A comparative outcomes analysis of patients treated for arteriovenous malformation with LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery by a standard frame-based technique or a frameless technique utilizing 3-dimensional rotational angiography

Frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A propensity-matched analysis

Objective

The frameless linear accelerator (LINAC) based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been evolving with a reduction in patient discomfort. However, there was limited evidence comparing frame-based and frameless SRS for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM). We aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between frame-based and frameless LINAC SRS.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective cohort compared the outcomes of frame-based LINAC SRS (1998-2009) with frameless LINAC SRS (2010-2020). The primary outcome was the obliteration rate. The other outcomes included the neurological, radiological, and functional outcomes after SRS. A matched cohort was identified by propensity scores for further comparisons.

Results

A total of 65 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 13.2 years (158.5 months). There were 40 patients in the frame-based group and 25 patients in the frameless group. The overall obliteration rate was comparable (Frame-based 82.5% vs Frameless 80.0%, p = 0.310) and not significantly different over time (log-rank p = 0.536). The crude post-SRS hemorrhage rate was 1.5% and the incidence was 0.3 per 100 person-years. There were 67.7% of patients with AVM obliteration without new persistent neurological deficits at the last visit and 56.9% of patients with AVM obliteration without any deficits (transient or persistent) during the entire follow-up period. Four patients (8.0%) developed late onset persistent adverse radiation effects (more than 96 months after SRS) among 50 patients with more than 8-year surveillance. In the propensity-matched cohort of 42 patients, there was no significant difference in AVM obliteration (Frame-based vs Frameless, log-rank p = 0.984).

Conclusion

Frameless and frame-based LINAC SRS have comparable efficacy in intracranial AVM obliteration. A longer follow-up duration may further characterize the rate of late adverse radiation effects in frameless SRS.

Frameless Co-Registration of Biplane 2D Digital Subtraction Angiography Whole Frames and 3D Rotational Angiography-Based Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Angiogram on Dedicated Software for Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Cranial Vascular Malformations

Purpose: Given its high spatial resolution and vasculature selectivity, the cone-beam computed tomography (CT) angiography (CBCTA) image acquired by selective 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) is the most suitable 3D image for the target definition of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs). Furthermore, the relatively low temporal resolution of 3DRA-based CBCTA can be complemented by the stereotactic co-registration of orthogonally paired 2D dynamic digital subtraction angiography (2D-DSA). The integration of 2D-DSA, which is usually limited to one or a few frames for each projection, into CBCTA and/or planning CT can be achieved only by catheter-directed angiography on the day of SRS via a dedicated image localizer under rigid frame fixation to the skull, which imposes substantial burdens on patients. This study aimed to demonstrate a novel, convenient, and significantly less invasive method for the frameless co-registration of biplane 2D-DSA whole frames and CBCTA on commercially available dedicated software, namely, Brainlab^® Elements (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany), and present its prerequisite for successful image fusion.

Technical Report: Elements have afforded the following functionality: A 3D vasculature image is automatically extracted as a floating image from any 3D image series containing vascular details and then subsequently co-registered manually and automatically to a selected frame pair of 2D-DSA with a six-degree-of-freedom rigid registration. As a preclinical feasibility study, two anonymous image datasets from patients harboring cerebral AVM and transverse-sigmoid (TS) DAVF were used to verify the accuracy and practicality of Elements for the frameless co-registration of 2D/3D vascular images, particularly on the assumption of clinical workflow for the target delineation of SRS planning. The use of ordinary unsubtracted CBCTA resulted in the insufficient extraction of abutting vessels or vessels that are in close proximity to bony structures, particularly in the case of TS-DAVF, where the fistulous pouch and the affected venous sinuses were adjacent to the cranial bone. By contrast, the amount and selectivity of vasculatures and the accuracy of subsequent image fusion were significantly improved from the subtracted CBCTA. The integration of CBCTA into dynamic 2D-DSA allowed the simultaneous review of both image information by sharing any concerning point and 2D or 3D structures under a common 3D coordinate.

Conclusions: Elements enable the clinically useful frameless co-registration of biplane 2D-DSA whole frames into CBCTA, for which the routine acquisition of both subtracted and unsubtracted CBCTA axial images for ordinary diagnostic purposes is an indispensable prerequisite for successful image fusion and further widespread application. This frameless integration of the 2D/3D angiogram would dramatically enhance both the frame-based and frameless SRS workflow and circumstances by allowing users to forward SRS planning well in advance before SRS, along with the omission of invasive angiography on the day of SRS, and would broaden the implementation of frameless SRS. Furthermore, the comprehensive alternating interactive review of the 2D/3D integrated angiogram leads to a more in-depth quasi-4D understanding of the affected angioarchitectures compared with the separate viewing of each image.

Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation Associated With Moyamoya Disease

BACKGROUND

Cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) can rarely occur in conjunction with moyamoya disease (MMD). There is still no consensus on how to treat AVM when accompanied by MMD. In this study, we assessed the clinical features and suggested appropriate management when AVM was combined with MMD.

METHODS

From August 1994 to December 2020, 7 out of 4004 patients with MMD were found to have AVM. The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was used to evaluate the clinical outcomes of AVM and MMD. KPS greater than 80 was classified as a good outcome. In addition, the radiologic outcomes of the patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

The incidence of AVM with MMD was 1.7 per 1000 persons. Five patients underwent bypass surgery for MMD, and 5 patients underwent Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for concurrent AVM. Postoperative perfusion magnetic resonance imaging and brain single photon emission computerized tomography showed improved cerebral hemodynamics in 4 out of 7 territories. Postoperative cerebral angiography showed good revascularization in 4 out of 8 territories. After GKS, 4 patients showed complete obliteration, and 1 patient showed a significantly decreased AVM size. Six patients showed favorable clinical outcomes (KPS 80-100), and 1 patient with delayed GKS for AVM had a poor outcome (KPS 20) due to AVM rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, AVM tended to occur where the angiographic stage of MMD was higher. When AVM is combined with MMD, MMD bypass surgery is recommended based on symptoms and cerebral perfusion status. For AVM, less invasive but effective treatments, such as GKS, should be implemented as soon as possible.

Long-term outcomes of 170 brain arteriovenous malformations treated by frameless image-guided robotic stereotactic radiosurgery: Ramathibodi hospital experience

This study was conducted to report long-term outcomes of the frameless robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) at Ramathibodi Hospital.Retrospective data of patients with brain AVM (bAVM), who underwent CyberKnife SRS (CKSRS) at Ramathibodi Hospital from 2009 to 2014, were examined. Exclusion criteria were insufficient follow-up time (<36 months) or incomplete information. Patients' demographics, clinical presentation, treatment parameters, and results were analyzed. Excellent outcome was defined as AVM obliteration without a new neurological deficit. Risk factors for achieving excellent outcome were assessed.From a total of 277 CKSRS treatments for bAVM during the 6 years, 170 AVMs in 166 patients met the inclusion criteria. One hundred and thirty-nine cases (81.76%) presented with hemorrhages from ruptured bAVMs. Almost two-thirds underwent embolization before radiosurgery. With the median AVM volume of 4.17 mL, three-quarters of the cohort had single-fraction CKSRS, utilizing the median prescribed dose of 15 Gray (Gy). In the multisession group (25.29%), the median prescribed dose and the AVM volume were 27.5 Gy and 22.3 mL, respectively. An overall excellent outcome, at a median follow-up period of 72.45 months, was observed in 99 cases (58.24%). Seven AVMs (4.12%) ruptured after CKSRS but 1 patient suffered a new neurological deficit. Two patients (1.18%) were classified into the poor outcome category but there were no deaths. Negative factors for excellent outcome, by multivariate regression analysis, were the male sex and multisession SRS delivery, but not age, history of AVM rupture, previous embolization, or AVM volume.Despite relatively larger bAVM and utilizing a lower prescribed radiation dose, the excellent outcome was within the reported range from previous literature. This study offers one of the longest follow-ups and the largest cohorts from the frameless image-guided robotic SRS community.