Evaluating angioarchitectural characteristics of glial and metastatic brain tumors with conventional magnetic resonance imaging

Association between the Anatomical Location of Glioblastoma and Its Evaluation with Clinical Considerations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Glioblastoma is a primary malignant brain tumor; it is aggressive with a high degree of malignancy and unfavorable prognosis and is the most common type of malignant brain tumor. Glioblastomas can be located in the brain, cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord, originating from glial cells, particularly astrocytes. Methods: The databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and CINAHL were researched up to January 2024. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, and data extraction. Methodological quality was evaluated with an assurance tool for anatomical studies (AQUA). The statistical mean, standard deviation, and difference of means calculated with the Student's t-test for presence between hemispheres and presence in the frontal and temporal lobes were analyzed. Results: A total of 123 studies met the established selection criteria, with a total of 6224 patients. In relation to the mean, GBM between hemispheres had a mean of 33.36 (SD 58.00) in the right hemisphere and a mean of 34.70 (SD 65.07) in the left hemisphere, due to the difference in averages between hemispheres. There were no statistically significant differences, p = 0.35. For the comparison between the presence of GBM in the frontal lobe and the temporal lobe, there was a mean in the frontal lobe of 23.23 (SD 40.03), while in the temporal lobe, the mean was 22.05 (SD 43.50), and for the difference in means between the frontal lobe and the temporal lobe, there was no statistically significant difference for the presence of GBM, p = 0.178. Conclusions: We believe that before a treatment, it will always be correct to know where the GBM is located and how it behaves clinically, in order to generate correct conservative or surgical treatment guidelines for each patient. We believe that more detailed studies are also needed to show why GBM is associated more with some regions than others, despite the brain structure being homologous to other regions in which GMB occurs less frequently, which is why knowing its predominant presence in brain regions is very important.

Efficacy evaluation of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating glioma from metastatic tumor of the brain and exploration of its association with patients’ neurological function

Objective

To determine the efficacy of contrast-enhanced MRI in differentiating glioma (GL) from the metastatic tumor of the brain (MTB) and its association with patients’ neurological function.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 49 cases of pathologically confirmed GL and 42 cases of MTB admitted between April 2019 and January 2022. All patients were examined by a set of MRI sequences that included T1WI, T2WI, FLAIR, and DWI. The values of fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and operation coefficient (K^trans) were calculated by taking the tumor parenchyma area, cystic area, and peritumor edema area as the regions of interest (ROIs). And according to the Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) results, the contrast-enhanced MRI with patients’ neurological dysfunction was observed.

Results

The clinical symptoms and MRI findings of MTB and GL were basically the same, mainly showing neurological symptoms. The tumor parenchyma area and cystic area were mainly located in the tumor periphery and tumor central area, respectively, while the peritumor edema area was widely distributed, showing an irregular patchy edema zone. Contrast-enhanced scans suggested an obvious enhancement in the tumor parenchymal area, presenting with nodular and annular enhancement, but no enhancement in the tumor cystic and peritumor edema areas. There was no difference between GL and MTB in FA values of tumor cystic area and peritumor edema area (P > 0.05), but the FA value of the parenchyma area of GL was higher (P < 0.05). Besides, GL and MTB showed no difference in ADC and K^trans values (P > 0.05), while the former presented lower ADC values and higher K^trans values of the peritumor edema area than the latter (P < 0.05). In patients with GL and MTB, the FA and K^trans values of all ROIs in those with neurological dysfunction were higher compared with those without neurological dysfunction, while the ADC values were lower (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Contrast-enhanced MRI of peritumor edema area can effectively distinguish GL from MTB, and improve the accuracy of early clinical screening, thus providing more reliable life security for patients.

Postoperative outcomes following glioblastoma resection using a robot-assisted digital surgical exoscope: a case series

INTRODUCTION

Maximal extent of resection (EOR) of glioblastoma (GBM) is associated with greater progression free survival (PFS) and improved patient outcomes. Recently, a novel surgical system has been developed that includes a 2D, robotically-controlled exoscope and brain tractography display. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes in a series of patients with GBM undergoing resections using this surgical exoscope.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted for robotic exoscope assisted GBM resections between 2017 and 2019. EOR was computed from volumetric analyses of pre- and post-operative MRIs. Demographics, pathology/MGMT status, imaging, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. The relationship between these perioperative variables and discharge disposition as well as progression-free survival (PFS) was explored.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients with GBM (median age = 57 years) met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 28 cases. Of these, 22 (79%) tumors were in eloquent regions, most commonly in the frontal lobe (14 cases, 50%). The median pre- and post-operative volumes were 24.0 cc and 1.3 cc, respectively. The median extent of resection for the cohort was 94.8%, with 86% achieving 6-month PFS. The most common neurological complication was a motor deficit followed by sensory loss, while 8 patients (29%) were symptom-free.

CONCLUSIONS

The robotic exoscope is safe and effective for patients undergoing GBM surgery, with a majority achieving large-volume resections. These patients experienced complication profiles similar to those undergoing treatment with the traditional microscope. Further studies are needed to assess direct comparisons between exoscope and microscope-assisted GBM resection.