Orthosis versus no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: A systematic review

Thoraco-lumbar-sacral orthoses in older people - A narrative literature review

Fractures in the thoracolumbar region have a bimodal distribution, with an increasing number of older people presenting with acute vertebral fractures after atraumatic or low energy mechanisms of injury. In the absence of neurological compromise and significant vertebral instability, thoracolumbar fractures are often managed conservatively and bracing is widely recommended. However, in older cohorts, bracing is often ill fitting and poorly tolerated with non-compliance leading to prolonged immobilization. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have challenged the motive of bracing, but as evidence quality is low, the role of exploratory analysis has been limited. This descriptive review summarises and examines the current evidence that underpins the use of spinal orthoses, specific to older patients, in an effort to streamline its judicious use in clinical practice and identify scope to direct further research.

Finite element analysis of the indirect reduction of posterior pedicle screw fixation for a thoracolumbar burst fracture

Because burst fractures often involve damage to the column and posterior structures of the spine, the fracture block may invade the spinal canal and compress the spinal cord or the cauda equina, causing corresponding neurological dysfunction. When a thoracolumbar burst fracture is accompanied by the presence of bone in the spinal canal, whether posterior surgery requires spinal canal incision decompression is still controversial. Computed tomography images of the thoracolumbar spine of a 31-year-old male with an L1 burst fracture and Mimics 10.0 were used to establish a three-dimensional fracture model for simulating the indirect reduction process. The model was imported into Ansys 10.0 (ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA), and a 1 to 10 mm displacement was loaded 10° behind the Z-axis on the upper endplate of the L1 vertebral body to simulate position reduction and open reduction. The displacement and stress changes in the intervertebral disc, fractured vertebral body and posterior longitudinal ligament were observed during reduction. Under a displacement loaded 10° behind the Z-axis, the maximum stress in the vertebral body was concentrated on the upper disc of the injured vertebrae. The maximum displacement was in the anterior edge of the vertebral body of the injured vertebrae, and the vertebral body height and the anterior lobes were essentially restored. When the displacement load was applied in the positive Z-axis direction, the maximum displacement was in the posterior longitudinal ligament behind the injured vertebrae. Under a 6 mm load, the posterior longitudinal ligament displacement was 11.3 mm. Under an 8 mm load, this displacement significantly increased to 15.0 mm, and the vertebral stress was not concentrated on the intervertebral disc. A reduction in the thoracolumbar burst fractures by positioning and distraction allowed the injured vertebrae to be restored to normal height and kyphosis. The reduction in the posterior longitudinal ligament can push the bone block in the spinal canal into the reset space and achieve a good reset.

Influence on Therapeutic Decision-Making of Supine and Standing Radiographs after Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fracture in the Elderly

Background A standing X-ray is recommended for decision-making relative to the therapy for a traumatic thoracolumbar fracture (TLF). However, standing X-ray management can be demanding in elderly patients because of pain. The goal of this study was to determine whether supine radiograph is sufficient for proper therapeutic decision-making in patients older than 65 years with acute stable traumatic TLF.

Methods Patients older than 65 years who came to the emergency department diagnosed with an acute and stable traumatic vertebral fracture between T10 and L3 (both included) were included in the study. Initially, all the patients were studied with a supine radiograph and computed tomography (CT) scan. If the TLF was stable, a standing radiograph was performed. Segmental kyphosis (SK) and visual analog scale (VAS) score were collected and compared in both the supine and standing X-ray projections.

Results Twenty-seven patients with a mean age of 76.39 (range: 65–93) years were included; most were females. The mean supine SK was 10.14degrees (SD±7.22degrees). It increased to 12.97 (SD±8.61degrees) in the standing projection (p<0.001). In 37.1% of the patients, the SK increased from 13.22degrees (SD±7.21degrees) in supine X-ray to 19.96degrees (SD±5.34degrees) in the standing position in this group. When the initial supine projection showed an SK of ≥10degrees, the mean SK observed in the standing X-ray increased to 20.5degrees (SD±5.30, p=0.321).

Conclusion Stable traumatic TLF in patients older than 65 years showing ≥10degrees of SK in supine radiography may benefit from a standing radiography to make a proper therapeutic decision.

An Indication-Based Concept for Stepwise Spinal Orthosis in Low Back Pain According to the Current Literature

Background: The current literature is not conclusive for spinal orthosis treatment in low back pain. Therefore, two questions have to be answered: Does the current literature support the indication of spinal orthosis treatment in low back pain? Which treatment concept can be derived from the result? Method: The 30 highest-rated literature citations (PubMed: best match, 30 December 2021) dealing with low back pain and spine orthosis were included in the study. Excluded were all articles related to Kinesio Taping, scoliosis, physical exercise, or dealing with side effects and unrelated to treatment effect. Thus, the literature list refers only to “low back pain and spine orthoses”. These articles were analyzed according to the PRISMA criteria and divided according to “specific diagnosis”, when the cause of pain was explained (group A), or when “specific diagnosis is not given” (group B). The articles were also distinguished by the information about the orthosis. Articles with biomechanical information about the function of the orthoses were called “diagnosis-based orthosis” (group C). All other articles were part of the group “unspecific orthotic treatment” (group D). The results were compared to each other in terms of effectiveness. According to anatomical causes, a concept of orthosis selection depending on diagnosis of low back pain for clinical practice was developed. The risk of bias lies in the choice of the MESH terms. The synthesis of the results was a clinical treatment concept based on findings from the current literature. Results: The literature citations with 1749 patients and 2160 citations of literature were processed; 21 prospective clinical or biomechanical studies and 9 review articles were included. The combination of literature citations according to “specific diagnosis” (group A) and “diagnosis based orthosis” (group C) was very likely to lead to a therapeutic effect (seven articles). No positive effect could be found in four articles, all dealing with postoperative treatment. When “specific diagnosis is not given” (group B) and combined with “unspecific orthotic treatment” (group D), therapy remained without measurable effect (15 articles). An effect was described in four articles (three biomechanical studies and one postoperative study). In review articles, according to specific diagnosis, only one article dealt with fractures and another with stenosis. In all review articles where specific diagnosis was not given, no effect with spine orthoses could be found. Using this knowledge, we created a clinical treatment concept. The structure was based on diagnosis and standardized orthoses. According to pain location and pathology (muscle, intervertebral disc, bone, statics, postoperative) the orthoses were classified to anatomical extent and the mechanical limitation (bandage, bodice, corset, orthosis with shoulder straps and erecting orthosis). Conclusion: The effectiveness of spinal orthoses could not be deduced from the current literature. The most serious limitation was the inconsistency of the complaint and the imprecise designation of the orthoses. Interpretation: Articles with a precise allocation of the complaint and a description of the orthosis showed a positive effect. The treatment concept presented here is intended to provide a basis for answering the question concerning the effectiveness of spinal orthoses as an accompanying treatment option in low back pain.

Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma

Thoracolumbar spine trauma can result in potentially life-threatening consequences and requires careful management to ensure good outcomes. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the anatomy, diagnostic tools, non-operative, and operative treatments important when addressing thoracolumbar trauma.