). Histopathological types of recurrent gliomas were analyzed, and 67 cases (75.3%) were classified into the active group, 14 (15.8%) into the low-activity group, and 8 (8.9%) into the necrosis group. The low-activity or necrosis group was associated with a higher radiotherapy dose and shorter operation interval. Further univariate and multivariate Cox survival analyses showed the histopathological patterns of recurrent gliomas to be related to survival time after reoperation. CONCLUSION Primary WHO low grade or IDH1 mutant gliomas appeared survival benefit mainly on later recurrence, but was not a prognostic predictor following recurrence. Histopathological feature of recurrent glioma is related to previous treatment, including radiotherapy dosage and chemotherapy treatment, and is also an important independent prognostic factor for patients after reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Li
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China ,grid.411866.c0000 0000 8848 7685The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120 China
| | - Shaoyan Xi
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Yingshen Chen
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Chengcheng Guo
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Ji Zhang
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Qunying Yang
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Jian Wang
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Ke Sai
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Jing Zeng
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Jing Wang
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Zhiqiang Zhang
- grid.411866.c0000 0000 8848 7685The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120 China
| | - Chao Ke
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Zhongping Chen
- grid.488530.20000 0004 1803 6191State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang M, Yu J, Zhang J, Pan Z, Chen J. Intraoperative ultrasound in recurrent gliomas surgery: Impact on residual tumor volume and patient outcomes. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1161496. [PMID: 37035181 PMCID: PMC10076842 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1161496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Reoperation may be beneficial for patients with recurrent gliomas. Minimizing the residual tumor volume (RTV) while ensuring the functionality of relevant structures is the goal of the reoperation of recurrent gliomas. Intraoperative ultrasound (IoUS) may be helpful for intraoperative tumor localization, intraoperative real-time imaging to guide surgical resection, and postoperative evaluation of the RTV in the reoperation for recurrent gliomas. Objective To assess the effect of real-time ioUS on minimizing RTV in recurrent glioma surgery compared to Non-ioUS. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data from 92 patients who had recurrent glioma surgical resection: 45 were resected with ioUS guidance and 47 were resected without ioUS guidance. RTV, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at 6 months after the operation, the number of recurrent patients, and the time to recurrence were evaluated. Results The average RTV in the ioUS group was significantly less than the Non-ioUS group (0.27 cm3 vs. 1.33 cm3, p = 0.0004). Patients in the ioUS group tended to have higher KPS scores at 6 months of follow-up after the operation than those in the Non-ioUS group (70.00 vs. 60.00, p = 0.0185). More patients in the Non-ioUS group experienced a recurrence than in the ioUS group (43 (91.49%) vs. 32 (71.11%), p = 0.0118). The ioUS group had a longer mean time to recurrence than the Non-ioUS group (7.9 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.0013). Conclusion The use of ioUS-based real-time for resection of recurrent gliomas has been beneficial in terms of both RTV and postoperative outcomes, compared to the Non-ioUS group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meiyao Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jin Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jibo Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiyong Pan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jincao Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- *Correspondence: Jincao Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ciammella P, Cozzi S, Botti A, Giaccherini L, Sghedoni R, Orlandi M, Napoli M, Pascarella R, Pisanello A, Russo M, Cavallieri F, Ruggieri MP, Cavuto S, Savoldi L, Iotti C, Iori M. Safety of Inhomogeneous Dose Distribution IMRT for High-Grade Glioma Reirradiation: A Prospective Phase I/II Trial (GLIORAD TRIAL). Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194604. [PMID: 36230525 PMCID: PMC9562035 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent primary malignant brain tumor, and despite advances in imaging techniques and treatment options, the outcome remains poor and recurrence is inevitable. Salvage therapy presents a challenge, and re-irradiation can be a therapeutic option in recurrent GBM. The decision-making process for re-irradiation is a challenge for radiation oncologists due to the expected toxicity of a second course of radiotherapy and the limited radiation tolerance of normal tissue; nevertheless, it is being increasingly used, as several studies have demonstrated its feasibility. The current study aimed to investigate the safety of moderate–high-voxel-based dose escalation radiotherapy in recurrent GBM patients after conventional concurrent chemoradiation. Twelve patients were enrolled in this prospective single-center study. Retreatment consisted of re-irradiation with a total dose range of 30–50 Gy over 5 days using the IMRT (arc VMAT) technique using dose painting planning. The treatment was well tolerated. No toxicities greater than 3 were recorded; only one patient had severe G3 acute toxicity, characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. Median overall survival (OS2) and progression-free survival (PFS2) from the time of re-irradiation were 10.4 months and 5.7 months, respectively. Our phase I study demonstrated an acceptable tolerance profile of this approach, and the future prospective phase II study will analyze the efficacy in terms of PFS and OS. Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive astrocytic primary brain tumor, and concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) followed by maintenance of adjuvant TMZ is the current standard of care. Despite advances in imaging techniques and multi-modal treatment options, the median overall survival (OS) remains poor. As an alternative to surgery, re-irradiation (re-RT) can be a therapeutic option in recurrent GBM. Re-irradiation for brain tumors is increasingly used today, and several studies have demonstrated its feasibility. Besides differing techniques, the published data include a wide range of doses, emphasizing that no standard approach exists. The current study aimed to investigate the safety of moderate–high-voxel-based dose escalation in recurrent GBM. From 2016 to 2019, 12 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this prospective single-center study. Retreatment consisted of re-irradiation with a total dose of 30 Gy (up to 50 Gy) over 5 days using the IMRT (arc VMAT) technique. A dose painting by numbers (DPBN)/dose escalation plan were performed, and a continuous relation between the voxel intensity of the functional image set and the risk of recurrence in that voxel were used to define target and dose distribution. Re-irradiation was well tolerated in all treated patients. No toxicities greater than G3 were recorded; only one patient had severe G3 acute toxicity, characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. Median overall survival (OS2) and progression-free survival (PFS2) from the time of re-irradiation were 10.4 months and 5.7 months, respectively; 3-, 6-, and 12-month OS2 were 92%, 75%, and 42%, respectively; and 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS2 were 83%, 42%, and 8%, respectively. Our work demonstrated a tolerable tolerance profile of this approach, and the future prospective phase II study will analyze the efficacy in terms of PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cozzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-3297317608
| | - Andrea Botti
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Lucia Giaccherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Roberto Sghedoni
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Matteo Orlandi
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Manuela Napoli
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Rosario Pascarella
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Anna Pisanello
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Marco Russo
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Cavallieri
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Ruggieri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Silvio Cavuto
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Luisa Savoldi
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cinzia Iotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Mauro Iori
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Multidisciplinary tumor board behavior consistency in the management of glioblastoma: A multi-center study. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2022.101582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
9
|
Krajewski S, Furtak J, Zawadka-Kunikowska M, Kachelski M, Birski M, Harat M. Rehabilitation Outcomes for Patients with Motor Deficits after Initial and Repeat Brain Tumor Surgery. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:10871. [PMID: 36078585 PMCID: PMC9518489 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Repeat surgery is often required to treat brain tumor recurrences. Here, we compared the functional state and rehabilitation of patients undergoing initial and repeat surgery for brain tumors to establish their individual risks that might impact management. In total, 835 patients underwent operations, and 139 (16.6%) required rehabilitation during the inpatient stay. The Karnofsky performance status, Barthel index, and the modified Rankin scale were used to assess functional status, and the gait index was used to assess gait efficiency. Motor skills, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were recorded. Patients were classified into two groups: first surgery (n = 103) and repeat surgery (n = 30). Eighteen percent of patients required reoperations, and these patients required prolonged postoperative rehabilitation as often as those operated on for the first time. Rehabilitation was more often complicated in the repeat surgery group (p = 0.047), and the complications were more severe and persistent. Reoperated patients had significantly worse motor function and independence in activities of daily living before surgery and at discharge, but the deterioration after surgery affected patients in the first surgery group to a greater extent according to all metrics (p < 0.001). The length of hospital stay was similar in both groups. These results will be useful for tailoring postoperative rehabilitation during a hospital stay on the neurosurgical ward as well as planning discharge requirements after leaving the hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanisław Krajewski
- Department of Physiotherapy, University of Bydgoszcz, Unii Lubelskiej 4, 85-059 Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Jacek Furtak
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Neurooncology and Radiosurgery, Franciszek Łukaszczyk Oncology Center, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Monika Zawadka-Kunikowska
- Department of Human Physiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Karłowicza 24, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Michał Kachelski
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Marcin Birski
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Marek Harat
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leone A, Colamaria A, Fochi NP, Sacco M, Landriscina M, Parbonetti G, de Notaris M, Coppola G, De Santis E, Giordano G, Carbone F. Recurrent Glioblastoma Treatment: State of the Art and Future Perspectives in the Precision Medicine Era. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10081927. [PMID: 36009473 PMCID: PMC9405902 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10081927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Current treatment guidelines for the management of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) are far from definitive, and the prognosis remains dismal. Despite recent advancements in the pharmacological and surgical fields, numerous doubts persist concerning the optimal strategy that clinicians should adopt for patients who fail the first lines of treatment and present signs of progressive disease. With most recurrences being located within the margins of the previously resected lesion, a comprehensive molecular and genetic profiling of rGBM revealed substantial differences compared with newly diagnosed disease. In the present comprehensive review, we sought to examine the current treatment guidelines and the new perspectives that polarize the field of neuro-oncology, strictly focusing on progressive disease. For this purpose, updated PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for pivotal studies and clinical trials published in the last five years. A total of 125 articles discussing locoregional management, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy strategies were included in our analysis, and salient findings were critically summarized. In addition, an in-depth description of the molecular profile of rGBM and its distinctive characteristics is provided. Finally, we integrate the above-mentioned evidence with the current guidelines published by international societies, including AANS/CNS, EANO, AIOM, and NCCN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto Leone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Nicola Pio Fochi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Sacco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Riuniti Hospital, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Landriscina
- Unit of Medical
Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical
Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Matteo de Notaris
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Rummo” Hospital, 82100 Benevento, Italy
| | - Giulia Coppola
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Elena De Santis
- Department of Anatomical Histological Forensic Medicine and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Guido Giordano
- Unit of Medical
Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical
Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Francesco Carbone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Effectiveness of bortezomib and temozolomide for eradication of recurrent human glioblastoma cells, resistant to radiation. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2021; 266:195-209. [PMID: 34689859 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a primary human brain tumor with the highest mortality rate. The prognosis for such patients is unfavorable, since the tumor is highly resistant to treatment, and the median survival of patients is 13 months. Chemotherapy might extend patients' life, but a tumor, that reappears after chemoradiotherapy, is resistant to temozolomide (TMZ). Using postgenome technologies in clinical practice might have a positive effect on the treatment of a recurrent GBM. METHODS T98G cells of human GBM have been used. Radiation treatment was performed with Rokus-M gamma-therapeutic system, using 60Сo as a source of radionuclide emissions. High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was used for proteome analysis. Mass spectrometry data were processed with MaxQuant (version 1.6.1.0) and Perseus (version 1.6.1) software, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (Germany). Biological processes, molecular functions, cells locations and protein pathways were annotated with a help of PubMed, PANTHER, Gene Ontology and KEGG and STRING v10 databases. Pharmaceutical testing was performed in vitro with a panel of traditional chemotherapeutic agents. RESULTS GBM cells proliferation speed is inversely proportional to the irradiation dose and recedes when the dosage is increased, as expected. Synthesis of ERC1, NARG1L, PLCD3, ROCK2, SARNP, TMSB4X and YTHDF2 in GBM cells, treated with 60Gy of radiation, shows more than a fourfold increase, while the synthesis level of PSMA2, PSMA3, PSMA4, PSMB2, PSMB3, PSMB7, PSMC3, PSMD1, PSMD3 proteins increases significantly. Traditional chemotherapeutic agents are not very effective against cancer cells of the recurrent GBM. Combination of TMZ and CCNU with a proteasome inhibitor-bortezomib-significantly increases their ability to eradicate cells of a radioresistant GBM. CONCLUSIONS Bortezomib and temozolomide effectively destroy cells of a radioresistant recurrent human glioblastoma; proteome mapping of the recurrent GBM cancer cells allows to identify new targets for therapy to improve the treatment results.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bryukhovetskiy I, Kosianova A, Zaitsev S, Pak O, Sharma A, Sharma HS. Glioblastoma: What can we do for these patients today and what will we be able to do in the future? PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2021; 265:99-118. [PMID: 34560928 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an extremely aggressive primary human brain tumor. The median survival of GBM patients is 15 months in case of completing the modern complex treatment protocol. Chemotherapy can help to extend the life expectancy of patients. GBM treatment resistance is associated with cancer stem cells (CSCs). The present paper analyses the main reasons for ineffectiveness of the existing GBM treatment methods and suggests treating CSCs as a complex phenomenon, resulting from the coordinated interaction of normal stem cells and cancer cells (CCs) in immunosuppressive microsurroundings. The GBM treatment strategy is suggested not for only suppressing strategically important signaling pathways in CCs, but also for regulating interaction between normal stem cells and cancer cells. The paper considers the issue of controlling penetrability of the blood-brain barrier that is one of the main challenges in neuro-oncology. Also, the paper suggests the ways of extending life expectancy of GBM patients today and prospects for the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Bryukhovetskiy
- School of Life Science & Biomedicine, Medical Center, Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), Vladivostok, Russia.
| | - Aleksandra Kosianova
- School of Life Science & Biomedicine, Medical Center, Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), Vladivostok, Russia
| | - Sergeis Zaitsev
- School of Life Science & Biomedicine, Medical Center, Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), Vladivostok, Russia
| | - Oleg Pak
- School of Life Science & Biomedicine, Medical Center, Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), Vladivostok, Russia
| | - Aruna Sharma
- International Experimental Central Nervous System Injury & Repair (IECNSIR), Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hari Shanker Sharma
- International Experimental Central Nervous System Injury & Repair (IECNSIR), Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Comparing Tumor Cell Invasion and Myeloid Cell Composition in Compatible Primary and Relapsing Glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143636. [PMID: 34298846 PMCID: PMC8303884 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We established a new minimally invasive mouse model for GBM relapse. For this, we utilized orthotopical implantation of HSVTK-transduced GBM cells and pharmacological treatment with GCV. In addition, we implanted patient-derived GBM cells of primary or recurrent tumors. We found that recurrent GBM were more aggressively invasive than primary GBM. Moreover, the recurring tumors had a higher ratio of monocyte-derived macrophages among the entire population of tumor associated myeloid cells. This shift in the composition of tumor-associated immune cells appeared to be independent from cell-death signaling or surgical intervention. This model provides the means to investigate the entire process of tumor relapse and test standard as well as experimental therapeutic strategies for relapsing GBM under defined conditions. Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence after treatment is almost inevitable but addressing this issue with adequate preclinical models has remained challenging. Here, we introduce a GBM mouse model allowing non-invasive and scalable de-bulking of a tumor mass located deeply in the brain, which can be combined with conventional therapeutic approaches. Strong reduction of the GBM volume is achieved after pharmacologically inducing a tumor-specific cell death mechanism. This is followed by GBM re-growth over a predictable timeframe. Pharmacological de-bulking followed by tumor relapse was accomplished with an orthotopic mouse glioma model. Relapsing experimental tumors recapitulated pathological features often observed in recurrent human GBM, like increased invasiveness or altered immune cell composition. Orthotopic implantation of GBM cells originating from biopsies of one patient at initial or follow-up treatment reproduced these findings. Interestingly, relapsing GBM of both models contained a much higher ratio of monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) versus microglia than primary GBM. This was not altered when combining pharmacological de-bulking with invasive surgery. We interpret that factors released from viable primary GBM cells preferentially attract microglia whereas relapsing tumors preponderantly release chemoattractants for MDM. All in all, this relapse model has the capacity to provide novel insights into clinically highly relevant aspects of GBM treatment.
Collapse
|
14
|
Birzu C, French P, Caccese M, Cerretti G, Idbaih A, Zagonel V, Lombardi G. Recurrent Glioblastoma: From Molecular Landscape to New Treatment Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:E47. [PMID: 33375286 PMCID: PMC7794906 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most frequent and aggressive form among malignant central nervous system primary tumors in adults. Standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma consists in maximal safe resection, if feasible, followed by radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide; despite this multimodal treatment, virtually all glioblastomas relapse. Once tumors progress after first-line therapy, treatment options are limited and management of recurrent glioblastoma remains challenging. Loco-regional therapy with re-surgery or re-irradiation may be evaluated in selected cases, while traditional systemic therapy with nitrosoureas and temozolomide rechallenge showed limited efficacy. In recent years, new clinical trials using, for example, regorafenib or a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy were performed with promising results. In particular, molecular targeted therapy could show efficacy in selected patients with specific gene mutations. Nonetheless, some molecular characteristics and genetic alterations could change during tumor progression, thus affecting the efficacy of precision medicine. We therefore reviewed the molecular and genomic landscape of recurrent glioblastoma, the strategy for clinical management and the major phase I-III clinical trials analyzing recent drugs and combination regimens in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Birzu
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière—Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, F-75013 Paris, France; (C.B.); (A.I.)
| | - Pim French
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Mario Caccese
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 54, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.C.); (V.Z.)
| | - Giulia Cerretti
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 54, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.C.); (V.Z.)
| | - Ahmed Idbaih
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière—Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, F-75013 Paris, France; (C.B.); (A.I.)
| | - Vittorina Zagonel
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 54, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.C.); (V.Z.)
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 54, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.C.); (V.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Reoperation for glioma is increasingly common but there is neither firm agreement on the indications nor unequivocally proven benefit from clinical trials. Patient and tumor factors should be considered when offering reoperation and a clear surgical goal set. Reoperation is challenging because of placement of previous incisions, wound devascularization by preceding radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, chronic steroid use, the need for further adjuvant therapy, and adherent and defective dura. This article reviews indications, challenges, and recommendations for repeat surgery in the patient with glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasheed Zakaria
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 442, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 442, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|