Effects of argatroban therapy for stroke patients: A meta-analysis

Safety and efficacy of argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy for acute mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke with large artery atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis are at risk of early progression and recurrence. The efficacy and safety of argatroban in stroke patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy, and which patients may benefit from it, are uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study to assess whether argatroban given within 72 hours of symptom onset, combined with antiplatelet therapy, improved neurological outcomes of patients with acute mild to moderate ischemic stroke in China. Patients were divided into the combined treatment group and the control group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline covariates. The primary efficacy outcome is the proportion of mRS score 0-2 at 90 days. The secondary efficacy outcomes included END proportion, change in NIHSS score from the baseline to day 7, recurrent cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular death. The safety outcomes were hemorrhagic transformation (HT) of infarction and organ hemorrhage at 7 days.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, a higher proportion of mRS (0-2) at 90 days was found in patients in the combined treatment group (85.3% vs 74.5%, p=0.042). There was no significant difference in the safety outcomes between the two groups. Exploratory subgroup analysis showed positive associations with argatroban combined therapy and good prognosis in NIHSS score ≥5 and age ≥70 subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that argatroban can improve neurological outcomes for mild to moderate LAA patients but not increase the risk of bleeding.

Factors associated with clopidogrel resistance and clinical outcomes in ischemic cerebrovascular disease: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Clopidogrel resistance may lead to the recurrence of cerebrovascular diseases. We aimed to identify potential factors associated with clopidogrel resistance and evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease treated with clopidogrel were included and classified into 2 groups according to the adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation. Patients with the ADP inhibition rate of <30 % were included in clopidogrel resistance group, otherwise were included in clopidogrel sensitive group. CYP2C19 genotype and other clinical data were analyzed to identify factors and clinical features in the multivariate analysis. The outcomes were vascular events in 6 months.

RESULTS

In total, 139 patients were enrolled with 81 (58.27 %) in clopidogrel sensitive group and 58 (41.73 %) in clopidogrel resistance group. Female and CYP2C19 *2*3 carrying were risk factors for clopidogrel resistance, and female was an independent risk factor (OR 2.481, 95 % CI 1.066-5.771, P=0.035). The clopidogrel resistance group showed a higher use rate of argatroban (P=0.030) and a lower arachidonic acid-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation (P=0.036). Clopidogrel resistance was related to the progressing stroke (HR 3.521, 95 % CI 1.352-9.170, P=0.010), but had no influence on the bleeding events (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of clopidogrel resistance increased significantly in female patients. Patients with clopidogrel resistance may have an increased incidence of stroke progression in the acute phase.

Efficacy of antiplatelet drugs combined with Argatroban in treating acute ischemic stroke and its impact on patients' coagulation function and neurological function: a preliminary trial

This retrospective study analyzed the efficacy of combined antiplatelet therapy with Argatroban in treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and its impact on patients' coagulation and neurological functions. Clinical data of 113 AIS patients admitted between January 2021 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into control (n = 56) and observation (n = 57) groups based on treatment interventions. The control group patients were treated with antiplatelet drugs, while the observation group patients received combination therapy with apatinib on the basis of the control group treatment. Compared to the control group, the observation group demonstrated higher clinical efficacy, improved coagulation parameters, reduced stroke severity (measured by NIHSS), enhanced daily living abilities (BI scores), and lowered inflammatory and neural injury markers post-treatment. Adverse reaction incidence was similar between groups. Combining Argatroban with antiplatelet drugs in AIS management showed superior efficacy without increasing adverse effects, suggesting its potential for clinical application.

The effect of argatroban on early neurological deterioration and outcomes in minor ischemic stroke: preliminary findings

Background

Minor ischemic stroke (MIS) is associated with early neurological deterioration (END) and poor prognosis. Here, we investigated whether argatroban administration can mitigate MIS-associated END and improve functional outcomes by monitoring activated partial thrombin time (APTT).

Methods

Data were collected for patients with MIS admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2022. Patients were divided into a dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group (aspirin + clopidogrel) and an argatroban group (aspirin + argatroban). Those in the latter group who achieved a target APTT of 1.5-3-fold that of baseline and <100 s at 2 h after argatroban infusion were included in the argatroban subgroup. The primary outcome was the END rate of the DAPT group versus that of the argatroban group or the argatroban subgroup. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 7 and 90 days. In addition, baseline date were compared between patients with and without END in the argatroban group.

Results

363 patients were included in the DAPT group and 270 in the argatroban group. There were no significant differences in any above outcome between them. 207 pairs were included in the DAPT group and the argatroban subgroup after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Significant differences were observed in the proportion of END (OR, 2.337; 95% CI, 1.200-4.550, p = 0.011) and mRS 0-2 at 7 days (OR, 0.624; 95% CI, 0.415-0.939, p = 0.023), but not in mRS 0-2 at 90 days or the hemorrhagic events between the two groups. In the argatroban group, univariate analysis showed that the rate of diabetes (OR, 2.316; 95% CI, 1.107-4.482, p = 0.023), initial random blood glucose (OR, 1.235; 95% CI, 1.070-1.425, p = 0.004), drinking history (OR, 0.445; 95% CI, 0.210-0.940, p = 0.031) or those reaching the target APTT (OR, 0.418; 95% CI, 0.184-0.949, p = 0.033) was significantly different among patients with and without END. However, there were no statistical differences in these parameters between them following multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

In patients with MIS, argatroban administration and reaching the target APTT can reduce the incidence of END and improve short-term functional prognosis.

Can the combination of antiplatelet or alteplase thrombolytic therapy with argatroban benefit patients suffering from acute stroke? a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of administering argatroban as a treatment approach following antiplatelet therapy or alteplase thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute stroke is presently uncertain. However, it is important to highlight the potential benefits of combining this medication with known thrombolytics or antiplatelet therapy. One notable advantage of argatroban is its short half-life, which helps minimize excessive anticoagulation and risk of bleeding complications in inadvertent cases of hemorrhagic stroke. By conducting a meticulous review and meta-analysis, we aim to further explore the common use of argatroban and examine the plausible advantages of combining this medication with established thrombolytic and antiplatelet therapies.

METHOD

In this study, we performed a rigorous and methodical search for both randomized controlled trials and retrospective analyses. Our main objective was to analyze the impact of argatroban on the occurrence of hemorrhagic events and the mRS scores of 0-2. We utilized a meta-analysis to assess the relative risk (RR) associated with using argatroban versus not using it.

RESULTS

In this study, we analyzed data from 11 different studies, encompassing a total of 8,635 patients. Out of these patients, 3999(46.3%) received argatroban treatment while the remaining 4636(53.7%)did not. The primary outcome of 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin scale (mRS) score≤2) showed that the risk ratio (RR) for patients using argatroban after alteplase thrombolytic therapy compared to those not using argatroban was(RR, 1.00 ([95% CI, 0.92-1.09]; P = 0.97), indicating no statistical significance. However, for patients using argatroban after antiplatelet therapy, was (RR,1.09 [95% CI, 1.04-1.14]; P = 0.0001), which was statistically significant. In terms of hemorrhagic events, the RR for patients using argatroban compared to those not using argatroban was (RR,1.08 [95% CI, 0.88-1.33]; P = 0.46), indicating no statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that further research into combination therapy with argatroban and antiplatelet agents may be warranted, however more rigorous RCTs are needed to definitively evaluate the effects of combination treatment.

Efficacy and safety of Argatroban in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Argatroban is a highly promising drug for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but there is currently insufficient strong evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of using Argatroban in the treatment of AIS. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Argatroban in the treatment of AIS.

Methods

Articles on PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from these websites' inceptions to 2th February 2023. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies on Argatroban therapy for acute ischemic stroke were included. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model.

Results

Fourteen studies involving 10,315 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed a significant reduction in the rate of early neurological deterioration (END) in the Argatroban group compared with the control group (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.73, I2 = 15.17%). The rates of adverse events were no significant difference between the two groups (ICH: OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.68-1.51, I2 = 0.00%; major extracranial bleeding: OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.48, I2 = 0.00%; mortality: OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.84-1.59, I2 = 0.00%). However, the rates of mRS score of 0-1 (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.71-2.67, I2 = 77.56%) and mRS score of 0-2 (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.98-1.42, I2 = 0.00%) during the 90 days did not significantly improved in the Argatroban group. Subgroup analyses showed that the rate of END (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.65, I2 = 2.77%) and mRS score of 0-2 (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.06-1.81, I2 = 0.00%) had significantly improved when the intervention group adopted Argatroban plus Antiplatelet.

Conclusion

Argatroban can improve neurological deterioration, with a low incidence of adverse events such as bleeding and death, and general analysis showed no improvement in mRS. However, subgroup analysis suggests that compared to mono-antiplatelet therapy, combination therapy of Argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced the incidence of END and improved mRS scores. After using Argatroban, there was no increase in the risk and mortality of intracranial hemorrhage and other bleeding sites.

Pathophysiology and Optimal Treatment of Intracranial Branch Atheromatous Disease

Intracranial branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is a pathological condition characterized by the occlusion of a relatively large perforating branch (700-800 µm) near the orifice of a parent artery due to atherosclerotic plaque-based thrombus (microatheroma). BAD is refractory to treatment and follows a course of progressive exacerbation, especially motor paralysis. Uniform treatment for common atherothrombotic cerebral infarction or lacunar infarction does not prevent the progressive exacerbation of BAD, and consequently affects functional prognosis. To date, various combinations of treatments have been investigated and proposed to attenuate the worsening symptoms of BAD. However, no therapy with established efficacy is yet available for BAD. Since it is the most difficult condition to treat in the area of cerebral infarction, the establishment of optimal treatment methods for BAD is keenly awaited. This review presents an overview of the acute treatments available for BAD and discusses the prospects for optimal treatment.

Thromboinflammatory challenges in stroke pathophysiology

Despite years of encouraging translational research, ischemic stroke still remains as one of the highest unmet medical needs nowadays, causing a tremendous burden to health care systems worldwide. Following an ischemic insult, a complex signaling pathway emerges leading to highly interconnected thrombotic as well as neuroinflammatory signatures, the so-called thromboinflammatory cascade. Here, we thoroughly review the cell-specific and time-dependent role of different immune cell types, i.e., neutrophils, macrophages, T and B cells, as key thromboinflammatory mediators modulating the neuroinflammatory response upon stroke. Similarly, the relevance of platelets and their tight crosstalk with a variety of immune cells highlights the relevance of this cell-cell interaction during microvascular dysfunction, neovascularization, and cellular adhesion. Ultimately, we provide an up-to-date overview of therapeutic approaches mechanistically targeting thromboinflammation currently under clinical translation, especially focusing on phase I to III clinical trials.

Novel Antithrombotic Agents in Pregnancy Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents

Increasing rates of thromboembolic complications have required increasing use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents during and after pregnancy. Furthermore, thromboembolism is both a cause and a complication of severe maternal morbidity requiring intensive care. As a consequence, almost all patients admitted to intensive care units receive an anticoagulant or an antiplatelet agent (or both) for either treatment or prevention of thromboembolism. In this review, we summarize commonly used anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents and outline the potential role of newly developed (novel) antithrombotic agents for pregnant and postpartum patients.

Thromboelastography 6s for assessment of platelet function during coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

Methods for assessing platelet function in patients with neurovascular disease remain controversial and poorly studied. This study aimed to assess associations between thromboelastography 6s (TEG6s) measurements and postoperative ischemic complications in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) treated by coil embolization.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients with UIAs taking a combined aspirin and clopidogrel protocol were retrospectively reviewed from January 2021 to May 2022. Blood samples were obtained for TEG6s to assess platelet function on the day of coil embolization. To identify acute ischemic complications, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed within 24 h after coil embolization. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential risk factors for postoperative positive DWI (DWI (+)) lesions.

RESULTS

Forty-three of the 84 patients (51%) with DWI (+) lesions were identified. Compared with patients without DWI (+) lesions, Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (MA_ADP) was significantly higher (53.6 mm [Interquartile range (IQR): 48.3-58.3 mm] vs 46.7 mm [IQR: 36.8-52.2 mm]; p=0.001) and ADP inhibition rate (ADP%) was significantly lower (19% [IQR: 11-31%] vs 31% [IQR: 21-44%]; p=0.001) in DWI (+) patients. Multivariate analysis identified MA_ADP, ADP%, and procedure time as significant independent predictors of subsequent DWI (+) lesions (odds ratios: 1.07, 0.96, and 1.02, respectively). Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, MA_ADP >50.9 mm and ADP% <28.8% were associated with postoperative DWI (+) lesions in patients undergoing coil embolization for UIAs.

CONCLUSIONS

MA_ADP and ADP% as assessed by TEG6s can offer reliable parameters to predict postoperative ischemic complications after coil embolization of UIAs. Lower MA_ADP values and higher ADP% may decrease the risk of postoperative ischemic complications.

Investigational drugs for ischemic stroke: what's in the clinical development pipeline for acute phase and prevention?

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality and its burden expected to increase. The only approved drug for acute ischemic stroke is the intravenous thrombolytic alteplase. The risk of bleeding complications is one of the reasons for the undertreatment of eligible patients. Numerous drugs are currently being developed to improve safety-efficacy.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed literature from January 1^st, 2000, to 15^th January 2022 for the development and testing of novel drugs with the aim of targeting treatment at prevention of ischemic stroke: PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrial.gov.

EXPERT OPINION

The pathophysiology of ischemic stroke involves multiple pathways causing cerebral artery obstruction and brain tissue ischemia. Data suggest that tenecteplase is a more promising fibrinolytic agent with a superior efficacy-safety profile, compared to the currently approved alteplase. Current guidelines consider a short-term cycle of mannitol or hypertonic saline to be advisable in patients with space-occupying hemispheric infarction. Regarding primary and secondary prevention, research is primarily focused on identifying mechanisms to improve the safety-efficacy profile using a "hemostasis-sparing" approach. Further evaluation on those agents that have already shown promise for their risk/benefit profiles, would benefit greatly a neurologist's capacity to successfully prevent and treat ischemic stroke patients.